Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / UnreliableNarrator

Go To

OR

Added: 354

Changed: 549

Removed: 199

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Lampshaded twice in ''HarryPotter/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone'' (HarryPotter has the hero as third-person narrator, except in first chapter in some books): in Gringotts, the narration tells the path in full of stalactites and stalagmites, then Harry confesses he can't tell the difference between them. Later: "Perhaps it was Harry's imagination, after all he'd heard about Slytherin, but he thought they looked like an unpleasant lot."

to:

* Lampshaded twice in ''HarryPotter/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone'' (HarryPotter ''Literature/HarryPotter'' has the hero as third-person narrator, except in first chapter in some books): books:
** Lampshaded twice in ''Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone'':
in Gringotts, the narration tells the path in full of stalactites and stalagmites, then Harry confesses he can't tell the difference between them. Later: "Perhaps it was Harry's imagination, after all he'd heard about Slytherin, but he thought they looked like an unpleasant lot."



** Throughout the series, Harry's narration describes Pansy Parkinson, the AlphaBitch, as ugly. When Pansy is quoted in one of Rita Skeeter's articles, Rita calls her "pretty and vivacious". It's possible Rita was lying as she is prone to do, but it's also possible that Harry sees Pansy as ugly because he hates her. Or perhaps it's both and actually Pansy is just average-looking.
*** Also, Draco Malfoy seems to have a fling with Pansy (during their school years at least). With his typical arrogance, would he go for, and want to be seen with, an ugly girl? Or even a plain one?

to:

** Throughout the series, Harry's narration describes Pansy Parkinson, the AlphaBitch, as ugly. When Pansy is quoted in one of Rita Skeeter's articles, Rita calls her "pretty and vivacious". It's possible Rita was lying as she is prone to do, but it's also possible that Harry sees Pansy as ugly because he hates her. Or perhaps it's both and actually Pansy is just average-looking.
***
average-looking. Also, Draco Malfoy seems to have a fling with Pansy (during their school years at least). With his typical arrogance, would he go for, and want to be seen with, an ugly girl? Or even a plain one?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Even though Website/{{Update}} is a work that is simply the retelling of life experiences from the perspective of the protagonist, much of the information given is clearly not fully correct or telling the whole story, with how frequently it's inconsistent or contradictory, and has been proven at some cases to be flat out false. Determining how much of the story is being told, and how much of it is accurate is up to the reader's interpretation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RonPerlman lies like a rug in the opening narration of ''VideoGame/{{Fallout 3}}'', claiming that the PlayerCharacter was born in Vault 101, that the Vault's door has never been opened since the Great War, and that no one ever enters or leaves the Vault. All of these things are swiftly proven false: the PC and his/her father are immigrants to the Vault, files on the Overseer's office computer document an expedition to scout the nearby landscape, and conversation with several citizens of Megaton indicate that there have been at least two previous successful escapes in recent memory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The reasoning behind the actions of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmet_Ali_A%C4%9Fca Mehmet Ali AÄŸca]], who shot Pope John Paul II in an extremely convoluted and complex assassination plot, remains a mystery in no small part due to AÄŸca's repeated inconsistent testimonies about who was behind the whole thing. He has claimed the involvement of everyone from the [[DirtyCommunists Bulgarian secret police]] to the CIA to Ayatollah Khomeini to [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking another Catholic archbishop]]. Talk about ''unreliable''...

to:

* The reasoning behind the actions of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmet_Ali_A%C4%9Fca Mehmet Ali AÄŸca]], Agca]], who shot Pope John Paul II in an extremely convoluted and complex assassination plot, remains a mystery in no small part due to AÄŸca's repeated inconsistent testimonies about who was behind the whole thing. He has claimed the involvement of everyone from the [[DirtyCommunists Bulgarian secret police]] to the CIA to Ayatollah Khomeini to [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking another Catholic archbishop]]. Talk about ''unreliable''...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Alan Bennet's ''[[AlanBennettsTalkingHeads Talking Heads]]'' series of monologues is built on this trope. Each narrator tries to tell their story to their own advantage, but we can see through their facade to see the real story. For example, 'Her Big Chance' features Julie Walters as a woman who thinks she's a highly professional actress but we get enough hints to see that she is anything but (for example whenever she says a line, the director tells her it might be silent). She also appears to have no idea that she's acting in a soft-core porn movie for the German market.

to:

