Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Sandbox / ReportingTrouble

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample illustrate the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Use too much text in the image or caption), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]] are not allowed. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.

to:

** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicy NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample illustrate the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Use too much text in the image or caption), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]] are not allowed. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.



* Adding text with blatantly false information, [[Administrivia/ConversationInTheMainPage personal comments]], [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit lewd comments]], [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining]], or [[Administrivia/FirstPersonWriting breaking the speech style]].

to:

* Adding text with blatantly false information, [[Administrivia/ConversationInTheMainPage personal comments]], [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicy lewd comments]], [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining]], or [[Administrivia/FirstPersonWriting breaking the speech style]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Know that it is ''completely acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if a TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched/bombed right away". Let the troper read the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.

to:

* Know that it is ''completely acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch Administrivia/WorkPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if a TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched/bombed right away". Let the troper read the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.



Main articles: Administrivia/WelcomeToTVTropes, Administrivia/WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13287249110A49840100 What Goes Where On The Forums]], TropeFinder, YouKnowThatShow, QueryBugs, Administrivia/ThisIsAWiki, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 Is This An Example?]], Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch.

to:

Main articles: Administrivia/WelcomeToTVTropes, Administrivia/WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13287249110A49840100 What Goes Where On The Forums]], TropeFinder, YouKnowThatShow, QueryBugs, Administrivia/ThisIsAWiki, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 Is This An Example?]], Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch.Administrivia/WorkPagesAreAFreeLaunch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
trope split


* In ATT, SingleIssueWonk refers to tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant where a troper ignores the Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] than what the pages currently have. Do ''not'' talk to these kinds of tropers, as they clearly show a certain intent to not follow the site's customs.

to:

* In ATT, SingleIssueWonk refers to tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant where a troper ignores the Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad [[PoliticalOvercorrectness opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] than what the pages currently have. Do ''not'' talk to these kinds of tropers, as they clearly show a certain intent to not follow the site's customs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Curly brackets here are unnecessary and a bit of Word Cruft.


** Note that certain usernames (usually those that begin with a number or have an underscore) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits, which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request assistance from a mod in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"

to:

** Note that certain usernames (usually those that begin with a number or have an underscore) underscore cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits, which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request assistance from a mod in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"

Changed: 1862

Removed: 187

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Here are some suggestions for finding problematic tropers and reporting them to AskTheTropers (ATT), if necessary. These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, and making the job of moderators easier as well.

Note: We can't and won't enforce these as guidelines, this page is here only to help making reports more concise and clear.

to:

Here are some suggestions for finding problematic tropers and reporting them to AskTheTropers (ATT), if necessary. These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, and making make the job of moderators easier as well.

Note: We can't and won't enforce these as guidelines, this page is here only to help making make reports more concise and clear.



* Rule breaking is not arguable, either it happened or it didn't. If you're reporting rule breaking, it doesn't matter which example is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', ''then'' the editing can continue.
** If you're not reporting rule-breaking but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond just improve it]]. There are better places to resolve small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider ATT as the ''measure of last resort''.
* Don't comment in a report ''unless it involves you, or you can append'' or elaborate the report. Off-topic comments or discussions of troper's personality, without new evidence of a problem, are called [[Administrivia/TVTropesGlossary Popcorning]] and will annoy the mods.
** Getting angry, bringing up your own or someone else's personal flaws and poor grammar are quick signs that someone can't keep up a constructive conversation.
** Don't threaten other tropers with a ban or ask to ban specific tropers (Mini-modding). It is for mods to decide, ''no jurors needed''.
** If the troper goes haywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. It's better to keep an eye on their edits and do a cleanup after they're being dealt with, than everyone jumping into Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed troper.
* ''Don't PM the mods'' unless it's really urgent. Mods monitor the ATT and their forums of choice regularly when they get online, they will respond to reports if needed ''eventually''. If the query didn't get any development in over a day and the issue still persists, make a "Bump" comment to bring it to the top of the ATT.
** Don't comment on reports that have been resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). If a similar issue appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one as reference.
** Don't ask to lock the query unless it's escalating into a FlameWar. If the issue is resolved, it should be obvious by looking at it, just let the query get buried in the queue.
* SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of it: a troper who ignores Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] than what the pages have. Talking to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', as they clearly show a certain intent to not follow site's customs.

to:

* Rule breaking Rule-breaking is not arguable, either it happened or it didn't. If you're reporting rule breaking, rule-breaking, it doesn't matter which example version is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', "more correct". Address and resolve the problem, ''then'' the editing can continue.
continue editing.
** If you're not reporting rule-breaking but making a post because you consider an a non-rule-breaking edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond just improve it]]. There are better places to resolve small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) ([=PMs=]) and forums. Consider ATT as the ''measure of last resort''.
''last measure taken''.
* Don't comment in a report ''unless unless it involves you, either ''involves you'', or you can append'' or ''append and/or elaborate on the report. report''. Off-topic comments or discussions of a troper's personality, personality without new evidence of a problem, problem are called [[Administrivia/TVTropesGlossary Popcorning]] and will annoy the mods.
** Getting angry, bringing up your own or someone else's personal flaws and flaws, and/or poor grammar are quick clear signs that someone you can't keep up a constructive conversation.
conversation, and you will likely be asked to take a break from ATT.
** Don't threaten other tropers with a ban or ask to ban specific tropers (Mini-modding). It tropers. This is referred to as mini-modding - bans are for mods to decide, ''no jurors are needed''.
** If the problem troper goes haywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. engage with them'''. It's better (and easier) to keep an eye on their edits and do a cleanup after they're being they've been dealt with, rather than having everyone jumping jump into an Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed problem troper.
* ''Don't Don't PM the mods'' mods unless it's really urgent. ''really urgent''. Mods monitor the ATT and their forums of choice regularly when they get online, they will respond to reports if needed (if needed) ''eventually''. If the query didn't get any development in over a day and the issue still persists, make a "Bump" comment to bring it to the top of the ATT.
** Don't comment on reports that have already been resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). (this is referred to as gravedancing for recent reports, and necromancy for older reports). If a similar issue with the same problem troper appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one as a reference.
** Don't ask to lock the query unless it's clearly escalating into a FlameWar. If the issue is resolved, it should be obvious by looking at it, the report thread - just let the query get buried in the queue.
* In ATT, SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of it: where a troper who ignores the Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] than what the pages currently have. Talking Do ''not'' talk to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', kinds of tropers, as they clearly show a certain intent to not follow the site's customs.



* To address a troper in a post: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are posting in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) creates a PM for them to check the post they are mentioned in. Paging does not work in ATT queries due to a bug.
** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits, which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request assistance from a mod in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"

to:

* To address a troper in a post: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are posting in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) creates a PM for them to check the post they are mentioned in. Paging Know that paging does not work in ATT queries due to a bug.
** Do note, however, Note that certain usernames (usually those that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) underscore) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits, which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request assistance from a mod in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"



* To link specific edits: from the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note that if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it, as it is hidden by the Show All button. If so, append "&more=t" after the pagename, e.g. ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.

to:

* To link specific edits: from the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note that if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it, as it is hidden by the Show All button. If so, append "&more=t" after the pagename, page name, e.g. ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.



* If the edit of the first troper was repeated by a third troper, it's technically not an Edit War, but consider talking to all parties involved to settle the dispute.

to:

* If the edit of the first troper was repeated by a third troper, it's technically ''technically'' not an Edit War, but consider talking to all parties involved to settle the dispute.



* If the edit was revised by the original troper, depending on how much has changed, and if the problem with the previous edit still remains, it may count as Edit War or it may not.

to:

* If the edit was revised by the original troper, depending troper (depending on how much has changed, changed) and if the problem with the their previous edit still remains, it may still count as an Edit War or it may not.War.



* Name the new ATT query something like ''Edit War: page name'', or ''Possible Edit War: page name'' if you're unsure.

to:

* Name the new ATT query something like along the lines of ''Edit War: page name'', or name''. If you're not sure if it's an edit war, title it ''Possible Edit War: page name'' if you're unsure.name''.



