Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
* HypocriticalHumour: After Guildenstern has expressed his disappointment that the Player's audience-participation shows are pornographic, bordering on sex work, Rosencrantz sidles up to the Player and asks what he'd do for one coin. When the Player isn't interested, Rosencrantz is instantly even more outraged that Guildenstern, shouting "Filth!" at him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AdaptationalVillainy: Interestingly, the play that brought the pair into the mainstream also removes any implication that they're just innocent victims sent to their deaths by someone they thought was a friend. Unlike in the original play, where there's no indication they're in on Claudius's plot to send them to England with orders to execute Hamlet on the spot, in the play they ''do'' know... but [[ExtremeDoormat decide to do nothing about it to save Hamlet's life]], in the process [[KarmicDeath sealing their own]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ArcWords: Subverted. When the duo are asked why they are where they are, they always answer "We were sent for". They never figure out ''why'' they were sent for but the viewers do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 102 (click to see context) from:
** For all their raging at their own helplessness, here is arguably ''one'' moment in the play when they could have broken out of the flow of events -- which they totally ignore. They actually read Claudius's letter to the English king and discover that it's all a ploy to have Hamlet killed... and they decide to do ''absolutely nothing'' about it, passively accepting their pinball status.
to:
** For all their raging at their own helplessness, here there is arguably ''one'' moment in the play when they could have broken out of the flow of events -- which they totally ignore. They actually read Claudius's letter to the English king and discover that it's all a ploy to have Hamlet killed... and they decide to do ''absolutely nothing'' about it, passively accepting their pinball status.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 85 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Rozencrantz''' ''(possibly)'': To sum up: your father, whom you love, dies. You are his heir. You come back to find that hardly was the corpse cold before his young brother pops onto his throne and into his sheets, thereby offending both legal and natural practice. Now... why exactly are you behaving in this extraordinary manner?
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* On the boat:
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': Do you think death could possibly be a boat?\\
to:
--->'''Rosencrantz''': Do you think death could possibly be a boat?\\
Added DiffLines:
** The Player correctly identifies that "Bet me the year of my birth doubled is an odd number" is a sucker bet, but misses ''why'', assuming that it's because Guildenstern knows his own year of birth and has worked it out in advance. He's quite happy to bet his ''own'' year of birth doubled is an odd number.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 129 (click to see context) from:
* WrongGenreSavvy: Twice Rosencrantz thinks he's found more objects behaving unusually just like the coin that proves their world is being manipulated. The two instances are a dropped ball and feather, and a set of pots arranged like a Newton's Cradle. In the case of the pots, [[spoiler:they break instead of swinging]]. In the case of the ball and feather...
to:
* WrongGenreSavvy: Twice in the movie, Rosencrantz thinks he's found more objects behaving unusually just like the coin that proves their world is being manipulated. The two instances are a dropped ball and feather, and a set of pots arranged like a Newton's Cradle. In the case of the pots, [[spoiler:they break instead of swinging]]. In the case of the ball and feather...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* EstablishingCharacterMoment: The opening scene establishes that Guildenstern is questioning the nature of their existence in this place, but unable to reach any conclusions about it (he recognises that the constant stream of heads is vanishingly improbable, but can't figure out what it ''means'') and Rosencrantz as more empathic and more inclined to accept the situation (he ''doesn't'' seem to recognise the improbability, but ''does'' feel a bit guilty that Guildenstern keeps losing).
Changed line(s) 69 (click to see context) from:
* GeniusDitz: Rosencrantz. In spite of being rather slow to understand what is going on around him, he has a great deal of scientific curiosity and insight - to the point of replicating some of Archimedes and Galileo's key experiments.
to:
* GeniusDitz: Rosencrantz. In the movie, in spite of being rather slow to understand what is going on around him, he has a great deal of scientific curiosity and insight - to the point of replicating some of Archimedes and Galileo's key experiments.
Added DiffLines:
** The 2023 Edinburgh Fringe production by Necessary Cat had ''Hamlet'' as a matinee and ''R&G'' as an evening performance on the ''same days'', which the theatre program says was "widely regarded as insanity. And that wide regard was right".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Zero-context examples
Deleted line(s) 58,59 (click to see context) :
* CriticalExistenceFailure
* DeadpanSnarker: Guildenstern.