* Alan Bennet's ''[[AlanBennettsTalkingHeads ''[[Series/AlanBennettsTalkingHeads Talking Heads]]'' series of monologues is built on this trope. Each narrator tries to tell their story to their own advantage, but we can see through their facade to see the real story. For example, 'Her Big Chance' features Julie Walters as a woman who thinks she's a highly professional actress but we get enough hints to see that she is anything but (for example whenever she says a line, the director tells her it might be silent). She also appears to have no idea that she's acting in a soft-core porn movie for the German market.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In three books of ''TheDresdenFiles'' so far, Harry's narration is made unreliable by various magical influences. The first is in ''Dead Beat,'' when [[spoiler:Lasciel's shadow in ''Dead Beat'' appears to him repeatedly in the form of "Sheila," a bookstore employee who doesn't actually exist]]. The second is in ''Small Favor'', in which [[spoiler:Mab takes his blasting rod (his weapon of choice in the series up to that point) and places a mental block which prevents him from even thinking about it or fire magic - only when another character draws attention to the blasting rod's absence does Harry (and the reader) realize something is wrong]]. The third instance is revealed in ''Ghost Story'': [[spoiler:in the previous novel, after deciding to become the Winter Knight, Harry set up his own assassination and then had Molly wipe his memory of doing so in order to keep Mab from becoming aware of it]].

to:

* In three books of ''TheDresdenFiles'' so far, Harry's narration is made unreliable by various magical influences. The first is in ''Dead Beat,'' when [[spoiler:Lasciel's shadow in ''Dead Beat'' which [[spoiler:the psychic imprint that the fallen angel Lasciel left in his mind appears to him repeatedly in the form of "Sheila," a bookstore employee who doesn't actually exist]]. The second is in ''Small Favor'', in which [[spoiler:Mab takes his blasting rod (his weapon of choice in the series up to that point) and places a mental block which prevents him from even thinking about it or fire magic - only when another character draws attention to the blasting rod's absence does Harry (and the reader) realize something is wrong]]. The third instance is revealed in ''Ghost Story'': [[spoiler:in the previous novel, after deciding to become the Winter Knight, Harry set up his own assassination and then had Molly wipe his memory of doing so in order to keep Mab from becoming aware of it]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In three books of ''TheDresdenFiles'' so far, Harry's narration is made unreliable by various magical influences. The first is in ''Dead Beat,'' when [[spoiler:Lasciel's shadow in ''Dead Beat'' appears to him repeatedly in the form of "Sheila," a bookstore employee who doesn't actually exist]]. The second is in ''Small Favor'', in which [[spoiler:Mab takes his blasting rod (his weapon of choice in the series up to that point) and places a mental block which prevents him from even thinking about it or fire magic]]. The third instance is revealed in ''Ghost Story'': [[spoiler:in the previous novel, after deciding to become the Winter Knight, Harry set up his own assassination and then had Molly wipe his memory of doing so in order to keep Mab from becoming aware of it]].

to:

* In three books of ''TheDresdenFiles'' so far, Harry's narration is made unreliable by various magical influences. The first is in ''Dead Beat,'' when [[spoiler:Lasciel's shadow in ''Dead Beat'' appears to him repeatedly in the form of "Sheila," a bookstore employee who doesn't actually exist]]. The second is in ''Small Favor'', in which [[spoiler:Mab takes his blasting rod (his weapon of choice in the series up to that point) and places a mental block which prevents him from even thinking about it or fire magic]].magic - only when another character draws attention to the blasting rod's absence does Harry (and the reader) realize something is wrong]]. The third instance is revealed in ''Ghost Story'': [[spoiler:in the previous novel, after deciding to become the Winter Knight, Harry set up his own assassination and then had Molly wipe his memory of doing so in order to keep Mab from becoming aware of it]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting a title
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting a title


** "Seven American Days" may be the height of this trope in Wolfe's oeuvre. First, the author of the travelogue that makes up the story states at one point that he altered the text for fear of it being read by the American secret police. Second, the author placed some hallucinogen into a candy egg, then mixed up the eggs so he wouldn't know which one was the real one. Then he ate a single egg every night. That means that at least one of his nights of experiences could have been a hallucination. And one of the eggs got stolen, so it was ''also'' possible the none of the nights were a hallucination. Finally, at the end of the story, [[spoiler: the author of the travelogue's mother, who had been the one reading it (along with his fiancee), calls into question the veracity of the handwriting. So it's possible the entire thing is a forgery, or at the very least important parts.]]

to:

** "Seven American Days" Nights" may be the height of this trope in Wolfe's oeuvre. First, the author of the travelogue that makes up the story states at one point that he altered the text for fear of it being read by the American secret police. Second, the author placed some hallucinogen into a candy egg, then mixed up the eggs so he wouldn't know which one was the real one. Then he ate a single egg every night. That means that at least one of his nights of experiences could have been a hallucination. And one of the eggs got stolen, so it was ''also'' possible the none of the nights were a hallucination. Finally, at the end of the story, [[spoiler: the author of the travelogue's mother, who had been the one reading it (along with his fiancee), calls into question the veracity of the handwriting. So it's possible the entire thing is a forgery, or at the very least important parts.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Franchise/EverAfterHigh'' suffers from this, mostly because there are two narrators who [[LikeAnOldMarriedCouple constantly criticize how the other tells the story.]] One favouring the Royals (female) and the other the Rebels (male) doesn't help.

