Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added collapsible folders.
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:ComicBooks]]
to:
[[folder: Comic Books ]]
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Film}}]]
to:
[[folder: Film ]]
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Literature}}]]
to:
[[folder: Literature ]]
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:LiveActionTV]]
to:
[[folder: Live Action TV ]]
Changed line(s) 60 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:VideoGames]]
to:
[[folder: Video Games ]]
Changed line(s) 63,64 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:RealLife]]
* During Prohibition, "bargain days" were the only way many courts could keep up with the alcohol-related workload. Everyone who agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the smallest penalty the judge could get away with would be scheduled for the same court date, and the formalities were zipped through to clear as many cases off the docket as possible.
* During Prohibition, "bargain days" were the only way many courts could keep up with the alcohol-related workload. Everyone who agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the smallest penalty the judge could get away with would be scheduled for the same court date, and the formalities were zipped through to clear as many cases off the docket as possible.
to:
[[folder: Real Life ]]
* During Prohibition, "bargain days" were the only way many courts could keep up with the alcohol-related workload. Everyone who agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the smallest penalty the judge could get away with would be scheduled for the same court date, and the formalities were zipped through to clear as many cases off the docket as possible.
Changed line(s) 73 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:WesternAnimation]]
to:
[[folder: Western Animation ]]
Added DiffLines:
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 61,62 (click to see context) from:
* In the second case of ''VisualNovel/PhoenixWrightAceAttorney: Justice for All'', the first thing Franziska tells Phoenix at the start of the trial is that he would be pleading within the first 10 minutes of the trial. Phoenix is later gave the choice of pleading or not, but the situation is a ButThouMust and he ends up not pleading.
to:
* In the second case of ''VisualNovel/PhoenixWrightAceAttorney: Justice for All'', ''VisualNovel/PhoenixWrightAceAttorneyJusticeForAll'', the first thing Franziska tells Phoenix at the start of the trial is that he would be pleading within the first 10 minutes of the trial. Phoenix is later gave the choice of pleading or not, but the situation is a ButThouMust and he ends up not pleading.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29,31 (click to see context) from:
* ''BloomCounty'' parodies this with a plea bargain for the death penalty.
* John Hartigan from ''SinCity'' agrees to a plea bargain so that he could get parole and track down Nancy Callahan, believing that she had been kidnapped.
* John Hartigan from ''SinCity'' agrees to a plea bargain so that he could get parole and track down Nancy Callahan, believing that she had been kidnapped.
to:
* ''BloomCounty'' ''ComicStrip/BloomCounty'' parodies this with a plea bargain for the death penalty.
* John Hartigan from''SinCity'' ''Comicbook/SinCity'' agrees to a plea bargain so that he could get parole and track down Nancy Callahan, believing that she had been kidnapped.
* John Hartigan from
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* The issue of whether or not to accept an offered plea bargain is a common plot point in ''ThePractice''. In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
to:
* The issue of whether or not to accept an offered plea bargain is a common plot point in ''ThePractice''.''Series/ThePractice''. In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 47 (click to see context) from:
** Which is a bit of a problem in the UK version as plea bargains aren't allowed under English law (although reduced sentances for pleading guilty are standard practise).
to:
** Which is a bit of a problem in the UK version as plea bargains aren't allowed under English law (although reduced sentances for pleading guilty are standard practise).practice). Charges often get reduced to something more minor for one reason and another -assault with a deadly weapon instead of attempted murder, for example- but that's up to the Crown ''Prosecution'' Service[[note]]sort of like District Attorneys in the US, but on the 'federal' level[[/note]] rather than the accused's defence team.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
combining \"The Practice\" entries
Changed line(s) 53,54 (click to see context) from:
* The issue of whether or not to accept an offered plea bargain is a common plot point in ''ThePractice''.
* ''Series/ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
* ''Series/ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
to:
* The issue of whether or not to accept an offered plea bargain is a common plot point in ''ThePractice''.
* ''Series/ThePractice'':''ThePractice''. In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
* ''Series/ThePractice'':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 65,67 (click to see context) from:
* During Prohibition, "bargain days" were the only way many courts could keep up with the alcohol-related workload. Everyone who agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the smallest penalty the judge could get away with would be scheduled for the same court date, and the formalities were zipped through to clear as many cases off the docket as possible.
