Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36,37 (click to see context) from:
* In ''SunsetBoulevard'', writer Joe Gillis complains to the producer Sheldrake that Betty Shaefer, a script reader, would have turned down ''GoneWithTheWind''; only for Sheldrake to reply "No. That was me".
to:
* In ''SunsetBoulevard'', ''Film/SunsetBoulevard'', writer Joe Gillis complains to the producer Sheldrake that Betty Shaefer, a script reader, would have turned down ''GoneWithTheWind''; only for Sheldrake to reply "No. That was me".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
to:
* In [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw0KbGi4gH8 one episode]] of ''Series/{{QI}}'' Alan is talking about how grated cheese tastes better than un-grated but if somebody where to, hypothetically speaking, work for a catering firm and steal a massive bag of grated cheese it tastes awful.
-->'''DavidMitchell:''' ''What sort of twit would do that?''
-->'''DavidMitchell:''' ''What sort of twit would do that?''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Also in ep. 519, where Ben is being fired for not turning up for work for two weeks, this dialogue happens with a supervising doctor.
-->'''Ben:''' There's an explanation for this. Which I can't exactly give you. I... Can I just tell you it's not my fault?
-->'''Doctor:''' Sure. You can also tell me that the dog ate your homework, or maybe eating Twinkies made you do it, or ... maybe yeah, that there's [[spoiler:really a wicked demonic creature living inside you that takes control of your body and forces you to do its bidding.]] Take responsibility for your actions, Ben!
-->'''Ben:''' There's an explanation for this. Which I can't exactly give you. I... Can I just tell you it's not my fault?
-->'''Doctor:''' Sure. You can also tell me that the dog ate your homework, or maybe eating Twinkies made you do it, or ... maybe yeah, that there's [[spoiler:really a wicked demonic creature living inside you that takes control of your body and forces you to do its bidding.]] Take responsibility for your actions, Ben!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13,15 (click to see context) from:
The inverse trope is RightBehindMe, when Alice talks dirty about Bob without knowing he's, well, right behind her.
to:
The inverse trope is RightBehindMe, when Alice talks dirty about Bob without knowing he's, well, right behind her.
her. Compare ImStandingRightHere, where the person is still right there, but the mockery is less oblivious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
->'''Alice:''' Did you know some people actually try to cook the rice without putting water first?
to:
->'''Alice:''' Did you know some people actually try to cook the rice without putting adding water first?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49,51 (click to see context) from:
* ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer''. Xander mocks Spike by saying that only a nutcase or a complete loser would sleep with him...in the presence of Buffy who's done just that the night before. The comment gives her an added incentive not to confess what's happened to her friends and forestall her DestructiveRomance.
* In "DoctorWho", when the Doctor and Donna try to solve a murder mystery with Agatha Christie, Donna states how unlikely this scenario is by comparing it with: "meeting Charles Dickens, on Christmas, while surrounded by ghosts." Which is something that happened to the Doctor, before he and Donna met.
* In "DoctorWho", when the Doctor and Donna try to solve a murder mystery with Agatha Christie, Donna states how unlikely this scenario is by comparing it with: "meeting Charles Dickens, on Christmas, while surrounded by ghosts." Which is something that happened to the Doctor, before he and Donna met.
to:
* ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer''.''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''. Xander mocks Spike by saying that only a nutcase or a complete loser would sleep with him...in the presence of Buffy who's done just that the night before. The comment gives her an added incentive not to confess what's happened to her friends and forestall her DestructiveRomance.
* In"DoctorWho", ''Series/DoctorWho'', when the Doctor and Donna try to solve a murder mystery with Agatha Christie, Donna states how unlikely this scenario is by comparing it with: "meeting Charles Dickens, on Christmas, while surrounded by ghosts." Which is something that happened to the Doctor, before he and Donna met.
* In
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging and InsultFriendlyFire. Contrast NoodleIncident, where the characters vaguely talk about an event they know but the viewer doesn't. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
to:
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging ObliviousGuiltSlinging, InsultFriendlyFire and InsultFriendlyFire.IResembleThatRemark. Contrast NoodleIncident, where the characters vaguely talk about an event they know but the viewer doesn't. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
->'''Bob:''' Oh come on, that's a urban legend, nobody can be that incompetent! Right, Carol?
to:
->'''Bob:''' Oh come on, that's a urban legend, nobody can be that clueless and incompetent! Right, Carol?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
->'''Carol:''' Er… yeah, totally, I can't imagine anyone doing that… ahahaha… hem…
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
What she doesn't know is that Bob, to or in presence of whom she said it, ''actually did'' the stupid thing in question. Whether he succeeded or failed miserably, he will either not answer anything or pretend to agree with Alice with an embarrassed expression; he may even be personally proud of it. If the ''viewer'' knows it, [[HilarityEnsues A Smile Ensues]]: it's a form of ContinuityNod. What makes this trope funny is the fact that Alice says it totally innocently, without any clue she is mocking someone within hearing range. Hence the Oblivious Mockery. In some cases, Bob may reveal out-loud that he did said action, and may or may not try to justify himself.
to:
What she doesn't know is that Bob, to or in presence of whom she said it, ''actually did'' the stupid thing in question. Whether he succeeded or failed miserably, he will either not answer anything or pretend to agree with Alice with an embarrassed expression; he may even be personally proud of it. If the ''viewer'' knows it, [[HilarityEnsues A Smile Ensues]]: it's a form of ContinuityNod. What makes this trope funny is the fact that Alice says it totally innocently, without any clue she is mocking someone within hearing range. Hence the Oblivious Mockery. In some cases, Bob may reveal out-loud that he did said action, and may or may not try to justify himself.
himself. Basically, this follows this kind of pattern:
->'''Alice:''' Did you know some people actually try to cook the rice without putting water first?
