Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ScienceFiction

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ...{{the future}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

+ ScienceFictionTheatre
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying its fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the technology is used as a means of exploring characters and its social/psychological effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of scientific detail and accuracy used.

to:

In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying its fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the technology is used as a means of exploring characters and its social/psychological effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. genre.]] However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of scientific detail and accuracy used.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* VideoGameStories
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting spelling


-->-- '''Creaor/RodSerling''', ''Series/TheTwilightZone1959''

to:

-->-- '''Creaor/RodSerling''', '''Creator/RodSerling''', ''Series/TheTwilightZone1959''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Science Fiction depends on asking "what if?" (Not quite the same thing as WhatIf.) Or as an obscure 1930s Science Fiction musical asked, "just imagine"...

to:

Science Fiction depends on asking "what if?" (Not quite the same thing as WhatIf.) WhatIf). Or as an obscure 1930s Science Fiction musical asked, "just imagine"...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

+ ScienceFictionPodcasts
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* TranshumansInSpace
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''"It's been said that science fiction and fantasy are two different things: science fiction the improbable made possible; fantasy, the impossible made probable..."''
-->-- '''Rod Serling''', ''{{The Twilight Zone}}''

to:

''"It's ->''"It's been said that science fiction and fantasy are two different things: science fiction the improbable made possible; fantasy, the impossible made probable..."''
-->-- '''Rod Serling''', ''{{The Twilight Zone}}'''''Creaor/RodSerling''', ''Series/TheTwilightZone1959''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TeslaTechTimeline
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(Exact definitions of these genres, including whether they're really Sci-Fi, and how much they overlap with {{Fantasy}}, will vary from person to person.)

to:

(Exact definitions of these genres, including whether they're really Sci-Fi, and how much they overlap with {{Fantasy}}, Fantasy, will vary from person to person.)

Added: 605

Changed: 262

Removed: 697

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
reorganizing & potholes


[[index]]
[floatboxright: By Medium:
+ ScienceFictionAnimatedFilms
+ ScienceFictionAnimeAndManga
+ ScienceFictionComicBooks
+ ScienceFictionFanFic
+ ScienceFictionFilms
+ ScienceFictionLiterature
+ ScienceFictionSeries
+ ScienceFictionTabletopGames
+ ScienceFictionVideoGames
+ ScienceFictionVisualNovels
+ ScienceFictionWebOriginals
+ SciFiWebcomics
+ ScienceFictionWesternAnimation
]
[[/index]]
->\\



* ...travel between stars were possible.
* ...aliens came to Earth.

to:

* ...[[FasterThanLightTravel travel between stars stars]] were possible.
* ...[[FirstContact aliens came came]] to Earth.



* ...we had superhuman abilities.

to:

* ...we had [[StockSuperpowers superhuman abilities.abilities]].



Subgenres of SF include:

to:

Subgenres of SF include:See also: SpeculativeFictionTropes, SpeculativeFictionSeries, SpeculativeFictionCreatorIndex, TechnologyMarchesOn.

----



[floatboxright:'''Mediums:'''
+ ScienceFictionAnimatedFilms
+ ScienceFictionAnimeAndManga
+ ScienceFictionComicBooks
+ ScienceFictionFanFic
+ ScienceFictionFilms
+ ScienceFictionLiterature
+ ScienceFictionSeries
+ ScienceFictionTabletopGames
+ ScienceFictionVideoGames
+ ScienceFictionVisualNovels
+ ScienceFictionWebOriginals
+ SciFiWebcomics
+ ScienceFictionWesternAnimation
]

!!Subgenres:
(Exact definitions of these genres, including whether they're really Sci-Fi, and how much they overlap with {{Fantasy}}, will vary from person to person.)



* {{Cyberpunk}}, {{Steampunk}}, and other PunkPunk genres



* ScienceFantasy and SciFiHorror
* SpaceOpera and SpaceWestern

to:

* ScienceFantasy and PunkPunk
** {{Cyberpunk}}
** {{Steampunk}}
*
SciFiHorror
* SpaceOpera and ScienceFantasy
* SpaceOpera
*
SpaceWestern



* Et cetera

to:

* Et cetera




(Exact definitions of these genres, including whether they're really SF, and how much they overlap with fantasy, will vary from person to person.)

