Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / SpecialEffectFailure

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added prop


Sometimes cheesy FX are regarded as part of the SoBadItsGood charm of a work. Sometimes authors will [[IntendedAudienceReaction intentionally aim for this]] as a form of StylisticSuck.

to:

Sometimes cheesy FX are regarded as part of the SoBadItsGood charm of a work. Sometimes authors will [[IntendedAudienceReaction intentionally aim for this]] as a form of StylisticSuck.
StylisticSuck. See also {{Prop}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Pretty much the whole of the ''WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender'' fancomic ''Webcomic/HowIBecameYours''. Special mention goes to all the copied poses. Diaz copies from everything, mostly the show itself (though she often uses [[Manga/{{Bleach}} Ichigo]] as a model for Zuko), and often uses the same artwork over and over (Iroh is depicted in the "holding out the white lotus tile" pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheWaterbendingScroll The Waterbending Scroll]]" several different times). He's also depicted in a pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheStorm The Storm]]" wherein he is in a dark room and lit from below by a fire, and no attempt was made to change the lighting, despite the ''How I Became Yours'' scene taking place in bright sunlight.

to:

* Pretty much the whole Most of the ''WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender'' fancomic ''Webcomic/HowIBecameYours''.''Webcomic/HowIBecameYours'' looks rather poor. Special mention goes to all the copied poses. Diaz copies from everything, mostly the show itself (though she often uses [[Manga/{{Bleach}} Ichigo]] as a model for Zuko), and often uses the same artwork over and over (Iroh is depicted in the "holding out the white lotus tile" pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheWaterbendingScroll The Waterbending Scroll]]" several different times). He's also depicted in a pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheStorm The Storm]]" wherein he is in a dark room and lit from below by a fire, and no attempt was made to change the lighting, despite the ''How I Became Yours'' scene taking place in bright sunlight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery1903'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy, people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.

to:

The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery1903'' ''Film/{{The Great Train Robbery|1903}}'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy, people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''SpecialEffectFailure/TheTomorrowPeople1973''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
There are 2 movies with the same name


The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.

to:

The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery1903'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), infancy, people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[SpecialEffectFailure/LiveActionFilm Films — Live-Action]]

to:

* [[SpecialEffectFailure/LiveActionFilm [[SpecialEffectFailure/LiveActionFilms Films — Live-Action]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!Examples subpages:

to:

!!Examples !!Example subpages:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!Examples with their own pages

to:

!!Examples with their own pagessubpages:



!!Other examples

to:

!!Other examples
examples:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Sometimes Australian sports broadcasters superimpose advertisements onto the grass beside the field or over other advertisements on billboards. The flat, jittering graphics tend to be unconvincing to say the least.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Fan Fic]]

to:

[[folder:Fan Fic]]Works]]



* The “destruction” of the Munich terrorist facility in the ''Franchise/JamesBond'' fan film ''WebVideo/DiamondsCut'' seems to intentionally go for the Camp factor with what seems like a really bad photoshop. Absolutely nothing collapses and the only signs of destruction are little tongues of flame with thin tendrils of smoke at the forefront.

to:

* The “destruction” "destruction" of the Munich terrorist facility in the ''Franchise/JamesBond'' fan film ''WebVideo/DiamondsCut'' seems to intentionally go for the Camp factor with what seems like a really bad photoshop. Absolutely nothing collapses and the only signs of destruction are little tongues of flame with thin tendrils of smoke at the forefront.



* In ParodyFic ''Plan 7 of 9 from Outer Space'', the alien abductor D'Ork of the Thorkoth looks like a cheap prop from a Creator/RogerCorman [[Film/ItConqueredTheWorld film]], has a KillerRobot that's just a [[Film/RobotMonster diving helmet on a gorilla suit]], and pilots a FlyingSaucer that's held up by visible strings.

to:

* In ParodyFic ''Plan 7 of 9 from Outer Space'', ''Fanfic/Plan7Of9FromOuterSpace'', the alien abductor D'Ork of the Thorkoth looks like a cheap prop from a Creator/RogerCorman [[Film/ItConqueredTheWorld film]], has a KillerRobot that's just a [[Film/RobotMonster diving helmet on a gorilla suit]], and pilots a FlyingSaucer that's held up by visible strings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Note that, despite the name, Practical Effect Failures go here too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The “destruction” of Munich terrorist facility in ''Franchise/Bond'' fan film ''WebVideo/DiamondsCut'' seems to intentionally go for the Camp factor with what seems like a really bad photoshop. Absolutely nothing collapses and the only signs of destruction are little tongues of flame with thin tendrils of smoke at the forefront.

