Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / SturgeonsLaw

Go To

OR

Tabs MOD

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The though is probably [[OlderThanTheyThink older than that]], though. UsefulNotes/BenjaminDisraeli wrote in 1870: "Books are fatal: they are the curse of the human race. Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense."

to:

The though idea is probably [[OlderThanTheyThink older than that]], though. UsefulNotes/BenjaminDisraeli wrote in 1870: "Books are fatal: they are the curse of the human race. Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Pareto principal is about wealth distribution, not productivity, and is only marginally related to Sturgeon's Law unless you're saying that 80/90% of all *people* are crap, which, let's not say that please.


* In economics, there's the Pareto Principle, sometimes called the "80-20 rule", which states that 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. And again, it makes sense if you think about it: in any given group, there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution. In other words, the vast majority of people are average or nearly so. That bell-curve represents the number of people at each level of performance; if you multiply that by the actual level of performance, the better performers will obviously produce more, and it shakes out quite close to 80% of all the work. This, of course, will vary by situation, but it's reliable enough that it's used in several places[[note]]such as Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, which states that generally, 80% of total defects are caused by 20% of known failure modes[[/note]].

to:

* In economics, there's the Pareto Principle, sometimes called the "80-20 rule", which states that 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. And again, it makes sense if you think about it: in any given group, there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution. In other words, the vast majority of people are average or nearly so. That bell-curve represents the number of people at each level of performance; if you multiply that by the actual level of performance, the better performers will obviously produce more, and it shakes out quite close to 80% of all the work. This, of course, will vary by situation, but it's reliable enough that it's used in several places[[note]]such as Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, which states that generally, 80% of total defects are caused by 20% of known failure modes[[/note]].

Changed: 14372

Removed: 1412

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This is Sturgeon's Revelation, but common usage has it that this phrase is what is meant when the Law is cited. (The actual quote for the Law is "Nothing is always absolutely so.")

This law comes from an observation on Sturgeon's part; when he saw that critics were calling [[SciFiGhetto 90% of Sci-Fi crap]], he flipped it on them instead and stated that [[SoWasX 90% of anything is crap]].

The first reference to Sturgeon's Revelation appears in the March 1958 issue of ''Venture Science Fiction,'' where science fiction author Creator/TheodoreSturgeon wrote:

-> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[StrawmanProduct used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crud."

There is also a (possibly apocryphal) story that tells of Sturgeon making the above comment during a panel discussion at a science fiction convention. When the audience protested, Sturgeon reportedly blinked and replied, "90% of ''everything'' is crap."

Sturgeon's Revelation is sometimes expanded as follows:
* Corollary 1: ''The existence of immense quantities of trash in science fiction is admitted and it is regrettable; but it is no more unnatural than the existence of trash anywhere.''
* Corollary 2: ''The best science fiction is as good as the best fiction in any field.'' (Note: It is clear this doesn't ''necessarily'' follow from the Revelation -- sci-fi has minor advantages and disadvantages compared to other genres, and differing amounts of literature compared to other genres. If a thousand write sci-fi, but a hundred thousand write real world, do the maths.)
* Crawford's Corollary: ''Should you ever find that less than 90% seems to be [crap], your standard is set too low and should be adjusted.''
* Critic's Corollary: ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crap and non-crap.''
** Critic's Second Corollary: ''90% of people will criticize 90% of what they see regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* Ghetto Corollary: ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatized genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' (See the GhettoIndex for examples of such stigmatized genres.)
* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crap [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crap is in the eye of the beholder... so to speak.")
** Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crap is further divided into "Subjective Crap", [[SoBadItsGood "Crap You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crap"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''
* TheTheoremOfNarrowInterests: ''The more constrained the thing you're looking for, the fewer good examples exist.''
* Video Game Corollary: ''If a video game has user-created content, then 90% of it will be based on [[VideoGamePerversityPotential male or female genitalia]] or "[[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet LittleBig]][[GodwinsLaw Holocaust.]]"'''[[note]]Or fart jokes, when applicable.[[/note]]
* [[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri]]'s Law: ''"The vast majority of people are idiots".'' or, in other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou ''You're probably crap.'']]
* Evonix's Corollary: Crap is fractal, 90% of crap is crappier and the non crap is 90% tainted.

Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry — the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the crappy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."

If we assume that the 90% figure applies only to works that managed to get published anyway, then about [[MillionToOneChance one in a million of all things out there]] is not crap. Most people, though, have seen more than one non-crappy thing in their lifetime.

Often the phrase is followed by the even more cynical addendum, "... including the other 10%." Rarely, a more optimistic (but even more stratifying) second clause is added: ''"...but the remaining 10% [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome is worth dying for]]."''

A more ominous reading has it that ''Sturgeon's Law is a baseline''. In other words, though ''at least'' 90% of a given thing is crap, it does not necessarily follow that the remaining tenth is all good. For a given subtype of medium, genre, etc., the percentage of crap may range from the minimum 90%, to 95%, to 99.99[vapor trail of 9s]%.

A related adage is employed by critic [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee Croshaw]], known as the ''[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]'', who declares in one review: "''Everything is shit until proven otherwise.''" In another review, he elaborates: "''Even if declaring a game to be shit after its first few hours of gameplay is [[CausticCritic perfectly professional]], one should never assume that [[DisappointingLastLevel a game that starts out good will stay that way]].''"

The NostalgiaFilter and ImportFilter can be considered both side effects of this and a major balancing factor.

In person, Theodore Sturgeon [[{{Bowdlerize}} didn't use the word 'crap']] when this subject came up, in 1979. According to the Wiki/PortlandPatternRepository, however, the true story is the opposite: Theodore Sturgeon said "crud", but the law is quoted using the word "crap".

There is a related principle actually observed in economics, the Pareto Principle or "80-20 rule": 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. This makes sense if you think about it: in a given group, there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution: the vast majority are average or near-average, with occurrence correlating to rarity. So, if you take that curve (representing the number of individuals at each level of performance) and multiply by said level of performance, you get a plot showing how the total amount of work done is distributed among the various levels of performance, which will obviously be skewing towards the higher-performance end. The rule is an approximation and the exact ratio will vary with the situation, but the general principle is very widespread in situations involving normal and power law distributions. The principle is also used in Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, stating that generally, 80% of total defects are caused by 20% of known failure modes.

Also relevant are two psychological principles known as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] and the Worse-Than-Average Effect, which basically boil down to "Incompetent people know too little about the subject to accurately assess their own competence" and "Competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is," respectively. The net effect of these two phenomena is that people who produce genuinely good work tend to constantly second-guess themselves, which reduces their output, while their less-talented peers crank out work that's "good enough" and put it out there without a second thought because they don't know enough to realize how bad their work actually is.

May be OlderThanTheyThink; UsefulNotes/BenjaminDisraeli wrote in 1870: "Books are fatal: they are the curse of the human race. Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense."

[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law Here]] is a link to Wiki/TheOtherWiki's article on this.

[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] the [[UsefulNotes/{{Scotland}} Scottish]] politician Nicola Sturgeon. Although since she's been the [[UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem First Minister of Scotland]] since 2014, she does play a part in making a number of laws.

''This just defines the fan-speak term. No examples, please.''

to:

This is [[WellThisIsNotThatTrope not technically Sturgeon's Revelation, Law]], but common usage has it that this phrase rather Sturgeon's Revelation. Sturgeon's Law, properly formulated, is what is meant when the Law is cited. (The actual quote for the Law is "Nothing broader ''Nothing is always absolutely so.")

This law
so''. But they mean effectively the same thing, and when people refer to "Sturgeon's Law", both on and off Wiki/ThisVeryWiki, the "90%" quote is what they mean.

The Law, and the Revelation that preceded it,
comes from an observation on Sturgeon's part; when he saw that critics were calling [[SciFiGhetto 90% of Sci-Fi crap]], he flipped it on them instead and stated that [[SoWasX 90% of anything is crap]].

The first reference to Sturgeon's Revelation appears in
ScienceFiction writer Creator/TheodoreSturgeon. In the March 1958 issue of ''Venture Science Fiction,'' where science fiction author Creator/TheodoreSturgeon wrote:

-> "I
Fiction'', he wrote:
->''"I
repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[StrawmanProduct used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that [[SciFiGhetto ninety percent of SF is crud."