** Nowadays this often happens (albeit less frequently) with possession charges for small amounts of marijuana.
* [[{{Canada}} Canadian]] serial killer Karla Homolka is one infamous example of a plea bargain. After assisting her husband Paul Bernardo in the murder and rape of three girls (including her own sister) in the city of St. Catharine's, she struck a deal with the prosecutors and received a 12 year sentence in exchange for taking the stand against Bernardo, who ended up getting life. Unfortunately, not long after the trial closed, tapes were found of the murders that revealed that Karla had had more to do with the murders than previously thought. For this reason, the case is often referred to as "the {{deal with the devil}}."
** Nowadays this often happens (albeit less frequently) with possession charges for small amounts of marijuana.
* [[{{Canada}} Canadian]] serial killer Karla Homolka is one infamous example of a plea bargain. After assisting her husband Paul Bernardo in the murder and rape of three girls (including her own sister) in the city of St. Catharine's, she struck a deal with the prosecutors and received a 12 year sentence in exchange for taking the stand against Bernardo, who ended up getting life. Unfortunately, not long after the trial closed, tapes were found of the murders that revealed that Karla had had more to do with the murders than previously thought. For this reason, the case is often referred to as "the {{deal with the devil}}."
to:
* During Prohibition, "bargain days" were the only way many courts could keep up with the alcohol-related workload. Everyone who agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the smallest penalty the judge could get away with would be scheduled for the same court date, and the formalities were zipped through to clear as many cases off the docket as possible.
possible.
** Nowadays this often happens (albeit less frequently) with possession charges for small amounts ofmarijuana.
marijuana. Again, the issue here is that in contraband cases, a trial is generally worse than useless--it would be pointless for the defendant to deny the charge, since the only way you get caught is if the cops actually see you commit the crime (carrying the contraband), so once the defense lawyer has tried and (usually) failed to get the evidence suppressed for alleged police misconduct, the defendant usually just wants to get the business over with.
*[[{{Canada}} [[UsefulNotes/{{Canada}} Canadian]] serial killer Karla Homolka is one infamous example of a plea bargain. After assisting her husband Paul Bernardo in the murder and rape of three girls (including her own sister) in the city of St. Catharine's, she struck a deal with the prosecutors and received a 12 year sentence in exchange for taking the stand against Bernardo, who ended up getting life. Unfortunately, not long after the trial closed, tapes were found of the murders that revealed that Karla had had more to do with the murders than previously thought. For this reason, the case is often referred to as "the {{deal with the devil}}."
** Nowadays this often happens (albeit less frequently) with possession charges for small amounts of
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
to:
* In ''Series/OrangeIsTheNewBlack'', the entire reason Piper convicted is because someone else in the drug ring named her as a part of a plea bargain. [[spoiler: She later discovers that the person who named her is Alex.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58,59 (click to see context) from:
* In the American version of {{Shameless}} Fiona is arrested for child endangerment for accidentally allowing her younger brother Liam to get into some cocaine she out in the open. Her somewhat overworked lawyer tells her that it would be best to plea bargain, as she's a first time offender, it's a fairly open-and-shut case, and at worst she'd probably only get 1-3 months in jail. Fiona, however, is resistant to plead guilty as the entire affair was an accident, and has to be persuaded to accept the plea deal (she ends up not having to actually serve any time, and is instead given probation).
to:
* In the American version of {{Shameless}} Fiona is arrested for child endangerment for accidentally allowing her younger brother Liam to get into some cocaine she had out in the open. Her somewhat overworked lawyer tells her that it would be best to plea bargain, as she's a first time offender, it's a fairly open-and-shut case, and at worst she'd probably only get 1-3 months in jail. Fiona, however, is resistant to plead guilty as the entire affair was an accident, and has to be persuaded to accept the plea deal (she ends up not having to actually serve any time, and is instead given probation).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
to:
* In the American version of {{Shameless}} Fiona is arrested for child endangerment for accidentally allowing her younger brother Liam to get into some cocaine she out in the open. Her somewhat overworked lawyer tells her that it would be best to plea bargain, as she's a first time offender, it's a fairly open-and-shut case, and at worst she'd probably only get 1-3 months in jail. Fiona, however, is resistant to plead guilty as the entire affair was an accident, and has to be persuaded to accept the plea deal (she ends up not having to actually serve any time, and is instead given probation).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
Very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''Franchise/PerryMason'' and ''PhoenixWright'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
to:
Very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''Franchise/PerryMason'' and ''PhoenixWright'', ''VisualNovel/{{Phoenix Wright|AceAttorney}}'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
Changed line(s) 60,61 (click to see context) from:
* In the second case of ''PhoenixWrightAceAttorney: Justice for All'', the first thing Franziska tells Phoenix at the start of the trial is that he would be pleading within the first 10 minutes of the trial. Phoenix is later gave the choice of pleading or not, but the situation is a ButThouMust and he ends up not pleading.
