Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** The RageAgainsTTheHeavens aspect of the painting is briefly discussed five minutes into [[https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/renaissance-art-europe-ap/v/leonardo-da-vinci-last-supper-1495-98 this video]].
to:
** The RageAgainsTTheHeavens RageAgainstTheHeavens aspect of the painting is briefly discussed five minutes into [[https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/renaissance-art-europe-ap/v/leonardo-da-vinci-last-supper-1495-98 this video]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** The RageAgainsTheHeavens aspect of the painting is briefly discussed five minutes into [[https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/renaissance-art-europe-ap/v/leonardo-da-vinci-last-supper-1495-98 this video]].
to:
** The RageAgainsTheHeavens RageAgainsTTheHeavens aspect of the painting is briefly discussed five minutes into [[https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/renaissance-art-europe-ap/v/leonardo-da-vinci-last-supper-1495-98 this video]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The RageAgainsTheHeavens aspect of the painting is briefly discussed five minutes into [[https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/renaissance-art-europe-ap/v/leonardo-da-vinci-last-supper-1495-98 this video]].
--->'''Dr. Steven Zucker:''' There's that incredible grouping of Thomas pointing upward.\\
'''Dr. Beth Harris:''' As if to say, is this something that is ordained by God? Is this God's plan, that one of us should betray you?
--->'''Dr. Steven Zucker:''' There's that incredible grouping of Thomas pointing upward.\\
'''Dr. Beth Harris:''' As if to say, is this something that is ordained by God? Is this God's plan, that one of us should betray you?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the {{painting|s}}. Leonardo insisted he needed to find the right face for the final apostle, and after several times being insulted by the friar, angrily claimed that the friar's face was looking more and more fitting for the last apostle: Judas Iscariot. The friar backed down and let Leonardo finish the piece..
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the {{painting|s}}. Leonardo insisted he needed to find the right face for the final apostle, and after several times being insulted by the friar, angrily claimed that the friar's face was looking more and more fitting for the last apostle: Judas Iscariot. The friar backed down and let Leonardo finish the piece..piece.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** While the painting has survived environmental damage, target practice from Napoleonic soldiers, and a [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarII WWII]] bombing run, most of the original paint Leonardo used has been lost and parts of the painting are obfuscated or damaged. Several restoration efforts have been made to combat the portraits decay, but these efforts have been accused of replacing the original painting with an imitation.
to:
** While the painting has survived environmental damage, target practice from Napoleonic soldiers, and a [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarII WWII]] bombing run, most of the original paint Leonardo used has been lost and parts of the painting are obfuscated or damaged. Several restoration efforts have been made to combat the portraits portrait's decay, but these efforts have been accused of replacing the original painting with an imitation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ObviousJudas: Judas is that one guy framed in shadow and leaning away from Jesus, spilling salt (a bad omen) all over the table.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ViewerGenderConfusion: Leonardo's depiction of John is often mistaken for a woman due to Leonardo's attempt to convey youth through John's long hair and lack of a beard. This confusion has led to wild mass guessing that Leonardo's John is supposed to be a depiction of Mary of Magdala, although this idea leaves Jesus with an Apostle missing from his supper.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
!The Painting
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the painting. Leonardo insisted he needed to find the right face for the final apostle, and after several times being insulted by the friar, angrily claimed that the friar's face looking more and more fitting for the last apostle: Judas Iscariot. The friar backed down and let Leonardo finish ''The Last Supper''.
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the painting. Leonardo insisted he needed to find the right face for the final apostle, and after several times being insulted by the friar, angrily claimed that the friar's face looking more and more fitting for the last apostle: Judas Iscariot. The friar backed down and let Leonardo finish ''The Last Supper''.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
** The actual painting is a plot element in ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'', since John's feminine appearance is a key piece of evidence for the book's fictional conspiracy.
* ScheduleSlip: Leonardo was highly irregular when working on the portrait. It's said some days he would work throughout the whole day without eating just to paint, while others he would walk in, stare intensely at the painting, and contribute a single brush stroke before heading out. It ultimately took three years to make.
* ScheduleSlip: Leonardo was highly irregular when working on the portrait. It's said some days he would work throughout the whole day without eating just to paint, while others he would walk in, stare intensely at the painting, and contribute a single brush stroke before heading out. It ultimately took three years to make.
to:
** The actual painting is a plot element in ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'', ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'' since John's feminine appearance is a key piece of evidence for the book's fictional conspiracy.
* ScheduleSlip: Leonardo was highly irregular when working on the portrait. It's said some days he would work throughout the whole day without eating just to paint, while others he would walk in, stare intensely at the painting, and contribute a single brush stroke before heading out. It ultimately took three years tomake.make.
----
* ScheduleSlip: Leonardo was highly irregular when working on the portrait. It's said some days he would work throughout the whole day without eating just to paint, while others he would walk in, stare intensely at the painting, and contribute a single brush stroke before heading out. It ultimately took three years to
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!The Painting
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the painting. Leonardo insisted he needed to find the right face for the final apostle, and after several times being insulted by the friar, angrily claimed that the friar's face looking more and more fitting for the last apostle: Judas Iscariot. The friar backed down and let Leonardo finish ''The Last Supper''.
* MissingEpisode:
** While the painting has survived environmental damage, target practice from Napoleonic soldiers, and a [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarII WWII]] bombing run, most of the original paint Leonardo used has been lost and parts of the painting are obfuscated or damaged. Several restoration efforts have been made to combat the portraits decay, but these efforts have been accused of replacing the original painting with an imitation.
** The bottom part of the portrait, which notably shows Jesus's feet, was so damaged that it was removed in favor of putting another door in the chapel, preventing any type of restoration for that part of the portrait.
* ReferencedBy:
** The painting has become a StockParody by this point, and has [[LastSupperSteal a page dedicated to imitations of it]].
** The actual painting is a plot element in ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'', since John's feminine appearance is a key piece of evidence for the book's fictional conspiracy.
* ScheduleSlip: Leonardo was highly irregular when working on the portrait. It's said some days he would work throughout the whole day without eating just to paint, while others he would walk in, stare intensely at the painting, and contribute a single brush stroke before heading out. It ultimately took three years to make.
* ExecutiveMeddling: A story about the creation of the painting claims that one of the friars overseeing it was tired of enduring Leonardo's lengthy production and demanded he finished the painting. Leonardo insisted he needed to find the right face for the final apostle, and after several times being insulted by the friar, angrily claimed that the friar's face looking more and more fitting for the last apostle: Judas Iscariot. The friar backed down and let Leonardo finish ''The Last Supper''.
* MissingEpisode:
** While the painting has survived environmental damage, target practice from Napoleonic soldiers, and a [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarII WWII]] bombing run, most of the original paint Leonardo used has been lost and parts of the painting are obfuscated or damaged. Several restoration efforts have been made to combat the portraits decay, but these efforts have been accused of replacing the original painting with an imitation.
** The bottom part of the portrait, which notably shows Jesus's feet, was so damaged that it was removed in favor of putting another door in the chapel, preventing any type of restoration for that part of the portrait.
* ReferencedBy:
** The painting has become a StockParody by this point, and has [[LastSupperSteal a page dedicated to imitations of it]].
** The actual painting is a plot element in ''Literature/TheDaVinciCode'', since John's feminine appearance is a key piece of evidence for the book's fictional conspiracy.
* ScheduleSlip: Leonardo was highly irregular when working on the portrait. It's said some days he would work throughout the whole day without eating just to paint, while others he would walk in, stare intensely at the painting, and contribute a single brush stroke before heading out. It ultimately took three years to make.
