Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / RuleZero

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Rule Zero (as this is frequently called, hence the TropeName) is a reminder to the players that the GM of any tabletop game has to exercise some common sense, and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. You could cite all the rules and mechanics you want that said you just one-shotted the BigBad by slamming [[InfinityPlusOneSword the best weapon in the game]] to invoke the ChunkySalsaRule; too bad. If the GM says it didn't happen, then it didn't happen. Period.

to:

Rule Zero (as this is frequently called, hence the TropeName) is a reminder to the players that the GM of any tabletop game has to exercise some common sense, and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. You could cite all the rules and mechanics you want that said you just one-shotted the BigBad by slamming using [[InfinityPlusOneSword the best weapon in the game]] to invoke the ChunkySalsaRule; too bad. If the GM says it didn't happen, then it didn't happen. Period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Rule Zero (as this is frequently called, hence the TropeName) is a reminder to the players that the GM of any tabletop game has to exercise some common sense, and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. You could cite all the rules and mechanics you want that said you just one-shotted the BigBad with a fireball to the face; too bad. If the GM says it didn't happen, then it didn't happen. Period.

to:

Rule Zero (as this is frequently called, hence the TropeName) is a reminder to the players that the GM of any tabletop game has to exercise some common sense, and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. You could cite all the rules and mechanics you want that said you just one-shotted the BigBad with a fireball to by slamming [[InfinityPlusOneSword the face; best weapon in the game]] to invoke the ChunkySalsaRule; too bad. If the GM says it didn't happen, then it didn't happen. Period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Can be worded very positively, as in "Rule Zero: [[TabletopGame/NewWorldOfDarkness if an interpretation of a rule is more fun, do that]]" or very negatively, as in "Rule Zero: [[TemptingFate don't give the GM ideas]]." How the rule is expressed is usually a good clue to the GM as to how far he can push it.

to:

Can be worded very positively, as in "Rule Zero: [[TabletopGame/NewWorldOfDarkness if an interpretation of a rule is more fun, do that]]" or very negatively, as in "Rule Zero: [[TemptingFate don't give the GM ideas]]." How the rule is expressed is usually a good clue to the GM as to how far he they can push it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Adult authority figures routinely dealing with children and teenagers will invoke this conjunction with ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem, namely for three reasons. First, no authority figure can foresee every possible situation and will have to adjudicate accordingly. Second, this is a way to deal with a real life RulesLawyer, especially those that argue every detail and word of a rule. Third, this is used to punish those who "creatively" interpret rules, instructions or bans with LoopholeAbuse or ExactWords.

Added: 118

Changed: 1414

Removed: 596

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UsefulNotes/AmericanFootball has a few rules against "palpably unfair acts", which function as this (The NFL has Rule 12-3-3 for players and substitutes, and Rule 13-1-7 for non-players--see below for an example). They're not used very often, and when they are, it's usually an obvious case (such as a substitute running into the field from the sideline during a play and tackling the ball carrier), when the advantage gained by the offending team was so extreme that a lesser penalty would not be sufficient to mitigate it. In high school and college codes, it's even possible for the referees to declare the offending team to have forfeited.
-->'''NFL Rule 12-3-3:''' A player or substitute shall not interfere with play by any act which is palpably unfair.\\

to:

* UsefulNotes/AmericanFootball has a few rules against "palpably unfair acts", which function as this (The NFL has Rule 12-3-3 for players and substitutes, and Rule 13-1-7 for non-players--see below for an example). the referees having fiat to make a judgement call on anything that they deem unfair but isn't specifically against any one rule. They're not used very often, and when they are, it's usually an obvious case (such as a substitute running into the field from the sideline during a play and tackling the ball carrier), when the advantage gained by the offending team was so extreme that a lesser penalty would not be sufficient to mitigate it. it (such as somebody running onto the field from the sidelines and tackling the guy with the ball).
**
In high school and college codes, it's even possible for college, this can go as far as the referees to declare declaring the offending team has instantly lost the game. The NFL doesn't allow that, but the refs can award the penalized team with whatever they think is appropriate, up to have forfeited.
-->'''NFL
and including a touchdown. However, Rule 17 does allow the NFL Commissioner to say that a team lost, regardless of the score. The Commissioner may also order the entire game to be replayed, or to be replayed starting from the moment of an unfair act. However, this power has never been used; it's considered unlikely that there will ever be any act of cheating so extreme that an NFL Commissioner would be willing to overturn the results on the field.
--->'''NFL
Rule 12-3-3:''' A player or substitute shall not interfere with play by any act which is palpably unfair.\\