See: SpeculativeFictionTropes, SpeculativeFictionSeries, SpeculativeFictionCreatorIndex, TechnologyMarchesOn.

Added: 46

Changed: 34

Removed: 16

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateHistory

to:

* AlternateHistoryAlienInvasion



* MechaShow
** RealRobotGenre
** SuperRobotGenre



* SciFiHorror
* ScienceFantasy

to:

* SciFiHorror
* ScienceFantasy
ScienceFantasy and SciFiHorror
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] science fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans), just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by deliberately altering basic scientific laws) and its effects on scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths.

to:

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness [[MohsScaleOfSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] science fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans), just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by deliberately altering basic scientific laws) and its effects on scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths.

Added: 10

Changed: 297

Removed: 122

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness Hard Science Fiction]]
* [[MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness Soft Science Fiction]]
* Social Science Fiction
* SpaceOpera
* ScienceFantasy
* SciFiHorror

to:

* [[MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness Hard Science Fiction]]
* [[MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness
and Soft Science Fiction]]
* Social Science Fiction
AlternateHistory
* SpaceOpera
[[AfterTheEnd Apocalyptic and Post-Apocalyptic Fiction]]
* ScienceFantasy
{{Cyberpunk}}, {{Steampunk}}, and other PunkPunk genres
* SciFiHorrorMilitaryScienceFiction



* NewWeird



* [[AfterTheEnd Post-Apocalypse]]
* {{Cyberpunk}}
* {{Steampunk}}
* Other PunkPunk genres

to:

* [[AfterTheEnd Post-Apocalypse]]
SciFiHorror
* {{Cyberpunk}}
ScienceFantasy
* {{Steampunk}}
* Other PunkPunk genres
SpaceOpera and SpaceWestern



* MilitaryScienceFiction
* AlternateUniverse
* NewWeird
* {{Transhuman}}ism
* {{Theotech}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing duplicate 'an'


Science Fiction authors and fans are [[BerserkButton notoriously cranky]] about [[SciFiGhetto how their work is not taken seriously by the literary community]], and especially resent being lumped in with [[{{Fantasy}} the fantasy genre.]] (SpeculativeFiction, an umbrella term for all varieties of imaginative literature, has an an analysis page that explains the [[Analysis/SpeculativeFiction differences between Fantasy and Science Fiction]].) Note also that many Science Fiction fans dislike the term SciFi: to them it suggests the [[{{Flanderization}} flanderized]] conception of the genre in popular culture, with green-skinned aliens, giant space battles and hammy production values. Therefore, [[InsistentTerminology they will insist on calling it]] [[SpellMyNameWithAnS SF]] for short.

to:

Science Fiction authors and fans are [[BerserkButton notoriously cranky]] about [[SciFiGhetto how their work is not taken seriously by the literary community]], and especially resent being lumped in with [[{{Fantasy}} the fantasy genre.]] (SpeculativeFiction, an umbrella term for all varieties of imaginative literature, has an an analysis page that explains the [[Analysis/SpeculativeFiction differences between Fantasy and Science Fiction]].) Note also that many Science Fiction fans dislike the term SciFi: to them it suggests the [[{{Flanderization}} flanderized]] conception of the genre in popular culture, with green-skinned aliens, giant space battles and hammy production values. Therefore, [[InsistentTerminology they will insist on calling it]] [[SpellMyNameWithAnS SF]] for short.