Added: 785

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''FanFic/HomeWithTheFairies'' downplays this. Maddie is not trying to lie, but her misunderstandings affect the narration, especially in the early chapters, when the LanguageBarrier is still a major problem. For example, Maddie visits the town of Fornost, but it might not be Fornost; Maddie later uses the name "maybe-not-Fornost". Then in chapter 13, Maddie believes that Lord Kinsey will fire her if "gossip gets out", but this might not be true; perhaps Lord Kinsey is smart enough to know that the gossip is false. A [[WordOfGod writer's note]] on chapter 14 declares Maddie as an unreliable narrator.



* Some members of the ''ForBetterOrForWorse'' {{Hatedom}} point out that a lot of events are communicated to the readers by having one character tell another, such that we get this information second or even third hand. This treatment is notably applied to Anthony's ex-wife, Therese - the audience sees very little of her, and almost everything we know about her is communicated by other characters when she's not present. As a result some question just how accurate the portrayal of Therese as an evil harpy really is.

to:

* Some members of the ''ForBetterOrForWorse'' ''ComicStrip/ForBetterOrForWorse'' {{Hatedom}} point out that a lot of events are communicated to the readers by having one character tell another, such that we get this information second or even third hand. This treatment is notably applied to Anthony's ex-wife, Therese - the audience sees very little of her, and almost everything we know about her is communicated by other characters when she's not present. As a result some question just how accurate the portrayal of Therese as an evil harpy really is.


Added DiffLines:

* ''ComicStrip/TomTheDancingBug'' parodies this in one strip. The narration obviously does not match what we see in each comic panel. At the end, Billy Dare kills the narrator.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''BigFinishDoctorWho'' audio And The Pirates'' is told by Evelyn and the Doctor. Evelyn gets many of the facts wrong and is caught making up names on the spot, such as "John Johnson" and "Tom Thompson". She even initially says the Doctor died mere minutes after saying he'll be around to tell more of the story. Parts are told out of order, and all the sailors have the same voice because she can't impersonate them well. The Doctor's version of events is much more accurate but suspiciously full of characters complementing his unorthodox wardrobe.

to:

* ''BigFinishDoctorWho'' ''AudioPlay/BigFinishDoctorWho'' audio And The Pirates'' is told by Evelyn and the Doctor. Evelyn gets many of the facts wrong and is caught making up names on the spot, such as "John Johnson" and "Tom Thompson". She even initially says the Doctor died mere minutes after saying he'll be around to tell more of the story. Parts are told out of order, and all the sailors have the same voice because she can't impersonate them well. The Doctor's version of events is much more accurate but suspiciously full of characters complementing his unorthodox wardrobe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Literature/ThievesWorld'' SharedUniverse used this as a way of dealing with [[ContinuitySnarl continuity errors]] between the many authors who wrote for it. A preface framing story has an old man explaining to a new arrival to the city of [[WretchedHive Sanctuary]] that one should not believe everything in the stories one hears, as everyone spins the stories to fit their agendas, to make themselves sound more important in a good story, or less to blame in a bad one, and two people telling the same story may have wildly different variations.



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WordOfGod states that Delios of ''ThreeHundred'' is an UnreliableNarrator; all of the supposed inconsistencies with actual history are actually bare-faced ''lies'', with Delios stretching the truth about who did what and how many there were. This naturally justifies the comic's explicit use of RuleOfCool and RefugeInAudacity.

to:

* WordOfGod states that Delios of ''ThreeHundred'' is an UnreliableNarrator; unreliable narrator; all of the supposed inconsistencies with actual history are actually bare-faced ''lies'', with Delios stretching the truth about who did what and how many there were. This naturally justifies the comic's explicit use of RuleOfCool and RefugeInAudacity.



* ''VisualNovel/HigurashiNoNakuKoroNi'' fanfic ''FanFic/CicadasCaseOfTheEndlessDreamer'' is [[UnreliableNarrator Unreliable Narration]] '''[[UpToEleven HE]][[MindScrew LL]]!'''

to:

%% * ''VisualNovel/HigurashiNoNakuKoroNi'' fanfic ''FanFic/CicadasCaseOfTheEndlessDreamer'' is [[UnreliableNarrator Unreliable Narration]] unreliable narration '''[[UpToEleven HE]][[MindScrew LL]]!'''



* ''Film/BigFish'' has an unusual take on the UnreliableNarrator, in that [[spoiler:the flashback stories are assumed to be pure fiction for most of the movie and the twist is that the father may actually be more reliable than was thought. The appearance of the twins, Giant, and Ringmaster at the father's funeral clearly leaves the son reeling as he reassesses his father's stories for where exactly they diverged from the truth. The reality is only slightly skewed from his stories, i.e., the Siamese twins are actually just regular twins from Siam, the giant is a 7'6" man, and so on.]]

to:

* ''Film/BigFish'' has an unusual take on the UnreliableNarrator, unreliable narrator, in that [[spoiler:the flashback stories are assumed to be pure fiction for most of the movie and the twist is that the father may actually be more reliable than was thought. The appearance of the twins, Giant, and Ringmaster at the father's funeral clearly leaves the son reeling as he reassesses his father's stories for where exactly they diverged from the truth. The reality is only slightly skewed from his stories, i.e., the Siamese twins are actually just regular twins from Siam, the giant is a 7'6" man, and so on.]]



* ''MonsterAGoGo'' has the ultimate UnreliableNarrator. [[spoiler:Whaddaya mean there was no monster, beauzeau?]]

to:

* ''MonsterAGoGo'' has the ultimate UnreliableNarrator.unreliable narrator. [[spoiler:Whaddaya mean there was no monster, beauzeau?]]



* The children's book ''Literature/TheStinkyCheeseMan and Other Fairly Stupid Tales'' combines an UnreliableNarrator with NoFourthWall: First, Jack the Narrator spoils the ending of "Little Red Running Shorts", prompting the characters from that story to quit in disgust. Then, Jack's narration of his own story, "Jack's Bean Problem" is immediately interrupted by the premature arrival of the Giant. When the Giant threatens to eat Jack if he can't tell a better story, Jack launches into a recursive story in which the Giant threatens to eat him if he can't tell a better story, so Jack launches into a recursive story in which the Giant threatens to eat him if he can't tell a better story. The giant also says that even if Jack tells a better story, he'll still eat him anyway (ho, ho, ho), leading to the looping story.

to:

* The children's book ''Literature/TheStinkyCheeseMan and Other Fairly Stupid Tales'' combines an UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator with NoFourthWall: First, Jack the Narrator spoils the ending of "Little Red Running Shorts", prompting the characters from that story to quit in disgust. Then, Jack's narration of his own story, "Jack's Bean Problem" is immediately interrupted by the premature arrival of the Giant. When the Giant threatens to eat Jack if he can't tell a better story, Jack launches into a recursive story in which the Giant threatens to eat him if he can't tell a better story, so Jack launches into a recursive story in which the Giant threatens to eat him if he can't tell a better story. The giant also says that even if Jack tells a better story, he'll still eat him anyway (ho, ho, ho), leading to the looping story.



* ''Literature/AnInstanceOfTheFingerpost'' has several narrators, all of whom are various varieties of UnreliableNarrator. One is insane, one is a xenophobe who imputes his own nasty motives on to others, one is relatively accurate except where his own identity is concerned, and one is actually a nice guy, but whose perceptions are shaped by the prejudices of the time.

to:

* ''Literature/AnInstanceOfTheFingerpost'' has several narrators, all of whom are various varieties of UnreliableNarrator.unreliable narrator. One is insane, one is a xenophobe who imputes his own nasty motives on to others, one is relatively accurate except where his own identity is concerned, and one is actually a nice guy, but whose perceptions are shaped by the prejudices of the time.



* Several times, Greg seems to be treated as a ButtMonkey in ''DiaryOfAWimpyKid''. However; numerous times, he's actually being a bit of a JerkAss himself. This is one of the examples in which the UnreliableNarrator is actually played for laughs.

to:

* Several times, Greg seems to be treated as a ButtMonkey in ''DiaryOfAWimpyKid''. However; numerous times, he's actually being a bit of a JerkAss himself. This is one of the examples in which the UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator is actually played for laughs.



* ''Literature/DonQuixote'' is one UnreliableNarrator telling a story received from another UnreliableNarrator to the point that you simply can't know if any of the story really ever happened or is all just fantasy. It gets even funnier when you take into account the non-canon "sequel" that was written by a different author before Cervantes finished the second part.\\

to:

* ''Literature/DonQuixote'' is one UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator telling a story received from another UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator to the point that you simply can't know if any of the story really ever happened or is all just fantasy. It gets even funnier when you take into account the non-canon "sequel" that was written by a different author before Cervantes finished the second part.\\