** While the NFL does not allow referees to declare a forfeit for a "palpably unfair act" as is the case in college and high school football, Rule 17 does allow the NFL Commissioner to do so. The Commissioner may also order the entire game to be replayed, or to be replayed starting from the moment of an unfair act, regardless of whether the referees themselves recognized the act as unfair. However, this power has never been used and it's considered unlikely that there will ever be any act of cheating so extreme that an NFL Commissioner would be willing to overturn the results on the field.



** This is one reason why MTG has LoadsAndLoadsOfRules: all official tournament referees are allowed to invoke Rule Zero if there is no precedent for how certain cards interact. Their decision then gets stuck in the big ol' list of errata/clarifications.
** More prominently, in tournaments, the head judge specifically has the power to make any ruling he wants, and his word will be final, even if he turns out to be wrong (ie. the ruling was actually against the official rules of the game). The only recourse a player has for this is to make a complaint afterwards. Fortunately these types of wrong rulings happen very rarely (but there are cases).

to:

** This is one reason why MTG ''MTG'' has LoadsAndLoadsOfRules: all official tournament referees are allowed to invoke Rule Zero if there is no precedent for how certain cards interact. Their decision then gets stuck in the big ol' list of errata/clarifications.
** More prominently, in In tournaments, the head judge specifically has the power to make any ruling he wants, and his word will be final, even if he turns out to be wrong (ie. (i.e. even if the ruling decision was actually against the official rules of the game). game, whatever the head judge of a tournament says goes, and that's that). The only recourse a player has for this if they don't like what the head judge ruled is to make a complaint afterwards. Fortunately And while these types of wrong incorrect rulings happen very rarely (but there are cases).do happen, such a thing is quite rare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** While the NFL does not allow referees to declare a forfeit for a "palpably unfair act" as is the case in college and high school football, Rule 17 does allow the NFL Commissioner to do so. The Commissioner may also order the entire game to be replayed, or to be replayed starting from the moment of an unfair act, regardless of whether the referees themselves recognized the act as unfair. However, this power has never been used and it's considered unlikely that there will ever be any act of cheating so extreme that an NFL Commissioner would be willing to overturn the results on the field.
** The NFL also has the penalty of "extraordinarily unfair act". It's basically the same as a "palpably unfair act", but more extreme and thus allowing for penalties beyond the game in which it occurred. In this case, the team can be fined and/or have draft picks revoked, and the player(s) involved can be suspended for however many games the NFL Commissioner deems appropriate.
** A specific example that's given of what constitutes a "palpably unfair act" is the defense repeatedly committing penalties near their own goal line to prevent scoring. "Half the distance to the goal" is a trivial penalty when the distance to the goal is only about a yard. But if a team is deemed by the referees to be doing this intentionally on multiple plays in a row, they can give the offensive team an automatic touchdown. In the NFL, this can only happen for fouls committed after the officials warn the defense that they're suspected of intentionally fouling.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-->'''GM Rule #1. You are IN CHARGE. You are ALWAYS RIGHT.'''\\\
We give you these rules as guidance. Use them when you do not know what you’d like to have happen in the game. When you do know, ignore them. We have tried to make the rules as helpful and powerful as we can, but '''if you don’t like a rule,''' '''''the rule is wrong.''''' Good rules help a lot but bad rules were made to be broken, tortured, lobotomized and summarily executed. Dice are handy for giving players the illusion they control their destiny. This is valuable but roll your dice out of the players’ sight, behind a screen. '''If a die roll gives you a result you don’t like,''' '''''the die is wrong.''''' Change the result to the number you want. You can dock the die credits or beat it up, though in our experience this has little effect.
** Emphasis not added. That's how it is in the book.