* Add any information that could be useful, like a troper's similar edits on other pages, or any correspondence you two had, if any.
* PM the troper by clicking the "Send Message" in the History page near their edit or at the troper's profile page. Invite them to a talk in the query involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that they really haven't been paying attention to the edit history and have "considered it strange" that their example has disappeared. Note that Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.

to:

* Add any information that could be useful, like if a troper's made similar edits on other pages, pages or any correspondence you two had, if any.
had.
* PM the troper by clicking the "Send Message" in the History page near their edit or at the troper's profile page. Invite them to a talk in the query involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that In some rare instances, they really haven't been weren't paying attention to the edit history and have "considered it strange" that their example has had disappeared. Note that Situations like those are the ''only ones'' where Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.Warring is pardoned; most other reasons will result in a ban.



* Someone's edits being very similar to the edits of a troper who has been brought up in ATT before and was suspended. They may have registered under a new username to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if they haven't broken other rules'', tropers under a suspension '''are not allowed to edit at all'''.
* A suspended troper directly asking someone else to edit or message on their behalf. Per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], this is not allowed either, even outside of the forums. Tropes who are edit-banned but not forum-banned can still use appropriate forums to suggest edits, however.

to:

* Someone's A troper's edits being very similar to the edits of a troper who has been brought up in ATT before and was suspended. They may have registered under a new username to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if if they haven't broken other rules'', any rules under their new account, tropers under a suspension '''are ''are not allowed to edit at all'''.
all''.
* A suspended troper directly asking someone else to edit or message on their behalf. Per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], this is not allowed either, even including outside of the forums. Tropes Tropers who are edit-banned but (but not forum-banned can still use forum-banned) and are using the appropriate forums to suggest edits, however.edits are ''not violating the rules''.



* Check the forum and edit activities for both of the suspicious tropers. If the second one has been inactive until the first one got suspended, it's very likely to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both accounts have been around for a while, the similarities are probably either coincidental or they have been be cooperating.
* '''Do not message suspected ban evaders. Do not ask them any questions.'''

to:

* Check the forum and edit activities for both of the suspicious tropers. If the second one has been "new" account was inactive until the first "old" one got suspended, it's very likely to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both accounts have been around for a while, then the similarities accounts are probably either coincidental coincidentally similar or they have been be cooperating.
cooperating together.
* '''Do ''Do not message any suspected ban evaders. Do evaders, and do not ask them any questions.'''''



* If the similarities are too glaring, then no further discussion is required. Just wait for the mod to perform the IP address check and make a decision.
* If the mod can't say anything decisive after the check, message the second troper with an invite to the ATT, so they can comment on why they have edits similar to the suspended troper's edits. If the correlation is not confirmed, if there are other problems with their edits, they can be addressed in private or in another query.
* If the mod suspends the second troper, ask on the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] for the sockpuppet's edits to be undone. To reiterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'', regardless if there are other issues with them. The edits can be re-added after the discussion with the thread, if necessary.

to:

* If the similarities are too glaring, glaringly obvious, then no further discussion is required. Just wait for the mod to perform the IP address check and make a decision.
* If the mod can't say anything decisive after the IP address check, message the second troper with an invite to the ATT, so they can comment on why they have edits similar to the suspended troper's edits. If the correlation is not confirmed, if confirmed or there are other problems with their edits, they can be addressed in private or in another query.
* If the mod suspends the second "new" troper, ask on the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] for the sockpuppet's edits to be undone. To reiterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'', regardless if there are other issues with them. The edits can be re-added after the discussion with the thread, if necessary.



* Multiple editors going back and forth with their edits on the same page, though not getting into a straight Administrivia/EditWar.

to:

* Multiple editors going back and forth with their edits on the same page, though page; these editors may or may not be getting into a straight an Administrivia/EditWar.



* If the page keeps attracting "heat", ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17 Locked Pages]] thread to freeze the page, it could be getting the attention because of a trending topic.

to:

* If the page keeps attracting "heat", ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17 Locked Pages]] thread to freeze the page, as it could be getting the attention because of a trending topic.



* A Private Message that is insulting, overly snarky, or too personal.
* Same for edit reasons, forum posts and discussion posts. Note, that [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem conversing in the edit reasons]] is not allowed by the either side.

to:

* A Private Message Messages, edit reasons, forum posts, and/or discussion posts that is are insulting, overly snarky, or too personal.
* Same
personal. Note that, for edit reasons, forum posts and discussion posts. Note, that reasons in particular, [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem conversing in the edit reasons]] is not allowed by the either side.



* Ask the troper to stop and ask why they're doing it. If they apologize and don't do it again, then it's up to you if that's good enough. If they do continue to act rude, '''stop interacting with them'''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM is not allowed''. This applies to other parts of the website as well. The mods have a tool to see the messages of any troper, they can check them if necessary.
* Bring up the offending troper in ATT, summarize in a couple of words how rude their messages are and what actions preceded them.

to:

* Ask the troper to stop and ask why they're doing it. If they apologize and don't do it again, then it's up to you if that's good enough. to decide whether or not they need to be reported in ATT. If they do continue to act rude, '''stop ''stop interacting with them'''.
them''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM any Private Message is not allowed''. This applies to other parts of the website as well.If you are reporting a rude PM, summarize what they're saying, do not directly quote them. The mods have a tool to see the messages of any troper, they can check them if necessary.
* Bring When bringing up the offending troper in ATT, summarize in a couple of words how rude their messages are and what actions preceded them.



* Read each article for the specifics.

to:

* Editing that doesn't follow the site's standard practices. Read each article for the specifics.



* Check up on them some time later. If they continue to edit with improper English, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make the ATT query with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up the edits. Ask the troper in a PM to come to the thread, in case they wish to respond.

to:

* Check up on them some time later.after a while. If they continue to edit with improper English, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make the ATT query with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up the edits. Ask the troper in a PM to come to the thread, in case they wish to respond.



* Stub trope drafts, lacking description or examples.

to:

* Stub trope drafts, lacking drafts (lacking description or examples.examples).



* It is ''completely acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed right away". Please, let the troper read the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.

to:

* It Know that it is ''completely acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if a TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed launched/bombed right away". Please, let Let the troper read the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.



* When a troper makes multiple "concept" drafts and doesn't work on them further, they only clutter the TLP queue. They, and their drafts, should be brought to the ATT for a talk.

to:

* When a troper makes multiple "concept" drafts and doesn't work on them further, they only clutter the TLP queue. They, They and their drafts, drafts should be brought to the ATT for a talk.



* [[Administrivia/TVTropesCustoms Don't be a smartass]], everyone has been a newbie at some point.

to:

* [[Administrivia/TVTropesCustoms Don't be a smartass]], rude or snarky]], everyone has been a newbie at some point.



* Encourage the troper to read the relevant Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also ask them to elaborate their questions in the future if they weren't clear.

to:

* Encourage the troper to read the relevant Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also ask tell them to elaborate their questions in the future if they weren't clear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If you're not reporting rule-breaking but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond just improve it]]. There are better places to resolve small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT as the ''measure of last resort''.

to:

** If you're not reporting rule-breaking but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond just improve it]]. There are better places to resolve small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT ATT as the ''measure of last resort''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Editing as per Get Help With English Here request.


Here, are some suggestions for finding problematic tropers and reporting them to AskTheTropers (ATT), if necessary. These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, and making the job of moderators easier as well.

to:

Here, Here are some suggestions for finding problematic tropers and reporting them to AskTheTropers (ATT), if necessary. These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, and making the job of moderators easier as well.



* The rule-breaking is not arguable, it either did happen or it didn't. If you're reporting a rule-breaking, it doesn't matter which example is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', ''then'' the editing can continue.
** If you're not reporting rule-breaking, but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond go improve it]]. And there are better places to resolve small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT as the ''measure of last-resort''.

to:

* The rule-breaking Rule breaking is not arguable, it either did happen it happened or it didn't. If you're reporting a rule-breaking, rule breaking, it doesn't matter which example is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', ''then'' the editing can continue.
** If you're not reporting rule-breaking, rule-breaking but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond go just improve it]]. And there There are better places to resolve small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT as the ''measure of last-resort''.last resort''.



** Getting angry, coming up with own or someone else's personal flaws and poor grammar are quick signs that someone can't keep up a constructive conversation.

to:

** Getting angry, coming bringing up with your own or someone else's personal flaws and poor grammar are quick signs that someone can't keep up a constructive conversation.



** If the troper goes haywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. It's better to keep an eye on their edits and do a cleanup after they're being dealt with, than everyone jumping in Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed troper.

to:

** If the troper goes haywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. It's better to keep an eye on their edits and do a cleanup after they're being dealt with, than everyone jumping in into Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed troper.