to:

* The “destruction” of the Munich terrorist facility in ''Franchise/Bond'' the ''Franchise/JamesBond'' fan film ''WebVideo/DiamondsCut'' seems to intentionally go for the Camp factor with what seems like a really bad photoshop. Absolutely nothing collapses and the only signs of destruction are little tongues of flame with thin tendrils of smoke at the forefront.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The “destruction” of Munich terrorist facility in ''Franchise/JamesBond'' fan film ''WebVideo/DiamondsCut'' seems to intentionally go for the Camp factor with what seems like a really bad photoshop. Absolutely nothing collapses and the only signs of destruction are little tongues of flame with thin tendrils of smoke at the forefront.

to:

* The “destruction” of Munich terrorist facility in ''Franchise/JamesBond'' ''Franchise/Bond'' fan film ''WebVideo/DiamondsCut'' seems to intentionally go for the Camp factor with what seems like a really bad photoshop. Absolutely nothing collapses and the only signs of destruction are little tongues of flame with thin tendrils of smoke at the forefront.



** They try to make a scene in which an unnamed man tries to take a shower, but worms come out instead of water. Greg can't find a way to make it looks natural, and settles for throwing gummy worms at Rowley's face and hoping it'll look realistic once they make the final cut.

to:

** They try to make a scene in which an unnamed man tries to take a shower, but worms come out instead of water. Greg can't find a way to make it looks look natural, and settles for throwing gummy worms at Rowley's face and hoping it'll look realistic once they make the final cut.

Added: 2425

Changed: 1860

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Hatbox Ghost from ''Franchise/TheHauntedMansion'' ride at Disneyland remained a legend for decades due to this. He was a skeletal old man with a hatbox in his hand, placed in the attic with the Bride figure, whose heart beat and glowed. Promotional materials said that in the story, the Hatbox Ghost was the groom, whose head faded from his shoulders and reappeared in his box in sync with his bride's heartbeat. (There is evidence that this was part of a murder story in the attic scene, with other hatbox heads in the attic, and the Hatbox Ghost exposing the Bride as the killer with his trick.) The effect was meant to be done with careful lighting- the light would go off above his shoulders, making his head seem to vanish, and go on in his box, revealing the second head inside. However, proximity of the figure to riders made the first part of the illusion fail and the Hatbox Ghost was removed very early in the ride's operation, never made it to the Walt Disney World version, and most riders never saw it, to the point that it was considered a myth until photos of the figure ''in situ'' emerged. After, the Attic scene was retooled to make the Bride a lonely, mournful character due to the lack of a victim. After several decades, during which a new murderous Bride story was implemented with more detail, the Hatbox Ghost was finally brought back to Disneyland in 2015 with much more complex effects, with fluid animation, a projected, animated face, and a head-traveling effect that worked while the character was placed right next to the riders' vehicles. (Part of this is due to the new figure being hollow and the head being pulled into the body when the "switch" occurs.) While the new Bride is more obviously murderous, the Hatbox Ghost assumes a similar narrative role to before, likely showing what's in the attic hatboxes, as the hats are on a rack.

to:

* Ride/DisneyThemeParks:
**
The Hatbox Ghost from ''Franchise/TheHauntedMansion'' ride at Disneyland remained a legend for decades due to this. He was a skeletal old man with a hatbox in his hand, placed in the attic with the Bride figure, whose heart beat and glowed. Promotional materials said that in the story, the Hatbox Ghost was the groom, whose head faded from his shoulders and reappeared in his box in sync with his bride's heartbeat. (There is evidence that this was part of a murder story in the attic scene, with other hatbox heads in the attic, and the Hatbox Ghost exposing the Bride as the killer with his trick.) The effect was meant to be done with careful lighting- the light would go off above his shoulders, making his head seem to vanish, and go on in his box, revealing the second head inside. However, proximity of the figure to riders made the first part of the illusion fail and the Hatbox Ghost was removed very early in the ride's operation, never made it to the Walt Disney World version, and most riders never saw it, to the point that it was considered a myth until photos of the figure ''in situ'' emerged. After, the Attic scene was retooled to make the Bride a lonely, mournful character due to the lack of a victim. After several decades, during which a new murderous Bride story was implemented with more detail, the Hatbox Ghost was finally brought back to Disneyland in 2015 with much more complex effects, with fluid animation, a projected, animated face, and a head-traveling effect that worked while the character was placed right next to the riders' vehicles. (Part of this is due to the new figure being hollow and the head being pulled into the body when the "switch" occurs.) While the new Bride is more obviously murderous, the Hatbox Ghost assumes a similar narrative role to before, likely showing what's in the attic hatboxes, as the hats are on a rack.rack.
** ''One Man's Dream II: The Magic Lives On'' at Tokyo Disneyland ended with a musical number where the company sings the praises of Mickey Mouse, complete with Mickey himself rising from the stage via an elevator. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7R_SE3NOpI One performance]] had the elevator get stuck midway, causing the show to end abruptly. Mickey's performer is visibly confused at the malfunction, and some of the dancers can be seen [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere booking it off the stage and behind the curtain]] when they realize what happened.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