Added: 495

Changed: 129

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.

to:

* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink. There's even notes on the Dungeon Master's Guide about how to apply Rule Zero, as well as general advice on how to be a good DM.
-->Before you add a new rule to your campaign, ask yourself two questions: "Will the rule improve the game?" (and) "Will my players like it?" If you're confident that the answer to both questions is "yes", then you have nothing to lose by giving it a try. Urge your players to provide feedback. If the rule or game element isn't functioning as intended or isn't adding much to your game, you can refine it or ditch it. No matter what a rule's source, a rule serves you, not the other way around.

Added: 778

Changed: 863

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In an open-ended tabletop RPG, game balance is sometimes hard to achieve, and, with an unlimited number of choices available to the players, a GameBreaker is inevitable (especially if you have a RulesLawyer at your table). For this reason, most tabletop roleplaying games mention some version of Rule Zero: ''The GameMaster is always right.''

Rule Zero is simply a reminder to the players that the GM has to exercise some common sense and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. While a GM has fiat to exercise Rule Zero at their table at will, they are reminded that excessive arbitrary use of this rule will eventually lead to an empty game table - also known as "Rule -1: The GM is not always right, but what the GM says goes. If they say enough stupid stuff, [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere the players go as well."]].

to:

In an open-ended tabletop RPG, game balance is sometimes hard to achieve, and, with since there is an unlimited number of choices available to the players, players. In such a GameBreaker is situation, it's inevitable (especially if you have that there's going to be a RulesLawyer at your table). GameBreaker, strange applications of the mechanics by the RulesLawyer, and things which are done in such a way that it's clearly NotTheIntendedUse. For this reason, these reasons, to protect the sanity and well-being of the average GameMaster, most tabletop roleplaying games mention some version of Rule Zero: ''The GameMaster the following rule:

'''The Game Master
is always right.''

'''

Rule Zero (as this is simply frequently called, hence the TropeName) is a reminder to the players that the GM of any tabletop game has to exercise some common sense sense, and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. You could cite all the rules and mechanics you want that said you just one-shotted the BigBad with a fireball to the face; too bad. If the GM says it didn't happen, then it didn't happen. Period.

While a GM has fiat to exercise Rule Zero at their table at will, they are reminded that excessive arbitrary use of this rule will eventually lead to an empty game table - also known as "Rule -1: The GM is not always right, but what the GM says goes. If they say enough stupid stuff, [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere the players go as well."]].
well]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The game ''Monster Horrorshow'' was a brief blip on the radar in the 1980s for tabletop gaming. But its manual gave what is thought to be the best advice ever on how to be a good GM: "[[https://1d4chan.org/wiki/File:Werewizard.jpg give your players a good time]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rule renumbering


* In many sports, to prevent {{Rules Lawyer}}s from [[LoopholeAbuse abusing obscure loopholes]], there's always a rule about how the officials/umpires/referees are the ultimate authority on the rules. One example is Major League Baseball, which has rule 9.01 (c), which states "Each umpire has authority to rule on any point not specifically covered in these rules".

to:

* In many sports, to prevent {{Rules Lawyer}}s from [[LoopholeAbuse abusing obscure loopholes]], there's always a rule about how the officials/umpires/referees are the ultimate authority on the rules. One example is Major League Baseball, which has rule 9.01 (c), 8.01(c), which states "Each umpire has authority to rule on any point not specifically covered in these rules".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The English [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law common law]] system more or less functions this way, at least with regard to civil matters; in general, people are expected to conduct themselves ''reasonably'', and legal artifices or loopholes tend to be disregarded when making judgments.
Willbyr MOD