** Don't comment to reports that have been resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). If a similar issue appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one as reference.

to:

** Don't comment to on reports that have been resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). If a similar issue appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one as reference.



* SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers, who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of it, a troper who ignores Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]], than what the pages have. Talking to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', as they clearly show a certain intent to not follow site's customs.

to:

* SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers, tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of it, it: a troper who ignores Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]], valuable]] than what the pages have. Talking to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', as they clearly show a certain intent to not follow site's customs.



** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by an oversight of TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"
* To link troper's edit history: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=TroperUsername TroperUsername's Edit History]]=]''.
* To link specific edits: From the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note, that if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it, as it is hidden by the Show All button. If so, append "&more=t" after the pagename, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.
* To look up troper's forum activity: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/forum_troper_posts.php?fortroper=TroperUsername]]=]'' (can be useful to check if they have been invited to Suspension Appeal before).
* To link a forum post: Copy the link from the timestamp to the right of the post, or click on it and copy the URL, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200&page=3#comment-54]]=]''

to:

** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by an oversight of TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits digits, which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance from a mod in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"
* To link a troper's edit history: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=TroperUsername TroperUsername's Edit History]]=]''.
* To link specific edits: From from the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note, Note that if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it, as it is hidden by the Show All button. If so, append "&more=t" after the pagename, ex: e.g. ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.
* To look up a troper's forum activity: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/forum_troper_posts.php?fortroper=TroperUsername]]=]'' (can be useful to check if they have been invited to Suspension Appeal [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=5cma6iojg5o27puhulc24sje Edit banned/Suspended - would like to edit again]] before).
* To link a forum post: Copy the link from the timestamp to the right of the post, or click on it and copy the URL, ex: e.g. ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200&page=3#comment-54]]=]''









[[folder:Reporting editwaring]]

to:

[[folder:Reporting editwaring]]edit warring]]



* To put it briefly, if the same troper ''reverts to their previous edit'', which was edited by someone else. (Troper A -> Troper B -> Troper A)

to:

* To put it briefly, if If a troper makes an edit, another troper reverts the edit, and the original troper makes the same troper ''reverts to their previous edit'', which was edited by someone else. edit again. (Troper A -> Troper B -> Troper A)A).



* If both tropers have repeated their edits, they are '''both''' Editwaring.

to:

* If both tropers have repeated their edits, they are '''both''' Editwaring.Edit Warring.



* If the edit was revised by the orginal troper, depending on how much has changed, and if the problem with the previous edit still remains, it may count as Edit War or it may not.

to:

* If the edit was revised by the orginal original troper, depending on how much has changed, and if the problem with the previous edit still remains, it may count as Edit War or it may not.



* Include the links to the troper's two or more repetitive edits and any relevant in-between edits by other tropes.
* Add any information that could be useful, like troper's similar edits on other pages, or any correspondance you two had, if any.
* PM the troper by clicking the "Send Message" in the History page near their edit or at troper's profile page. Invite them to a talk in the query involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that they really haven't been paying attention to the edit history and have "considered it strange" that their example has disappeared. Note that Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.

to:

* Include the links to the troper's two or more repetitive edits and any relevant in-between edits by other tropes.
of all of the tropers involved.
* Add any information that could be useful, like a troper's similar edits on other pages, or any correspondance correspondence you two had, if any.
* PM the troper by clicking the "Send Message" in the History page near their edit or at the troper's profile page. Invite them to a talk in the query involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that they really haven't been paying attention to the edit history and have "considered it strange" that their example has disappeared. Note that Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.



* Someone's edits being very similar to the edits of a troper, who has been brought up in ATT before and was suspended. They may have registered under a new username to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if they haven't broken other tules'', tropers under a suspension '''are not allowed to edit at all'''.

to:

* Someone's edits being very similar to the edits of a troper, troper who has been brought up in ATT before and was suspended. They may have registered under a new username to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if they haven't broken other tules'', rules'', tropers under a suspension '''are not allowed to edit at all'''.



* Check the forum and edit activities for both of the suspicious tropers. If the second one has been inactive until the first one got suspended, it's almost guaranteed to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both accounts have been around for a while, the similarities are either coincidental or they have been be cooperating.

to:

* Check the forum and edit activities for both of the suspicious tropers. If the second one has been inactive until the first one got suspended, it's almost guaranteed very likely to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both accounts have been around for a while, the similarities are probably either coincidental or they have been be cooperating.



* If the similarities are too glaring, then no further discussion is required. Just wait for the mod to perform the ip-address check and them to make a decision.
* If the mod can't say anything decisive after the check, message the second troper with the invite to the ATT, so they can comment on why they have edits similar to the suspended troper's edits. If the correlation is not confirmed, if there are other problems with their eidts, they can be addressed in private or in another query.
* If the mod suspends the second troper, ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] to undo the edits of the sockpuppet. To iterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'', regardless if there are other issues with them. The edits can be re-added after the discussion with the thread, if necessary.

to:

* If the similarities are too glaring, then no further discussion is required. Just wait for the mod to perform the ip-address IP address check and them to make a decision.
* If the mod can't say anything decisive after the check, message the second troper with the an invite to the ATT, so they can comment on why they have edits similar to the suspended troper's edits. If the correlation is not confirmed, if there are other problems with their eidts, edits, they can be addressed in private or in another query.
* If the mod suspends the second troper, ask on the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] to undo for the sockpuppet's edits of the sockpuppet. to be undone. To iterate, reiterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'', regardless if there are other issues with them. The edits can be re-added after the discussion with the thread, if necessary.



* Replacing an existing image without the approval of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=images IP]] ("Changed w/o discussion"), especially when the previous image already has the IP comment (check the page source). The Mod replaces images ''themself when the replacement thread is closed''.

to:

* Replacing an existing image without the approval of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=images IP]] ("Changed w/o discussion"), especially when the previous image already has the IP comment (check the page source). The Mod replaces images ''themself ''themselves when the replacement thread is closed''.



* Adding, without a discussion, an image to a page that doesn't have one is not considered a violation. With the exceptions:
** Pages that are marked as Administrivia/ImagePickinSpecialCases require a discussion. And a very good image suggestion.

to:

* Adding, without a discussion, an image to a page that doesn't have one is not considered a violation. With violation, with the following exceptions:
** Pages that are marked as Administrivia/ImagePickinSpecialCases require a discussion. And discussion and a very good image suggestion.



** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample illustrate the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Use too much text in the image or caption), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]] are nopt allowed. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.

to:

** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample illustrate the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Use too much text in the image or caption), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]] are nopt not allowed. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.



* Bring up the page that has a problematic image to the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 IP]], preferably also mentioning who made the change and what have they've changed, if the image was replaced. This is ''not considered an ATT problem'', unless the troper systematically replaces images or adds bad images.
* Check the edit history of the troper who put a problematic image, they may have done so somewhere else as well.

to:

* Bring up the page that has a problematic image to on the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 IP]], preferably also mentioning who made the change and what have they've changed, if the image was replaced. This is ''not considered an ATT problem'', unless the troper systematically replaces images or adds bad images.
* Check the edit history of the troper who put a problematic image, they may have done so somewhere else elsewhere as well.



* Removing large portions of text from pages without an approval or an edit reason.

to:

* Removing large portions of text from pages without an approval or an edit reason.



* Use the "Report Page" button at the side bar, or bring the page up in the ATT while linking the relevant edits.
* ''Don't message tropes'' who deliberataly harm pages.

to:

* Use the "Report Page" button at the side bar, or bring the page up in the ATT while linking the relevant edits.
* ''Don't message tropes'' tropers'' who deliberataly deliberately harm pages.



* Ask the troper to stop and add why. If they apologize and don't do it again, then it's up to you if that's good enough. If they do continue to act rude, '''stop interacting with them'''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM is not allowed'', this applies to other parts of the website as well. The mods have a tool to see the messages of any troper, they can check them if necessary.
* Bring up the offending troper in the ATT, summarize in a couple of words how rude are them messages and what actions preceeded them.

to:

* Ask the troper to stop and add why.ask why they're doing it. If they apologize and don't do it again, then it's up to you if that's good enough. If they do continue to act rude, '''stop interacting with them'''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM is not allowed'', this allowed''. This applies to other parts of the website as well. The mods have a tool to see the messages of any troper, they can check them if necessary.
* Bring up the offending troper in the ATT, summarize in a couple of words how rude are them their messages are and what actions preceeded preceded them.



