Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TheBigListOfBooboosAndBlunders

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Most women keep their draws in drawers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***"Maroon" is also term referring to runaway slaves and ethnic groups that originated with runaway slaves[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maroon_(people)]], in addition to a color. Eastern Kentucky University had to change the name of its sports team from "The Maroons" (maroon is one of the school colors) to "The Colonels" as a direct result of this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Similarly, "pause" (see above) vs. "pose" (staying still for a photograph or a painting)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Who loves me? He loves me. I love whom? I love him.

to:

** Who loves me? whom? [[HoYay He loves me. I love whom? I love him.him]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "who" (subjective pronoun) vs. "whom" (objective pronoun); few people know when to use "whom" and thus default to "who" for all cases. A simple way to remember which is appropriate is to substitute the "who" with "he" or "him". If "he" sounds correct, use "who"; if "hi'''m'''" sounds correct, use "who'''m'''".
** Who loves me? He loves me. I love whom? I love him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Error correction

Added DiffLines:

** No, it isn't. It's "less-ay fair". What you said means "prejudice do!". [[YouFailLinguisticsForever And French doesn't have a nasal R.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The plural of "penis" is "penises" (or "penes" if you're a real stickler for the Latin). It's not the same as the singular, nor is it "penii" or any variation on that, no matter how much funnier that construction is.[[hottip:note:If you must know, the '-ii' pluralization only works for words that end in '-ius'. You can have a single Toyota Prius or multiple Toyota Prii, but if you have penii ''or'' a penus you should really consult your doctor.]]

to:

* The plural of "penis" is "penises" (or "penes" if you're a real stickler for the Latin). It's not the same as the singular, nor is it "penii" or any variation on that, no matter how much funnier that construction is.[[hottip:note:If you must know, the '-ii' '-i' pluralization only works for words that end in '-ius'.'-us' (thus '-ii' is only the correct plural ending if the singular ends in '-ius'). You can have a single Toyota Prius or multiple Toyota Prii, but if you have penii ''or'' a penus you should really consult your doctor.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[http://cardhaus.com/images/db2-en246.jpg Or vice versa.]] Pharaonic Guardian was a dark time for ''YuGiOh!'' fans.

to:

** [[http://cardhaus.com/images/db2-en246.jpg Or vice versa.]] Pharaonic Guardian was a dark time for ''YuGiOh!'' ''[=~Yu-Gi-Oh!~=]'' fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And then there's "allay", which means to put at ease.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I possess corrections


** This treatment of plural possessives is not consistent, varying depending on the grammar and style guide used. Many will have all plural possessives that end in 's' be pluralized by simply adding an apostrophe -- thus, "dogs' toys," "clouds' shapes," or "James' party." Irregular plurals ending in letters other than 's' are pluralized by adding "'s" to the end -- thus, "women's clothing," "people's choice," or "octopi's tentacles." This method seems to be falling out of favor though, replaced by the "always 's" method.
** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" -- they are referred to as "its" possessions, not "it's" possessions.

to:

** This treatment of plural possessives is not consistent, varying depending on the grammar and style guide used. Many will have all plural possessives that end in 's' be pluralized by simply adding an apostrophe -- thus, "dogs' toys," "clouds' shapes," or "James' party." Irregular plurals ending in letters other than 's' are pluralized made possessive by adding "'s" to the end -- thus, "women's clothing," "people's choice," or "octopi's tentacles." This method seems to be falling out of favor though, replaced by the "always 's" method.
** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" possessive pronouns -- for example, they are referred to as "its" possessions, not "it's" possessions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The plural of "penis" is "penises" (or "penes" if you're a real stickler for the Latin). It's not the same as the singular, nor is it "penii" or any variation on that, no matter how much funnier that construction is.[[hottip:note:If you must know, the '-ii' pluralization only works for words that end in '-us'. You can have a single Toyota Prius or multiple Toyota Priii, but if you have penii ''or'' a penus you should really consult your doctor.]]

to:

* The plural of "penis" is "penises" (or "penes" if you're a real stickler for the Latin). It's not the same as the singular, nor is it "penii" or any variation on that, no matter how much funnier that construction is.[[hottip:note:If you must know, the '-ii' pluralization only works for words that end in '-us'. '-ius'. You can have a single Toyota Prius or multiple Toyota Priii, Prii, but if you have penii ''or'' a penus you should really consult your doctor.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Felicity" for "facility".

to:

* "Felicity" (a female given name) for "facility".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "Felicity" for "facility".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "suit" for "sued". Well, if you get sued you'll have a suit on your hands, but they're not quite the same thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** You'd prefer "laser muskets", on the grounds they had unrifled barrels?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" -- they are referred to as "its" possesions, not "it's" possessions.

to:

** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" -- they are referred to as "its" possesions, possessions, not "it's" possessions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On the other hand, when referring to possesives of anything ''other'' then an "it", the apostraphe ''should'' be used. For example, "John's" can be either "John is" or "something belonging to John". "Johns" is just a plural.

to:

** On the other hand, when referring to possesives possessives of anything ''other'' then an "it", the apostraphe apostrophe ''should'' be used. For example, "John's" can be either "John is" or "something belonging to John". "Johns" is just a plural.