Added: 9

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[index]]




to:

[[/index]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SciFiHorror
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] science fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by deliberately altering basic scientific laws) and its effects on scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths.

to:

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] science fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, Babe}}s (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) humans), just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by deliberately altering basic scientific laws) and its effects on scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying its fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the technology is used as a means of exploring characters and it's social/psychological effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of scientific detail and accuracy used.

to:

In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying its fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the technology is used as a means of exploring characters and it's its social/psychological effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of scientific detail and accuracy used.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the technology is used as a means of exploring characters and it's social/psychological effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of scientific detail and accuracy used.

to:

In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's its fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the technology is used as a means of exploring characters and it's social/psychological effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of scientific detail and accuracy used.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The one defining(-ish, definitions differ) trait of Science Fiction is that there is technology that doesn't exist ''in the time period the story is written in''. Consider ''20,000 Leagues Under the Sea''. The story was written in a time when submarines were still at the prototype stage, so ''20,000 Leagues Under the Sea'' falls within the boundaries of Science Fiction.

to:

The one defining(-ish, definitions differ) trait of Science Fiction is that there is technology that doesn't exist ''in the time period the story is written in''. Consider ''20,000 ''[[Literature/TwentyThousandLeaguesUnderTheSea 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea''.Sea]]''. The story was written in a time when submarines were still at the prototype stage, so ''20,000 Leagues Under the Sea'' falls within the boundaries of Science Fiction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Theotech}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


ScienceFiction depends on asking "what if?" (Not quite the same thing as WhatIf.) Or as an obscure 1930s ScienceFiction musical asked, "just imagine"...

to:

ScienceFiction Science Fiction depends on asking "what if?" (Not quite the same thing as WhatIf.) Or as an obscure 1930s ScienceFiction Science Fiction musical asked, "just imagine"...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Science Fiction authors and fans are [[BerserkButton notoriously cranky]] about [[SciFiGhetto how their work is not taken seriously by the literary community]], and especially resent being lumped in with [[{{Fantasy}} the fantasy genre.]] (SpeculativeFiction, an umbrella term for all varieties of imaginative literature, has an an analysis page that explains the [[Analysis/SpeculativeFiction differences between Fantasy and Science Fiction]].) Note also that many Science Fiction fans dislike the term {{Sci-Fi}}: to them it suggests the [[{{Flanderization}} flanderized]] conception of the genre in popular culture, with green-skinned aliens, giant space battles and hammy production values. Therefore, [[InsistentTerminology they will insist on calling it]] [[SpellMyNameWithAnS SF]] for short.

to:

Science Fiction authors and fans are [[BerserkButton notoriously cranky]] about [[SciFiGhetto how their work is not taken seriously by the literary community]], and especially resent being lumped in with [[{{Fantasy}} the fantasy genre.]] (SpeculativeFiction, an umbrella term for all varieties of imaginative literature, has an an analysis page that explains the [[Analysis/SpeculativeFiction differences between Fantasy and Science Fiction]].) Note also that many Science Fiction fans dislike the term {{Sci-Fi}}: SciFi: to them it suggests the [[{{Flanderization}} flanderized]] conception of the genre in popular culture, with green-skinned aliens, giant space battles and hammy production values. Therefore, [[InsistentTerminology they will insist on calling it]] [[SpellMyNameWithAnS SF]] for short.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The GITS hidden depths example is kind of redundant since it\'s saying more or less the same thing as the \"hard\" sf example of The Captain (and there\'s no rule that says \"soft\" SF can\'t have realistic tech and explore it\'s consequences, just that it doesn\'t go into detail explaining or justifying it). There\'s more than enough about \"hard\" and \"soft\" SF on this page anyway, especially considering we have a separate page about it.


In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of Science Fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the science is used as a means of exploring characters and the social/psychological effects of the new technology. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "science-y" atmosphere without the author actually having to use actual science. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of science used.

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] Science Fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by making a few minor changes to mathematical formulas) and its effects on scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths, as a story might be "[[GhostInTheShell cyborg police bust crime in the grimdark future by hacking people's brains]]", which sounds like soft science fiction, but further [[AllThereInTheManual exploration]] shows next to everything to be based on technology that is currently available, and the consequences of such technology is explored in depth.

to:

In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of Science Fiction, science fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the science technology is used as a means of exploring characters and the it's social/psychological effects of the new technology.effects. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is often little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "science-y" "sci-fi" atmosphere without the author actually having to use actual science.detailed scientific principles. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of science scientific detail and accuracy used.