* Check after a few hours their edit history. If they still show no understanding of how to edit the pages, make the ATT query with problematic edits and bring the troper to it. You may explain further how to write examples until the mods arrive.

to:

* Check after After a few hours hours, check their edit history. If they still show no understanding of how to edit the pages, make the ATT query with problematic edits and bring send a message to the troper asking them to join it. You may explain further how to write examples until the mods arrive.



* Page descriptions and examples that are copied verbatim from other sites, even if it's from the troper [[Administrivia/TheFicMayBeYoursButTheTropePageIsOurs own fanfic webpage]].

to:

* Page descriptions and examples that are copied verbatim from other sites, even if it's from the troper troper's [[Administrivia/TheFicMayBeYoursButTheTropePageIsOurs own fanfic webpage]].



* Comment out the copied text and put the URL of the page you've found it's from as the edit reason.

to:

* Comment out the copied text and put the URL of the page you've found where it's from as the edit reason.



* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve the edit]] if necessary, then send the Grammar notifier from the page's History by explaining why the spelling is wrong and also ask them to consult with the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Help With English]] thread. Edit War / Rudeness routine may kick in depending on response.
* Check up on them some time later. If they continue to edit with improper English, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make the ATT query with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up the edits. Ask the troper in PM to come to the thread, in case they could say something.

to:

* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve the edit]] if necessary, then send the Grammar notifier from the page's History by explaining why the spelling is wrong and also ask them to consult with the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Get Help With English]] English Here]] thread. The Edit War / Rudeness routine may kick in in, depending on their response.
* Check up on them some time later. If they continue to edit with improper English, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make the ATT query with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up the edits. Ask the troper in a PM to come to the thread, in case they could say something.wish to respond.



* Troper not working with their own drafts' discussions and suggestions.

to:

* Troper not working with their own drafts' draft's discussions and suggestions.



* Making a bad first draft is something expected. Politely bring up anything you can think of to improve the draft. Get attention of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=mrrv0lfphb29fvme6ofumrj0 TLP workstation]] thread for additional help.
* It's not recommended, but it is ''acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a Work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed right away". Please, let the troper read [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.

to:

* Making a bad first draft is something expected. Politely bring up anything you can think of to improve the draft. Get the attention of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=mrrv0lfphb29fvme6ofumrj0 TLP workstation]] thread for additional help.
* It's not recommended, but it It is ''acceptable'' ''completely acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a Work work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed right away". Please, let the troper read the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.



* Questions in the ATT like "is that correct?", "where can I find?" or "does anyone know?".

to:

* Questions in the ATT like "is "Is that correct?", "where "Where can I find?" or "does "Does anyone know?".



* Encourage the troper to read the relevant Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also ask to elaborate their questions in the future if they weren't clear.

to:

* Encourage the troper to read the relevant Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also ask them to elaborate their questions in the future if they weren't clear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by an oversight of TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history.

to:

** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug caused by an oversight of TV Tropes not recognizing those characters as valid username digits which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history. You'll know if the username is bugged if the troper's profile page has the following header highlighted in red text: "'''Sorry, the groupname and title must start with a letter and cannot contain special characters.'''"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug that doesn't support those characters and breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that, check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history.

to:

** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug that doesn't support caused by an oversight of TV Tropes not recognizing those characters and as valid username digits which breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that, that (ex: ''[=5Troper_Username=]''), check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Grammar check (part 2)


* To address a troper in a post: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are posting in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) creates a PM for them to check the post they are mentioned in. Paging does not work in ATT due to a bug.

to:

* To address a troper in a post: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are posting in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) creates a PM for them to check the post they are mentioned in. Paging does not work in ATT queries due to a bug.



* To put it briefly, if the same troper ''reverts to their previous edit'' that was edited by someone else.
* If an edit was repeated by a third party and not the same troper, it's not an Edit War ''yet'', consider talking to all parties to settle the dispute.
* If both tropers repeated their edits, they are '''both''' Editwaring.
* Removing someone's edit without an edit reason is not an Edit War ''yet''. If you feel it was wrongly removed, PM the troper that removed it and await their respone before anything else, and if you're unsatisfied, ask in an appropriate forum.
* If the edit was modified by the orginal troper, depending on how much and if the problem with the previous edit is gone, it may count or may not.

to:

* To put it briefly, if the same troper ''reverts to their previous edit'' that edit'', which was edited by someone else.
else. (Troper A -> Troper B -> Troper A)
* If an the edit of the first troper was repeated by a third party and not the same troper, it's technically not an Edit War ''yet'', War, but consider talking to all parties involved to settle the dispute.
* If both tropers have repeated their edits, they are '''both''' Editwaring.
* Removing someone's edit without an edit reason is not an Edit War ''yet''. If you feel it your edit was wrongly removed, PM the troper that who removed it and await their respone response before doing anything else, and if you're else. If you still feel unsatisfied, ask in an appropriate forum.
forum.
* If the edit was modified revised by the orginal troper, depending on how much has changed, and if the problem with the previous edit is gone, still remains, it may count as Edit War or it may not.



* Title the ATT query something like ''Edit War: page name'' or ''Possible Edit War: page name'' if you're unsure.
* Include the links to offending troper's two or more repetetive edits and any relevant edits by other tropes in between.
* Add any relevant information you may find useful, like troper's similar edits on other pages, or any correspondance you two had, if any.
* PM the offending troper by clicking the "Send Message" near the edit message or on their profile page. Invite them to a talk in the ATT involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that they really haven't been paying attention to the edit history and "considered it strange" that their example disappeared. Note that Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.

to:

* Title Name the new ATT query something like ''Edit War: page name'' name'', or ''Possible Edit War: page name'' if you're unsure.
* Include the links to offending the troper's two or more repetetive repetitive edits and any relevant in-between edits by other tropes in between.
tropes.
* Add any relevant information you may find that could be useful, like troper's similar edits on other pages, or any correspondance you two had, if any.
* PM the offending troper by clicking the "Send Message" in the History page near the edit message or on their edit or at troper's profile page. Invite them to a talk in the ATT query involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that they really haven't been paying attention to the edit history and have "considered it strange" that their example has disappeared. Note that Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.



* If you notice someone's edits are very similar to edits of someone who's been brought up in ATT and suspended. They may have registered under a new name to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if they don't violate anything else'', the person under a suspension '''is not allowed to edit at all'''.
* A suspended troper directly asking someone else to edit or PM others on their behalf. Per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], this is not allowed either even outside forums. Tropes that are edit-banned but not forum-banned can still use appropriate forums to suggest edits, however.

to:

* If you notice someone's Someone's edits are being very similar to the edits of someone who's a troper, who has been brought up in ATT before and was suspended. They may have registered under a new name username to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if they don't violate anything else'', the person haven't broken other tules'', tropers under a suspension '''is '''are not allowed to edit at all'''.
* A suspended troper directly asking someone else to edit or PM others message on their behalf. Per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], this is not allowed either either, even outside of the forums. Tropes that who are edit-banned but not forum-banned can still use appropriate forums to suggest edits, however.



* Check the forum and edit activity for both suspected accounts. If the second one was inactive until the first one was suspended, it's almost guaranteed to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both account have been around for a while, it may be a coincidence or they may be cooperating.
* '''Do not message suspected ban evadors. Do not ask them any questions.'''
* Make an ATT query with a header like "Possible Ban Evader." Bring up a comparison of edits between two tropers, and also any information that you find relevant.
* If the similarities are too glaring, no further action is needed, just wait for the mod to do the ip-address check and make a decision.
* If the mod can't tell anything decisive after the check, message the second troper with the invite the ATT and ask why they have similar edits as a suspended troper. If the correlation is not confirmed, ask to settle the disputes elsewhere.
* If the mod suspends the second troper, request the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] to undo the edits of a sockpuppet. To iterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'' regardless if there's an issue with them. They can be re-added with a different wording after a discussion with the thread.

to:

* Check the forum and edit activity activities for both suspected accounts. of the suspicious tropers. If the second one was has been inactive until the first one was got suspended, it's almost guaranteed to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both account accounts have been around for a while, it may be a coincidence the similarities are either coincidental or they may have been be cooperating.
* '''Do not message suspected ban evadors.evaders. Do not ask them any questions.'''
* Make an the ATT query with a header the title like "Possible Ban Evader." Bring up a comparison of Evader". Compare the edits between two tropers, and also add any information that you find relevant.
* If the similarities are too glaring, then no further action discussion is needed, just required. Just wait for the mod to do perform the ip-address check and them to make a decision.
* If the mod can't tell say anything decisive after the check, message the second troper with the invite to the ATT and ask ATT, so they can comment on why they have edits similar edits as a to the suspended troper. troper's edits. If the correlation is not confirmed, ask to settle the disputes elsewhere.
if there are other problems with their eidts, they can be addressed in private or in another query.
* If the mod suspends the second troper, request ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] to undo the edits of a the sockpuppet. To iterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'' principle'', regardless if there's an issue there are other issues with them. They The edits can be re-added with a different wording after a the discussion with the thread.thread, if necessary.