* Creator/HPLovecraft's stories are usually narrated from a first-person point of view by said stories' main characters. The unreliability of the narrators may range from becoming increasingly maddened as the narration progresses to seemingly sane persons questioning their own sanity and the quality of their recollections as they recall a horrific experience they lived through. Lovecraft also had a penchant for having some of his stories' narrators narrating from mental asylums. In ''The Temple'', the narrator is a German submarine commander in WorldWarI, who steadfastly refuses to believe in anything supernatural, and instead he's sure that he went insane and became an UnreliableNarrator. Lovecraft loved (no pun intended) to play the Refuge In Insanity card when his characters faced an EldritchAbomination or related supernatural phenomenon. One could say that a lot of his stories can be a form of this Aesop: "If you ever see the Truth, run. For it has many tentacles."

to:

* Creator/HPLovecraft's stories are usually narrated from a first-person point of view by said stories' main characters. The unreliability of the narrators may range from becoming increasingly maddened as the narration progresses to seemingly sane persons questioning their own sanity and the quality of their recollections as they recall a horrific experience they lived through. Lovecraft also had a penchant for having some of his stories' narrators narrating from mental asylums. In ''The Temple'', the narrator is a German submarine commander in WorldWarI, who steadfastly refuses to believe in anything supernatural, and instead he's sure that he went insane and became an UnreliableNarrator.unreliable narrator. Lovecraft loved (no pun intended) to play the Refuge In Insanity card when his characters faced an EldritchAbomination or related supernatural phenomenon. One could say that a lot of his stories can be a form of this Aesop: "If you ever see the Truth, run. For it has many tentacles."



** Heinlein could be said to be the UnreliableNarrator of his own life: for decades fans accepted, without question, his assertion that "Life-Line" was the first work of fiction he'd written ([[Literature/ForUsTheLivingAComedyOfCustoms it wasn't]]) and that he'd written it for a contest (he hadn't).

to:

** Heinlein could be said to be the UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator of his own life: for decades fans accepted, without question, his assertion that "Life-Line" was the first work of fiction he'd written ([[Literature/ForUsTheLivingAComedyOfCustoms it wasn't]]) and that he'd written it for a contest (he hadn't).



** And in the whole saga, were the Slytherin really mostly bad guys, or do they look like it because Harry is an UnreliableNarrator? The debate is far from over.

to:

** And in the whole saga, were the Slytherin really mostly bad guys, or do they look like it because Harry is an UnreliableNarrator? unreliable narrator? The debate is far from over.



* In ''Gilligan's Wake'' (by Tom Carson), all the narrators have a trace of this, but the Professor takes the cake. For one thing, he commits [[spoiler:serial rape]] but his narcissism convinces him that this an act of generosity to his inferiors (who are, naturally, grateful). For another thing, he ends the story believing that [[spoiler:he, like every other American, is a {{kaiju}}]]: it is strongly implied that he is really [[spoiler:completely out of touch with reality, and living on the street]]. He is so confused and forgetful at this point that it retroactively turns the detailed, if slanted, nature of the preceding narrative into a very odd mixture of UnreliableNarrator and implausibly InfallibleNarrator.

to:

* In ''Gilligan's Wake'' (by Tom Carson), all the narrators have a trace of this, but the Professor takes the cake. For one thing, he commits [[spoiler:serial rape]] but his narcissism convinces him that this an act of generosity to his inferiors (who are, naturally, grateful). For another thing, he ends the story believing that [[spoiler:he, like every other American, is a {{kaiju}}]]: it is strongly implied that he is really [[spoiler:completely out of touch with reality, and living on the street]]. He is so confused and forgetful at this point that it retroactively turns the detailed, if slanted, nature of the preceding narrative into a very odd mixture of UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator and implausibly InfallibleNarrator.



* ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'' started off occasionally playing with this, but has used the device increasingly often as it progressed. Unusually, it is not because Future Ted is lying ''per se'' (at least, not often - there are some instances of outright lies), but because of ordinary memory lapses (having a character named Blah Blah because he can't recall her name), subjective interpretation of ordinary events (showing Robin's forty-something date as elderly), or sanitizing the story for his children (using "I'm getting too old for this ''stuff''" instead of "shit".). The few times he tells us things that seem to defy reality (such as Lily and Marshall escaping their own party by jumping out the window, or having high school athletes and a ''Film/TeenWolf'' on a kindergarten basketball team), he {{Hand Wave}}s it by saying that's all he heard about it. In short, if there is a way to exploit the potential of an UnreliableNarrator for comedic purposes, it's been done on ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'' at some point.

to:

* ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'' started off occasionally playing with this, but has used the device increasingly often as it progressed. Unusually, it is not because Future Ted is lying ''per se'' (at least, not often - there are some instances of outright lies), but because of ordinary memory lapses (having a character named Blah Blah because he can't recall her name), subjective interpretation of ordinary events (showing Robin's forty-something date as elderly), or sanitizing the story for his children (using "I'm getting too old for this ''stuff''" instead of "shit".). The few times he tells us things that seem to defy reality (such as Lily and Marshall escaping their own party by jumping out the window, or having high school athletes and a ''Film/TeenWolf'' on a kindergarten basketball team), he {{Hand Wave}}s it by saying that's all he heard about it. In short, if there is a way to exploit the potential of an UnreliableNarrator unreliable narrator for comedic purposes, it's been done on ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'' at some point.