* DeadpanSnarker: Guildenstern.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EstablishingSeriesMoment: The play opens with the two title characters flipping a coin, only for it to defy the laws of probability and land on heads every time. Guildenstern then remarks they this means they have wandered into a place that defies random chance and conventional time-tables you would find in RealLife. This establishes the metatextual nature of the story, the play a dramatization of ''Hamlet'' that draws attention to the artificiality of theatre so indicative of {{Absurd|ism}}ist media.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AllThereInTheScript: The characters themselves aren't sure which of them is Rosencrantz and which is Guildenstern. The script (and movie credits) say that the one who keeps winning the coin tosses is Rosencrantz, and the one who keeps worrying about what's happening is Guildenstern.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 23 (click to see context) :
Added DiffLines:
* AscendedExtra: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were both very minor characters in ''Hamlet''. In this play, they're the main characters and are significantly more fleshed out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope
Changed line(s) 61 (click to see context) from:
* TheDividual: Taken UpToEleven with Rosencrantz & Guildenstern. Even ''they themselves'' can't tell which one is which.[[note]]The script gives them names for convenience—the more self-aware, neurotic one is "Guildenstern", the more cheerful, dim-witted one is "Rosencrantz"—and these names are conventionally used when actors are listed in the playbill. But the text of the play itself is very careful not to give any clue which is which; "Rosencrantz" answers to both names without noticing it.[[/note]] This goes back to a joke in ''{{Theatre/Hamlet}}''. When R and G appear at court, the King addresses them with "Thanks Rosencrantz, and gentle Guildenstern", and the Queen says "Thanks Guildenstern, and gentle Rosencrantz." Though the script doesn't say so, this is almost invariably performed as the Queen correcting the King, who mixed their names up.
to:
* TheDividual: Taken UpToEleven Exaggerated with Rosencrantz & Guildenstern. Even ''they themselves'' can't tell which one is which.[[note]]The script gives them names for convenience—the more self-aware, neurotic one is "Guildenstern", the more cheerful, dim-witted one is "Rosencrantz"—and these names are conventionally used when actors are listed in the playbill. But the text of the play itself is very careful not to give any clue which is which; "Rosencrantz" answers to both names without noticing it.[[/note]] This goes back to a joke in ''{{Theatre/Hamlet}}''. When R and G appear at court, the King addresses them with "Thanks Rosencrantz, and gentle Guildenstern", and the Queen says "Thanks Guildenstern, and gentle Rosencrantz." Though the script doesn't say so, this is almost invariably performed as the Queen correcting the King, who mixed their names up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* OverlyLongGag: Rosencrantz tossing the coin and it always coming down as heads. In the film, it's implied that he's been doing this for hours, and at one point, while he's riding a horse and tossing the coin, he drops it and the camera follows it as it falls down a ravine, bouncing from rock to rock, and finally landing on the ground as... heads.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
[[caption-width-right:304:Do you ever think of yourself as actually ''dead'', lying in a box with a lid on it?]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 127 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': You would think this [a ball] would fall faster than this [a feather], wouldn't you? (He drops them. [[spoiler:The feather, encountering more air resistance, is much the slower to fall.)'' ...And you'd be absolutely right.]]
to:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': You would think this [a ball] would fall faster than this [a feather], wouldn't you? (He ''(He drops them. [[spoiler:The feather, encountering more air resistance, is much the slower to fall.)'' ...And you'd be absolutely right.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 127 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': You would think this [a ball] would fall faster than this [a feather], wouldn't you? ''(He drops them. [[spoiler:''The feather, encountering more air resistance, is much the slower to fall.)''...And you'd be absolutely right.]]
to:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': You would think this [a ball] would fall faster than this [a feather], wouldn't you? ''(He (He drops them. [[spoiler:''The [[spoiler:The feather, encountering more air resistance, is much the slower to fall.)''...)'' ...And you'd be absolutely right.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 127 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': You would think this [ball] would fall faster than this [feather], wouldn't you? ''[drops them]'' [[spoiler:''[the feather, encountering more air resistance, is much the slower to fall]''...And you'd be absolutely right.]]
to:
-->'''Rosencrantz''': You would think this [ball] [a ball] would fall faster than this [feather], [a feather], wouldn't you? ''[drops them]'' [[spoiler:''[the ''(He drops them. [[spoiler:''The feather, encountering more air resistance, is much the slower to fall]''...fall.)''...And you'd be absolutely right.]]
Deleted line(s) 129,130 (click to see context) :
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 98 (click to see context) from:
* PopculturalOsmosis: Even people who haven't seen the play and know nothing of its contents are aware of it -- and its leads.
to:
* PopculturalOsmosis: PopCulturalOsmosis: Even people who haven't seen the play and know nothing of its contents are aware of it -- and its leads.