* Replacing an existing image without the approval of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=images IP]] ("Changed w/o discussion"), especially when the previous one already has an IP comment. The Mod replaces images ''themself when the replacement thread is closed''.
* Replacing a low quality image with the HD version of the same image is usually not a violation, but it would be best if [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1560893280064589300 Artifacts R Us]] was notified beforehand.
* Adding an image without a discussion to a page that doesn't have an image is not a violation. Except:
** Pages that are marked as Administrivia/ImagePickinSpecialCases require a discussion, and a very good image suggestion.
** Spoiler images on pages that aren't Administrivia/SpoilersOff subpages are not allowed.
** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample fit the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Rely on text too much), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]]. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.

to:

* Replacing an existing image without the approval of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=images IP]] ("Changed w/o discussion"), especially when the previous one image already has an the IP comment.comment (check the page source). The Mod replaces images ''themself when the replacement thread is closed''.
* Replacing a low quality image with the HD version of the same image is usually not considered a violation, but it would be for the best if to ask [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1560893280064589300 Artifacts R Us]] was notified beforehand.
* Adding an image Adding, without a discussion discussion, an image to a page that doesn't have an image one is not considered a violation. Except:
With the exceptions:
** Pages that are marked as Administrivia/ImagePickinSpecialCases require a discussion, and discussion. And a very good image suggestion.
** Spoiler images on pages that aren't are not considered Administrivia/SpoilersOff subpages are not allowed.
allowed. Ask around if you're not sure they are considered Administrivia/SpoilersOff.
** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample fit illustrate the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Rely on Use too much text too much), in the image or caption), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]].copyrighted]] are nopt allowed. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.



* Bring up the page that has a violating image to the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 IP]], prefebly bringing up who made the change and what was the old image, if there was one. This is ''not an ATT problem'', unless the troper systematically replaces images or adds bad images.
* Check the edit history for the troper who put a violating image, they may have done so somewhere else as well.
* Do nothing else. The mod will pull the images when they notice them.

to:

* Bring up the page that has a violating problematic image to the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 IP]], prefebly bringing up preferably also mentioning who made the change and what have they've changed, if the image was the old image, if there was one. replaced. This is ''not considered an ATT problem'', unless the troper systematically replaces images or adds bad images.
* Check the edit history for of the troper who put a violating problematic image, they may have done so somewhere else as well.
* Do nothing else. The Wait for the mod will to pull the images when they notice them.them, if necessary.



* Removing large portions of text from pages without an approval or edit reason.
* Adding text with obviously false information, [[Administrivia/ConversationInTheMainPage personal comment]], [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit lewd comment]], [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining]], or [[Administrivia/FirstPersonWriting breaking the speech style]].
* Multiple editors going back and forth with edits on the same page without getting into straight Administrivia/EditWar.

to:

* Removing large portions of text from pages without an approval or an edit reason.
* Adding text with obviously blatantly false information, [[Administrivia/ConversationInTheMainPage personal comment]], comments]], [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit lewd comment]], comments]], [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining]], or [[Administrivia/FirstPersonWriting breaking the speech style]].
* Multiple editors going back and forth with their edits on the same page without page, though not getting into a straight Administrivia/EditWar.



* Use the "Report Page" button in the side bar or bring the page in ATT while bringing up relevant edits.
* ''Don't message tropes'' that are deliberataly harm pages.
* Check the edit history of the guilty parties for any other problems.
* If the page keeps getting "heat", ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17 Lock Page]] thread to freeze the page, it may be getting outside attention because of a trending topic.
* Ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200 Complaining cleanup]] thread if there's anything else that should be removed.

to:

* Use the "Report Page" button in at the side bar bar, or bring the page up in the ATT while bringing up linking the relevant edits.
* ''Don't message tropes'' that are who deliberataly harm pages.
* Check the edit history histories of the guilty parties for any other problems.
* If the page keeps getting attracting "heat", ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17 Lock Page]] Locked Pages]] thread to freeze the page, it may could be getting outside the attention because of a trending topic.
* Ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200 Complaining cleanup]] Cleanup]] thread if there's anything else that should be removed.



* A private message that is insulting, overly snarky, or too personal.
* Ditto for edit reasons, forum posts and discussions. Note that [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem coversing in edit reasons]] is not allowed by either side.

to:

* A private message Private Message that is insulting, overly snarky, or too personal.
* Ditto Same for edit reasons, forum posts and discussions. Note discussion posts. Note, that [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem coversing conversing in the edit reasons]] is not allowed by the either side.



* Ask them the troper to stop and tell why. If they apologize and don't do it again, it's up to you if that's considered resolved. If they continue, '''stop interacting with them'''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM is not allowed'', this applies outside the forums as well. The mods have a tool to see messages of any user, they'll know what are you refering to.
* Bring up the offending troper in the ATT, summarize in a few words what's wrong, and what actions preceeded these messages.
* Create the query as private. Since it's a problem between two tropers, no peanut gallery is necessary.

to:

* Ask them the troper to stop and tell add why. If they apologize and don't do it again, then it's up to you if that's considered resolved. good enough. If they continue, do continue to act rude, '''stop interacting with them'''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM is not allowed'', this applies outside to other parts of the forums website as well. The mods have a tool to see the messages of any user, they'll know what are you refering to.
troper, they can check them if necessary.
* Bring up the offending troper in the ATT, summarize in a few couple of words what's wrong, how rude are them messages and what actions preceeded these messages.
them.
* Create the query as private."private". Since it's a problem between two tropers, no peanut gallery is necessary.



* Read each article for specifics.

to:

* Read each article for the specifics.



* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve or remove the edit]], then use "Send Message" from the page history and use the appropriate notifier type.
* Depending on their reaction, the Edit War or Rudeness guidelines may kick in.
* Check after a few hours their edit history. If they still show no understanding of how to edit the pages, make an ATT with bringing up problematic edits and summon them to it. You may further explain how and how not to write examples until the mods arrive.
* Collaborate with appropriate cleanup threads to fix the pages if there's too much to edit.

to:

* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve or remove the edit]], edits]] that clearly don't follow the rules, then use "Send Message" button from the page history and use page's History with the appropriate notifier type.
* Depending on their the troper's reaction, the Edit War or Rudeness guidelines procedures may kick in.
* Check after a few hours their edit history. If they still show no understanding of how to edit the pages, make an the ATT query with bringing up problematic edits and summon them bring the troper to it. You may explain further explain how and how not to write examples until the mods arrive.
* Collaborate with the appropriate cleanup threads to fix the pages if there's too much to edit.fix.



* Page descriptions and examples that are copied from another website, even if the troper is that page's [[Administrivia/TheFicMayBeYoursButTheTropePageIsOurs fanfic owner]].
** Translations are a grey area, but if the troper is working with another language, they're more than capable of rephrasing the text.
* Refer to Reporting Images for copyrighted photos and comics that are "mostly borrowed" without permission.

to:

* Page descriptions and examples that are copied verbatim from another website, other sites, even if it's from the troper is that page's [[Administrivia/TheFicMayBeYoursButTheTropePageIsOurs own fanfic owner]].
webpage]].
** Translations are a grey area, but if the troper is working can work with another language, they're they should be more than capable of rephrasing the text.
* Refer to Reporting Images case for copyrighted photos and comics that are "mostly borrowed" used without permission.



* Comment out the text and put the URL of the page you've found it's taken from as edit reason.

to:

* Comment out the copied text and put the URL of the page you've found it's taken from as the edit reason.