There is also a (possibly apocryphal)
crud]]."''
The
story then goes that tells of Sturgeon making the above made this comment during at a panel discussion at a science fiction convention. When sci-fi convention, and when the audience predictably protested, Sturgeon reportedly blinked and replied, "90% of ''everything'' is crap." (This may be apocryphal, though.) It's also not certain whether Sturgeon originally said "crap" or [[{{Bowdlerise}} "crud"]]; when the story first came up in 1979, it implied that Sturgeon said "crap" but had to be quoted as saying "crud". The Wiki/PortlandPatternRepository, however, has it the other way around: that Sturgeon said "crud", but the public quoted him as saying "crap".

The though is probably [[OlderThanTheyThink older than that]], though. UsefulNotes/BenjaminDisraeli wrote in 1870: "Books are fatal: they are the curse of the human race. Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense.
"

In any event, the Law makes sense when you think about it. You can see it in action when the CreativityLeash is removed and anyone can publish anything without any real barriers to entry. Fields like VanityPublishing and FanFiction seem to have much worse writers than professional publishing, but they're actually just reflective of Sturgeon's Revelation is sometimes expanded as follows:
* Corollary 1: ''The existence of immense quantities of trash in science fiction is admitted
Law; publishers obscure their crap by rejecting it, and it is regrettable; but it is no more unnatural than the existence of trash anywhere.''
* Corollary 2: ''The best science fiction is as good as the best fiction in any field.'' (Note: It is clear this doesn't ''necessarily'' follow from the Revelation -- sci-fi has minor advantages and disadvantages compared to other genres, and differing amounts of literature compared to other genres. If a thousand write sci-fi, but a hundred thousand write real world, do the maths.)
* Crawford's Corollary: ''Should
they'll tell you ever find that less than 90% seems to be [crap], your standard is set too low and should be adjusted.''
* Critic's Corollary: ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crap and non-crap.''
** Critic's Second Corollary: ''90% of people will criticize
it comprises 90% of what they see regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* Ghetto Corollary: ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatized genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' (See the GhettoIndex for examples of such stigmatized genres.)
* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10%
is '''not''' crap [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crap is in the eye of the beholder... so to speak.")
** Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The
submitted. In other 90% of crap is further divided into "Subjective Crap", [[SoBadItsGood "Crap You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crap"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''
* TheTheoremOfNarrowInterests: ''The more constrained the thing
words, it's not that published works are better on average; it's that you're looking for, just not seeing the fewer good examples exist.''
* Video Game Corollary: ''If a video game
crap it produces.

And publishers aren't the only filters of crap. Audiences have their own filters, like the NostalgiaFilter and the ImportFilter, which skew certain genres away from Sturgeon's Law only because the crap
has user-created content, then 90% of a hard time making it will be through the filter. Anyone who points out how much better classical music is than modern pop music based on [[VideoGamePerversityPotential male or female genitalia]] or "[[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet LittleBig]][[GodwinsLaw Holocaust.]]"'''[[note]]Or fart jokes, when applicable.[[/note]]
percentage of non-crap is missing the fact that 90% of classical music ''was'' crap, but the crap was just buried into obscurity over the centuries.

Sturgeon's Law is borne out by ''actual'', non-fictional science:
* [[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri]]'s Law: ''"The The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] essentially says that the skills necessary in assessing how good you are at something are the same skills necessary for actually ''being'' good at something. In other words, the worse you are at something, the less likely you are to ''know'' how bad you are. This is the phenomenon that leads to someone being GiftedlyBad and fuels Sturgeon's Law.
* The related "Worse-than-Average Effect" states that competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is. This kind of selects for Sturgeon's Law, in that good writers will be more hesitant to publish their work than bad ones, which in turn leads to over-representation of bad writers.
* In economics, there's the Pareto Principle, sometimes called the "80-20 rule", which states that 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. And again, it makes sense if you think about it: in any given group, there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution. In other words, the
vast majority of people are idiots".'' or, in other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou ''You're probably crap.'']]
* Evonix's Corollary: Crap is fractal, 90%
average or nearly so. That bell-curve represents the number of crap is crappier people at each level of performance; if you multiply that by the actual level of performance, the better performers will obviously produce more, and it shakes out quite close to 80% of all the non crap is 90% tainted.

work. This, of course, will vary by situation, but it's reliable enough that it's used in several places[[note]]such as Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, which states that generally, 80% of total defects are caused by 20% of known failure modes[[/note]].