* About half of season 3 of ''RedVsBlue'' is about the time traveling adventures of Church as he repeatedly is thrown back in time by a bomb, teleports to Blood Gulch with the help of a friendly AI, and tries to avert his death, Tex's death, the bomb going off, and any number of other past problems. It's all to no avail, however, as he fails to achieve anything. Turns out Church was an unwitting UnreliableNarrator... he was never being thrown back in time, it was all a torture scenario run by the AI, who was himself an unreliable narrator, lying to Church (and the dirty shisnos in the audience) about everything from the timeline to his own origins.

to:

* About half of season 3 of ''RedVsBlue'' is about the time traveling adventures of Church as he repeatedly is thrown back in time by a bomb, teleports to Blood Gulch with the help of a friendly AI, and tries to avert his death, Tex's death, the bomb going off, and any number of other past problems. It's all to no avail, however, as he fails to achieve anything. Turns out Church was an unwitting UnreliableNarrator...unreliable narrator... he was never being thrown back in time, it was all a torture scenario run by the AI, who was himself an unreliable narrator, lying to Church (and the dirty shisnos in the audience) about everything from the timeline to his own origins.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Reams of paper have been written on the narrative technique used in ''TheBrothersKaramazov'', which ostensibly makes the narrator out to be a resident of the town, even placing him physically at certain events. It's clear, however, that he knows more than an observer could possibly know, and there are disturbing stretches of the narrative in which the narrator is completely absent, dissolved into the perspective of the characters. This becomes a problem when one character starts [[TheDevil speaking with things that probably aren't there]], and the critical reader will start to wonder about other times this character supposedly heard things. The real kicker though? The points at which the narrator's reliability are questioned are ''[[MindScrew pivotal moments in the book]]'', moments that affect your understanding of everything that has happened up till then.

to:

* Reams of paper have been written on the narrative technique used in ''TheBrothersKaramazov'', ''Literature/TheBrothersKaramazov'', which ostensibly makes the narrator out to be a resident of the town, even placing him physically at certain events. It's clear, however, that he knows more than an observer could possibly know, and there are disturbing stretches of the narrative in which the narrator is completely absent, dissolved into the perspective of the characters. This becomes a problem when one character starts [[TheDevil speaking with things that probably aren't there]], and the critical reader will start to wonder about other times this character supposedly heard things. The real kicker though? The points at which the narrator's reliability are questioned are ''[[MindScrew pivotal moments in the book]]'', moments that affect your understanding of everything that has happened up till then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Very well done in the ''VisualNovel/HigurashiNoNakuKoroNi'' manga-only arc ''Onisarashi-hen''. In the final chapter, it's revealed that the point-of-view character [[spoiler:is responsible for every murder in the story]].

to:

* Very well done in the ''VisualNovel/HigurashiNoNakuKoroNi'' ''VisualNovel/HigurashiWhenTheyCry'' manga-only arc ''Onisarashi-hen''. In the final chapter, it's revealed that the point-of-view character [[spoiler:is responsible for every murder in the story]].



** The narrator in ''VisualNovel/UminekoNoNakuKoroNi'' (or the camera, in the anime) is pretty much the queen of this trope. Pretty much anything the main character doesn't see with his own eyes is highly suspect, at best. Halfway in, and it's ''still'' unclear if the series is a genuine mystery or merely a massive MindScrew, since [[spoiler:Beatrice is narrating most of the third-person sections and writing the TIPS.]] This may only apply to what's happening on the game board, since [[spoiler: message bottles were found which depicted the events on the island of the first two episodes, but apparently didn't mention the metaworld segments.]]
** At the end of EP 8, we learn that the whole series (except possibly the first two episodes) [[MindScrew might consist of]] [[spoiler:stories that Battler wrote/collaborated on to help him regain his memories of that fateful weekend]]. Before that, however, Umineko was a MindScrew of ''epic'' proportions, largely because it had ''dueling'' unreliable narrators.

to:

** The narrator in ''VisualNovel/UminekoNoNakuKoroNi'' ''VisualNovel/UminekoWhenTheyCry'' (or the camera, in the anime) is pretty much the queen of this trope. Pretty much anything the main character doesn't see with his own eyes is highly suspect, at best. Halfway in, and it's ''still'' unclear if the series is a genuine mystery or merely a massive MindScrew, since [[spoiler:Beatrice is narrating most of the third-person sections and writing the TIPS.]] This may only apply to what's happening on the game board, since [[spoiler: message bottles were found which depicted the events on the island of the first two episodes, but apparently didn't mention the metaworld segments.]]
** At the end of EP 8, we learn that the whole series (except possibly the first two episodes) episodes, which may have been written by [[spoiler:Yasu]]) [[MindScrew might consist of]] [[spoiler:stories that Battler wrote/collaborated on to help him regain his memories of that fateful weekend]]. Before that, however, Umineko was a MindScrew of ''epic'' proportions, largely because it had ''dueling'' unreliable narrators.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Also Marmot sounds similar to the Greek Word for ant, making this more understandable.

Changed: 263

Removed: 442

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed a duplicate entry.


* All of the world background in White Wolf's OldWorldOfDarkness is presented in this way. This is most notable in the clanbooks/tribebooks etc. Each Vampire clan tells a different version of history in which their own clan is somehow older, smarter and generally more awesome than all the others.

to:

* All of the world background in White Wolf's OldWorldOfDarkness is presented in this way. Each book. This is most notable in the clanbooks/tribebooks etc. Each Vampire clan splatbooks: each faction tells a different version of history in which their own clan faction is somehow older, smarter smarter, and generally more awesome than all the others.others. Each game line had its own creation myths filtered through the interpretations and prejudices of whatever faction is the focus of the book you're reading and most are mutually exclusive.



* Indie storytelling game The Adventures of Baron Munchausen makes every player into an unreliable narrator, and has specific mechanics governing how players can challenge the veracity of each others' tales.

to:

* Indie storytelling game The ''The Adventures of Baron Munchausen Munchausen'' makes every player into an unreliable narrator, and has specific mechanics governing how players can challenge the veracity of each others' tales.



* The First and Early Second Edition Sourcebooks of the ''LegendOfTheFiveRings'' RPG were all written from the subjective in-universe point of view of the Clan or Faction that was the primary focus of the book. This was done both for flavor and to give the GM the freedom to decide what was true and what wasn't in his campaign. This approach was eventually abandoned during the Second Edition because WizardsOfTheCoast [[ViewersAreMorons thought it was too confusing]] for d20 players.
* Games and Sourcebooks from the Old World of Darkness games are like this. For example, the base rulebook on vampire and the Sabbat sourcebook both have contradictory representations of what is going on and the text of the rules represents both as The Truth. This continues with every book that is added. Werewolves, Mages, Changeling, Wraith, the various sourcebooks all present things as The Truth that can't all be true in the same world.

to:

* The First first and Early Second Edition Sourcebooks early second edition sourcebooks of the ''LegendOfTheFiveRings'' RPG were all written from the subjective in-universe point of view of the Clan clan or Faction faction that was the primary focus of the book. This was done both for flavor and to give the GM the freedom to decide what was true and what wasn't in his campaign. This approach was eventually abandoned during the Second Edition second edition because WizardsOfTheCoast [[ViewersAreMorons thought it was too confusing]] for d20 players.
* Games and Sourcebooks from the Old World of Darkness games are like this. For example, the base rulebook on vampire and the Sabbat sourcebook both have contradictory representations of what is going on and the text of the rules represents both as The Truth. This continues with every book that is added. Werewolves, Mages, Changeling, Wraith, the various sourcebooks all present things as The Truth that can't all be true in the same world.
players.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''BubbaHoTep''. The stories Elvis and JFK share about themselves and how they ended up in a Texas nursing home are VERY speculative and unreliable.

to:

* ''BubbaHoTep''.''Film/BubbaHoTep''. The stories Elvis and JFK share about themselves and how they ended up in a Texas nursing home are VERY speculative and unreliable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added an example

Added DiffLines:

* Hagar Shipley (formally Currie) from Margaret Laurence's "A Stone Angel" fits the bill in that she is a very proud, cynical woman. It can be very difficult to discern whether she is exaggerating about somebody or if the negative attributes she applies to someone is all in her head.
** Lottie is a girl Hagar grows up with, and often Hagar will dismiss her as a nobody. She also assumes that when Lottie makes a comment about her, it is meant in a derogatory manner.
** Hagar describes her husband as a low-class slob who is lazy and not worth her respect; insight into Bram's character, however, can reveal that Hagar drove him to drink.