->'''Bob:''' Oh come on, that's a urban legend, nobody can be that incompetent! Right, Carol?
->'''Carol:''' Er… yeah, totally, I can't imagine anyone doing that… ahahaha… hem…
->'''Alice:''' Did you know some people actually try to cook the rice without putting water first?
->'''Bob:''' Oh come on, that's a urban legend, nobody can be that incompetent! Right, Carol?
->'''Carol:''' Er… yeah, totally, I can't imagine anyone doing that… ahahaha… hem…
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 55 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''Webcomic/SchlockMercenary'' has a few, such as [[http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2010-09-28 this]]:
-->'''Mob soldier''': I think some idiot decided to store a stack of hull-plates in that chamber.
-->'''Ms. Damicco''': Oh, that was me. Those are leftovers from another project.
-->'''Mob soldier''': Correction: that room is a ''great'' place for hullmetal barricades. Lull the enemy into a false sense of security!
-->'''Mob soldier''': I think some idiot decided to store a stack of hull-plates in that chamber.
-->'''Ms. Damicco''': Oh, that was me. Those are leftovers from another project.
-->'''Mob soldier''': Correction: that room is a ''great'' place for hullmetal barricades. Lull the enemy into a false sense of security!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Nobody mentioned this scene from Doctor Who. :DD
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
to:
* In "DoctorWho", when the Doctor and Donna try to solve a murder mystery with Agatha Christie, Donna states how unlikely this scenario is by comparing it with: "meeting Charles Dickens, on Christmas, while surrounded by ghosts." Which is something that happened to the Doctor, before he and Donna met.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53,54 (click to see context) from:
:: He says this while standing next to Red, who just happens to have chosen fire.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* From ''GetSmart'':
to:
* From ''GetSmart'':''Series/GetSmart'':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
misuse as emphasis
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* In ''HajimeNoIppo'', a flashback shows us how Genji Kamogawa hardened his fists by ''[[BeyondTheImpossible punching large wooden logs into a hill]]''. Later in the manga, Ippo hits logs into a hill with a hammer to train his leg and body muscles. Itagaki tells Kamogawa about this training.
to:
* In ''HajimeNoIppo'', a flashback shows us how Genji Kamogawa hardened his fists by ''[[BeyondTheImpossible punching ''punching large wooden logs into a hill]]''.hill''. Later in the manga, Ippo hits logs into a hill with a hammer to train his leg and body muscles. Itagaki tells Kamogawa about this training.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45,46 (click to see context) from:
* ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer''. Xander mocks Spike by saying that only a complete loser would sleep with him...in the presence of Buffy who's done just that the night before. The comment gives her an added incentive not to confess what's happened to her friends and forestall her DestructiveRomance.
to:
* ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer''. Xander mocks Spike by saying that only a nutcase or a complete loser would sleep with him...in the presence of Buffy who's done just that the night before. The comment gives her an added incentive not to confess what's happened to her friends and forestall her DestructiveRomance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53,54 (click to see context) from:
:: True to the trope, he says this while standing next to Red, who just happens to have chosen fire.
to:
:: True to the trope, he He says this while standing next to Red, who just happens to have chosen fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer''. Xander mocks Spike by saying that only a complete loser would sleep with him...in the presence of Buffy who's done just that the night before. The comment gives her an added incentive not to confess what's happened to her friends and forestall her DestructiveRomance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 55 (click to see context) from:
* Early in the ''{{Ben 10}}'' WhatIf episode "Gwen 10", Gwen gets the Omnitrix stuck on her wrist and turns into [[MagmaMan Heatblast]]. Ben, who remembers going through this before, warns her about the danger of using fiery powers in the middle of a forest. She immediately responds that only an idiot would set the forest on fire. Naturally, that's exactly what Ben did in the first episode.
to:
* Early in the ''{{Ben ''WesternAnimation/{{Ben 10}}'' WhatIf episode "Gwen 10", Gwen gets the Omnitrix stuck on her wrist and turns into [[MagmaMan Heatblast]]. Ben, who remembers going through this before, warns her about the danger of using fiery powers in the middle of a forest. She immediately responds that only an idiot would set the forest on fire. Naturally, that's exactly what Ben did in the first episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
* In ''{{Super Effective}}'':
to:
* In ''{{Super ''Webcomic/{{Super Effective}}'':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49,50 (click to see context) from:
{{Webcomics}}:
to:
Changed line(s) 53,54 (click to see context) from:
** True to the trope, he says this while standing next to Red, who just happens to have chosen fire.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29,30 (click to see context) from:
'''Harry:''' Hmm, sounds like a good investment to me.