to:
* In the second case of ''PhoenixWrightAceAttorney: ''VisualNovel/PhoenixWrightAceAttorney: Justice for All'', the first thing Franziska tells Phoenix at the start of the trial is that he would be pleading within the first 10 minutes of the trial. Phoenix is later gave the choice of pleading or not, but the situation is a ButThouMust and he ends up not pleading.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* If the client is innocent, an AmoralAttorney--or [[BeleaguredBureaucrat an overworked one]]--may pressure him to do a plea bargain anyway, because the case would be too hard to win, or for less savory reasons.
to:
* If the client is innocent, an AmoralAttorney--or [[BeleaguredBureaucrat [[BeleagueredBureaucrat an overworked one]]--may pressure him to do a plea bargain anyway, because the case would be too hard to win, or for less savory reasons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* If the client is innocent, an AmoralAttorney may pressure him to do a plea bargain anyway, because the case would be too hard to win, or for less savory reasons.
to:
* If the client is innocent, an AmoralAttorney may AmoralAttorney--or [[BeleaguredBureaucrat an overworked one]]--may pressure him to do a plea bargain anyway, because the case would be too hard to win, or for less savory reasons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 73 (click to see context) from:
* ''WesternAnimation/BatmanBeyond'': District Attorney Sam Young's reelection campaign in "Eyewitness" had it mentioned that, during his tenure, the District Attorney's office had a decrease on the ratio of plea bargains for violent crimes.
to:
* ''WesternAnimation/BatmanBeyond'': District Attorney Sam Young's reelection campaign in "Eyewitness" had it mentioned that, during his tenure, the District Attorney's office had a decrease on in the ratio of plea bargains for violent crimes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[AC:WesternAnimation]]
* ''WesternAnimation/BatmanBeyond'': District Attorney Sam Young's reelection campaign in "Eyewitness" had it mentioned that, during his tenure, the District Attorney's office had a decrease on the ratio of plea bargains for violent crimes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
A very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''Franchise/PerryMason'' and ''PhoenixWright'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''.[[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession--after all, it's hard to say, "no I wasn't carrying that bag" when the police have the bag before the court--making trials a waste of everyone's time. Because the facts are usually undisputed, usually the defense might make a few perfunctory motions to see if the drugs can be suppressed for some kind of police misconduct, but that almost inevitably fails, and then begins the bargaining.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
to:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''.[[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession--after all, it's hard to say, "no I wasn't carrying that bag" any drugs" when the police have the bag drugs and you before the court--making trials a waste of everyone's time. Because the facts are usually undisputed, usually the defense might make a few perfunctory motions to see if the drugs can be suppressed for some kind of police misconduct, but that almost inevitably fails, and then begins the bargaining.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''.[[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession--after all, it's hard to say, "no I wasn't carrying that bag" when the police have the bag before the court--making trials a waste of everyone's time. Because the facts are usually undisputed, usually the defense will make a few perfunctory motions to see if the drugs can be suppressed, and when that inevitably fails, the plea is on.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
to:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''.[[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession--after all, it's hard to say, "no I wasn't carrying that bag" when the police have the bag before the court--making trials a waste of everyone's time. Because the facts are usually undisputed, usually the defense will might make a few perfunctory motions to see if the drugs can be suppressed, and when suppressed for some kind of police misconduct, but that almost inevitably fails, and then begins the plea is on.bargaining.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''.[[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession, making trials a waste of everyone's time.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
to:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''.[[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession, making possession--after all, it's hard to say, "no I wasn't carrying that bag" when the police have the bag before the court--making trials a waste of everyone's time.time. Because the facts are usually undisputed, usually the defense will make a few perfunctory motions to see if the drugs can be suppressed, and when that inevitably fails, the plea is on.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''. Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
to:
And it's a pretty good deal for the prosecution too, usually. Sure, they probably could have gotten a conviction, but full trials take time, and money, and tie up attorneys who could be working on the next case. It has been pointed out many times that if a sizable number of defendants suddenly refused to plea-bargain it would cause a collapse of the legal system, as the government would be unable to hold trials for them all. In the United States as much as '''97% of cases are resolved by plea bargaining'''. [[note]]Note that on account of the US' peculiar drug laws, a lot of these are drug cases; evidence tends to be particularly airtight with drug possession, making trials a waste of everyone's time.[[/note]] Note also this can be subject to EaglelandOsmosis. In most civil law nations it's simply not possible. Even if you plead guilty they do a full trial to establish how much time you get. In the other Common Law nations, it's officially frowned on and officially doesn't happen. Unofficially it happens all the time, but it's considered very impolite to suggest it. This has been a huge issue at international tribunals. Depending on conditions in the facility a suspect is held in pre-trial, it could also be seen as coercing a confession.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* In ''AFewGoodMen'', LT Dan Kaffee (TomCruise's character) has made a career out of skillful plea bargaining, but he decides not to on this case once he sees the emotional damage it'd do to his clients.
