Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / SockPuppet

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A secondary, pseudonymous Net identity created by an individual in order to give the impression that there are multiple people who agree with a given point, idea or action, when in reality there's only one. Sock puppets are usually used to post follow-ups that praise their owner or echo his convictions, in the hopes that they will convince real people to pay attention to him and/or his agenda. While the first Sock Puppets appeared on {{Usenet}}, they have long since spread to other electronic venues, most notably blogs.

to:

A secondary, pseudonymous Net identity created by an individual in order to give the impression that there are multiple people who agree with a given point, idea or action, when in reality [[VocalMinority there's only one.one]]. Sock puppets are usually used to post follow-ups that praise their owner or echo his convictions, in the hopes that they will convince real people to pay attention to him and/or his agenda. While the first Sock Puppets appeared on {{Usenet}}, they have long since spread to other electronic venues, most notably blogs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This video titled [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fhvmg9oiWU Creationists' First time on the Internet]] shows a pair of creationists using multiple accounts to flag opposing views videos and up-voting theirs.

to:

* This video titled [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fhvmg9oiWU Creationists' First time on the Internet]] by WebAnimation/DarkMatter2025, shows a pair of creationists using multiple accounts to flag opposing views videos and up-voting theirs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* This video titled [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fhvmg9oiWU Creationists' First time on the Internet]] shows a pair of creationists using multiple accounts to flag opposing views videos and up-voting theirs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The new DungeonKeeper for iOS systems had managed to get 5000 5 / 5 star reviews by people, some of them even saying "This game is trash" to "EA has another smash hit!". ''All'' 5 / 5 star reviews. It wasn't until actual gaming sites and magazines started to come out with 1 / 5 reviews that the contrast became evident seeing as it's reliance on being an AllegedlyFreeGame tries to get you to pay up to 80 dollars for the largest amount of "[[InGameCurrency crystals]]".

to:

* The new DungeonKeeper ''VideoGame/DungeonKeeper'' for iOS systems had managed to get 5000 5 / 5 star reviews by people, some of them even saying "This game is trash" to "EA has another smash hit!". ''All'' 5 / 5 star reviews. It wasn't until actual gaming sites and magazines started to come out with 1 / 5 reviews that the contrast became evident seeing as it's reliance on being an AllegedlyFreeGame tries to get you to pay up to 80 dollars for the largest amount of "[[InGameCurrency crystals]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The new DungeonKeeper for iOS systems had managed to get 5000 5 / 5 star reviews by people, some of them even saying "This game is trash" to "EA has another smash hit!". ''All'' 5 / 5 star reviews. It wasn't until actual gaming sites and magazines started to come out with 1 / 5 reviews that the contrast became evident seeing as it's reliance on being an AllegedlyFreeGame tries to get you to pay up to 80 dollars for the largest amount of "[[InGameCurrency crystals]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also AstroTurf and the second definition of MeatPuppet. Not to be confused with an actual HandPuppet made from a sock.

to:

See also AstroTurf and the second definition of MeatPuppet. Not to be confused with an actual HandPuppet made from a sock.
sock. For when you're not sure whether the person is real or not, that's PoesLaw.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/WilliamShakespeare [[TheZerothLawOfTropeExamples has an example of this]]. In ''Theatre/JuliusCaesar,'' Cassius wins Brutus to his cause by leaving outside of Brutus' home a bunch of petitions written by himself in various handwriting styles, all criticizing Caesar and praising Brutus.
* The CharlesStross novel ''HaltingState'' discusses sock puppets, by name, extensively. [[spoiler: An apparently missing man turns out never to have existed.]]
* Not only Shakespeare but also Creator/CharlesDickens, in ''MartinChuzzlewit''. Mrs Gamp's ImaginaryFriend, Mrs Harris, is essentially a spoken sock-puppet, since she lives (by Mrs Gamp's own accounts) entirely to agree with Mrs Gamp's opinions, flatter her character and express confidence in her abilities. Nobody else believes she exists.
* One of the murder suspects in ''Bimbos of the Death Sun'' turns out to be a Sock Puppet created by some guys who wanted to yank the chains of FanDumb.
* In the Dean Koontz novel ''FalseMemory,'' pop psychology writer Derek Lampton and his son spend hours posting negative reviews of a rival writer's books on Amazon, using false names and e-mail addresses.