Added: 4754

Changed: 2747

Removed: 3492

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.
* ''TabletopGame/MutantsAndMasterminds'' is notable for having a game mechanic for Rule Zero called "Gamemaster fiat". The Gamemaster is permitted to arbitrarily create setbacks to keep his story on track (such as having a hero slip and fall if he's about to catch the bad guy long before the adventure says he should) but requires that the Gamemaster award the hero a hero point (which players can spend later on to perform impressive feats normally beyond their abilities).
** Players can go a step further with "complications" which are specific recurring dramatic setbacks that a GM can use on a player that fit the player's character concept. A common example is the secret identity.
* ''TabletopGame/{{OnlyWar}}'' directly specifies early in the general rules section that the Game Master should exercise common sense and discretion to make things work ideally and many rules refer to "Game Masters' Discretion" for things where any specific rule set would be impractical.
* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The GM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the GM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution -- of the player's character, not the player himself![[/note]]
* B.A. From ''ComicStrip/KnightsOfTheDinnerTable'' averts this. He plays every rule for better or for worse. He eventually seized control of his game through the use of a GMPC and his control over non mechanical story elements (even in the PC's backstories.)

to:

\n[[foldercontrol]]

[[folder:Comic Strips]]
* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.
* ''TabletopGame/MutantsAndMasterminds'' is notable for having a game mechanic for Rule Zero called "Gamemaster fiat". The Gamemaster is permitted to arbitrarily create setbacks to keep his story on track (such as having a hero slip and fall if he's about to catch the bad guy long before the adventure says he should) but requires that the Gamemaster award the hero a hero point (which players can spend later on to perform impressive feats normally beyond their abilities).
''ComicStrip/KnightsOfTheDinnerTable'':
** Players can go a step further with "complications" which are specific recurring dramatic setbacks that a GM can use on a player that fit the player's character concept. A common example is the secret identity.
* ''TabletopGame/{{OnlyWar}}'' directly specifies early in the general rules section that the Game Master should exercise common sense and discretion to make things work ideally and many rules refer to "Game Masters' Discretion" for things where any specific rule set would be impractical.
* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The GM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the GM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution -- of the player's character, not the player himself![[/note]]
*
B.A. From ''ComicStrip/KnightsOfTheDinnerTable'' averts this. He plays every rule for better or for worse. He eventually seized control of his game through the use of a GMPC and his control over non mechanical story elements (even in the PC's backstories.)



* Averted in ''World of Synnibarr'', which actually imposes limits on what the GM can and cannot do:
-->"Fate [the GM] has absolute control during the game regarding rolls and interpretation of the rules. Fate may not, however, deviate from the rules as they are written, for if he or she does and the players find out, then the adventure can be declared null, and the characters must be restored to their original condition, as they were before the game began."
-->"Players may attempt what is known as 'calling Fate.' This means that if a ruling is disputed by a player and he challenges Fate and is found to be absolutely correct, the player may receive double gaming points [XP] for the entire adventure."
* In ''Roleplay/DestroyTheGodmodder'', the GM always has the last word on if an attack, charge, entity, sidequest, or plotline can go through. '''Always.'''
* Dane from ''Literature/StatlessAndTactless'' agrees to give up rule zero in relation to a player to get him to bring a friend. It doesn't go well.
* American Football has a few rules against "palpably unfair acts", which function as this (The NFL has Rule 12-3-3 for players and substitutes, and Rule 13-1-7 for non-players--see below for an example). They're not used very often, and when they are, it's usually an obvious case (such as a substitute running into the field from the sideline during a play and tackling the ball carrier), when the advantage gained by the offending team was so extreme that a lesser penalty would not be sufficient to mitigate it. In high school and college codes, it's even possible for the referees to declare the offending team to have forfeited.

to:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Sports]]
* Averted in ''World of Synnibarr'', which actually imposes limits on what the GM can and cannot do:
-->"Fate [the GM] has absolute control during the game regarding rolls and interpretation of the rules. Fate may not, however, deviate from the rules as they are written, for if he or she does and the players find out, then the adventure can be declared null, and the characters must be restored to their original condition, as they were before the game began."
-->"Players may attempt what is known as 'calling Fate.' This means that if a ruling is disputed by a player and he challenges Fate and is found to be absolutely correct, the player may receive double gaming points [XP] for the entire adventure."
* In ''Roleplay/DestroyTheGodmodder'', the GM always has the last word on if an attack, charge, entity, sidequest, or plotline can go through. '''Always.'''
* Dane from ''Literature/StatlessAndTactless'' agrees to give up rule zero in relation to a player to get him to bring a friend. It doesn't go well.
* American Football
UsefulNotes/AmericanFootball has a few rules against "palpably unfair acts", which function as this (The NFL has Rule 12-3-3 for players and substitutes, and Rule 13-1-7 for non-players--see below for an example). They're not used very often, and when they are, it's usually an obvious case (such as a substitute running into the field from the sideline during a play and tackling the ball carrier), when the advantage gained by the offending team was so extreme that a lesser penalty would not be sufficient to mitigate it. In high school and college codes, it's even possible for the referees to declare the offending team to have forfeited.



* Rule Zero is used often in games played by Mr Welch of Blog/ThingsMrWelchIsNoLongerAllowedToDoInAnRPG to protect the game from his more creative excesses. Usually, there is no rule stating he can't do what he wants to do. In general TheLoonie is a {{Player Archetype|s}} that will often require the exercise of this rule to keep the game on track (though knowing when ''not'' to crush a Loonie's creativity with Rule Zero can be just as important).
* This is one reason why ''MagicTheGathering'' has LoadsAndLoadsOfRules: all official tournament referees are allowed to invoke Rule Zero if there is no precedent for how certain cards interact. Their decision then gets stuck in the big ol' list of errata/clarifications.
** More prominently, in tournaments, the head judge specifically has the power to make any ruling he wants, and his word will be final, even if he turns out to be wrong (ie. the ruling was actually against the official rules of the game). The only recourse a player has for this is to make a complaint afterwards. Fortunately these types of wrong rulings happen very rarely (but there are cases).



* Most countries have laws against very vague crimes like "disturbing the public peace". They function the same as the other examples: when you're obviously doing something wrong without breaking any other laws, you're breaking these.
* ''Panty Explosion Perfect'' averts this. The GM's role is ''very'' strictly defined and delimited. The GM can even have their own PC, with the only rule mod necessary to keep them from manipulating things in favor of their character being that someone else has to GM scenes where the GM's PC is the focus.



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Tabletop Games]]
* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.
* ''TabletopGame/MutantsAndMasterminds'' is notable for having a game mechanic for Rule Zero called "Gamemaster fiat". The Gamemaster is permitted to arbitrarily create setbacks to keep his story on track (such as having a hero slip and fall if he's about to catch the bad guy long before the adventure says he should) but requires that the Gamemaster award the hero a hero point (which players can spend later on to perform impressive feats normally beyond their abilities).
** Players can go a step further with "complications" which are specific recurring dramatic setbacks that a GM can use on a player that fit the player's character concept. A common example is the secret identity.
* ''TabletopGame/{{OnlyWar}}'' directly specifies early in the general rules section that the Game Master should exercise common sense and discretion to make things work ideally and many rules refer to "Game Masters' Discretion" for things where any specific rule set would be impractical.
* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The GM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the GM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution -- of the player's character, not the player himself![[/note]]
* ''TabletopGame/MagicTheGathering'':
** This is one reason why MTG has LoadsAndLoadsOfRules: all official tournament referees are allowed to invoke Rule Zero if there is no precedent for how certain cards interact. Their decision then gets stuck in the big ol' list of errata/clarifications.
** More prominently, in tournaments, the head judge specifically has the power to make any ruling he wants, and his word will be final, even if he turns out to be wrong (ie. the ruling was actually against the official rules of the game). The only recourse a player has for this is to make a complaint afterwards. Fortunately these types of wrong rulings happen very rarely (but there are cases).