to:
* In ''AFewGoodMen'', ''Film/AFewGoodMen'', LT Dan Kaffee (TomCruise's character) has made a career out of skillful plea bargaining, but he decides not to on this case once he sees the emotional damage it'd do to his clients.
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* A plea bargain given to the wrong party (the actual killer, who sold his patsy down the river) is the motive for ''LawAbidingCitizen'' to go on a RoaringRampageOfRevenge.
to:
* A plea bargain given to the wrong party (the actual killer, who sold his patsy down the river) is the motive for ''LawAbidingCitizen'' ''Film/LawAbidingCitizen'' to go on a RoaringRampageOfRevenge.
Changed line(s) 39,41 (click to see context) from:
* ''TheLincolnLawyer'' once pressured a client charged with rape and murder to plead guilty so he'd be sentenced to just 30 years with a chance to obtain a parole after 15 years. That came to bite him hard when he not only learned the client was innocent but he was also defending the actual culprit from an attempted rape charge.
* ''ConAir'' had an illegal usage of a plea bargain: the judge agreed to the bargain, and then reneged on the terms offered to the defendant.
* ''ConAir'' had an illegal usage of a plea bargain: the judge agreed to the bargain, and then reneged on the terms offered to the defendant.
to:
* ''TheLincolnLawyer'' ''Film/TheLincolnLawyer'' once pressured a client charged with rape and murder to plead guilty so he'd be sentenced to just 30 years with a chance to obtain a parole after 15 years. That came to bite him hard when he not only learned the client was innocent but he was also defending the actual culprit from an attempted rape charge.
*''ConAir'' ''Film/ConAir'' had an illegal usage of a plea bargain: the judge agreed to the bargain, and then reneged on the terms offered to the defendant.
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespaces.
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
* Attempts at plea bargains are common in the various ''LawAndOrder'' series, usually between the apprehension and trial phases.
to:
* Attempts at plea bargains are common in the various ''LawAndOrder'' ''Series/LawAndOrder'' series, usually between the apprehension and trial phases.
Changed line(s) 48,50 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Shark}}'' (the show with James Woods) has this happen regularly, or at least has attempts to plea bargain.
* ''Homicide: Life on the Street'' frequently went to plea bargain by the end of the story.
* There is an episode of ''BostonLegal'' that uses this. Alan Shore's client an old friend and fellow lawyer who is accused of murder. She is offered a plea bargain at the beginning but of course [[IWontSayImGuilty won't say she's guilty]] and has a {{Big Secret}}.
* ''Homicide: Life on the Street'' frequently went to plea bargain by the end of the story.
* There is an episode of ''BostonLegal'' that uses this. Alan Shore's client an old friend and fellow lawyer who is accused of murder. She is offered a plea bargain at the beginning but of course [[IWontSayImGuilty won't say she's guilty]] and has a {{Big Secret}}.
to:
* ''{{Shark}}'' ''Series/{{Shark}}'' (the show with James Woods) has this happen regularly, or at least has attempts to plea bargain.
*''Homicide: Life on the Street'' ''Series/HomicideLifeOnTheStreet'' frequently went to plea bargain by the end of the story.
* There is an episode of''BostonLegal'' ''Series/BostonLegal'' that uses this. Alan Shore's client an old friend and fellow lawyer who is accused of murder. She is offered a plea bargain at the beginning but of course [[IWontSayImGuilty won't say she's guilty]] and has a {{Big Secret}}.BigSecret.
*
* There is an episode of
Changed line(s) 52,53 (click to see context) from:
* Happens all the time on ''TheCloser'' and it's AfterShow, ''MajorCrimes''.
** One instance of it on ''TheCloser'' is notable because it backfired ''spectacularly''. An elderly shopkeeper and his 8-year-old grandson are shot to death by a local gang member, and the police think that they know who it is. They also think that ''another'' gang member witnessed the murder or maybe, at most, was an accomplice. The potential witness is offered an immunity agreement, stating that he won't get charged with anything in exchange for telling them everything he knows, in the hopes that his testimony will be enough to get the other guy. Except it turns out the guy they thought did it was innocent, the "witness" committed the murder himself, and the other guy just happened to come into the shop as the killer was leaving. So basically, they've just let a guy off scot-free for murdering an old man and a child.