to:

* Creator/WilliamShakespeare [[TheZerothLawOfTropeExamples has an example of this]]. In ''Theatre/JuliusCaesar,'' Cassius wins Brutus to his cause by leaving outside of Brutus' Brutus's home a bunch of petitions written by himself in various handwriting styles, all criticizing Caesar and praising Brutus.
* The CharlesStross novel ''HaltingState'' discusses sock puppets, by name, extensively. [[spoiler: An apparently missing man turns out never to have existed.]]
*
Not only Shakespeare but also Creator/CharlesDickens, in ''MartinChuzzlewit''.''Literature/MartinChuzzlewit''. Mrs Gamp's ImaginaryFriend, Mrs Harris, is essentially a spoken sock-puppet, since she lives (by Mrs Gamp's own accounts) entirely to agree with Mrs Gamp's opinions, flatter her character and express confidence in her abilities. Nobody else believes she exists.
* The Creator/CharlesStross novel ''Literature/HaltingState'' discusses sock puppets, by name, extensively. [[spoiler: An apparently missing man turns out never to have existed.]]
* One of the murder suspects in ''Bimbos of the Death Sun'' ''Literature/BimbosOfTheDeathSun'' turns out to be a Sock Puppet created by some guys who wanted to yank the chains of FanDumb.
* In the Dean Koontz novel ''FalseMemory,'' ''Literature/FalseMemory,'' pop psychology writer Derek Lampton and his son spend hours posting negative reviews of a rival writer's books on Amazon, using false names and e-mail addresses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Watchdog}} (or at least the Rogue Traders part) had an amusing example of a case where the owner of a sewing machine company used these... over the telephone. Seriously, he'd pretend to be multiple people working for the same company to respond to complaints with threats and insults and fob off any unsatisfied customers wanting a refund. You can read their official write up of the story [[http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mg74/features/rogue-traders-coopers-sewing here on their site]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Literature/EndersGame'', pre-teens Peter and Valentine Wiggin set up anonymous accounts called "Locke" and "Demosthenes" on the online adult political forums (which serve much the same purpose as the blogosphere in real life). They then use Sock Puppet accounts to comment on their main posts in order to quickly gain notice/influence. Quite notable as the book pre-dated fora as a large part of internet culture, and in fact pre-dated the World Wide Web.

to:

* In ''Literature/EndersGame'', pre-teens Peter and Valentine Wiggin set up anonymous accounts called "Locke" and "Demosthenes" on the online adult political forums (which serve much the same purpose as the blogosphere in real life). They then use Sock Puppet accounts to comment on their main posts in order to quickly gain notice/influence. Quite notable as the book pre-dated fora as a large part of internet culture, and in fact pre-dated the World Wide Web.Web (but not Usenet).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a new user called "Curious" and started posting controversial but also sincere arguments (and not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]) in the hopes of making the point of "See? This is how make arguments without being shut down or banned" to the detractors; Unfortunately the critics were proven right when both his new user and his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppetry and also demanded to issue an apology for his "social experiment", and when he refused [[https://a-plus-scribe.com/doku.php?id=transcriptions:matt_dillahunty_ok_with_ban_-_but_not_with_blame he was banned from there]].

to:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a new user called "Curious" and started posting made a post with controversial but also sincere arguments (and not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]) in the hopes of making the point of "See? This is how you make arguments without being shut down or banned" to the detractors; Unfortunately Unfortunately, the critics were proven right when both his new user and his post was unilaterally removed (and then went down on a memory hole) and his subsequent posts following the process to appeal this were summarily deleted, disdained met with disdain and ridiculed ridicule by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppetry and also demanded to issue an apology for his "social experiment", and when he refused [[https://a-plus-scribe.com/doku.php?id=transcriptions:matt_dillahunty_ok_with_ban_-_but_not_with_blame he was banned from there]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a user called "curious" and started posting sincere and controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment", and when he refused [[https://a-plus-scribe.com/doku.php?id=transcriptions:matt_dillahunty_ok_with_ban_-_but_not_with_blame he was banned from there]].

to:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a new user called "curious" "Curious" and started posting sincere and controversial but also sincere arguments (but (and not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately trolling]]) in the hopes of making the point of "See? This is how make arguments without being shut down or banned" to the detractors; Unfortunately the critics were proven right when both his new user and his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering puppetry and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment", "social experiment", and when he refused [[https://a-plus-scribe.com/doku.php?id=transcriptions:matt_dillahunty_ok_with_ban_-_but_not_with_blame he was banned from there]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Examples Are Not Recent. Please use a date to mark when it happened.