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] Science Fiction. science fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by making a few minor changes to mathematical formulas) deliberately altering basic scientific laws) and its effects on scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths, as a story might be "[[GhostInTheShell cyborg police bust crime in the grimdark future by hacking people's brains]]", which sounds like soft science fiction, but further [[AllThereInTheManual exploration]] shows next to everything to be based on technology that is currently available, and the consequences of such technology is explored in depth.
HiddenDepths.

Changed: 398

Removed: 384

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] Science Fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by making a few minor changes to mathematical formulas) and its effects on science.

This can often lead to HiddenDepths, as a story might be "[[GhostInTheShell cyborg police bust crime in the grimdark future by hacking people's brains]]", which sounds like soft Science Fiction, but further [[AllThereInTheManual exploration]] shows next to everything to be based on technology that is currently available, and the consequences of such technology is explored in depth.

to:

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] Science Fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by making a few minor changes to mathematical formulas) and its effects on science.

scientific research. This can often lead to HiddenDepths, as a story might be "[[GhostInTheShell cyborg police bust crime in the grimdark future by hacking people's brains]]", which sounds like soft Science Fiction, science fiction, but further [[AllThereInTheManual exploration]] shows next to everything to be based on technology that is currently available, and the consequences of such technology is explored in depth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of Science Fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe. In the latter, the science is used as a means of exploring characters and the social/psychological effects of the new technology. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "science-y" atmosphere without the author actually having to use actual science. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of science used.

to:

In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of Science Fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe.GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe, instead of having to have him use a boring, ordinary gun and have boring, ordinary sex, with the boring, ordinary-skinned Earth babe. In the latter, the science is used as a means of exploring characters and the social/psychological effects of the new technology. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "science-y" atmosphere without the author actually having to use actual science. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of science used.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of Science Fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction falls under two main schools - adventure/pulp science fiction and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe. In the latter, the science is used as a means of exploring characters and the social/psychological effects of the new technology. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "science-y" atmosphere without the author actually having to use actual science. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of science used.

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] Science Fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by making a few minor changes to mathematical formulas) and its effects on science.

to:

In general, without getting too much into the advanced and diverse subgenres of Science Fiction, there are two schools -- [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness "hard" and "soft"]]. While the distinction isn't always clear cut, there are a few key differences. Hard science fiction relies on using already established science or justifying it's fictionalized science using carefully calculated predictions. Hard SF tries to use the advanced technology as something that is important in itself, with its consequences, limitations and new uses being the main plot points. Due to the heavy focus on the scientific aspect, this is a rather niche market. Soft science fiction includes everything else, and generally falls under two main major schools - adventure/pulp science fiction (which includes the SpaceOpera) and social science fiction. The former uses technology as a means to an end, merely a backdrop that allows TheCaptain to fight for Justice™ with a [[StunGun Stun Ray]] against the evil aliens and have [[BoldlyComing space sex]] with the GreenSkinnedSpaceBabe. In the latter, the science is used as a means of exploring characters and the social/psychological effects of the new technology. Of course, it is entirely possible to have an action packed adventure story with deep social commentary. In both schools of soft science fiction, it usually doesn't matter whether the technology used is actually plausible or not, and there is little to no explanation as to how the technology would actually work. Otherwise, it may rely on such devices as TechnoBabble to maintain a "science-y" atmosphere without the author actually having to use actual science. Because hard science fiction tends to focus more on scientific detail and soft science fiction focuses on well developed characters and/or adventure, there is a divide between certain sections of the fandom. This divide has been around since, essentially, [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=231 the very beginning of the genre]]. However, "hard" and "soft" say nothing about quality or literary value, just the level of science used.

As with everything, there is often a [[MohsScaleofSciFiHardness blend of Hard and Soft]] Science Fiction. It is perfectly possible to write a hard Science Fiction story about TheCaptain running around shooting people with miniaturized microwave emitters designed to incapacitate people without killing them, shooting aliens and having sex with {{Green Skinned Space Babe}}s, (with no chance of conception because green aliens are biologically incompatible with humans) just as one can go into considerable detail justifying otherwise implausible technology that is [[ClarkesThirdLaw much like magic]] (usually accomplished by making a few minor changes to mathematical formulas) and its effects on science.
science.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

+ ScienceFictionFanFic

Top