It's important to note that there's a bit of a spectrum of pessimism with respect to
Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry — the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment Law. The most optimistic end of the Internet, makes the crappy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression spectrum admits that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact 90% of everything is crap, but posits that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public.remaining 10% is [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome absolutely worth it]]. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."

If we assume
"
The most pessimistic end of the spectrum posits
that the 90% figure applies only to works that managed to get published anyway, then about [[MillionToOneChance one in a million of all things out there]] is not crap. Most people, though, have seen more than one non-crappy thing in their lifetime.

Often the phrase is followed by the even more cynical addendum, "... including the other 10%." Rarely, a more optimistic (but even more stratifying) second clause is added: ''"...but the remaining 10% [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome is worth dying for]]."''

A more ominous reading has it that ''Sturgeon's
Sturgeon's Law is a baseline''. In baseline; in other words, though ''at least'' 90% of a given thing everything is crap, it does not necessarily follow that the remaining tenth is all good. For a given subtype of medium, genre, etc., and the percentage of crap may range from the minimum 90%, to could be as high as 95%, to 98%, or 99.99[vapor trail of 9s]%.

A related adage
9s]%. The other side of the pessimism is employed by critic [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee Croshaw]], known the idea that the various filters (nostalgia, import, publication) aren't actually working, that 90% of all ''published'' work is crap, and the percentage of all works that are not crap is closer to [[MillionToOneChance one in a million]].

Fandom being what it is, there are a lot of expansions, clarifications, and specific instances of Sturgeon's Revelation out there:
* '''Corollary 1:''' ''The existence of immense quantities of trash in science fiction is admitted, and it is regrettable, but it is no more unnatural than the existence of trash anywhere.'' This is essentially how we get from "90% of SF is crap" to "90% of everything is crap".
* '''Corollary 2:''' ''The best science fiction is as good
as the ''[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]'', who declares best fiction in any field.'' Obviously, this doesn't ''necessarily'' follow from the Revelation. Sci-fi has its strengths and weaknesses compared to other genres, but most of them are quite incidental. Also, the proportion of good sci-fi compared to good works in other genres is obscured by differences in the raw numbers; if there are a thousand people writing sci-fi and a hundred thousand people writing everything else, well, you do the maths.
* '''Crawford's Corollary:''' ''Should you ever find that less than 90% seems to be [crap], your standard is too low and should be adjusted.''
* '''Critic's First Corollary:''' ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crap and non-crap.''
* '''Critic's Second Corollary:''' ''90% of people will criticise 90% of what they see, regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatised genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' We've classified the stigmatised genres in the GhettoIndex.
* '''Wiki/TVTropes' First Corollary:''' ''The difficulty of getting a fanbase to agree on exactly which 10% is not crap [[UnpleasableFanbase increases exponentially]] with [[BrokenBase the size of the fanbase]]''. In other words, crap is in the eye of the beholder.
* '''Wiki/TVTropes' Second Corollary:''' ''Fanbases are perfectly happy to consume a portion of the genre they consider crap, but the difficulty of getting a fanbase to agree on exactly which portion of the "crap" part of the genre is worth consuming, and the size thereof, increases exponentially with the size of the fanbase.'' After all, we've got things like SoBadItsGood and GuiltyPleasure; it's "crap", but we still enjoy it. But we've also got DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible and EpicFail, and we generally ''don't'' enjoy it. The division between "crap you enjoy" and "total crap" is much more nebulous than the
one review: "''Everything between crap and non-crap; we don't even have a percentage for you.
* '''TheTheoremOfNarrowInterests:''' ''The more constrained the thing you're looking for, the fewer good examples exist.''
* '''Evonix's Corollary:''' ''Crap is fractal.'' In other words, 90% of the crap is crappier than the rest, and 90% of the non-crap is still head-and-shoulders worse than the rest. And you can keep doing that division all the way down.
* '''Video Game Corollary:''' ''If a {{Video Game|s}} has user-created content, not only will 90% of it be crap, 90% of the crap will be [[VideoGamePerversityPotential obscene in nature]]''. That 90% can be further divided into depictions of genitalia (male or female), [[ToiletHumour fart jokes]], and "[[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet LittleBig]][[GodwinsLaw Holocaust]]", although that division is more nebulous because it relies on a particular game's ability and willingness to filter out such content.
* '''[[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's Corollary]]:''' ''Everything
is shit until proven otherwise.''" In another review, he elaborates: '' Yahtzee has sometimes referred to this as the "[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]" and elaborated further in one review: "''Even if declaring a game to be shit after its first few hours of gameplay is [[CausticCritic perfectly professional]], one should never assume that [[DisappointingLastLevel a game that starts out good will stay that way]].''"