* Another pluralization issue: No word, other than individual characters and '''''[[YourMileageMayVary maybe]]''''' numerals and initialisms -- i.e., no word ''at all'' written as a series of letters representing sounds -- is pluralized with an apostrophe. You can have forty cakes, but never forty cake's (unless the forty cakes do own something... iceing, perhaps). God help you if you combine this with the above and conjure up the abomination "story's" when you mean "stories". The apostrophe-S construction is possessive.

to:

* Another pluralization issue: No word, other than individual characters and '''''[[YourMileageMayVary maybe]]''''' numerals and initialisms -- i.e., no word ''at all'' written as a series of letters representing sounds -- is pluralized with an apostrophe. You can have forty cakes, but never forty cake's (unless the forty cakes do own something... iceing, icing, perhaps). God help you if you combine this with the above and conjure up the abomination "story's" when you mean "stories". The apostrophe-S construction is possessive.



** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" - they are referred to as "its" possesions, not "it's" possesions.

to:

** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" - -- they are referred to as "its" possesions, not "it's" possesions.possessions.

Added: 353

Changed: 61

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Possesive apostrophes


** On the other hand, when referring to possesives of anything ''other'' then an "it", the apostraphe ''should'' be used. For example, "John's" can be either "John is" or "something belonging to John". "Johns" is just a plural.



* Another pluralization issue: No word, other than individual characters and '''''[[YourMileageMayVary maybe]]''''' numerals and initialisms -- i.e., no word ''at all'' written as a series of letters representing sounds -- is pluralized with an apostrophe. You can have forty cakes, but never forty cake's. God help you if you combine this with the above and conjure up the abomination "story's" when you mean "stories". The apostrophe-S construction is possessive.

to:

* Another pluralization issue: No word, other than individual characters and '''''[[YourMileageMayVary maybe]]''''' numerals and initialisms -- i.e., no word ''at all'' written as a series of letters representing sounds -- is pluralized with an apostrophe. You can have forty cakes, but never forty cake's.cake's (unless the forty cakes do own something... iceing, perhaps). God help you if you combine this with the above and conjure up the abomination "story's" when you mean "stories". The apostrophe-S construction is possessive.


Added DiffLines:

** An exception to the rule are things belonging to an "it" - they are referred to as "its" possesions, not "it's" possesions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** It's even easier to re-parse the sentence mentally so it uses the verb 'to differ'. Nothing will ever ''differ to'' or ''differ than'' anything; things will only ever ''differ from'' one another.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A 'Christain' is, presumably, a smudge or mark left behind by a Chri. A 'Christian' is a follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ. Compare 'athiest'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "scarred" for "scared"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Although, since subtraction is just the addition of a negative number to some other number, some persnickety mathematicians could argue that 12-7 is still a sum.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "synthetic" for "artificial" -- ever hear of photosynthesis? This error is particularly bad when used for things such as the Duophonic process (to turn mono recordings into fake stereo), which necessarily involves taking the original apart in order to place different elements at different points on the sound stage -- that's analysis, not synthesis.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "wizened up" (grew dried out and wrinkly) for "wised up" (got a clue)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "relive" (experience again) vs. "relieve" (ease one's conscience). The former was used as a malapropism for the latter on WMG.TheSimpsons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This confusion was deliberately used as a pun by the management of Windsor Greyhound Track, whose restaraunt was called "Eton Gambol" (Eton being the name of the local district -- yes, as in the famous public school).

to:

** This confusion was deliberately used as a pun by the management of Windsor Greyhound Track, whose restaraunt restaurant was called "Eton Gambol" (Eton being the name of the local district -- yes, as in the famous public school).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** So we can look forward to ''Aviator: The Last Airman''?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This confusion was deliberately used as a pun by the management of Windsor Greyhound Track, whose restaraunt was called "Eton Gambol" (Eton being the name of the local district -- yes, as in the famous public school).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* One malapropism on this very wiki (WMG.TheSimpsons) is "edict" (n., formal proclamation) for "eidetic" (adj., (of memory) total-recall).

Added: 232

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Whee


* "eye" (organ of vision) for "aye" (agreement from a pirate)

to:

* "eye" (organ of vision) for "aye" (agreement from a pirate)seaman)


Added DiffLines:

* "Nameless" (not having a name) is not the same as "unnamed" (having a name that has been undisclosed).


Added DiffLines:

* A painfully common mistake is using "headless" when the person/creature clearly ''has a head that is detached or detachable''.

Top