When {{special effects}} look really cheap and dodgy, to the point of pulling the audience out of the narrative, you have a Special Effect Failure. All-too-common prior to 1980, and still with us today despite relatively inexpensive digital effects that can be very convincing and realistic... but often aren't.

to:

When {{special effects}} look really cheap and dodgy, to the point of pulling the audience out of the narrative, you have a [[TitleDrop Special Effect Failure.Failure]]. All-too-common prior to 1980, and still with us today despite relatively inexpensive digital effects that can be very convincing and realistic... but often aren't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rewrote entry to include link to work article and remove mention of non-present aspect of the trope


* Parodied by ''[[http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff500/fv00448.htm Freefall]]'', where cheesy special effects have been painstakingly re-created by CGI, including the wires.

to:

* Parodied by ''[[http://freefall.''WebComic/{{Freefall}}'', where cheesy special effects have been [[http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff500/fv00448.htm Freefall]]'', where cheesy special effects have been painstakingly re-created by CGI, including CGI.]] Sam considers the wires.programmers responsible to be geniuses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Pretty much the whole of the ''WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender'' fancomic ''[[Webcomic/HowIBecameYours How I Became Yours]]''. Special mention goes to all the copied poses. Diaz copies from everything, mostly the show itself (though she often uses [[Manga/{{Bleach}} Ichigo]] as a model for Zuko), and often uses the same artwork over and over (Iroh is depicted in the "holding out the white lotus tile" pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheWaterbendingScroll The Waterbending Scroll]]" several different times). He's also depicted in a pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheStorm The Storm]]" wherein he is in a dark room and lit from below by a fire, and no attempt was made to change the lighting, despite the ''How I Became Yours'' scene taking place in bright sunlight.

to:

* Pretty much the whole of the ''WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender'' fancomic ''[[Webcomic/HowIBecameYours How I Became Yours]]''.''Webcomic/HowIBecameYours''. Special mention goes to all the copied poses. Diaz copies from everything, mostly the show itself (though she often uses [[Manga/{{Bleach}} Ichigo]] as a model for Zuko), and often uses the same artwork over and over (Iroh is depicted in the "holding out the white lotus tile" pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheWaterbendingScroll The Waterbending Scroll]]" several different times). He's also depicted in a pose from "[[Recap/AvatarTheLastAirbenderTheStorm The Storm]]" wherein he is in a dark room and lit from below by a fire, and no attempt was made to change the lighting, despite the ''How I Became Yours'' scene taking place in bright sunlight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* People responsible for news graphics are only human, and sometimes they put up a picture of the wrong person.

to:

* People responsible for news graphics are only human, and sometimes they put up a picture of the wrong person. Or in one case, [[https://youtu.be/uTVVgY3gGGs show a hamster instead of a murder suspect.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for Video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.

to:

The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for Video video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Animation/MotuPatlu'': In "Motu Banega Don", Motu and Patlu hide in one of the containers in a container yard to hide from John the Don's gang, who are chasing after them. Inspector Chingum notices John's gang entering the container and goes in as well. In the dark insides of the container, the characters can only be seen ByTheLightsOfTheirEyes... but then they start to beat each other up, creating visible hit stars that light up the inside of the container just enough to make it noticeable that their eyes are actually the only part of their bodies that they animated for that scene, with the rest of their bodies nowhere to be seen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In-universe example in ''Literature/DiaryOfAWimpyKidDoubleDown'', where middle school student Greg Heffley tries to create a homemade horror movie on NoBudget:

to:

* In-universe example in ''Literature/DiaryOfAWimpyKidDoubleDown'', where middle school student Greg Heffley tries and Rowley try to create a homemade horror movie on NoBudget:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed dead youtube link


* People responsible for news graphics are only human, and sometimes they put up a picture of the wrong person. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRcTgMsEG2k Here is a case where that happened.]]

to:

* People responsible for news graphics are only human, and sometimes they put up a picture of the wrong person. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRcTgMsEG2k Here is a case where that happened.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for Video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.

to:

The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]; ''StarWars'' ''Franchise/StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for Video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
misuse


When {{special effects}} look really cheap and dodgy, to the point of pulling the audience out of the narrative, you have a Special Effect Failure. All-too-common prior to 1980, and still with us today despite relatively inexpensive digital effects that can be very convincing and realistic... but often [[ConspicuousCG aren't]].

to:

When {{special effects}} look really cheap and dodgy, to the point of pulling the audience out of the narrative, you have a Special Effect Failure. All-too-common prior to 1980, and still with us today despite relatively inexpensive digital effects that can be very convincing and realistic... but often [[ConspicuousCG aren't]].
aren't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for Video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.

to:

The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]].reasons]]; ''StarWars'' raised the bar for visual effects so high that only the most advanced pre-1977 effects can measure up. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background. Same for Video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.
weird.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sometimes a Special Effect Failure is caused by resorting to OffTheShelfFX. Many examples are just plain {{Blooper}}s (a literal failure of the effects). In a video game it can be because of ModelDissonance being revealed by a glitch or oversight.

to:

Sometimes a Special Effect Failure is caused by resorting to OffTheShelfFX. Many examples are just plain {{Blooper}}s (a literal failure of the effects). In a video game it can be because of ModelDissonance being revealed by a glitch or oversight.
oversight. In animation, it can be lumped in with OffModel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Webcomic/ElGoonishShive'', this trope is [[StylisticSuck used intentionally]] to make [[http://egscomics.com/comic/2013-10-08 Sarah throwing a couch]] look fake [[http://egscomics.com/comic/2013-10-09 as intended]] in-universe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: Theme Parks]]

to:

[[folder: Theme [[folder:Theme Parks]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I could have sworn this was here...

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Theme Parks]]
* The Hatbox Ghost from ''Franchise/TheHauntedMansion'' ride at Disneyland remained a legend for decades due to this. He was a skeletal old man with a hatbox in his hand, placed in the attic with the Bride figure, whose heart beat and glowed. Promotional materials said that in the story, the Hatbox Ghost was the groom, whose head faded from his shoulders and reappeared in his box in sync with his bride's heartbeat. (There is evidence that this was part of a murder story in the attic scene, with other hatbox heads in the attic, and the Hatbox Ghost exposing the Bride as the killer with his trick.) The effect was meant to be done with careful lighting- the light would go off above his shoulders, making his head seem to vanish, and go on in his box, revealing the second head inside. However, proximity of the figure to riders made the first part of the illusion fail and the Hatbox Ghost was removed very early in the ride's operation, never made it to the Walt Disney World version, and most riders never saw it, to the point that it was considered a myth until photos of the figure ''in situ'' emerged. After, the Attic scene was retooled to make the Bride a lonely, mournful character due to the lack of a victim. After several decades, during which a new murderous Bride story was implemented with more detail, the Hatbox Ghost was finally brought back to Disneyland in 2015 with much more complex effects, with fluid animation, a projected, animated face, and a head-traveling effect that worked while the character was placed right next to the riders' vehicles. (Part of this is due to the new figure being hollow and the head being pulled into the body when the "switch" occurs.) While the new Bride is more obviously murderous, the Hatbox Ghost assumes a similar narrative role to before, likely showing what's in the attic hatboxes, as the hats are on a rack.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background.

to:

The audience's expectations for effects have grown up with the media. For example, it is obviously a dummy being thrown from a train in ''Film/TheGreatTrainRobbery'' -- but since it was filmed when filmmaking ''itself'' was in its infancy (1903 to be exact), people forgave it. If a modern remake had done that, however, they would not have been nearly as kind. kind unless it was for [[StylisticSuck other reasons]]. It should also be noted that the modern push to update everything to HD can also result in a retroactive form of this, as a matte painting in a 1980s VHS release looks fine, but on the cleaned up, [[DigitalDestruction "remastered"]] Blu-ray looks like, well, a cheap matte painting in the background.
background. Same for Video games when prerendered backgrounds look weird.

Top