Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / StockLegalPhrases

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Fruit of the poisonous tree": Evidence that was obtained by an illegal action by an investigator must now be considered inadmissable and must be removed from the prosecution's indictment of the client, which can mean that the defendant's arrest is now also voided and is free to go.



** "Argumentative": The question or statement spoken is not establishing or examining a fact, but is spoken merely to argue with the witness or counsel.



** "Irrelevant" or "immaterial": the question or statement has nothing to do with the case at hand.
** "Assumes facts not in evidence": The question or testimony is making assumptions with no proof to back it up.



<<|StockPhrases|>>

to:

<<|StockPhrases|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "The witness is not on trial here!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Parodied in an {{xkcd}} strip where Black Hat Guy pleads the ''third'' amendment [[http://xkcd.com/496/ during a congressional hearing.]]\\

to:

** Parodied in an {{xkcd}} strip where Black Hat Guy pleads the ''third'' amendment [[http://xkcd.com/496/ during a congressional hearing.]]\\]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Parodied in an {{xkcd}} strip where Black Hat Guy pleads the ''third'' amendment [[http://xkcd.com/496/ during a congressional hearing.]]\\
--->"You refuse to quarter troops in your house?"\\
"I have few principles, but I stick by them."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "I take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Also heard as "I hereby invoke my Fifth Amendment privilege" or "I refuse to answer on the ground it may tend to incriminate me." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.

to:

* "I take plead/take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Also heard as "I hereby invoke my Fifth Amendment privilege" or "I refuse to answer on the ground it may tend to incriminate me." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "Perhaps this will refresh your memory."

Changed: 119

Removed: 259

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Don\'t need a bullet to explain why a witness might be considered hostile


* "Permission to treat the witness as hostile?" This gives the attorney the right to be more abrasive and direct in their line of questioning, and avoid an objection for badgering the witness.

to:

* "Permission to treat the witness as hostile?" This Once a witness has contradicted himself or changed his testimony from pre-trial discovery, this gives the attorney the right to be more abrasive and direct in their line of questioning, questioning during direct examination, and avoid an objection for badgering the witness.



** Note that simply asking the court for permission to do this is usually insufficient. You need to have a good reason to do so (the witness contradicted themselves, or have changed their testimony from pre-trial discovery). Otherwise, expect to be overruled.

Changed: 402

Removed: 220

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Taking the 11th


* "I take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.
** Oddly it pops up in ''{{Persona 4}}'', despite being set in Japan (where an equivalent protection against self incrimination exists)... the only rational explanation is it is done as part of the TranslationConvention.

to:

* "I take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Also heard as "I hereby invoke my Fifth Amendment privilege" or "I refuse to answer on the ground it may tend to incriminate me." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.
** Oddly it pops up in ''{{Persona 4}}'', despite being set in Japan (where an equivalent protection against self incrimination exists)... the only rational explanation is it is done as part of the TranslationConvention.
amendment.



** Some people apparently try to 'take the fifth' in Canada, forgetting that it's a ''different country''...
** The more formal version of invoking the Fifth Amendment is to say "I refuse to answer on the ground it may tend to incriminate me."

to:

** Some people apparently try to 'take the fifth' in Canada, forgetting that it's a ''different country''...
** The more formal version of invoking
country''. [[http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/charter/page-1.html It's the Fifth Amendment is to say "I refuse to answer on "eleventh" there]].
** Oddly it pops up in ''{{Persona 4}}'', as an arguable TranslationConvention for
the ground it may tend to incriminate me."equivalent protection against self incrimination in Japan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
On the other hand, because the next two items are about affirming, it might be better to explain where this affirming bit came from.


** In the United States you don't have to say the God part, or swear on a [[TheBible Bible]]. [[hottip:*:Anymore. A few centuries ago, though, before the present Constitution, it wouldn't be a stretch that anyone who ''wouldn't'' swear on a Bible [[BurnTheWitch might find themselves tied to a flaming piece of wood]].]]
*** Nevertheless, in AynRand's play ''Night of January 16th'', a judge forces Karen Andre to affirm despite her objecting as an atheist to the "so help you God" part.

to:

** In the The United States you don't have introduced "affirming" in the 1780s to answer the objections of those whose religious convictions wouldn't let them say the God part, "God" part or swear on a [[TheBible Bible]]. [[hottip:*:Anymore. A few centuries ago, though, before the present Constitution, TheBible. [[hottip:*:Before this, it wouldn't be a stretch that anyone who ''wouldn't'' swear on a Bible [[BurnTheWitch might find themselves tied to a flaming piece of wood]].]]
*** Nevertheless, in In AynRand's play ''Night of January 16th'', a judge forces Karen Andre to affirm despite her objecting as an atheist to the "so help you God" part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
what changed about the \"God\" part in the USA