** One instance of it on ''TheCloser'' is notable because it backfired ''spectacularly''. An elderly shopkeeper and his 8-year-old grandson are shot to death by a local gang member, and the police think that they know who it is. They also think that ''another'' gang member witnessed the murder or maybe, at most, was an accomplice. The potential witness is offered an immunity agreement, stating that he won't get charged with anything in exchange for telling them everything he knows, in the hopes that his testimony will be enough to get the other guy. Except it turns out the guy they thought did it was innocent, the "witness" committed the murder himself, and the other guy just happened to come into the shop as the killer was leaving. So basically, they've just let a guy off scot-free for murdering an old man and a child.
to:
* Happens all the time on ''TheCloser'' ''Series/TheCloser'' and it's AfterShow, ''MajorCrimes''.
**''MajorCrimes''. One instance of it on ''TheCloser'' ''The Closer'' is notable because it backfired ''spectacularly''. An elderly shopkeeper and his 8-year-old grandson are shot to death by a local gang member, and the police think that they know who it is. They also think that ''another'' gang member witnessed the murder or maybe, at most, was an accomplice. The potential witness is offered an immunity agreement, stating that he won't get charged with anything in exchange for telling them everything he knows, in the hopes that his testimony will be enough to get the other guy. Except it turns out the guy they thought did it was innocent, the "witness" committed the murder himself, and the other guy just happened to come into the shop as the killer was leaving. So basically, they've just let a guy off scot-free for murdering an old man and a child.
**
Changed line(s) 55 (click to see context) from:
** ''ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
** Not only has Kaffee made a career out of his plea negotiating skills, but it's pretty much implied that the authorities assigned him to the case with the expectation that he'd plea his clients out, thus preventing the scandalous details of PFC Santiago's murder from becoming public.
to:
** Not only has Kaffee made a career out of his plea negotiating skills, but it's pretty much implied that the authorities assigned him to the case with the expectation that he'd plea his clients out, thus preventing the scandalous details of PFC Santiago's murder death from becoming public.
Changed line(s) 69 (click to see context) from:
* RomanPolanski's reasons for escaping from his sexual assault case in the USA hinged on technical details of plea bargaining. Polanski and the prosecutor agreed and submitted a plea bargain where Polanski would not be imprisoned, but the judge threatened not to accept these terms and have him do 90 days.
to:
* RomanPolanski's Creator/RomanPolanski's reasons for escaping from his sexual assault case in the USA hinged on technical details of plea bargaining. Polanski and the prosecutor agreed and submitted a plea bargain where Polanski would not be imprisoned, but the judge threatened not to accept these terms and have him do 90 days.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
expand drawbacks
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
Essentially, the defendant agrees to plead "guilty" to one or more charges, in exchange for a lighter sentence. Often, a lesser charge is agreed to, avoiding a harsher penalty. For example, plea bargaining a felony down to misdemeanor, or an offense that would get the defendant on a "sex offenders" listing down to one that will not. The prosecutor may also ''recommend'' a lighter sentence to the judge, usually within the standard range. For instance, crime A is worth 6-9 months, crime B is worth 18-24 months. The accused was originally charged with crime B, but bargains and pleads guilty to crime A, and in exchange, the prosecutor recommends a sentence of 6 months. The judge may choose to give more, but only up to 9 months. Also note that the acceptance of the plea bargain is entirely dependent on the judge: if he or she feels the plea bargain is a gross miscarriage of justice (if a first-degree murder is pleaded down to manslaughter for example), the plea bargain can be ''rejected''. If this happens, expect the judge to rebuke the prosecution.
to:
Essentially, the defendant agrees to plead "guilty" to one or more charges, in exchange for a lighter sentence. Often, a lesser charge is agreed to, avoiding a harsher penalty. For example, plea bargaining a felony down to misdemeanor, or an offense that would get the defendant on a "sex offenders" listing down to one that will not. The prosecutor may also ''recommend'' a lighter sentence to the judge, usually within the standard range. For instance, crime A is worth 6-9 months, crime B is worth 18-24 months. The accused was originally charged with crime B, but bargains and pleads guilty to crime A, and in exchange, the prosecutor recommends a sentence of 6 months. The judge may choose to give more, but only up to 9 months. Also note that the acceptance of the plea bargain is entirely dependent on the judge: if he or she feels the plea bargain is a gross miscarriage of justice (if a first-degree murder is pleaded down to manslaughter for example), the plea bargain can be ''rejected''. If this happens, expect the judge to rebuke the prosecution.
