Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been renamed, and it needs to be dewicked/moved
Deleted line(s) 60,62 (click to see context) :
* NotSoDifferent: Liz and Finn. To wit, they're both communications specialists working to protect the police's image, out of a genuine passion for social justice. As the series progresses, they begin swapping preferred tactics to undermine each other.
** Personality-wise, they're both shrewd [[DeadpanSnarker Deadpan Snarkers]] with a habit of cracking jokes at bad times and making [[GeekyAnalogy Geeky Analogies]]. In fact, during one of their confrontations, Liz laughs at Finn for referencing Star Wars...only to unironically use the Death Star as a metaphor in her very next scene.
** Banjo and Clarkey are the ones to suggest the Armed Response and TSG strikes, respectively.
** Personality-wise, they're both shrewd [[DeadpanSnarker Deadpan Snarkers]] with a habit of cracking jokes at bad times and making [[GeekyAnalogy Geeky Analogies]]. In fact, during one of their confrontations, Liz laughs at Finn for referencing Star Wars...only to unironically use the Death Star as a metaphor in her very next scene.
** Banjo and Clarkey are the ones to suggest the Armed Response and TSG strikes, respectively.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Your Cheating Heart is an index, not a trope.
Deleted line(s) 79,80 (click to see context) :
* YourCheatingHeart: Davina is cheating on Banjo with Clarkey, who's also married.
** [[spoiler: Richard has had multiple affairs, including one with Sharon, and UnresolvedSexualTension with Liz.]]
** [[spoiler: Richard has had multiple affairs, including one with Sharon, and UnresolvedSexualTension with Liz.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16,17 (click to see context) from:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive'', ''Series/BabylonBerlin'' (which has some similar themes) or the Japanese novel ''Literature/{{Babylon}}''.
to:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive'', ''Series/BabylonBerlin'' (which has some similar themes) or the Japanese novel series ''Literature/{{Babylon}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
Added DiffLines:
Head here [[Characters/BabylonTV for the character page]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive'' or ''Series/BabylonBerlin'' (which has some similar themes).
to:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive'' or ''Series/BabylonFive'', ''Series/BabylonBerlin'' (which has some similar themes).
themes) or the Japanese novel ''Literature/{{Babylon}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive'' or ''Series/BabylonBerlin'', which has some similar themes.
to:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive'' or ''Series/BabylonBerlin'', which ''Series/BabylonBerlin'' (which has some similar themes.
themes).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive''.
to:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive''.
''Series/BabylonFive'' or ''Series/BabylonBerlin'', which has some similar themes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Not to be confused with ''Series/BabylonFive''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
to:
!!Tropes:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* AbortedArc: In Episode Three, after their latest argument, Finn doubles back to suggest that Liz check "the filing cabinets on the fourth floor - you might want to see where the bodies are buried". The line seems to be a CallBack to the previous episode, when Mia joked that the PR department files press coverage about Richard in a box marked 'Richard's Massive Ego'. Liz doesn't check, and it's never brought up again.
to:
* AbortedArc: In Episode Three, Grant Delgado tells Liz that the Met "lost its soul after their latest a boozy lunch with the tabloids." At the end of Liz and Finn's next argument, Finn doubles back to suggest that Liz check "the filing cabinets on the fourth floor - you might want [...] to see where the bodies are buried". The line seems to be a CallBack to the previous episode, when Mia joked that the PR department files press coverage about Richard in a box marked 'Richard's Massive Ego'. Liz doesn't check, and it's never brought up again.
Changed line(s) 40,41 (click to see context) from:
* {{Expy}}: Finn is a less sociopathic Dan from {{Series/Veep}} (which is another show Jesse Armstrong writes for); Liz is also a more {{Cloudcuckoolander}} version of Amy, and their relationship with each other has similar shades of Dan and Amy's BelligerentSexualTension.
* {{Foreshadowing}}: In the pilot, Finn tells Mia that Liz was hired because "[[SleepingTheirWayToTheTop the Commissioner saw her TED Talk and his dick went hard]]". [[spoiler: At first viewing, it seems like Finn is making a misogynistic comment about Liz because he’s TheResenter. Then, come Episode Three, you learn that Richard has had multiple affairs, including at least two in the workplace. Finn has a habit of spying on everyone, so he probably thinks that’s the case with Liz as well.]]