* Scientific journal publisher Elsevier was recently [[http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/09/bad-science-medical-journals-companies busted with publishing "journals"]] that were merely sock puppets of medical companies, containing nothing but positive reports about the drugs they produced.

to:

* In 2009, Scientific journal publisher Elsevier was recently [[http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/09/bad-science-medical-journals-companies busted with publishing "journals"]] that were merely sock puppets of medical companies, containing nothing but positive reports about the drugs they produced.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moving micronationalism-related examples


* MicroWiki, a micronational encyclopedia with an attached forum, has had several notorious sockpuppeters in its time. Among the most (in)famous is Robert Lethler of Erusia, whose “ptrcancer” account was supposedly run by an Erusian politician who turned out to be – like Erusia and all its other SockPuppet citizens – [[ConsummateLiar completely fake]]. Interestingly, one of Lethler's primary opponents - whose names included Marco Dresner, William Danforth, Sebastian von Linden, and several others - was an equally infamous sockpuppeter. The difference is that "Linden" went on to lead a real micronation.
** February 2011 saw the rise of several "nations" which turned out to be the SockPuppets of micronationalist Barnaby Hands, leading to the term "Handspuppet" in the micronational community.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:240:"Your argument [[IncrediblyLamePun socks]]!"[[note]][[http://www.flickr.com/photos/alexbrn/7919873782/ Photo by Alex Brown]][[/note]] ]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:240:"Your argument [[IncrediblyLamePun [[{{Pun}} socks]]!"[[note]][[http://www.flickr.com/photos/alexbrn/7919873782/ Photo by Alex Brown]][[/note]] ]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Web Original]]
* In ''Literature/{{Worm}}'', the Parahumans Online forums are very well moderated because [[ArtificialIntelligence Dragon]] is several of the moderators.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Apparently Matt has removed his videos regarding his experience.


* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a user called "curious" and started posting sincere and controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment", and when he refused [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBwaa1_n0o he was banned from there]].

to:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a user called "curious" and started posting sincere and controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment", and when he refused [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBwaa1_n0o [[https://a-plus-scribe.com/doku.php?id=transcriptions:matt_dillahunty_ok_with_ban_-_but_not_with_blame he was banned from there]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LiveJournal communities often see Sockpuppets used to get around bans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a user called "curious" and started posting sincere and controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment", and when he refused he was banned from there.

to:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posed as a user called "curious" and started posting sincere and controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment", and when he refused [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHBwaa1_n0o he was banned from there.there]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he attempted a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posted as a user called "curious" and started posting controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then was accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment" and when he refused he was banned from there.

to:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he attempted performed a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posted posed as a user called "curious" and started posting sincere and controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but then he was immediately accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment" "experiment", and when he refused he was banned from there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he attempted a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posted as a user called "curious" and started posting controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but he was demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment" and when he refused he was banned from there.

to:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he attempted a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posted as a user called "curious" and started posting controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but he then was accused of sock puppeteering and also demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment" and when he refused he was banned from there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[Series/TheAtheistExperience Matt Dillahunty]] was accused of this, when he attempted a SecretTestOfCharacter on the members and moderators of a certain forum he was a well-known member of: He wanted to prove to the forum's critics and detractors that, contrary to their claims, the people of said forum were polite, reasonable and open to ideas; So he posted as a user called "curious" and started posting controversial arguments (but not at the extent of [[{{Troll}} trolling]]), unfortunately the critics were proven right when his post were summarily deleted, disdained and ridiculed by both the members and moderators. It wasn't until Matt revealed his true identity that he was then treated more respectfully, but he was demanded to issue an apology for his "experiment" and when he refused he was banned from there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Website/StarDestroyerDotNet gives each admin and some of the moderators one sockpuppet account. One account is their "everyday use" account, the other is the account they use when making administrative decisions. For example, site owner Mike Wong goes by Darth Wong normally and switches to [=AdmiralKanos=] when he needs to (for example) ban someone. Apart from that, sockpuppeting is a bannable offense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An interviewer for Harper's magazine, trying to get in touch with ''TheRoom'' auteur Tommy Wiseau, first had to arrange an interview through a man named "John," allegedly the "administrator" of Wiseau Films. (John is the same guy who sent cease-and-desist letters to Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses for reviewing his film.) Judging by John's peculiar brand of broken English, the writer theorized that John may in fact be Tommy Wiseau himself.