Added: 337

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Rather common in TheSlenderManMythos. Examples on the wiki include [[WebVideo/MarbleHornets J]] and [[Blog/DreamsInDarkness Damien]] [[spoiler:in no small part thanks to his multiple personalities]]. A possible example (via AlternativeCharacterInterpretation) would be [[spoiler:[[Blog/SeekingTruth Zeke Strahm]], according to the final entry in the blog.]]

to:

* Rather common in TheSlenderManMythos.Franchise/TheSlenderManMythos. Examples on the wiki include [[WebVideo/MarbleHornets J]] and [[Blog/DreamsInDarkness Damien]] [[spoiler:in no small part thanks to his multiple personalities]]. A possible example (via AlternativeCharacterInterpretation) would be [[spoiler:[[Blog/SeekingTruth Zeke Strahm]], according to the final entry in the blog.]]


Added DiffLines:

** The girls of ''Webvideo/OneHundredYardStare'' manage to subvert this trope and being worse by it. They tell the story as it happened from their point of view. [[spoiler:''Why'' they made the series is the true reveal. They are spreading the infection in the hope to divert the monsters attention, how do you feel being Slender bait?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This trope is an excellent summary of ''VideoGame/{{Touhou}}''. Each of the various routes in the games (depicting different characters or even the same character experiencing similar, slightly altered events) are ''all canon'' simultaneously. The universe compendiums are written by a reporter who hasn't even heard of journalistic integrity, a historian relying almost entirely on conjecture and second-hand reports, and an insane thief. Even [[WordOfGod ZUN himself]] is prone to [[FlipFlopOfGod blatant contradictions]], [[TeasingCreator messing with the fans]] and [[LyingCreator outright lying]]. Inevitably, the {{Fanon}} is truly massive.

to:

* This trope is an excellent summary of ''VideoGame/{{Touhou}}''. Each of the various routes in the games (depicting different characters or even the same character experiencing similar, slightly altered events) are ''all canon'' simultaneously. The universe compendiums are written by a reporter who hasn't even heard of journalistic integrity, a racist historian relying almost entirely on conjecture and second-hand reports, reports with a massive dislike of the local youkai populace and an insane thief.who readily accepts bribes to smear and stroke egos, and a hyperactive thief obsessed with explosions. Even [[WordOfGod ZUN himself]] is prone to [[FlipFlopOfGod blatant contradictions]], [[TeasingCreator messing with the fans]] and [[LyingCreator outright lying]]. Inevitably, the {{Fanon}} is truly massive.

Added: 309

Changed: 318

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RobertAHeinlein's ''Literature/TimeEnoughForLove'' is a (sort of) autobiography of immortal(?) Lazarus Long. Long himself states in the book that some of the details may or may not be true. A later book, ''Literature/ToSailBeyondTheSunset'', has the lead character state out right that Lazarus had lied all through the book.

to:

* RobertAHeinlein's Creator/RobertAHeinlein:
**
''Literature/TimeEnoughForLove'' is a (sort of) autobiography of immortal(?) Lazarus Long. Long himself states in the book that some of the details may or may not be true. A later book, ''Literature/ToSailBeyondTheSunset'', has the lead character state out right that Lazarus had lied all through the book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added an example from Strange Aeons

Added DiffLines:

** Arron of ''WebVideo/StrangeAeons'' could possibly be this as well. Very suspicious that he claimed to not be able to see the clips randomly in his videos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Likewise, his account of why he lost a swimming race is stated to be at the very least exaggerated, when his friend mutters that last time he heard the story, there were less sea monsters in it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note: as this is often a particularly subversive [[TheReveal Reveal]], '''REALLY BIG spoilers''' ahead, especially in the Literature section. See also RashomonStyle, RashomonEpisode, TheMouthOfMadness and UnreliableVoiceover.

to:

Note: as this is often a particularly subversive [[TheReveal Reveal]], '''REALLY BIG spoilers''' ahead, especially in the Literature section. See also RashomonStyle, RashomonEpisode, TheMouthOfMadness and UnreliableVoiceover.


* The first half of Elizabeth Wein's WorldWarII novel ''CodeNameVerity'' is told entirely through the written confession of an Allied agent to her Nazi captors. Unsurprisingly, she's not giving them (or us) the full story...

to:

* The first half of Elizabeth Wein's WorldWarII novel ''CodeNameVerity'' ''Literature/CodeNameVerity'' is told entirely through the written confession of an Allied agent to her Nazi captors. Unsurprisingly, she's not giving them (or us) the full story...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The first half of Elizabeth Wein's WorldWarII novel ''Codename: Verity'' is told entirely through the written confession of an Allied agent to her Nazi captors. Unsurprisingly, she's not giving them (or us) the full story...

to:

* The first half of Elizabeth Wein's WorldWarII novel ''Codename: Verity'' ''CodeNameVerity'' is told entirely through the written confession of an Allied agent to her Nazi captors. Unsurprisingly, she's not giving them (or us) the full story...

Top