** In the United States you don't have to say the God part, or swear on a [[TheBible Bible]]. [[hottip:*:At least, not in ''modern'' times. A few centuries ago, though... well, maybe it wouldn't be a stretch that anyone who ''wouldn't'' swear on a Bible [[BurnTheWitch might find themselves tied to a flaming piece of wood]].]]

to:

** In the United States you don't have to say the God part, or swear on a [[TheBible Bible]]. [[hottip:*:At least, not in ''modern'' times. [[hottip:*:Anymore. A few centuries ago, though... well, maybe though, before the present Constitution, it wouldn't be a stretch that anyone who ''wouldn't'' swear on a Bible [[BurnTheWitch might find themselves tied to a flaming piece of wood]].]]

Changed: 245

Removed: 100

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "May I approach the bench?". I know of one Canadian law student who requested this during a mock trial, only to be informed that it was only done in the US and/or on TV, and he should just approach without asking.
** Funny that. In most other Commonwealth jurisdictions you should ask if you're allowed to do that.

to:

* "May I approach the bench?". I know of one Canadian law student who requested In Canada lawyers can do this during a mock trial, only to be informed that it was only done in the US and/or on TV, and he should just approach without asking.
** Funny that. In
asking, but in most other Commonwealth jurisdictions you should ask if you're allowed to do that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That markup is to be stricken from the record


* "I [[strike:plead]] take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.

to:

* "I [[strike:plead]] take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed reference to \"UK\" to \"England\" (apologies to any Welsh editors); the law is different, and in my experience at least, \"Beyond reasonable doubt\" is still used in Scotland.


* "Beyond a reasonable doubt." / "So that you are sure" (In the UK the former was replaced by the latter because juries often had difficulty establishing what a "reasonable doubt" was.)

to:

* "Beyond a reasonable doubt." / "So that you are sure" (In the UK England the former was replaced by the latter because juries often had difficulty establishing what a "reasonable doubt" was.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "I can no longer represent my client in this matter." (Lawyer speak for "My client specifically asked me to lie to the court.")
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Funny that. In most other Commonwealth jurisdictions you should ask if you're allowed to do that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Objection!" The CatchPhrase of the ''AceAttorney'' games. Some common objections:

to:

* "Objection!" The CatchPhrase MagicFranchiseWord of the ''AceAttorney'' games. Some common objections:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Objection!" The MagicFranchiseWord of the ''AceAttorney'' games. Some common objections:

to:

* "Objection!" The MagicFranchiseWord CatchPhrase of the ''AceAttorney'' games. Some common objections:

Added: 321

Changed: 34

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Does the defendant plead guilty or not guilty?"

to:

* "Does the defendant plead guilty or not guilty?"guilty?" / "How does the defendant plead?"


Added DiffLines:

** Habeas corpus is a ''right'' of all imprisoned citizens, and designed to give them a chance of representation, so that the government cannot imprison people indefinitely. You ''always'' have the right to your day in court, no matter what anyone says. At least in the US. And as long as you're not an enemy combatant...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Hilariously, in RealLife, asking this question is just begging to get hit with an objection for relevance. If the witness is lying, you have to ''show'' it, you can't imply it.

Added: 370

Changed: 118

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Hearsay is allowed in certain conditions. Dying Declarations (the last words of a person who ''knows'' they're dying) are popular exceptions. Reading in pre-trial discovery testimony is a much harder prospect, but is allowed in certain cases where the witness has testified before the trial itself and is now unavailable due to unforeseeable events (death, usually).



*** Note that during cross-examination, a certain amount of leading is allowed, on the grounds that the person testifying is not on the side of the lawyer doing the questioning, and might need some additional pointers to reach the conclusions needed.

to:

*** Note that during cross-examination, a certain amount of leading is allowed, on the grounds that the person testifying is not on the side of the lawyer doing the questioning, and might need some additional pointers to reach the conclusions needed. See hostile witness below.



** "Speculation" (the lawyer is asking the witness to essentially guess about something)

to:

** "Speculation" (the lawyer is asking the witness to essentially guess about something)something: "What did it look like the victim did for a living?")



* "Order in the courtroom!" The Judge says this while banging a gavel. Failure to maintain order in the courtroom might result in expulsion from said room, or even being held in contempt.

to:

* "Order in the courtroom!" The Judge says this while banging a gavel. Failure to maintain Disruption of the order in the courtroom might result in expulsion from said room, or even being held in contempt.