* {{Foreshadowing}}: In the pilot, Finn tells Mia that Liz was hired because "[[SleepingTheirWayToTheTop the Commissioner saw her TED Talk and his dick went hard]]". [[spoiler: At first viewing, it seems like Finn is making a misogynistic comment about Liz because he’s TheResenter. Then, come Episode Three, you learn that Richard has had multiple affairs, including at least two in the workplace. Finn has a habit of spying on everyone, so he probably thinks that’s the case with Liz as well.]]
to:
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
** Liz's email in Episode Two isn't entirely readable, but pausing and squinting at it reveals that she's making contrived metaphors about Apple and Samsung, has seemingly forgotten how to use punctuation, and suddenly starts typing in all caps.
to:
** In Episode Two, Liz's email in Episode Two isn't entirely readable, but pausing and squinting at it reveals that she's features her making contrived metaphors about Apple and Samsung, has seemingly forgotten forgetting how to use punctuation, and suddenly starts typing in all caps.
Added DiffLines:
** Later, a police convoy goes down a road, only to find it blocked by rioters...and an abandoned police car that's on fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* ChekovsGun: Banjo beating up a bin.
to:
* ChekovsGun: ChekhovsGun: Banjo beating up a bin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not enough context.
Deleted line(s) 48 (click to see context) :
* HannibalLecture: Zig-zagged in Episode Six, by Liz and Finn. [[spoiler: They apparently both got through to each other.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* {{Foreshadowing}}: In the pilot, Finn tells Mia that Liz was hired because "the Commissioner saw her TED Talk and his dick went hard". [[spoiler: At first viewing, it seems like Finn is making a [[NeverASelfMadeWoman misogynistic comment]] about Liz because he’s TheResenter. Then, come Episode Three, you learn that Richard has had multiple affairs, including at least two in the workplace. Finn has a habit of spying on everyone, so he probably thinks that’s the case with Liz as well.]]
to:
* {{Foreshadowing}}: In the pilot, Finn tells Mia that Liz was hired because "the "[[SleepingTheirWayToTheTop the Commissioner saw her TED Talk and his dick went hard". hard]]". [[spoiler: At first viewing, it seems like Finn is making a [[NeverASelfMadeWoman misogynistic comment]] comment about Liz because he’s TheResenter. Then, come Episode Three, you learn that Richard has had multiple affairs, including at least two in the workplace. Finn has a habit of spying on everyone, so he probably thinks that’s the case with Liz as well.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Banjo and Clarkey are the ones to suggest the Armed Response and TSG strikes, respectively.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 71 (click to see context) from:
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: The missing boy in Episode Five is implied to have been [spoiler: kidnapped and murdered]], but there's no mention of whether the perpetrator was caught.
to:
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: The missing boy in Episode Five is implied to have been [spoiler: [[spoiler: kidnapped and murdered]], but there's no mention of whether the perpetrator was caught.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
** Early in the pilot, Finn and Mia side by side, watching Liz address a crowd. The final scene of the series has them in that position again.
to:
** Early in the pilot, Finn and Mia stand side by side, watching Liz address a crowd. The final scene of the series has them in that position again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** Early in the pilot, Finn and Mia side by side, watching Liz address a crowd. The final scene of the series has them in that position again.
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* {{Foreshadowing}}: In the pilot, Finn tells Mia that Liz was hired because "the Commissioner saw her TED Talk and his dick went hard". [[spoiler: At first viewing, it seems like Finn is making a [[NeverASelfMadeWoman misogynistic comment]] about Liz because he’s TheResenter. Then, come Episode Three, you learn that Richard has had multiple affairs, including at least two in the workplace - Finn has a habit of spying on everyone, and he genuinely thinks that’s the case with Liz as well.]]
to:
* {{Foreshadowing}}: In the pilot, Finn tells Mia that Liz was hired because "the Commissioner saw her TED Talk and his dick went hard". [[spoiler: At first viewing, it seems like Finn is making a [[NeverASelfMadeWoman misogynistic comment]] about Liz because he’s TheResenter. Then, come Episode Three, you learn that Richard has had multiple affairs, including at least two in the workplace - workplace. Finn has a habit of spying on everyone, and so he genuinely probably thinks that’s the case with Liz as well.]]
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
** In Episode Four, the news portal which hacked into the drone feed has a sidebar speculating if [[spoiler: Richard]] was 'killed by the Russians'.
to:
** In Episode Four, the news portal which hacked into the drone feed has a sidebar speculating if [[spoiler: Richard]] was 'killed "killed by the Russians'.Russians".
Changed line(s) 57 (click to see context) from:
** Personality-wise, they're both efficient, shrewd [[DeadpanSnarker Deadpan Snarkers]] with a habit of cracking jokes at bad times and making [[GeekyAnalogy Geeky Analogies]]. In fact, during one of their confrontations, Liz laughs at Finn for referencing Star Wars...only to unironically use the Death Star as a metaphor in her very next scene.
to:
** Personality-wise, they're both efficient, shrewd [[DeadpanSnarker Deadpan Snarkers]] with a habit of cracking jokes at bad times and making [[GeekyAnalogy Geeky Analogies]]. In fact, during one of their confrontations, Liz laughs at Finn for referencing Star Wars...only to unironically use the Death Star as a metaphor in her very next scene.