prosecution. The other side of the coin is the problem with District Attorneys "front loading" the charges and potential sentences against the defendant to encourage a plea bargain. Many defendants who are either innocent or at least believe they have a reasonable chance at being found not guilty at trial plea bargain out - if crime B is worth 5-10 years jail but a plea bargain is available for crime A that allows for 6-9 months jail many defendants would take the plea even if innocent to avoid the risk of spending 10 years inside.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
A very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''PerryMason'' and ''PhoenixWright'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
to:
A very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''PerryMason'' ''Franchise/PerryMason'' and ''PhoenixWright'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58,59 (click to see context) from:
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic (usually a former member of his chambers--particularly Guthrie Featherstone and Phyllida Trant).
to:
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic (usually a former member of his chambers--particularly Guthrie Featherstone and Phyllida Trant).
Erskine-Brown).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 43,45 (click to see context) :
* In ''Series/RumpoleOfTheBailey'' (the book versions, anyway), Rumpole makes a point of never having his clients plead guilty, and any lawyer in the books who even thinks of plea bargaining is seen as a moron. The odd thing is that Rumpole sometimes does lose the case this way, but the story is clearly on his side.
** There is one story where Rumpole does end up going for a plea bargain, but only after his client has made it impossible for him to continue believing in her innocence, and his principles won't allow him to defend somebody he knows to be guilty.
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic, i.e. a former member of his chambers.
** There is one story where Rumpole does end up going for a plea bargain, but only after his client has made it impossible for him to continue believing in her innocence, and his principles won't allow him to defend somebody he knows to be guilty.
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic, i.e. a former member of his chambers.
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
to:
* In ''Series/RumpoleOfTheBailey'', Rumpole ultimately makes a point of never having his clients plead guilty, and any lawyer in the books who even thinks of plea bargaining is seen as a moron. The odd thing is that Rumpole sometimes does lose the case this way, but the story is clearly on his side.
** There is one story where Rumpole does end up going for a plea bargain, but only after his client has made it impossible for him to continue believing in her innocence, and his principles won't allow him to defend somebody he knows to be guilty.
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic (usually a former member of his chambers--particularly Guthrie Featherstone and Phyllida Trant).
** There is one story where Rumpole does end up going for a plea bargain, but only after his client has made it impossible for him to continue believing in her innocence, and his principles won't allow him to defend somebody he knows to be guilty.
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic (usually a former member of his chambers--particularly Guthrie Featherstone and Phyllida Trant).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,7 (click to see context) from:
A very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''[[Main/{{PerryMason}} Perry Mason]]'' and ''[[Main/{{PhoenixWright}} Phoenix Wright]]'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
Now, if the prosecution's case is weak, or you've got a flair for the dramatic, [[Main/{{CourtroomAntics}} Courtroom Antics]] and [[MyRuleFuIsStrongerThanYours looking for technicalities]] might [[OffOnATechnicality win the day]]. But sometimes the evidence is airtight, the prosecutor is a pro, and the judge has no mercy. At that point, the client's best interest might lie in making a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]].
Now, if the prosecution's case is weak, or you've got a flair for the dramatic, [[Main/{{CourtroomAntics}} Courtroom Antics]] and [[MyRuleFuIsStrongerThanYours looking for technicalities]] might [[OffOnATechnicality win the day]]. But sometimes the evidence is airtight, the prosecutor is a pro, and the judge has no mercy. At that point, the client's best interest might lie in making a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]].
to:
A very few attorneys can make a living solely representing innocent people who have been falsely accused of crimes. ''[[Main/{{PerryMason}} Perry Mason]]'' ''PerryMason'' and ''[[Main/{{PhoenixWright}} Phoenix Wright]]'', ''PhoenixWright'', for example. But most defense attorneys don't have that luxury. Guilty people are legally entitled to representation too (at least in most modern democracies) and odds are a given lawyer will wind up with at least a few of them as clients.
Now, if the prosecution's case is weak, or you've got a flair for the dramatic,[[Main/{{CourtroomAntics}} Courtroom Antics]] {{Courtroom Antic}}s and [[MyRuleFuIsStrongerThanYours looking for technicalities]] might [[OffOnATechnicality win the day]]. But sometimes the evidence is airtight, the prosecutor is a pro, and the judge has no mercy. At that point, the client's best interest might lie in making a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]].
Bargain.
Now, if the prosecution's case is weak, or you've got a flair for the dramatic,
Changed line(s) 16,19 (click to see context) from:
Because a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]] is not nearly as dramatic as a case that goes to trial, the frequency of the two is inverted between [[Main/{{RealLife}} Real Life]] and fiction.
Some dramatic situations that might be seen with a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]]:
Some dramatic situations that might be seen with a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]]:
to:
Because a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]] plea bargain is not nearly as dramatic as a case that goes to trial, the frequency of the two is inverted between [[Main/{{RealLife}} Real Life]] RealLife and fiction.
Some dramatic situations that might be seen with a[[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]]:
plea bargain:
Some dramatic situations that might be seen with a
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* If the client is innocent, an [[Main/{{AmoralAttorney}} Amoral Attorney]] may pressure him to do a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]] anyway, because the case would be too hard to win, or for less savory reasons.
to:
* If the client is innocent, an [[Main/{{AmoralAttorney}} Amoral Attorney]] AmoralAttorney may pressure him to do a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]] plea bargain anyway, because the case would be too hard to win, or for less savory reasons.
Changed line(s) 23,24 (click to see context) from:
* The main story is about someone else's trial, and the person who made a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]] testifies against them as part of the deal. Naturally, the second defendant's attorney will cast aspersions on the witness' motivations and veracity.
to:
* The main story is about someone else's trial, and the person who made a [[Main/{{PleaBargain}} Plea Bargain]] plea bargain testifies against them as part of the deal. Naturally, the second defendant's attorney will cast aspersions on the witness' motivations and veracity.
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* As seen in the page quote, Buck Wild from [[Main/{{MilestoneComics}} Milestone Comics]]'s ''ComicBook/{{Icon}}'' series benefited from one of these.
to:
* As seen in the page quote, Buck Wild from [[Main/{{MilestoneComics}} Milestone Comics]]'s MilestoneComics' ''ComicBook/{{Icon}}'' series benefited from one of these.
Changed line(s) 34,36 (click to see context) from:
* In ''AFewGoodMen'', LT Dan Kaffee (Tom Cruise's character) has made a career out of skillful plea bargaining, but he decides not to on this case once he sees the emotional damage it'd do to his clients.
** Not only is it the case that Kaffee has made a career out of his plea negotiating skills, but it's pretty much implied that the authorities assigned him to the case with the expectation that he'd plea his clients out, thus preventing the scandalous details of PFC Santiago's murder from becoming public.
** Kaffee actually takes the plea bargain to his client, who gives him an earful of IWontSayImGuilty
** Not only is it the case that Kaffee has made a career out of his plea negotiating skills, but it's pretty much implied that the authorities assigned him to the case with the expectation that he'd plea his clients out, thus preventing the scandalous details of PFC Santiago's murder from becoming public.
** Kaffee actually takes the plea bargain to his client, who gives him an earful of IWontSayImGuilty
to:
* In ''AFewGoodMen'', LT Dan Kaffee (Tom Cruise's (TomCruise's character) has made a career out of skillful plea bargaining, but he decides not to on this case once he sees the emotional damage it'd do to his clients.
** Not onlyis it the case that has Kaffee has made a career out of his plea negotiating skills, but it's pretty much implied that the authorities assigned him to the case with the expectation that he'd plea his clients out, thus preventing the scandalous details of PFC Santiago's murder from becoming public.
** Kaffee actually takes the plea bargain to his client, who gives him an earful ofIWontSayImGuiltyIWontSayImGuilty.
** Not only
** Kaffee actually takes the plea bargain to his client, who gives him an earful of
Changed line(s) 39 (click to see context) from:
* In ''The Trials of Oscar Wilde'' the title character's lawyer is disgusted when he learns that Wilde lied under oath about being gay (it's the lie that he objects to; he feels like Wilde suckered him into betraying his professional ethics.) However, he agrees to defend Wilde against charges of [[ValuesDissonance "gross indecency"]] when he learns that the prosecution is offering plea bargains to male prostitutes in exchange for evidence against Wilde - at the time, this sort of arrangement was absolutely unheard of under English law, and the lawyer feels it's a far worse perversion of justice than Wilde's perjuring himself.
to:
* In ''The Trials of Oscar Wilde'' the title character's lawyer is disgusted when he learns that Wilde lied under oath about being gay (it's the lie that he objects to; he feels like Wilde suckered him into betraying his professional ethics.) ethics). However, he agrees to defend Wilde against charges of [[ValuesDissonance "gross indecency"]] when he learns that the prosecution is offering plea bargains to male prostitutes in exchange for evidence against Wilde - at the time, this sort of arrangement was absolutely unheard of under English law, and the lawyer feels it's a far worse perversion of justice than Wilde's perjuring himself.