The NostalgiaFilter and ImportFilter can be considered both side effects of this and a major balancing factor.

In person, Theodore Sturgeon [[{{Bowdlerize}} didn't use the word 'crap']] when this subject came up, in 1979. According to the Wiki/PortlandPatternRepository, however, the true story is the opposite: Theodore Sturgeon said "crud", but the law is quoted using the word "crap".

There is a related principle actually observed in economics, the Pareto Principle or "80-20 rule": 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. This makes sense if you think about it: in a given group, there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution: the
''"
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The
vast majority of people are average or near-average, with occurrence correlating to rarity. So, if you take that curve (representing the number idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of individuals at each level of performance) and multiply by said level of performance, you get a plot showing how the total amount of work done is distributed among the various levels of performance, which will obviously be skewing towards the higher-performance end. The rule is an approximation and the exact ratio will vary with the situation, but the general principle is very widespread in situations involving normal and power law distributions. The principle is also used in Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, stating that generally, 80% of total defects people are caused by 20% of known failure modes.

Also relevant are two psychological principles known as the
crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].

Need to read more? Even Wiki/TheOtherWiki's got
[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] and the Worse-Than-Average Effect, which basically boil down to "Incompetent people know too little about the subject to accurately assess their own competence" and "Competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is," respectively. The net effect of these two phenomena is that people who produce genuinely good work tend to constantly second-guess themselves, which reduces their output, while their less-talented peers crank out work that's "good enough" and put it out there without a second thought because they don't know enough to realize how bad their work actually is.

May be OlderThanTheyThink; UsefulNotes/BenjaminDisraeli wrote in 1870: "Books are fatal: they are the curse of the human race. Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense."

[[https://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law Here]] is a link to Wiki/TheOtherWiki's article on this.

an article]].

[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] the [[UsefulNotes/{{Scotland}} Scottish]] politician First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. Although since she's been Even if you think 90% of the [[UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem First Minister UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem is crap, it's [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment best not to mention it here]][[note]]and also to remember that 90% of Scotland]] since 2014, she does play a part in making a number of laws.

''every'' political system [[AcceptablePoliticalTargets is probably crap]][[/note]].

''This just page defines the fan-speak term.a FanSpeak term and is thus a Administrivia/{{Definition Only Page|s}}. No examples, please.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] the [[UsefulNotes/{{Scotland}} Scottish]] politician Nicola Sturgeon. Although since she's been the [[Useful Notes/BritishPoliticalSystem First Minister of Scotland]] since 2014, she does play a part in making a number of laws.

to:

[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] the [[UsefulNotes/{{Scotland}} Scottish]] politician Nicola Sturgeon. Although since she's been the [[Useful Notes/BritishPoliticalSystem [[UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem First Minister of Scotland]] since 2014, she does play a part in making a number of laws.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] [[UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem Scottish First Minister]] Nicola Sturgeon. Although she does play a part in making a number of laws.

to:

[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] [[UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem Scottish First Minister]] the [[UsefulNotes/{{Scotland}} Scottish]] politician Nicola Sturgeon. Although since she's been the [[Useful Notes/BritishPoliticalSystem First Minister of Scotland]] since 2014, she does play a part in making a number of laws.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Corrected the quote to what he actually said.


-> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[StrawmanProduct used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crap."

to:

-> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[StrawmanProduct used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crap.crud."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Nothing to do with]] [[UsefulNotes/BritishPoliticalSystem Scottish First Minister]] Nicola Sturgeon. Although she does play a part in making a number of laws.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/6a00d83451688869e200e54f332b7b8834_800wi.png]][[caption-width-right:350:TakeThatAudience He's looking at you!]]]]

to:

[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/6a00d83451688869e200e54f332b7b8834_800wi.png]][[caption-width-right:350:TakeThatAudience png]][[caption-width-right:350:[[TakeThatAudience He's looking at you!]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/6a00d83451688869e200e54f332b7b8834_800wi.png]]

to:

[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/6a00d83451688869e200e54f332b7b8834_800wi.png]]
png]][[caption-width-right:350:TakeThatAudience He's looking at you!]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[SciFiGhetto used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crap."

to:

-> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[SciFiGhetto [[StrawmanProduct used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crap."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That's nowhere near what he said, no reason to make it edgy for the sake of edgy.


''90% of everything is [[PrecisionFStrike complete shit.]]''

to:

''90% of everything is [[PrecisionFStrike complete shit.]]''
crap.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[SciFiGhetto used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crap."

to:

--> -> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[SciFiGhetto used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crap."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry -- the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the crappy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."

to:

Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry -- the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the crappy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Clearing up sentence.


If we assume that the 90% figure applies only to published works, then about [[MillionToOneChance one in a million of all things out there]] is not crap. Most people, though, have seen more than one non-crappy thing in their lifetime.

to:

If we assume that the 90% figure applies only to works that managed to get published works, anyway, then about [[MillionToOneChance one in a million of all things out there]] is not crap. Most people, though, have seen more than one non-crappy thing in their lifetime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
broken link


Also relevant are two psychological principles known as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] and the Worse-Than-Average Effect, which basically boil down to "Incompetent people know too little about the subject to accurately assess their own competence" and "Competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is," respectively. The net effect of these two phenomena is that people who produce genuinely good work tend to constantly second-guess themselves, which reduces their output, while their less-talented peers crank out work that's "good enough" and put it out there without a second thought because they don't know enough to realize how bad their work actually is.

to:

Also relevant are two psychological principles known as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] and the Worse-Than-Average Effect, which basically boil down to "Incompetent people know too little about the subject to accurately assess their own competence" and "Competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is," respectively. The net effect of these two phenomena is that people who produce genuinely good work tend to constantly second-guess themselves, which reduces their output, while their less-talented peers crank out work that's "good enough" and put it out there without a second thought because they don't know enough to realize how bad their work actually is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added Dunning-Kruger effect link


Also relevant are two psychological principles known as the Dunning-Kruger Effect and the Worse-Than-Average Effect, which basically boil down to "Incompetent people know too little about the subject to accurately assess their own competence" and "Competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is," respectively. The net effect of these two phenomena is that people who produce genuinely good work tend to constantly second-guess themselves, which reduces their output, while their less-talented peers crank out work that's "good enough" and put it out there without a second thought because they don't know enough to realize how bad their work actually is.

to:

Also relevant are two psychological principles known as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect Effect]] and the Worse-Than-Average Effect, which basically boil down to "Incompetent people know too little about the subject to accurately assess their own competence" and "Competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is," respectively. The net effect of these two phenomena is that people who produce genuinely good work tend to constantly second-guess themselves, which reduces their output, while their less-talented peers crank out work that's "good enough" and put it out there without a second thought because they don't know enough to realize how bad their work actually is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Un-vandalizing the page from the handiwork of some of the worst Bluenose Bowdlerizers on this entire wiki.


''90% of everything is complete garbage.''

to:

''90% of everything is [[PrecisionFStrike complete garbage.''
shit.]]''



--> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[SciFiGhetto used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crud."

There is also a (possibly apocryphal) story that tells of Sturgeon making the above comment during a panel discussion at a science fiction convention. When the audience protested, Sturgeon reportedly blinked and replied, "90% of ''everything'' is crud."

to:

--> "I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who [[SciFiGhetto used the worst examples of the field for ammunition]], and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crud.crap."

There is also a (possibly apocryphal) story that tells of Sturgeon making the above comment during a panel discussion at a science fiction convention. When the audience protested, Sturgeon reportedly blinked and replied, "90% of ''everything'' is crud.crap."