* "Witness, please answer the question." (If a witness is asked a question on the witness stand, they don't have the option of not answering. They must either answer the question or provide a reason why they can't (Fifth Amendment being popular). Simply stalling or avoiding the question entirely can result in contempt of court or even perjury charges.)

to:

* "Witness, please answer the question." (If a witness is asked a question on the witness stand, they don't have the option of not answering. They must either answer the question or provide a reason why they can't (Fifth Amendment being popular). Simply stalling or avoiding the question entirely can result in contempt of court or even perjury charges.)

Added: 877

Changed: 964

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Relevance"
** "Speculation"

to:

*** Note that during cross-examination, a certain amount of leading is allowed, on the grounds that the person testifying is not on the side of the lawyer doing the questioning, and might need some additional pointers to reach the conclusions needed.
** "Relevance"
"Relevance" (the lawyer is asking questions that have little to no bearing on the scope of the case)
** "Speculation""Speculation" (the lawyer is asking the witness to essentially guess about something)



* "Order in the courtroom!" The Judge says this while banging a gavel.

to:

* "Order in the courtroom!" The Judge says this while banging a gavel. Failure to maintain order in the courtroom might result in expulsion from said room, or even being held in contempt.



** Note that simply asking the court for permission to do this is usually insufficient. You need to have a good reason to do so (the witness contradicted themselves, or have changed their testimony from pre-trial discovery). Otherwise, expect to be overruled.
*** By definition, during a cross-examination, a witness is considered hostile (they're not on the questioning lawyer's side, after all).



*** In most cases in RealLife, simply saying "withdrawn" isn't enough. You could be subject to penalties or fines. If you have a reputation for constantly making inflammatory statements (see [[LawAndOrder Jack McCoy]]), you won't have any leeway at all, and you're likely to hurt your case by trying to pull this off. You'll also push yourself closer and closer to mistrial with each offense.



* "Witness, please answer the question."
* "You don't have to answer that."

to:

* "Witness, please answer the question."
" (If a witness is asked a question on the witness stand, they don't have the option of not answering. They must either answer the question or provide a reason why they can't (Fifth Amendment being popular). Simply stalling or avoiding the question entirely can result in contempt of court or even perjury charges.)
* "You don't have to answer that."" (A judge can direct the witness not to answer if an objection to the question is sustained. The lawyers ''can't'' (and it's a punishable offense), but will try to do so anyway, at least on TV.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Note that when the prosecution rests, they still have the option of rebuttal testimony after the defense rests, so they're not really ''done''. However, when the defense rests, they are definitively done (except for cross-examination of rebuttal witnesses).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Or, of course, if one of the witnesses ''other'' than the defendant was a party to the crime, or committed some other crime that comes up during cross-examination.

to:

*** Or, of course, if one of the witnesses ''other'' than the defendant was a party to the crime, or committed some other crime that comes up during cross-examination. However, considering the extent of the pre-trial preparation these days, any ''competent'' lawyer (on both sides) will avoid any such question. Unless it ''might'' help the defense, but at that point the prosecution will likely avoid calling the witness (and the rules for the defense calling a witness makes it a little more difficult for them to ask such a question).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
listed on Other Stock Phrases, but it goes better here

Added DiffLines:

* "Are you aware of the penalties for perjury?" Lawyer-ese for "I know you're lying." Similarly, there's: "May I remind you you are under oath?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->'''Strongbad''': This is a [[{{Malaproper}} subpoena!]] I summons Exhibit 4-B to my chambers!
->'''Homestar''': Sustained! *[[TheDitz hits self with a gavel]]*
--->''[[HomestarRunner Strong Bad Email: Rampage]]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Nevertheless, in AynRand's play ''Night of January 16th'', a judge forces Karen Andre to affirm despite her objecting as an atheist to the "so help you God" part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The more formal version of invoking the Fifth Amendment is to say "I refuse to answer on the ground it may tend to incriminate me."

Changed: 144

Removed: 179

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "I rest my case."
**What does that even ''mean''?
*** That the prosecution or defense believes they have adequately presented their arguments and examined necessary witnesses. Basically, they' done.

to:

* "I rest my case."
**What does that even ''mean''?
*** That the
" (The prosecution or defense believes they have adequately presented their arguments and examined necessary witnesses. Basically, they' they're done.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "I plead the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard pleading the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.

to:

* "I plead [[strike:plead]] take the Fifth." This refers to the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the provision that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Technically, a jury is not supposed to regard pleading taking the Fifth in any prejudicial light, but human nature being what it is, it's impossible to make sure that they follow that. Often subverted by people yelling the incorrect amendment.



** Some people apparently try to 'plead the fifth' in Canada, forgetting that it's a ''different country''...

to:

** Some people apparently try to 'plead 'take the fifth' in Canada, forgetting that it's a ''different country''...

Top