* Played with in Arcanik. While Rule Zero still applies, players are capable of using the "Ingenuity System" in response to it. The system allows players to combine skills, attribute scores, and so on to create a ridiculously high skill roll that is almost guaranteed to succeed at whatever the problem is. The catch is that all of those numbers must be combined into a stupid plan that has no chance of working otherwise.

to:

* Played with in Arcanik.''Arcanik''. While Rule Zero still applies, players are capable of using the "Ingenuity System" in response to it. The system allows players to combine skills, attribute scores, and so on to create a ridiculously high skill roll that is almost guaranteed to succeed at whatever the problem is. The catch is that all of those numbers must be combined into a stupid plan that has no chance of working otherwise.otherwise.
* ''Panty Explosion Perfect'' averts this. The GM's role is ''very'' strictly defined and delimited. The GM can even have their own PC, with the only rule mod necessary to keep them from manipulating things in favor of their character being that someone else has to GM scenes where the GM's PC is the focus.
* Averted in ''TabletopGame/WorldOfSynnibarr'', which actually imposes limits on what the GM can and cannot do:
-->"Fate [the GM] has absolute control during the game regarding rolls and interpretation of the rules. Fate may not, however, deviate from the rules as they are written, for if he or she does and the players find out, then the adventure can be declared null, and the characters must be restored to their original condition, as they were before the game began."
-->"Players may attempt what is known as 'calling Fate.' This means that if a ruling is disputed by a player and he challenges Fate and is found to be absolutely correct, the player may receive double gaming points [XP] for the entire adventure."
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Web Original]]
* In ''Roleplay/DestroyTheGodmodder'', the GM always has the last word on if an attack, charge, entity, sidequest, or plotline can go through. '''Always.'''
* Dane from ''Literature/StatlessAndTactless'' agrees to give up rule zero in relation to a player to get him to bring a friend. It doesn't go well.
* Rule Zero is used often in games played by Mr Welch of ''Blog/ThingsMrWelchIsNoLongerAllowedToDoInAnRPG'' to protect the game from his more creative excesses. Usually, there is no rule stating he can't do what he wants to do. In general TheLoonie is a {{Player Archetype|s}} that will often require the exercise of this rule to keep the game on track (though knowing when ''not'' to crush a Loonie's creativity with Rule Zero can be just as important).
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Other]]
* Most countries have laws against very vague crimes like "disturbing the public peace". They function the same as the other examples: when you're obviously doing something wrong without breaking any other laws, you're breaking these.
[[/folder]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed a misquote from the rulebook; added Double Subversion note.


* Subverted with ''TabletopGame/{{Munchkin}}'', which has a Rule Zero, but that rule reads "Disputes should be settled by loud arguments among the players."

to:

* Subverted with ''TabletopGame/{{Munchkin}}'', which has a Rule Zero, but Zero that rule in the rulebook that reads "Disputes "Any other disputes should be settled by loud arguments among arguments," followed by a DoubleSubversion, adding "with the players.owner of the game having the last word."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added Destroy the Godmodder example.

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Roleplay/DestroyTheGodmodder'', the GM always has the last word on if an attack, charge, entity, sidequest, or plotline can go through. '''Always.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is prevalent in UsefulNotes/MixedMartialArts, still a very young sport that's trying to tweak rules as the years go by and fighters look to abuse looopholes in the Unified Rules, or clarify exactly what is legal/illegal. This is often left to the referee to make split second decisions during a fight based on their understanding of the rules:

to:

** This is prevalent in UsefulNotes/MixedMartialArts, still a very young sport that's trying to tweak rules as the years go by and fighters look to abuse looopholes loopholes in the Unified Rules, or clarify exactly what is legal/illegal. This is often left to the referee to make split second decisions during a fight based on their understanding of the rules:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** More prominently, in tournaments, the head judge specifically has the power to make any ruling he wants, and his word will be final, even if he turns out to be wrong (ie. the ruling was actually against the official rules of the game). The only recourse a player has for this is to make a complaint afterwards. Fortunately these types of wrong rulings happen very rarely (but there are cases).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Rule Zero is simply a reminder to the players that the GM has to exercise some common sense and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. While a GM has fiat to exercise Rule Zero at their table at will, they are reminded that excessive arbitrary use of this rule will eventually lead to an empty game table.

to:

Rule Zero is simply a reminder to the players that the GM has to exercise some common sense and is permitted to supersede the rules when the rules would ruin enjoyment and fair play. While a GM has fiat to exercise Rule Zero at their table at will, they are reminded that excessive arbitrary use of this rule will eventually lead to an empty game table.
table - also known as "Rule -1: The GM is not always right, but what the GM says goes. If they say enough stupid stuff, [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere the players go as well."]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The GM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the GM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution.[[/note]]

to:

* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The GM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the GM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution.[[/note]]execution -- of the player's character, not the player himself![[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RugbyUnion's laws has a long list of what is defined by "dangerous play and misconduct", one of which is that players must not commit "acts contrary to good sportsmanship".

to:

* RugbyUnion's UsefulNotes/RugbyUnion's laws has a long list of what is defined by "dangerous play and misconduct", one of which is that players must not commit "acts contrary to good sportsmanship".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.
* ''MutantsAndMasterminds'' is notable for having a game mechanic for Rule Zero called "Gamemaster fiat". The Gamemaster is permitted to arbitrarily create setbacks to keep his story on track (such as having a hero slip and fall if he's about to catch the bad guy long before the adventure says he should) but requires that the Gamemaster award the hero a hero point (which players can spend later on to perform impressive feats normally beyond their abilities).

to:

* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''DungeonsAndDragons'', ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', the first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.
* ''MutantsAndMasterminds'' ''TabletopGame/MutantsAndMasterminds'' is notable for having a game mechanic for Rule Zero called "Gamemaster fiat". The Gamemaster is permitted to arbitrarily create setbacks to keep his story on track (such as having a hero slip and fall if he's about to catch the bad guy long before the adventure says he should) but requires that the Gamemaster award the hero a hero point (which players can spend later on to perform impressive feats normally beyond their abilities).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> Rule 1: The GM is always right.
--> Rule 2: If the GM is wrong, refer to rule 1.

to:

--> -> Rule 1: The GM is always right.
--> -> Rule 2: If the GM is wrong, refer to rule 1.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/{{OnlyWar}}'' directly specifies early in the general rules section that the Game Master should excercise common sense and discretion to make things work ideally and many rules refer to "Game Masters' Discretion" for things where any specific rule set would be impractical.

to:

* ''TabletopGame/{{OnlyWar}}'' directly specifies early in the general rules section that the Game Master should excercise exercise common sense and discretion to make things work ideally and many rules refer to "Game Masters' Discretion" for things where any specific rule set would be impractical.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is prevalent in {{UsefulNotes/MixedMartialArts}}, still a very young sport that's trying to tweak rules as the years go by and fighters look to abuse looopholes in the Unified Rules, or clarify exactly what is legal/illegal. This is often left to the referee to make split second decisions during a fight based on their understanding of the rules:
*** Grabbing the fence is illegal, but ''pressing your hand'' against the fence is not. Where exactly the point between grabbing it and your hands natural curl is left up to the ref. Additionally, the rule was thought for years to only apply to hands/fingers, not feet/toes, and it was a common sight to see someone grabbing the fence with their feet. Recently, many referees have started cracking down on this practice too.
*** It's illegal to hit the back of the head, but what point is exactly the back of the head can vary depending on head types and the referee's discretion. The general rule is anything past the "headphone" area, but with people punching fast and people moving their head to avoid damage, the ref needs to make a judgement call on whether or not a blow went to far or whether it was an unavoidable accident, etc.