* Crawford's Corollary: ''Should you ever find that less than 90% seem to be [crud], your standard is set too low and should be adjusted.''
* Critic's Corollary: ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crud and non-crud.''
** Critic's Second Corollary: ''90% of people will criticize 90% of what they see regardless of their ability to distinguish crud from non-crud.''

to:

* Crawford's Corollary: ''Should you ever find that less than 90% seem seems to be [crud], [crap], your standard is set too low and should be adjusted.''
* Critic's Corollary: ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crud crap and non-crud.non-crap.''
** Critic's Second Corollary: ''90% of people will criticize 90% of what they see regardless of their ability to distinguish crud crap from non-crud.non-crap.''



* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crud is in the eye of the beholder... so to speak.")
** Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crud is further divided into "Subjective Crud", [[SoBadItsGood "Crud You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crud"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''

to:

* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud crap [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crud "Crap is in the eye of the beholder... so to speak.")
** Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crud crap is further divided into "Subjective Crud", Crap", [[SoBadItsGood "Crud "Crap You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crud"]].Crap"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''



* [[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri]]'s Law: ''"The vast majority of people are idiots".'' or, in other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou ''You're probably crud.'']]
* Evonix's Corollary: Crud is fractal, 90% of crud is cruddyer and the non crud is 90% tainted.

Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry -- the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the cruddy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."

If we assume that the 90% figure applies only to published works, then about [[MillionToOneChance one in a million of all things out there]] is not crud. Most people, though, have seen more than one non-cruddy thing in their lifetime.

to:

* [[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri]]'s Law: ''"The vast majority of people are idiots".'' or, in other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou ''You're probably crud.crap.'']]
* Evonix's Corollary: Crud Crap is fractal, 90% of crud crap is cruddyer crappier and the non crud crap is 90% tainted.

Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry -- the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the cruddy crappy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."

If we assume that the 90% figure applies only to published works, then about [[MillionToOneChance one in a million of all things out there]] is not crud. crap. Most people, though, have seen more than one non-cruddy non-crappy thing in their lifetime.



A more ominous reading has it that ''Sturgeon's Law is a baseline''. In other words, though ''at least'' 90% of a given thing is crud, it does not necessarily follow that the remaining tenth is all good. For a given subtype of medium, genre, etc., the percentage of crud may range from the minimum 90%, to 95%, to 99.99[vapor trail of 9s]%.

to:

A more ominous reading has it that ''Sturgeon's Law is a baseline''. In other words, though ''at least'' 90% of a given thing is crud, crap, it does not necessarily follow that the remaining tenth is all good. For a given subtype of medium, genre, etc., the percentage of crud crap may range from the minimum 90%, to 95%, to 99.99[vapor trail of 9s]%.



In person, Theodore Sturgeon [[{{Bowdlerize}} didn't use the word 'crud']] when this subject came up, in 1979. According to the Wiki/PortlandPatternRepository, however, the true story is the opposite: Theodore Sturgeon said "crud", but the law is quoted using the word "crap".

to:

In person, Theodore Sturgeon [[{{Bowdlerize}} didn't use the word 'crud']] 'crap']] when this subject came up, in 1979. According to the Wiki/PortlandPatternRepository, however, the true story is the opposite: Theodore Sturgeon said "crud", but the law is quoted using the word "crap".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''90% of everything is crud.''

to:

''90% of everything is crud.complete garbage.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This law comes from an observation on Sturgeon's part; when he saw that critics were calling 90% of Sci-Fi crap, he flipped it on them instead and stated that [[SoWasX 90% of anything is crap]].

to:

This law comes from an observation on Sturgeon's part; when he saw that critics were calling [[SciFiGhetto 90% of Sci-Fi crap, crap]], he flipped it on them instead and stated that [[SoWasX 90% of anything is crap]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry -- the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the cruddy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through [[FanFictionDotNet Fanfiction.net]] is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."

to:

Sturgeon's Law is particularly obvious when [[CreativityLeash the barriers to entry -- the whims of publishers]] -- are removed. Self-publishing, especially in the virtually cost-free environment of the Internet, makes the cruddy 90% visible to the public; it no longer languishes in an aspiring writer's desk drawer. This often leads to the false impression that FanFic attracts poor writers; the fact is that the poor writers have ''always'' been out there, but until recently, their poor writing had few outlets to the public. As one writer put it, "flipping through [[FanFictionDotNet Fanfiction.net]] Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")
** Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crud is further divided into [[LoveItOrHateIt "Subjective Crud"]], [[SoBadItsGood "Crud You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crud"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''

to:

* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]...beholder... so to speak.")
** Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crud is further divided into [[LoveItOrHateIt "Subjective Crud"]], Crud", [[SoBadItsGood "Crud You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crud"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->--Music/BruceSpringsteen, "57 Channels (And Nothin' On)"

to:

-->--Music/BruceSpringsteen, -->-- Music/BruceSpringsteen, "57 Channels (And Nothin' On)"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud [[UnpleasaableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")

to:

* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud [[UnpleasaableFanbase [[UnpleasableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases]].'' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud exponentially approaches infinity as the size of the group increases. '' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")

to:

* Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud [[UnpleasaableFanbase exponentially approaches infinity infinity]] [[BrokenBase as the size of the group increases. increases]].'' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")



There is a related principle actually observed in economics, the Pareto Principle or "80-20 rule": 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. This makes sense if you think about it: in a given group there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution: the vast majority are average or near-average, with occurrence correlating to rarity. So, if you take that curve (representing the number of individuals at each level of performance) and multiply by said level of performance, you get a plot showing how the total amount of work done is distributed among the various levels of performance, which will obviously be skewing towards the higher-performance end. The rule is an approximation and the exact ratio will vary with the situation, but the general principle is very widespread in situations involving normal and power law distributions. The principle is also used in Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, stating that generally, 80% of total defects are caused by 20% of known failure modes.

to:

There is a related principle actually observed in economics, the Pareto Principle or "80-20 rule": 80% of the work is done by 20% of the group. This makes sense if you think about it: in a given group group, there will be, for whatever reason, variation in the capability of its constituent individuals, and by and large, variation tends to take the form of a bell-curve distribution: the vast majority are average or near-average, with occurrence correlating to rarity. So, if you take that curve (representing the number of individuals at each level of performance) and multiply by said level of performance, you get a plot showing how the total amount of work done is distributed among the various levels of performance, which will obviously be skewing towards the higher-performance end. The rule is an approximation and the exact ratio will vary with the situation, but the general principle is very widespread in situations involving normal and power law distributions. The principle is also used in Statistical Process Control, a mathematical approach to quality control, stating that generally, 80% of total defects are caused by 20% of known failure modes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


In person, Theodore Sturgeon [[{{Bowdlerize}} didn't use the word 'crud']] when this subject came up, in 1979. According to the PortlandPatternRepository, however, the true story is the opposite: Theodore Sturgeon said "crud", but the law is quoted using the word "crap".

to:

In person, Theodore Sturgeon [[{{Bowdlerize}} didn't use the word 'crud']] when this subject came up, in 1979. According to the PortlandPatternRepository, Wiki/PortlandPatternRepository, however, the true story is the opposite: Theodore Sturgeon said "crud", but the law is quoted using the word "crap".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law Here]] is a link to the OtherWiki's article on this.

to:

[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law Here]] is a link to the OtherWiki's Wiki/TheOtherWiki's article on this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Quality upgrade.


[[quoteright:185:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/irishdrinker_8826.jpg]]

to:

[[quoteright:185:http://static.[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/irishdrinker_8826.jpg]]org/pmwiki/pub/images/6a00d83451688869e200e54f332b7b8834_800wi.png]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TvTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud exponentially approaches infinity as the size of the group increases. '' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")
** TvTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crud is further divided into [[LoveItOrHateIt "Subjective Crud"]], [[SoBadItsGood "Crud You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crud"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''

to:

* TvTropes Wiki/TVTropes Corollary: ''The difficulty of getting a group of people to agree on '''which''' 10% is '''not''' crud exponentially approaches infinity as the size of the group increases. '' (Or, "Crud is in the [[LoveItOrHateIt eye of the beholder]]... so to speak.")
** TvTropes Wiki/TVTropes Second Corollary: ''The other 90% of crud is further divided into [[LoveItOrHateIt "Subjective Crud"]], [[SoBadItsGood "Crud You]] [[GuiltyPleasure Like Anyway"]], and [[EpicFail "Total]] [[DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible Crud"]]. The exact proportions of this division have never been researched, and most likely vary by the individual for reasons mentioned above.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Top