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
* Attempts at plea bargains are common in the various ''[[Main/{{LawAndOrder}} Law And Order]]'' series, usually between the apprehension and trial phases.
to:
* Attempts at plea bargains are common in the various ''[[Main/{{LawAndOrder}} Law And Order]]'' ''LawAndOrder'' series, usually between the apprehension and trial phases.
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
* There is an episode of ''{{Boston Legal}}'' that uses this. Alan Shore's client an old friend and fellow lawyer who is accused of murder. She is offered a plea bargain at the beginning but of course [[IWontSayImGuilty won't say she's guilty]] and has a {{Big Secret}}.
to:
* There is an episode of ''{{Boston Legal}}'' ''BostonLegal'' that uses this. Alan Shore's client an old friend and fellow lawyer who is accused of murder. She is offered a plea bargain at the beginning but of course [[IWontSayImGuilty won't say she's guilty]] and has a {{Big Secret}}.
Changed line(s) 59,60 (click to see context) from:
** ''ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appaled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
to:
** ''ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appaled appalled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
Changed line(s) 62,63 (click to see context) from:
* In the second case of ''[[Main/{{PhoenixWrightAceAttorney}} Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney]]: Justice for All'', the first thing Franziska tells Phoenix at the start of the trial is that he would be pleading within the first 10 minutes of the trial. Phoenix is later gave the choice of pleading or not, but the situation is a ButThouMust and he ends up not pleading.
to:
* In the second case of ''[[Main/{{PhoenixWrightAceAttorney}} Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney]]: ''PhoenixWrightAceAttorney: Justice for All'', the first thing Franziska tells Phoenix at the start of the trial is that he would be pleading within the first 10 minutes of the trial. Phoenix is later gave the choice of pleading or not, but the situation is a ButThouMust and he ends up not pleading.
Changed line(s) 67 (click to see context) from:
* ''[[Main/{{Canada}} Canadian]]'' serial killer Karla Homolka is one infamous example of a plea bargain. After assisting her husband Paul Bernardo in the murder and rape of three girls (including her own sister) in the city of St. Catharine's, she struck a deal with the prosecutors and received a 12 year sentence in exchange for taking the stand against Bernardo, who ended up getting life. Unfortunately, not long after the trial closed, tapes were found of the murders that revealed that Karla had had more to do with the murders than previously thought. For this reason, the case is often referred to as "the {{deal with the devil}}."
to:
* ''[[Main/{{Canada}} Canadian]]'' [[{{Canada}} Canadian]] serial killer Karla Homolka is one infamous example of a plea bargain. After assisting her husband Paul Bernardo in the murder and rape of three girls (including her own sister) in the city of St. Catharine's, she struck a deal with the prosecutors and received a 12 year sentence in exchange for taking the stand against Bernardo, who ended up getting life. Unfortunately, not long after the trial closed, tapes were found of the murders that revealed that Karla had had more to do with the murders than previously thought. For this reason, the case is often referred to as "the {{deal with the devil}}."
Deleted line(s) 73 (click to see context) :
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved The Practice entries together
Deleted line(s) 55 (click to see context) :
* The issue of whether or not to accept an offered plea bargain is a common plot point in ''ThePractice''.
Changed line(s) 59,60 (click to see context) from:
* ''ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appaled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
to:
* The issue of whether or not to accept an offered plea bargain is a common plot point in ''ThePractice''.
** ''ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appaled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
** ''ThePractice'': In one episode, Todd Beck was arrested for killing a cop and the victim's partners decided to coerce a confession from him instead of allowing the doctors to give him the needed medical care. To make things worse, the prosecutor in charge of the case was [[AmoralAttorney Kenneth Walsh]], who condoned the torture. Beck was forced to testify against Joe Moran (a friend of Beck's who was at the crime scene). Walsh then offered Moran immunity in exchange for testifying against Beck. The judge was appaled at this but [[OffOnATechnicality had to allow this since Moran wasn't forced to testify]]. Walsh then offered Beck a deal: if he pleads guilty to illegally possessing a gun, he gets six months for that and it'd be officially declared he was justified about shooting the cop. Beck accepted the deal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** By contrast, Rumpole does attempt plea-bargaining at times in the series; the first "Play for Today" pilot [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness had him advise this right off the bat]], while in subsequent cases he appeared to be willing to do a deal when (and only when) he could get the client out of jail time, which usually meant that the judge was sympathetic, i.e. a former member of his chambers.