to:
'''Harry:''' Hmm, [[ButHeSoundsHandsome sounds like a good investment to me.
me.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging, InsultFriendlyFire and NoodleIncident. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
to:
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging, InsultFriendlyFire ObliviousGuiltSlinging and NoodleIncident.InsultFriendlyFire. Contrast NoodleIncident, where the characters vaguely talk about an event they know but the viewer doesn't. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging and InsultFriendlyFire. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
to:
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging ObliviousGuiltSlinging, InsultFriendlyFire and InsultFriendlyFire.NoodleIncident. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
to:
Can overlap with an in-universe OldShame.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
Sometimes, be it in a realistic universe or in a WorldOfBadass, there are actions that are deemed ridiculously dangerous, totally stupid or [[ImpossibleTask downright impossible]] to pull off. Nothing to be really proud of in any case. The characters talk about such actions and, soon enough, Alice will wonder out loud (probably sniggering) WhoWouldBeStupidEnough to do that?
to:
Sometimes, be it in a realistic universe or in a WorldOfBadass, there are actions that are deemed ridiculously dangerous, totally stupid or [[ImpossibleTask downright impossible]] to pull off. Nothing to be really proud of in any case. The characters talk about such actions and, soon enough, Alice will wonder out loud (probably sniggering) WhoWouldBeStupidEnough − "WhoWouldBeStupidEnough to do that?
that?"
Changed line(s) 5,8 (click to see context) from:
Can overlap with (in-universe) OldShame or with InsultFriendlyFire.
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
Compare ObliviousGuiltSlinging. Contrast and compare WhoWouldBeStupidEnough, when Alice [[TemptingFate tempts fate]] and is proven right away that someone ''is'' stupid enough, and SchmuckBait.
to:
Compare
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,22 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Kamogawa''': He's hitting logs into the earth?! He can't be doing it with his fists?!
-->'''Itagaki''' (laughing): If he did that he'd break his fists! There's no one reckless and stupid enough to do that! He uses a hammer.
-->'''Kamogawa''': Ye… yeah… fists would be reckless and stupid…
-->'''Itagaki''' (laughing): If he did that he'd break his fists! There's no one reckless and stupid enough to do that! He uses a hammer.
-->'''Kamogawa''': Ye… yeah… fists would be reckless and stupid…
to:
-->'''Kamogawa''': He's hitting logs into the earth?! He can't be doing it with his fists?!
-->'''Itagaki'''fists?!\\
'''Itagaki''' (laughing): If he did that he'd break his fists! There's no one reckless and stupid enough to do that! He uses ahammer.
-->'''Kamogawa''':hammer.\\
'''Kamogawa''': Ye… yeah… fists would be reckless and stupid…
-->'''Itagaki'''
'''Itagaki''' (laughing): If he did that he'd break his fists! There's no one reckless and stupid enough to do that! He uses a
-->'''Kamogawa''':
'''Kamogawa''': Ye… yeah… fists would be reckless and stupid…
Changed line(s) 28,30 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Ron:''' Did I tell you about their private investor in their joke shop? Some bloke gave them a bunch of money. They won't tell us who though, said he wants to remain anonymous. What moron would give those two money?
-->'''Harry:''' Hmm, sounds like a good investment to me.
-->'''Harry:''' Hmm, sounds like a good investment to me.
to:
-->'''Ron:''' Did I tell you about their private investor in their joke shop? Some bloke gave them a bunch of money. They won't tell us who though, said he wants to remain anonymous. What moron would give those two money?
-->'''Harry:'''money?\\
'''Harry:''' Hmm, sounds like a good investment to me.
-->'''Harry:'''
'''Harry:''' Hmm, sounds like a good investment to me.
Changed line(s) 42,45 (click to see context) from:
->'''Max:''' But even if they do get a man into the Pentagon, that's not saying he'll be able to get out. I remember one of our own agents was lost in there for three days.
->'''Chief:''' Three days? Max, no agent could be that confused.
->'''Max:''' Well, let me see now. I went in on a Friday...
->'''Chief:''' Three days? Max, no agent could be that confused.
->'''Max:''' Well, let me see now. I went in on a Friday...
to:
->'''Chief:'''
'''Chief:''' Three days? Max, no agent could be that
->'''Max:'''
'''Max:''' Well, let me see now. I went in on a Friday...
Added DiffLines:
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
AnimeAndManga:
to:
[[AC:AnimeAndManga]]
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
{{Comics}}
to:
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
{{Fanfic}}
to:
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
{{Film}}
to:
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
{{Literature}}
to:
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
LiveActionTV
to:
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
VideoGames:
to:
Changed line(s) 52,54 (click to see context) from:
He says this while standing next to Red, who just happened to have chosen fire.
WesternAnimation:
WesternAnimation:
to: