Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification (That being, "Totalbiscuit has no right to make advertising revenue with our license") was false[[labelnote:note]]Exhibit A: Totalbiscuit approached the developer with a request for review code with a strongly implied intention to monetize, which was granted by the developer within 24 hours. Exhibit B: Other videos from different youtubers covering the game (not all of whom were necessarily positive) were not taken down, giving the impression that Totalbiscuit's video was only targeted for being highly viewed and ranked very high in search ranking. Exhibit C: A post on the game's steam forums from Stephane Woods explicitly granted blanket permission to make Youtube videos of the game.[[/labelnote]]. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification (That being, "Totalbiscuit has no right to make advertising revenue with our license") was false[[labelnote:note]]Exhibit A: Totalbiscuit approached the developer with a request for review code with a strongly implied intention to monetize, which was granted by the developer within 24 hours. Exhibit B: Other videos from different youtubers covering the game (not all of whom were necessarily positive) were not taken down, giving the impression that Totalbiscuit's video was only targeted for being highly viewed and ranked very high in search ranking. Exhibit C: A post on the game's steam forums from Stephane Woods explicitly granted blanket permission to make Youtube videos of the game.[[/labelnote]]. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious unscrupulous for doing so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SimilarlyNamedWorks: Shares a prominent name with VideoGame/GarrysMod.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification (That being, "Totalbiscuit has no right to make advertising revenue with our license") was false[[labelnote:note]]Exhibit A: Totalbiscuit approached the developer with a request for review code with a strongly implied intention to monetize, which was granted by the developer within 24 hours. Exhibit B: Other videos on Youtube from different youtubers (not all of whom were necessarily positive) weren't taken down, giving the impression that Totalbiscuit was only targeted for being highly viewed and ranked very high in search ranking. Exhibit C: A post on the game's steam forums from Stephane Woods explicitly granted blanket permission to make Youtube videos of the game.[[/labelnote]]. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification (That being, "Totalbiscuit has no right to make advertising revenue with our license") was false[[labelnote:note]]Exhibit A: Totalbiscuit approached the developer with a request for review code with a strongly implied intention to monetize, which was granted by the developer within 24 hours. Exhibit B: Other videos on Youtube from different youtubers covering the game (not all of whom were necessarily positive) weren't were not taken down, giving the impression that Totalbiscuit Totalbiscuit's video was only targeted for being highly viewed and ranked very high in search ranking. Exhibit C: A post on the game's steam forums from Stephane Woods explicitly granted blanket permission to make Youtube videos of the game.[[/labelnote]]. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification was false. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification (That being, "Totalbiscuit has no right to make advertising revenue with our license") was false.false[[labelnote:note]]Exhibit A: Totalbiscuit approached the developer with a request for review code with a strongly implied intention to monetize, which was granted by the developer within 24 hours. Exhibit B: Other videos on Youtube from different youtubers (not all of whom were necessarily positive) weren't taken down, giving the impression that Totalbiscuit was only targeted for being highly viewed and ranked very high in search ranking. Exhibit C: A post on the game's steam forums from Stephane Woods explicitly granted blanket permission to make Youtube videos of the game.[[/labelnote]]. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CreatorKiller: The bad reviews and sales of the game, combined with the even worse publicity caused by the Totalbiscuit incident, made it so that Wild Games Studio would never make another game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification was false. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification was false. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers being seen as even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification was false. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit [[Creator/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification was false. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game, causing him to strike back with a masterful response video. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown service to remove [[WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game, causing game. This prompted him to strike back with a masterful response video.video, pointing out three damning pieces of evidence that showed that their justification was false. The result was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]]]
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown notice to remove WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit's video on the game and the Brit struck back, with the result of making the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown notice service to remove WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit's [[WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit TotalBiscuit]]'s video on the game and the Brit struck back, game, causing him to strike back with the a masterful response video. The result of making was [[SelfFulfillingProphecy the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Total Biscuit doesn\'t do reviews.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown notice to remove WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit's review of the game and the Brit struck back, with the result of making the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.
to:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown notice to remove WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit's review of video on the game and the Brit struck back, with the result of making the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* StreisandEffect: The developers brought it upon themselves when they tried to use the Website/YouTube copyright takedown notice to remove WebVideo/TheCynicalBrit's review of the game and the Brit struck back, with the result of making the game and the developers even more unpopular and odious for doing so.