to:

* An interviewer for Harper's magazine, trying to get in touch with ''TheRoom'' ''Film/TheRoom'' auteur Tommy Wiseau, first had to arrange an interview through a man named "John," allegedly the "administrator" of Wiseau Films. (John is the same guy who sent cease-and-desist letters to Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses for reviewing his film.) Judging by John's peculiar brand of broken English, the writer theorized that John may in fact be Tommy Wiseau himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
link back to trope page for literal version


See also AstroTurf and the second definition of MeatPuppet. Not to be confused with an actual constructed puppet, made from a sock.

to:

See also AstroTurf and the second definition of MeatPuppet. Not to be confused with an actual constructed puppet, HandPuppet made from a sock.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An interviewer for Harper's magazine, trying to get in touch with ''TheRoom'' auteur Tommy Wiseau, first had to arrange an interview through a man named "John," allegedly the "administrator" of Wiseau Films. (John is the same guy who sent cease-and-desist letters to ThatGuyWithTheGlasses for reviewing his film.) Judging by John's peculiar brand of broken English, the writer theorized that John may in fact be Tommy Wiseau himself.

to:

* An interviewer for Harper's magazine, trying to get in touch with ''TheRoom'' auteur Tommy Wiseau, first had to arrange an interview through a man named "John," allegedly the "administrator" of Wiseau Films. (John is the same guy who sent cease-and-desist letters to ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses for reviewing his film.) Judging by John's peculiar brand of broken English, the writer theorized that John may in fact be Tommy Wiseau himself.



----

to:

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Video game publishers have been known to offer jobs which consist of using sockpuppets to post on various gaming forums to praise their products. They even provide outlines for different consistent personas to create and maintain (girl gamer, casual gaming jock, etc.) and daily post requirements which can have three digits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Marc Williams of the micronation Freedomia trolled the MicroWiki Forum for over a month in 2013 with sockpuppets in an attempt to evade a one month ban. Supposedly he managed to rack up a ''[[EpicFail six year ban]]'' as a result.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MicroWiki, a micronational encyclopedia with an attached forum, has had several notorious sockpuppeters in its time. Among the most (in)famous is Robert Lethler of Erusia, whose “ptrcancer” account was supposedly run by an Erusian politician named Cameron Jack-Smith, who turned out to be – like Erusia and all its other SockPuppet citizens – [[ConsummateLiar completely fake]]. Interestingly, Lethler's primary former opponent - whose names included Marco Dresner, William Danforth, Sebastian von Linden, and several others - was an equally infamous sockpuppeter. The difference is that "Linden" went on to lead a real micronation.

to:

* MicroWiki, a micronational encyclopedia with an attached forum, has had several notorious sockpuppeters in its time. Among the most (in)famous is Robert Lethler of Erusia, whose “ptrcancer” account was supposedly run by an Erusian politician named Cameron Jack-Smith, who turned out to be – like Erusia and all its other SockPuppet citizens – [[ConsummateLiar completely fake]]. Interestingly, one of Lethler's primary former opponent opponents - whose names included Marco Dresner, William Danforth, Sebastian von Linden, and several others - was an equally infamous sockpuppeter. The difference is that "Linden" went on to lead a real micronation.



** Marc Williams of the micronation Freedomia trolled the forum for over a month in 2013 with sockpuppets in an attempt to evade a one month ban. Supposedly he managed to rack up a ''[[EpicFail six year ban]]'' as a result.

to:

** Marc Williams of the micronation Freedomia trolled the forum MicroWiki Forum for over a month in 2013 with sockpuppets in an attempt to evade a one month ban. Supposedly he managed to rack up a ''[[EpicFail six year ban]]'' as a result.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Some users will cheat the system if they're not happy with how their auction is going. If the bid is too low they will use another account to outbid at the last second so they won't have to sell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

Top