Changed line(s) 115 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Guildenstern''': (after counting) ...six!
to:
Changed line(s) 117 (click to see context) from:
-->'' A "thunk!" is heard as two more actors pantomime themselves hanging on the gallows on stage. These are clearly the in-play versions of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern themselves.''
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Guildenstern''': "...stabbing his elders, abusing his parents, insulting his lover, and appearing hatless in public..."
to:
--> '''Guildenstern''': "...'''Guildenstern''': ...stabbing his elders, abusing his parents, insulting his lover, and appearing hatless in public..."
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
'''The Player:''' We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 43,45 (click to see context) from:
-->"We can show you rapiers!" ''Players mimic a man and woman fencing'' "Or rape!" ''Players mimic the woman jumping on the man's crotch.'' "Or both!" ''Players mimic the woman raping the man while fencing another man.''
--->''(later in that same scene)''
-->"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see."
--->''(later in that same scene)''
-->"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see."
to:
--->''(later
-->''(Later in that same
-->"We're
'''The Player:''' We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see.
Changed line(s) 82,83 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Rozencrantz''' (possibly): "To sum up: your father, whom you love, dies. You are his heir. You come back to find that hardly was the corpse cold before his young brother pops onto his throne and into his sheets, thereby offending both legal and natural practice. Now... why exactly are you behaving in this extraordinary manner?"
-->'''Guildenstern''' (maybe): "I can't imagine."
-->'''Guildenstern''' (maybe): "I can't imagine."
to:
-->'''Rozencrantz''' (possibly): "To ''(possibly)'': To sum up: your father, whom you love, dies. You are his heir. You come back to find that hardly was the corpse cold before his young brother pops onto his throne and into his sheets, thereby offending both legal and natural practice. Now... why exactly are you behaving in this extraordinary manner?"
manner?
-->'''Guildenstern'''(maybe): "I ''(maybe)'': I can't imagine."
-->'''Guildenstern'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
--> -- '''First Ambassador''' in ''Theatre/Hamlet'', Act V, Scene II
to:
--> -- '''First Ambassador''' in ''Theatre/Hamlet'', ''Theatre/{{Hamlet}}'', Act V, Scene II
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
->''The sight is dismal,\\
to:
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
That Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead.''
to:
That Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead.''
"''
--> -- '''First Ambassador''' in ''Theatre/Hamlet'', Act V, Scene II
--> -- '''First Ambassador''' in ''Theatre/Hamlet'', Act V, Scene II
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
--->''(later in that same scene)''
-->"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see."
-->"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* InnocentBystander: Played with. The two have no knowledge of or desire to participate in the power struggle between Hamlet and Claudius, and are unwittingly recruited by the latter as informants and messengers. This marginal participation costs them their lives. However, they aren't entirely innocent, since they discover the contents of Claudius's letter to the King of England ordering the death of Hamlet, but decided to carry on with their mission regardless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* TheCuckoolanderWasRight: Rosencrantz, frequently. Guildenstern is the smarter of the two in terms of raw cognitive power, but has a tendency to think in circles. Rosencrantz comes closer to actual brilliance, but falls short of the mark trying to vocalize or demonstrate his thoughts to Guildenstern.
to:
* TheCuckoolanderWasRight: Rosencrantz, frequently. Guildenstern is the smarter of the two in terms of raw cognitive power, being the first to understand what's going on, but has a tendency to think in circles. Rosencrantz comes closer to actual brilliance, but falls short of the mark trying to vocalize or demonstrate his thoughts to Guildenstern.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
* AnyoneCanDie: One of the play's major themes is the fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were mostly innocent go-betweens and messengers in the whole Elsinore intrigue surrounding Hamlet and Claudius, and yet they're still paid for their peripheral participating with their lives.
to:
* AnyoneCanDie: One of the play's major themes is the fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were mostly innocent go-betweens and messengers in the whole Elsinore intrigue surrounding Hamlet and Claudius, and yet they're they still paid for their peripheral participating with their lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WholesomeCrossDresser: Averted with Alfred. In addition to being a male actor playing female characters on the stage, it's strongly implied that Alfred helps supplement the acting troupe's income by working as a male prostitute, with The Player as his pimp.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
* AnyoneCanDie: One of the play's major themes is the fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were mostly innocent go-betweens and messengers in the whole Elsinore intrigue surrounding Hamlet and Claudius, and yet their still paid for their peripheral participating with their lives.
to:
* AnyoneCanDie: One of the play's major themes is the fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were mostly innocent go-betweens and messengers in the whole Elsinore intrigue surrounding Hamlet and Claudius, and yet their they're still paid for their peripheral participating with their lives.