Changed line(s) 62 (click to see context) from:
* ShipTease: Between Liz and Richard. She has a serious case of [[HeroWorshipper Hero Worship]] towards him, and lets slip to Granger that "he's not always perfect, but it's something to get out of bed for - saving an institution." Richard keeps kissing her on the cheek, and says she's the only person he trusts. [[spoiler: Nothing ever happens between them before he kills himself.]]
to:
* ShipTease: Between Liz and Richard. She has a serious case of [[HeroWorshipper Hero Worship]] towards him, and lets slip to Granger that "he's not always perfect, but it's something to get out of bed for - saving an institution." Richard keeps kissing her on the cheek, and says she's the only person he trusts. [[spoiler: Nothing ever happens between them before he kills himself.]]
Changed line(s) 70 (click to see context) from:
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: The last we see or hear of [[spoiler: Matt Coward]] is his arrest. There's also the matter of his former employers encouraging Robbie to tamper with evidence.
to:
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: The missing boy in Episode Five is implied to have been [spoiler: kidnapped and murdered]], but there's no mention of whether the perpetrator was caught.
** The last we see or hear of [[spoiler: Matt Coward]] is his arrest. There's also the matter of his former employers encouraging Robbie to tamper with evidence.
** The last we see or hear of [[spoiler: Matt Coward]] is his arrest. There's also the matter of his former employers encouraging Robbie to tamper with evidence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
to:
** Similarly, the Earlier, Finn's phone call to Charles implies that Charles may have some dirt on Richard. It's never clarified whether this is related to [[spoiler: Richard's affairs or something separate.]]
** The Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
** The Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 50,51 (click to see context) from:
** In Episode Five:
---->'''Liz''': This place is on fire. Richard, Jeffries, and do you know what Finn is doing? He's bolting the front door, and he is locking all the windows, and now Charlie's going round and collecting all the fire extinguishers, and he's dousing them in petrol and he's burning them all. Fire extinguishers. On fire!
---->'''Liz''': This place is on fire. Richard, Jeffries, and do you know what Finn is doing? He's bolting the front door, and he is locking all the windows, and now Charlie's going round and collecting all the fire extinguishers, and he's dousing them in petrol and he's burning them all. Fire extinguishers. On fire!
to:
** In Episode Five:
---->'''Liz''': This place is on fire. Richard, Jeffries,Five, Liz's impassioned pitch to Sharon paints the Met as metaphorically burning to the ground, with Charles and do you know what Finn is doing? He's bolting the front door, windows and he is locking all the windows, and now Charlie's going round and collecting all the fire extinguishers, and he's dousing them in petrol and he's burning them all. Fire extinguishers. On fire!setting extinguishers on fire.
---->'''Liz''': This place is on fire. Richard, Jeffries,
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MeaningfulEcho: Richard comparing handling the police force to putting out fires.
--->'''Richard''': I know I look like a police officer, but I'm a firefighter. That's all I do. I put out fires.
** In Episode Five:
---->'''Liz''': This place is on fire. Richard, Jeffries, and do you know what Finn is doing? He's bolting the front door, and he is locking all the windows, and now Charlie's going round and collecting all the fire extinguishers, and he's dousing them in petrol and he's burning them all. Fire extinguishers. On fire!
** And after Armed Response chooses not to carry their firearms, as a form of protest.
--->'''Liz''': (''incredulously'') Can they also choose to be firemen?
--->'''Richard''': I know I look like a police officer, but I'm a firefighter. That's all I do. I put out fires.
** In Episode Five:
---->'''Liz''': This place is on fire. Richard, Jeffries, and do you know what Finn is doing? He's bolting the front door, and he is locking all the windows, and now Charlie's going round and collecting all the fire extinguishers, and he's dousing them in petrol and he's burning them all. Fire extinguishers. On fire!
** And after Armed Response chooses not to carry their firearms, as a form of protest.
--->'''Liz''': (''incredulously'') Can they also choose to be firemen?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
* BathroomStallOfOverheardInsults: In Episode One, Liz retreats to the restroom to think - and overhears Mia on a call with one of her friends, whom Liz made a bad impression on by ranting about work. Mia herself is somewhat protective over Liz ("No, she's fine, she's nice [...] I like her, I do"), but it still visibly hurts Liz.
to:
* BathroomStallOfOverheardInsults: In Episode One, Liz retreats to the restroom to think - and overhears Mia on a call with one of her friends, whom Liz made a bad impression on by ranting about work. Mia herself is somewhat protective over Liz ("No, she's fine, she's nice [...] I like her, I do"), Liz, but it still visibly hurts Liz.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
* NoSuchThingAsHR: The higher-ups in the police and the PR department are constantly at each other's throats, resorting to verbal abuse, rude gestures, and borderline harassment. Possibly justified, in the sense that their squabbles never seem to affect the lower-ranking workers, and they're almost all guilty of it to some degree.