* If they can't or won't do it, try working with the text yourself, and if you can't, ask [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=14727740310A09919300 Copypaste cleanup]] what to do with the text and with the troper.

to:

* If they can't or won't do it, try working with ask the text yourself, and if you can't, ask [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=14727740310A09919300 Copypaste cleanup]] about what to do should be done with the text and with the troper.



* Systematically replacing one spelling with another when Administrivia/AmericanAndCommonwealthSpellings and Administrivia/BluenoseBowdlerizer say not to.

to:

* Systematically replacing one acceptable type of spelling with another when Administrivia/AmericanAndCommonwealthSpellings and Administrivia/BluenoseBowdlerizer say ask not to.



* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve the edit]], then use "Send Message" from the page history by explaining why the spelling is wrong and also ask them to consult with [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Help With English]] thread. Edit War / Rudeness guidelines may kick in on response.
* Check on them some time later. If they continue to edit with bad English, a poorly spelt example is as bad as a wrong example, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make an ATT with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up edits with poor grammar. Ask the troper in PM to come to the thread in case they want to say something.

to:

* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve the edit]], edit]] if necessary, then use "Send Message" send the Grammar notifier from the page history page's History by explaining why the spelling is wrong and also ask them to consult with the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Help With English]] thread. Edit War / Rudeness guidelines routine may kick in depending on response.
* Check up on them some time later. If they continue to edit with bad improper English, a poorly spelt example is as bad as a wrong example, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make an the ATT query with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up edits with poor grammar. the edits. Ask the troper in PM to come to the thread thread, in case they want to could say something.



* Stub trope drafts (no description / examples).
* Not working with own drafts discussions / suggestions.

to:

* Stub trope drafts (no drafts, lacking description / examples).
or examples.
* Not Troper not working with their own drafts drafts' discussions / and suggestions.



* Making a bad first draft is something expected. Politely bring up everything you can think of to improve the draft up to a standard. Get attention from / to [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=mrrv0lfphb29fvme6ofumrj0 TLP workstation]] for additional help.
* It's not recommended, but it's ''acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a Work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed right away". Please, let the troper read [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] and cooperate with them if you can.
* If a trope has launched (visible on the main page) when it had some lingering problems, or launched by someone who isn't the draft's current owner, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13544789560A75740100 bring it here]] for it to be sent back.
* When someone makes multiple "concept" drafts and doesn't work on them, they clutter the TLP queue. They, and their drafts, should be brought to ATT for a talk.

to:

* Making a bad first draft is something expected. Politely bring up everything anything you can think of to improve the draft up to a standard. draft. Get attention from / to of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=mrrv0lfphb29fvme6ofumrj0 TLP workstation]] thread for additional help.
* It's not recommended, but it's it is ''acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a Work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed right away". Please, let the troper read [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] thread and cooperate with them if you can.
* If a trope has is launched (visible (it's visible on the main page) page or at [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/launches.php recent launches]]) when it had there were some lingering problems, or it's launched by someone who isn't is not the draft's current owner, bring the page to the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13544789560A75740100 bring it here]] TLP Crash Course]] thread for it to be sent back.
* When someone a troper makes multiple "concept" drafts and doesn't work on them, them further, they only clutter the TLP queue. They, and their drafts, should be brought to the ATT for a talk.



* Questions in ATT like "is that correct", "where can I find" or "does anyone know".

to:

* Questions in the ATT like "is that correct", correct?", "where can I find" find?" or "does anyone know".know?".



* [[Administrivia/TVTropesCustoms Don't be a smartass]], everyone was a newbie at some point.
* Post a link to the appropriate place.
* Don't answer the question if you can't come with the answer right away.
* Encourage the troper to read appropriate Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also to elaborate their questions in the future if it didn't sound clear clear.

to:

* [[Administrivia/TVTropesCustoms Don't be a smartass]], everyone was has been a newbie at some point.
* Post a link to the appropriate place.
place for these questions.
* Don't answer the question if you can't come up with the an answer right away.
* Encourage the troper to read appropriate the relevant Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also ask to elaborate their questions in the future if it didn't sound clear they weren't clear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixing problematic spelling I can think of (part 1)


Here are the suggestions for finding and reporting problematic tropers to AskTheTropers (ATT). These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, as well as making the job of moderators easier.

Note: We can't and won't enforce these as guidelines, it's only to help making reports more concise and clear.

to:

Here Here, are the some suggestions for finding and reporting problematic tropers and reporting them to AskTheTropers (ATT). (ATT), if necessary. These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, as well as and making the job of moderators easier.

easier as well.

Note: We can't and won't enforce these as guidelines, it's this page is here only to help making reports more concise and clear.



* Rule-breaking is not arguable, it either did happen or didn't. If you're reporting rulebreaking, it doesn't matter who's example is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', ''then'' the editing can continue.
** If you're not reporting rulebreaking, but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond improve it]]. And there are better places to resolve disputes, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT as a ''last-resort measure''.
* Don't comment to reports ''unless it involves you or you can append'' or elaborate the report. Off-topic comments or discussions of troper's personality without new evidence of a problem is called [[Administrivia/TVTropesGlossary Popcorning]] and will annoy the mods.
** Getting angry, coming up with own or someone else's personal flaws and poor grammar are quick signs that someone can't keep a constructive conversation.
** Don't threaten other tropers with a ban or ask to ban specific tropers (Minimodding). It's for mods to decide, ''no jurors''.
** If the troper goess heywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. It's better to keep track on their edits and do cleanup after they're being dealt with, then everyone jumping in Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed troper.
* ''Don't PM the mods'' unless it's really urgent. Mods monitor the ATT and their forums of choice as part of their duties when they get online, they will respond to reports if needed ''eventually''. If the query didn't get a development in over a day and the issue persists, make a "Bump" comment to bring it to the top of ATT.
** Don't comment to reports that were resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). If a similar issue appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one for reference.
** Don't ask to lock the thread unless it's developing into a FlameWar. If the issue is resolved, it will be obvious by looking, just let the query get buried in the queue.
* SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages with a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of that, who ignores Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and think their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] than what the pages had. Talking to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', as they clearly have a certain intent to not follow common decency.

to:

* Rule-breaking The rule-breaking is not arguable, it either did happen or it didn't. If you're reporting rulebreaking, a rule-breaking, it doesn't matter who's which example is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', ''then'' the editing can continue.
** If you're not reporting rulebreaking, rule-breaking, but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond go improve it]]. And there are better places to resolve disputes, small disputes than ATT, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT as a ''last-resort measure''.
the ''measure of last-resort''.
* Don't comment to reports in a report ''unless it involves you you, or you can append'' or elaborate the report. Off-topic comments or discussions of troper's personality personality, without new evidence of a problem is problem, are called [[Administrivia/TVTropesGlossary Popcorning]] and will annoy the mods.
** Getting angry, coming up with own or someone else's personal flaws and poor grammar are quick signs that someone can't keep up a constructive conversation.
** Don't threaten other tropers with a ban or ask to ban specific tropers (Minimodding). It's (Mini-modding). It is for mods to decide, ''no jurors''.
jurors needed''.
** If the troper goess heywire goes haywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. It's better to keep track an eye on their edits and do a cleanup after they're being dealt with, then than everyone jumping in Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed troper.
* ''Don't PM the mods'' unless it's really urgent. Mods monitor the ATT and their forums of choice as part of their duties regularly when they get online, they will respond to reports if needed ''eventually''. If the query didn't get a any development in over a day and the issue still persists, make a "Bump" comment to bring it to the top of the ATT.
** Don't comment to reports that were have been resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). If a similar issue appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one for as reference.
** Don't ask to lock the thread query unless it's developing escalating into a FlameWar. If the issue is resolved, it will should be obvious by looking, looking at it, just let the query get buried in the queue.
* SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers tropers, who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages with involving a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of that, it, a troper who ignores Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and think thinks their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] valuable]], than what the pages had. have. Talking to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', as they clearly have show a certain intent to not follow common decency.
site's customs.



* Addressing the troper: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) will create a PM for them to check the post they're mentioned on. Paging does not work in ATT due to a bug.
** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug that doesn't support those characters and breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that, request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history.
* Bringing up troper's edit history: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=TroperUsername TroperUsername's Edit History]]=]''.
* Bringing up specific edits: From the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note, if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it as it's hidden by the Show All button. Append "&more=t" after the pagename, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.
* Bringing up troper's forum activity: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/forum_troper_posts.php?fortroper=TroperUsername]]=]'' (can be useful to check if they were invited to Suspension Appeal before).
* Bringing up a forum post: copy the link from the timestamp to the right of the post, or click on it and copy the URL, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200&page=3#comment-54]]=]''
* Bringing up troper's page discussion activity: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/comment_activity.php?t=TroperUsername
* Main dispute forums: [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 Image Picking (IP)]], [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 Is This An Example?]], [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Get Help With English Here]]. Some specific tropes (especially YMMV) are moderated by the designated cleanup threads.
* List of policy pages: {{Administrivia}}.
* Contacting a specific moderator: Administrivia/KnowTheStaff.

to:

* Addressing the troper: To address a troper in a post: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are posting in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) will create creates a PM for them to check the post they're they are mentioned on.in. Paging does not work in ATT due to a bug.
** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug that doesn't support those characters and breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that, check their profile by clicking on their username, or request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history.
* Bringing up To link troper's edit history: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=TroperUsername TroperUsername's Edit History]]=]''.
* Bringing up To link specific edits: From the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note, that if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it, as it as it's is hidden by the Show All button. Append If so, append "&more=t" after the pagename, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.
* Bringing To look up troper's forum activity: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/forum_troper_posts.php?fortroper=TroperUsername]]=]'' (can be useful to check if they were have been invited to Suspension Appeal before).
* Bringing up To link a forum post: copy Copy the link from the timestamp to the right of the post, or click on it and copy the URL, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200&page=3#comment-54]]=]''
* Bringing To look up troper's page discussion activity: https://tvtropes.''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/comment_activity.php?t=TroperUsername
php?t=TroperUsername]]=]''
* Main dispute forums: [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 Image Picking (IP)]], [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 Is This An Example?]], [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Get Help With English Here]]. Some specific tropes (especially YMMV) are moderated by the designated cleanup threads.
* List The list of policy pages: {{Administrivia}}.
* Contacting To contact a specific moderator: Administrivia/KnowTheStaff.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Do note, however, that certain usernames that begin with a number or have an underscore (_) cannot be linked properly. This is due to a bug that doesn't support those characters and breaks the linking functionality, leading to dead links. If the troper you want to report has a username like that, request a mod for assistance in citing their editing and posting history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[/folder]]

to:

[[/folder]][[/folder]]
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Refer to [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16360739690A32406300 this discussion]].
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Here are the suggestions for finding and reporting problematic tropers to AskTheTropers (ATT). These are meant to discourage tropers from cluttering the ATT with unnecessary commentary and non-issues, as well as making the job of moderators easier.

Note: We can't and won't enforce these as guidelines, it's only to help making reports more concise and clear.

[[folder:General tips]]
* Rule-breaking is not arguable, it either did happen or didn't. If you're reporting rulebreaking, it doesn't matter who's example is more correct. The problem should be addressed ''first'', ''then'' the editing can continue.
** If you're not reporting rulebreaking, but you consider an edit problematic, [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond improve it]]. And there are better places to resolve disputes, like in Private Messages (PM) and forums. Consider AAT as a ''last-resort measure''.
* Don't comment to reports ''unless it involves you or you can append'' or elaborate the report. Off-topic comments or discussions of troper's personality without new evidence of a problem is called [[Administrivia/TVTropesGlossary Popcorning]] and will annoy the mods.
** Getting angry, coming up with own or someone else's personal flaws and poor grammar are quick signs that someone can't keep a constructive conversation.
** Don't threaten other tropers with a ban or ask to ban specific tropers (Minimodding). It's for mods to decide, ''no jurors''.
** If the troper goess heywire and starts vandalizing or throwing insults, '''don't engage'''. It's better to keep track on their edits and do cleanup after they're being dealt with, then everyone jumping in Administrivia/EditWar against one non-disarmed troper.
* ''Don't PM the mods'' unless it's really urgent. Mods monitor the ATT and their forums of choice as part of their duties when they get online, they will respond to reports if needed ''eventually''. If the query didn't get a development in over a day and the issue persists, make a "Bump" comment to bring it to the top of ATT.
** Don't comment to reports that were resolved recently (Gravedancing) or a while ago (Necromancy). If a similar issue appears, ''make a new report'' and link the old one for reference.
** Don't ask to lock the thread unless it's developing into a FlameWar. If the issue is resolved, it will be obvious by looking, just let the query get buried in the queue.
* SingleIssueWonk in ATT refers to tropers who have a noticeable pattern to their edits, like mass-editing pages with a specific topic. "Agenda-Based Troper" is a variant of that, who ignores Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment and think their [[PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad opinion]] on a controversial topic is [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs more valuable]] than what the pages had. Talking to these people is '''generally considered pointless''', as they clearly have a certain intent to not follow common decency.

!! Quick tools:
* Addressing the troper: ''[=Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]''. If you are in a forum, ''[=@Tropers/{{TroperUsername}}=]'' (Paging) will create a PM for them to check the post they're mentioned on. Paging does not work in ATT due to a bug.
* Bringing up troper's edit history: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=TroperUsername TroperUsername's Edit History]]=]''.
* Bringing up specific edits: From the page's History tab, navigate to the edit and copy the link from the timestamp at the top-right corner of the post. Note, if the edit is not recent, using the link won't show it as it's hidden by the Show All button. Append "&more=t" after the pagename, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Administrivia.TropesNeedingTRS&more=t#edit30413004]]=]''.
* Bringing up troper's forum activity: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/forum_troper_posts.php?fortroper=TroperUsername]]=]'' (can be useful to check if they were invited to Suspension Appeal before).
* Bringing up a forum post: copy the link from the timestamp to the right of the post, or click on it and copy the URL, ex: ''[=[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200&page=3#comment-54]]=]''
* Bringing up troper's page discussion activity: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/comment_activity.php?t=TroperUsername
* Main dispute forums: [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 Image Picking (IP)]], [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 Is This An Example?]], [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Get Help With English Here]]. Some specific tropes (especially YMMV) are moderated by the designated cleanup threads.
* List of policy pages: {{Administrivia}}.
* Contacting a specific moderator: Administrivia/KnowTheStaff.
[[/folder]]
----
[[foldercontrol]]

[[folder:Reporting editwaring]]
Main article: Administrivia/EditWar
!! What counts?
* To put it briefly, if the same troper ''reverts to their previous edit'' that was edited by someone else.
* If an edit was repeated by a third party and not the same troper, it's not an Edit War ''yet'', consider talking to all parties to settle the dispute.
* If both tropers repeated their edits, they are '''both''' Editwaring.
* Removing someone's edit without an edit reason is not an Edit War ''yet''. If you feel it was wrongly removed, PM the troper that removed it and await their respone before anything else, and if you're unsatisfied, ask in an appropriate forum.
* If the edit was modified by the orginal troper, depending on how much and if the problem with the previous edit is gone, it may count or may not.
!! Steps to take:
* Title the ATT query something like ''Edit War: page name'' or ''Possible Edit War: page name'' if you're unsure.
* Include the links to offending troper's two or more repetetive edits and any relevant edits by other tropes in between.
* Add any relevant information you may find useful, like troper's similar edits on other pages, or any correspondance you two had, if any.
* PM the offending troper by clicking the "Send Message" near the edit message or on their profile page. Invite them to a talk in the ATT involving them. Rarely, but it does happen, that they really haven't been paying attention to the edit history and "considered it strange" that their example disappeared. Note that Edit Wars are still rarely pardoned.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting ban evaders]]
Main article: Administrivia/WhatToDoIfYouAreSuspended
!! What counts?
* If you notice someone's edits are very similar to edits of someone who's been brought up in ATT and suspended. They may have registered under a new name to continue editing (Sockpuppeting). Even ''if they don't violate anything else'', the person under a suspension '''is not allowed to edit at all'''.
* A suspended troper directly asking someone else to edit or PM others on their behalf. Per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], this is not allowed either even outside forums. Tropes that are edit-banned but not forum-banned can still use appropriate forums to suggest edits, however.
!! Steps to take:
* Check the forum and edit activity for both suspected accounts. If the second one was inactive until the first one was suspended, it's almost guaranteed to be a sockpuppet. On the other hand, if both account have been around for a while, it may be a coincidence or they may be cooperating.
* '''Do not message suspected ban evadors. Do not ask them any questions.'''
* Make an ATT query with a header like "Possible Ban Evader." Bring up a comparison of edits between two tropers, and also any information that you find relevant.
* If the similarities are too glaring, no further action is needed, just wait for the mod to do the ip-address check and make a decision.
* If the mod can't tell anything decisive after the check, message the second troper with the invite the ATT and ask why they have similar edits as a suspended troper. If the correlation is not confirmed, ask to settle the disputes elsewhere.
* If the mod suspends the second troper, request the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16091187550A68598200 Ban Evader Reversion Thread]] to undo the edits of a sockpuppet. To iterate, edits by ban evaders are ''reverted on principle'' regardless if there's an issue with them. They can be re-added with a different wording after a discussion with the thread.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting image violation]]
Main article: Administrivia/HowToPickAGoodImage
!! What counts?
* Replacing an existing image without the approval of the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/conversations.php?topic=images IP]] ("Changed w/o discussion"), especially when the previous one already has an IP comment. The Mod replaces images ''themself when the replacement thread is closed''.
* Replacing a low quality image with the HD version of the same image is usually not a violation, but it would be best if [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1560893280064589300 Artifacts R Us]] was notified beforehand.
* Adding an image without a discussion to a page that doesn't have an image is not a violation. Except:
** Pages that are marked as Administrivia/ImagePickinSpecialCases require a discussion, and a very good image suggestion.
** Spoiler images on pages that aren't Administrivia/SpoilersOff subpages are not allowed.
** Images that are [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit NSFW]], don't [[ThisImageIsNotAnExample fit the page]] ("Does Not Illustrate" / Administrivia/JustAFaceAndACaption / Rely on text too much), [[Sandbox/ArtifactsRUs hard to see]] or [[Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright copyrighted]]. "Better than nothing" is not how things work.
!! Steps to take:
* Bring up the page that has a violating image to the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100 IP]], prefebly bringing up who made the change and what was the old image, if there was one. This is ''not an ATT problem'', unless the troper systematically replaces images or adds bad images.
* Check the edit history for the troper who put a violating image, they may have done so somewhere else as well.
* Do nothing else. The mod will pull the images when they notice them.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting vandalism]]
Main article: WikiVandal, FlameWar, Administrivia/LockedPages
!! What counts?
* Removing large portions of text from pages without an approval or edit reason.
* Adding text with obviously false information, [[Administrivia/ConversationInTheMainPage personal comment]], [[Administrivia/TheContentPolicyAndThe5PCircuit lewd comment]], [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining]], or [[Administrivia/FirstPersonWriting breaking the speech style]].
* Multiple editors going back and forth with edits on the same page without getting into straight Administrivia/EditWar.
!! Steps to take:
* Use the "Report Page" button in the side bar or bring the page in ATT while bringing up relevant edits.
* ''Don't message tropes'' that are deliberataly harm pages.
* Check the edit history of the guilty parties for any other problems.
* If the page keeps getting "heat", ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17 Lock Page]] thread to freeze the page, it may be getting outside attention because of a trending topic.
* Ask the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327578050A72722200 Complaining cleanup]] thread if there's anything else that should be removed.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting rudeness]]
Main article: Administrivia/TVTropesCustoms
!! What counts?
* A private message that is insulting, overly snarky, or too personal.
* Ditto for edit reasons, forum posts and discussions. Note that [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem coversing in edit reasons]] is not allowed by either side.
!! Steps to take:
* Ask them the troper to stop and tell why. If they apologize and don't do it again, it's up to you if that's considered resolved. If they continue, '''stop interacting with them'''.
* As per [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=365rl6gt9w6vijv1envyi76j forum rules]], ''sharing the contents of your PM is not allowed'', this applies outside the forums as well. The mods have a tool to see messages of any user, they'll know what are you refering to.
* Bring up the offending troper in the ATT, summarize in a few words what's wrong, and what actions preceeded these messages.
* Create the query as private. Since it's a problem between two tropers, no peanut gallery is necessary.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting poor editing style]]
Main articles: Administrivia/TextFormattingRules, Administrivia/HowToWriteAnExample, Administrivia/ConversationInTheMainPage, Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists, Administrivia/ImagesInWikiPages, Administrivia/FirstPersonWriting, Administrivia/ThreadMode, Administrivia/WordCruft, Administrivia/ZeroContextExample, Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike.
!! What counts?
* Read each article for specifics.
!! Steps to take:
* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve or remove the edit]], then use "Send Message" from the page history and use the appropriate notifier type.
* Depending on their reaction, the Edit War or Rudeness guidelines may kick in.
* Check after a few hours their edit history. If they still show no understanding of how to edit the pages, make an ATT with bringing up problematic edits and summon them to it. You may further explain how and how not to write examples until the mods arrive.
* Collaborate with appropriate cleanup threads to fix the pages if there's too much to edit.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting plagiarism]]
Main article: Administrivia/AboutImagesAndCopyright
!! What counts?
* Page descriptions and examples that are copied from another website, even if the troper is that page's [[Administrivia/TheFicMayBeYoursButTheTropePageIsOurs fanfic owner]].
** Translations are a grey area, but if the troper is working with another language, they're more than capable of rephrasing the text.
* Refer to Reporting Images for copyrighted photos and comics that are "mostly borrowed" without permission.
!! Steps to take:
* Comment out the text and put the URL of the page you've found it's taken from as edit reason.
* Sent the Plagiarism notifier to the troper who added it and ask them to rephrase it ''in their own words''.
* If they can't or won't do it, try working with the text yourself, and if you can't, ask [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=14727740310A09919300 Copypaste cleanup]] what to do with the text and with the troper.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting poor grammar]]
Main article: TipsOnGrammar
!! What counts?
* When the troper seems to have trouble with English, basic or not.
* Systematically replacing one spelling with another when Administrivia/AmericanAndCommonwealthSpellings and Administrivia/BluenoseBowdlerizer say not to.
!! Steps to take:
* [[Administrivia/RepairDontRespond Improve the edit]], then use "Send Message" from the page history by explaining why the spelling is wrong and also ask them to consult with [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=b9tcd2k65789p1pglrd92nvr Help With English]] thread. Edit War / Rudeness guidelines may kick in on response.
* Check on them some time later. If they continue to edit with bad English, a poorly spelt example is as bad as a wrong example, they're just creating more mess to clean up. Make an ATT with a title like "Poor Grammar: Tropername" and bring up edits with poor grammar. Ask the troper in PM to come to the thread in case they want to say something.
* Wait for the mod. They will likely restrict their editing access until they pass a few tests in the mentioned thread.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Reporting Trope Launch Pad violations]]
Main article: Administrivia/TLPGuidelines
!! What counts?
* Stub trope drafts (no description / examples).
* Not working with own drafts discussions / suggestions.
* Rogue Launching.
!! Steps to take:
* Making a bad first draft is something expected. Politely bring up everything you can think of to improve the draft up to a standard. Get attention from / to [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=mrrv0lfphb29fvme6ofumrj0 TLP workstation]] for additional help.
* It's not recommended, but it's ''acceptable'' to use TLP to draft a Work page. Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch does not mean "if TLP draft is a Work page, it should be launched / bombed right away". Please, let the troper read [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15946606200A77250100 New Work Page Workshop]] and cooperate with them if you can.
* If a trope has launched (visible on the main page) when it had some lingering problems, or launched by someone who isn't the draft's current owner, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13544789560A75740100 bring it here]] for it to be sent back.
* When someone makes multiple "concept" drafts and doesn't work on them, they clutter the TLP queue. They, and their drafts, should be brought to ATT for a talk.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Replying to typically non-ATT questions]]
Main articles: Administrivia/WelcomeToTVTropes, Administrivia/WhatGoesWhereOnTheWiki, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13287249110A49840100 What Goes Where On The Forums]], TropeFinder, YouKnowThatShow, QueryBugs, Administrivia/ThisIsAWiki, [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100 Is This An Example?]], Administrivia/WorksPagesAreAFreeLaunch.
!! What counts?
* Questions in ATT like "is that correct", "where can I find" or "does anyone know".
!! Steps to take:
* [[Administrivia/TVTropesCustoms Don't be a smartass]], everyone was a newbie at some point.
* Post a link to the appropriate place.
* Don't answer the question if you can't come with the answer right away.
* Encourage the troper to read appropriate Administrivia pages if you think their knowledge is lacking, and also to elaborate their questions in the future if it didn't sound clear clear.
[[/folder]]

Top