to:

** This is prevalent in {{UsefulNotes/MixedMartialArts}}, UsefulNotes/MixedMartialArts, still a very young sport that's trying to tweak rules as the years go by and fighters look to abuse looopholes in the Unified Rules, or clarify exactly what is legal/illegal. This is often left to the referee to make split second decisions during a fight based on their understanding of the rules:
*** Grabbing the fence is illegal, but ''pressing your hand'' against the fence is not. Where exactly the point is between grabbing it and your hands hand's natural curl is left up to the ref. Additionally, the rule was thought for years to only apply to hands/fingers, not feet/toes, and it was a common sight to see someone grabbing the fence with their feet. Recently, many referees have started cracking down on this practice too.
*** It's illegal to hit the back of the head, but what point is exactly the back of the head can vary depending on head types and the referee's discretion. The general rule is anything past the "headphone" area, but with people punching fast and people moving their head to avoid damage, the ref needs to make a judgement judgment call on whether or not a blow went to too far or whether it was an unavoidable accident, etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The DM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the DM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution.[[/note]]

to:

* ''TabletopGame/{{Paranoia}}'' is notable in that it's one of the few tabletop games in which arbitrary use of Rule Zero is '''encouraged'''. The DM GM is allowed to fudge rolls, to let other plays fudge their rolls or fudge each other's rolls, and generally discard the rules as long as RuleOfFun is observed. The justifying reason for this caveat? Any player who tried to call the DM GM out on it would be acknowledging they have read the rules, which are [[MemeticMutation above their security clearance]]. [[note]]For reference, the rules are Ultraviolet-level, the top of the ladder, whereas most players are Red, just one rank above the bottom. Possessing knowledge above your security clearance is punishable by summary execution.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added new entry (Arcanik).

Added DiffLines:

* Played with in Arcanik. While Rule Zero still applies, players are capable of using the "Ingenuity System" in response to it. The system allows players to combine skills, attribute scores, and so on to create a ridiculously high skill roll that is almost guaranteed to succeed at whatever the problem is. The catch is that all of those numbers must be combined into a stupid plan that has no chance of working otherwise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/{{Thrash}}'', an RPG by Ewen Cluney (better known as the translator for ''TabletopGame/MaidRPG''). His formulation of the rule (drawn from the obscure ''Anime/ProjectAKo'' RPG) was: "If a rule annoys you, ignore it."

to:

* The TropeNamer for Rule Zero is ''TabletopGame/{{Thrash}}'', an RPG by Ewen Cluney (better known as ''DungeonsAndDragons'', the translator for ''TabletopGame/MaidRPG''). His formulation of the rule (drawn first tabletop roleplaying game. Many other games take it from the obscure ''Anime/ProjectAKo'' RPG) was: "If a rule annoys you, ignore it."there, but it's OlderThanYouThink.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** It's illegal to hit the back of the head, but what point is exactly the back of the head can vary depending on head types and the referee's discretion. The general rule is antything past the "headphone" area, but with people punching fast and people moving their head to avoid damage, the ref needs to make a judgement call on whether or not a blow went to far or whether it was an unavoidable accident, etc.

to:

*** It's illegal to hit the back of the head, but what point is exactly the back of the head can vary depending on head types and the referee's discretion. The general rule is antything anything past the "headphone" area, but with people punching fast and people moving their head to avoid damage, the ref needs to make a judgement call on whether or not a blow went to far or whether it was an unavoidable accident, etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted with ''TabletopGame/{{Munchkin}}'', which has a Rule Zero, which reads "Disputes should be settled by loud arguments among the players."

to:

* Subverted with ''TabletopGame/{{Munchkin}}'', which has a Rule Zero, which but that rule reads "Disputes should be settled by loud arguments among the players."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Subverted with ''TabletopGame/{{Munchkin}}'', which has a Rule Zero, which reads "Disputes should be settled by loud arguments among the players."

Top