to:
* NoSuchThingAsHR: The higher-ups in the police and the PR department at Scotland Yard are constantly at each other's throats, resorting to verbal abuse, rude gestures, and borderline harassment. Possibly justified, in the sense that their squabbles never seem to affect the lower-ranking workers, and they're almost all guilty of it to some degree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* AbortedArc: In Episode Three, after their latest argument, Finn doubles back to suggest that Liz check "the filing cabinets on the fourth floor - you might want to see where the bodies are buried". The line seems to be a CallBack to the previous episode, when Mia joked that the PR department files press coverage about Richard in a box marked 'Richard's Massive Ego'. Liz doesn't check, and it's never brought up again.
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
Changed line(s) 62,64 (click to see context) from:
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: In Episode Three, after their latest argument, Finn doubles back to suggest that Liz check "the filing cabinets on the fourth floor - you might want to see where the bodies are buried". The line seems to be a CallBack to the previous episode, when Mia joked that the PR department files press coverage about Richard in a box marked 'Richard's Massive Ego'. Liz doesn't check, and it's never brought up again.
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
** The last we see or hear of [[spoiler: Matt Coward]] is his arrest.
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
** The last we see or hear of [[spoiler: Matt Coward]] is his arrest.
to:
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: In Episode Three, after their latest argument, Finn doubles back to suggest that Liz check "the filing cabinets on the fourth floor - you might want to see where the bodies are buried". The line seems to be a CallBack to the previous episode, when Mia joked that the PR department files press coverage about Richard in a box marked 'Richard's Massive Ego'. Liz doesn't check, and it's never brought up again.
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
**The last we see or hear of [[spoiler: Matt Coward]] is his arrest.arrest. There's also the matter of his former employers encouraging Robbie to tamper with evidence.
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** In Episode Four, the news portal which hacked into the drone feed has a sidebar speculating if [[spoiler: Richard]] was 'killed by the Russians'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Liz's email in Episode Two isn't entirely readable, but pausing and squinting at it reveals that she's making contrived metaphors about Apple and Samsung, has seemingly forgotten how to use punctuation, and suddenly starts typing in all caps.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 39 (click to see context) from:
* FreezeFrameBonus: The dates and times on shots of surveillance camera footage. Apparently, Series 1 takes place over little more than twenty-four days. This isn't a coincidence or oversight - the dates are consistent with Matt Coward's dialogue in Episode Three and Caroline Carey's article in Episode Four. [[note]]But there are two minor errors. The footage in Episode One is all dated 1/9.; however, the wardrobe changes between Liz and Finn's first scenes together indicate that the Cravenwood riots span two days. Throughout the series, Armed Response's bodycams also seem to be stuck on that date.[[/note]]
to:
* FreezeFrameBonus: The dates and times on shots of surveillance camera footage. Apparently, Series 1 takes place over little more than twenty-four days. This isn't a coincidence or oversight - the dates are consistent with Matt Coward's dialogue in Episode Three and Caroline Carey's article in Episode Four. [[note]]But there are two minor errors. The footage in Episode One is all dated 1/9.; 1/9; however, the wardrobe changes between Liz and Finn's first scenes together indicate that the Cravenwood riots span two days. Throughout the series, Armed Response's bodycams also seem to be stuck on that date.[[/note]][[/note]]
** In Episode Three, when Liz first speaks with Richard, a framed poster in her office reads "too good to be true".
** In Episode Three, when Liz first speaks with Richard, a framed poster in her office reads "too good to be true".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FreezeFrameBonus: The dates and times on shots of surveillance camera footage. Apparently, Series 1 takes place over little more than twenty-four days. This isn't a coincidence or oversight - the dates are consistent with Matt Coward's dialogue in Episode Three and Caroline Carey's article in Episode Four. [[note]]But there are two minor errors. The footage in Episode One is all dated 1/9.; however, the wardrobe changes between Liz and Finn's first scenes together indicate that the Cravenwood riots span two days. Throughout the series, Armed Response's bodycams also seem to be stuck on that date.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time - coinciding with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
to:
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days' time - coinciding time. This should coincide with Robbie's first day in Armed Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days, as is Robbie's first day in Armed Response. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.
to:
** Similarly, the Initiatives on Policing Conference mentioned in Episode Two is supposed to take place in two days, as is days' time - coinciding with Robbie's first day in Armed Response.Response, according to Matt Coward's documentary. However, the conference doesn't seem to occur before or during Episode Three, and it isn't referenced afterwards.