Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / NoControlGroup

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No potholes in page quotes.


->''[Caesars CEO Gary Loveman] likes to say there are three things that can get you fired from Caesars: [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Stealing, sexual harassment and running an experiment without a control group.]]''

to:

->''[Caesars CEO Gary Loveman] likes to say there are three things that can get you fired from Caesars: [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Stealing, sexual harassment and running an experiment without a control group.]]''''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In addition, even in biological settings controls are not always necessary. If you are testing a serum to turn people into super-soldiers, there's no point in having a control group because we already know that people don't spontaneously turn into super-soldiers when given a placebo. Any such effect can only be the result of the serum, with no control group needed to know that. Control groups are only a necessity when looking for relatively small effects that can only be seen by statistically studying large groups. A serum to slightly increase sporting performance would need a control group to be sure any effect was not simply due to people unconsciously trying harder because they think they should be doing better after being injected with something. A serum that turns people into Captain America with an immediate large increase in muscle mass and the ability to run many times faster than any other human, not so much.

to:

** In addition, even in biological settings controls are not always necessary. If you are [[{{ComicBook/CaptainAmerica}} testing a serum to turn people into super-soldiers, super-soldiers]], there's no point in having a control group because we already know that people don't spontaneously turn into super-soldiers when given a placebo. Any such effect can only be the result of the serum, with no control group needed to know that. Control groups are only a necessity when looking for relatively small effects that can only be seen by statistically studying large groups. A serum to slightly increase sporting performance would need a control group to be sure any effect was not simply due to people unconsciously trying harder because they think they should be doing better after being injected with something. A serum that turns people into Captain America with an immediate large increase in muscle mass and the ability to run many times faster than any other human, not so much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In reality, not only do most scientific experiments not need control groups, in anything other than a biological setting the concept rarely makes sense at all. If you're testing whether a large or small cannonball will fall faster, for example, having a second pair of cannonballs that don't get dropped does not aid the experiment in any way.
** In addition, even in biological settings controls are not always necessary. If you are testing a serum to turn people into super-soldiers, there's no point in having a control group because we already know that people don't spontaneously turn into super-soldiers when given a placebo. Any such effect can only be the result of the serum, with no control group needed to know that. Control groups are only a necessity when looking for relatively small effects that can only be seen by statistically studying large groups. A serum to slightly increase sporting performance would need a control group to be sure any effect was not simply due to people unconsciously trying harder because they think they should be doing better after being injected with something. A serum that turns people into Captain America with an immediate large increase in muscle mass and the ability to run many times faster than any other human, not so much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A nice little aversion in ''StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'' where Sisko, Jake, Nog, and [[ItMakesSenseInContext Quark]] are surveying a planet, Nog notes they are going to check other water sources to make sure the elements in the water they are reading isn't unique to the local area.

to:

* A nice little aversion in ''StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'' ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'' where Sisko, Jake, Nog, and [[ItMakesSenseInContext Quark]] are surveying a planet, Nog notes they are going to check other water sources to make sure the elements in the water they are reading isn't unique to the local area.

Added: 1191

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Invoking whats\' his name\'s law, you know, the one about Hitler and the Nazis


** As Victorian-era sexologists like Havelock Ellis and von Kraft-Ebbing were vocally frustrated with their society's squeamish refusal to acknowledge ''any'' form of human sexuality whatsoever for reasons of propriety, the (black) joke hypothesis could well have been the case. They were, after all, scientists who were trained in appropriate methodology [[note]]even a cursory glance at their published work makes this clear[[/note]] and who carefully trained others to treat the subject matter carefully and diligently.

to:

** As Victorian-era sexologists like Havelock Ellis and von Kraft-Ebbing were vocally frustrated with their society's squeamish refusal to acknowledge ''any'' form of human sexuality whatsoever for reasons of propriety, the (black) joke hypothesis could well have been the case. They were, after all, scientists who were trained in appropriate methodology [[note]]even a cursory glance at their published work makes this clear[[/note]] and who carefully trained others to treat the subject matter carefully and diligently. diligently.
* The dirty little secret about the Nazi death camps, one which all Western countries -and Russia - are unwilling to admit to, is that many of the experiments carried out on living people by the Nazis did indeed provide valid scientific knowledge of a sort which would have been impossible to recreate in any country with a normal regard for human rights. The Nazis systematically and ruthlessly tested concepts on living people, adhering rigidly to scientific protocols (including repeatability) and testing against "control groups". Much of their research on behalf of the Luftwaffe and Kreigsmarine involved replicating the effects of extreme temperature and pressure change on human bodies and human endurance. This involved pressure chambers in which the atmospheric effects of either extremely high flight or extremely low depths were tested on living people, with and without experimental flight-suits or diving/submarine apparatus. Nobody wants to admit how Nazi research still keeps our military pilots and submariners able to function[[note]]without Britain, the USA, Russia or even Israel having to do anything ''directly'' morally unsound[[/note]], but this, alas, is the truth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adding notes

Added DiffLines:

** As Victorian-era sexologists like Havelock Ellis and von Kraft-Ebbing were vocally frustrated with their society's squeamish refusal to acknowledge ''any'' form of human sexuality whatsoever for reasons of propriety, the (black) joke hypothesis could well have been the case. They were, after all, scientists who were trained in appropriate methodology [[note]]even a cursory glance at their published work makes this clear[[/note]] and who carefully trained others to treat the subject matter carefully and diligently.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Centuries ago, an early doctor desperately tried to convince his contemporaries, who all had different treatments for the same disease, to start using control groups so they could work out, once and for all, which treatment was the best. Everyone refused, on the basis that their treatment was ''obviously'' the best, and they would not let their patients die. Well, just imagine how many lives could have been saved if scientists actually ''checked''.

Added: 2279

Removed: 2279

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Real Life sections are listed at the bottom of the page.


[[folder:Real Life]]
* A RealLife example, [[http://lesswrong.com/lw/37k/rationality_quotes_december_2010/35rk attributed to Dr. E. E. Peacock, Jr.]]:
-->'One day when I was a junior medical student, a very important Boston surgeon visited the school and delivered a great treatise on a large number of patients who had undergone successful operations for vascular reconstruction.
-->
-->At the end of the lecture, a young student at the back of the room timidly asked, “Do you have any controls?” Well, the great surgeon drew himself up to his full height, hit the desk, and said, “Do you mean did I not operate on half the patients?” The hall grew very quiet then. The voice at the back of the room very hesitantly replied, “Yes, that’s what I had in mind.” Then the visitor’s fist really came down as he thundered, “Of course not. [[EmergencyTransformation That would have doomed half of them to their death.]]”
-->
-->God, it was quiet then, and one could scarcely hear the small voice ask, “Which half?”'
** Because of the ethical considerations of giving potentially dying people placebos and condemning them to death, many medical drug tests have a "control" group which receives the best known conventional treatment (the "gold-standard regimen") while the test group receives the new drug, and it's compared to the known rather than to completely untreated people.
** There have been more than a few cases of doctors deciding to forgo control groups in order to rush out a life-saving drug, only for it to be tragically realized later how ineffective and/or fatal it actually was.
* This is believed to be the origin of the saying "stop it or you'll go blind". Because early sex researchers thought that "normal, respectable" people would be offended at the researchers questioning them about something as private as sex, the researchers decided to ask low-status people, most notably the blind housed in institutions. They found a high incidence of masturbation amongst the blind. Since there was no control group, people simply assumed that the high numbers were abnormal ([[ScienceMarchesOn they're not]]) and that [[FalseCause the blindness was caused by masturbation.]] Or it may have just been a joke which some people took seriously. Nobody now knows for sure.
[[/folder]]


Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Real Life]]
* A RealLife example, [[http://lesswrong.com/lw/37k/rationality_quotes_december_2010/35rk attributed to Dr. E. E. Peacock, Jr.]]:
-->'One day when I was a junior medical student, a very important Boston surgeon visited the school and delivered a great treatise on a large number of patients who had undergone successful operations for vascular reconstruction.
-->
-->At the end of the lecture, a young student at the back of the room timidly asked, “Do you have any controls?” Well, the great surgeon drew himself up to his full height, hit the desk, and said, “Do you mean did I not operate on half the patients?” The hall grew very quiet then. The voice at the back of the room very hesitantly replied, “Yes, that’s what I had in mind.” Then the visitor’s fist really came down as he thundered, “Of course not. [[EmergencyTransformation That would have doomed half of them to their death.]]”
-->
-->God, it was quiet then, and one could scarcely hear the small voice ask, “Which half?”'
** Because of the ethical considerations of giving potentially dying people placebos and condemning them to death, many medical drug tests have a "control" group which receives the best known conventional treatment (the "gold-standard regimen") while the test group receives the new drug, and it's compared to the known rather than to completely untreated people.
** There have been more than a few cases of doctors deciding to forgo control groups in order to rush out a life-saving drug, only for it to be tragically realized later how ineffective and/or fatal it actually was.
* This is believed to be the origin of the saying "stop it or you'll go blind". Because early sex researchers thought that "normal, respectable" people would be offended at the researchers questioning them about something as private as sex, the researchers decided to ask low-status people, most notably the blind housed in institutions. They found a high incidence of masturbation amongst the blind. Since there was no control group, people simply assumed that the high numbers were abnormal ([[ScienceMarchesOn they're not]]) and that [[FalseCause the blindness was caused by masturbation.]] Or it may have just been a joke which some people took seriously. Nobody now knows for sure.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This is believed to be the origin of the saying "stop it or you'll go blind". Because early sex researchers thought that "normal, respectable" people would be offended at the researchers questioning them about something as private as sex, the researchers decided to ask low-status people, most notably the blind housed in institutions. They found a high incidence of masturbation amongst the blind. Since there was no control group, people simply assumed that the high numbers were abnormal ([[ScienceMarchesOn they're not]]) and that the blindness was caused by masturbation. Or it may have just been a joke which some people took seriously. Nobody now knows for sure.

to:

* This is believed to be the origin of the saying "stop it or you'll go blind". Because early sex researchers thought that "normal, respectable" people would be offended at the researchers questioning them about something as private as sex, the researchers decided to ask low-status people, most notably the blind housed in institutions. They found a high incidence of masturbation amongst the blind. Since there was no control group, people simply assumed that the high numbers were abnormal ([[ScienceMarchesOn they're not]]) and that [[FalseCause the blindness was caused by masturbation. masturbation.]] Or it may have just been a joke which some people took seriously. Nobody now knows for sure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Averted in [[http://xkcd.com/507/ this]] Webcomic/{{xkcd}} strip, with male sex partners serving as "control groups" for [[ExperimentedInCollege lesbian experimentation]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
spelling fix


** Ironically, this may violate experimental procedure in a different way. A second variable introduced into the experiment is known as an [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding procedural confound]], and poses a danger to the validity of the experiment.

to:

** Ironically, this may violate experimental procedure in a different way. A second variable introduced into the experiment is known as an a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding procedural confound]], and poses a danger to the validity of the experiment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Creator/StephenKing's ''Literature/{{Firestarter}}'' [[MadScientist Dr. Wanless]] tells the students that half of them will be receiving distilled water (and the other half will be receiving a mildly hallucinogenic drug called "Lot 6"), but it's made clear later on that all of the volunteers received "Lot 6" (which induces a wide variety of psychic powers in the subjects, some of which are permanent -- not to mention acting as a mutagen which produces even stronger results in the children of those who receive it).

to:

* In Creator/StephenKing's ''Literature/{{Firestarter}}'' [[MadScientist Dr. Wanless]] tells the students that half of them will be receiving distilled water (and the other half will be receiving a mildly hallucinogenic drug called "Lot 6"), but it's made clear later on that all of the volunteers received "Lot 6" (which induces a wide variety of psychic powers in the subjects, some of which are permanent -- not to mention acting as a mutagen which produces even stronger results in the children of those who receive it). Although there isn't much need to cancel the placebo effect if you don't tell the subjects what are they actually getting...

Changed: 229

Removed: 519

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Name Space. Deleting Natter.


* Despite usually being the epitome of unscientific, ''TheXFiles'' actually gets this one right. In the episode ''Red Museum'', a small town was being used to test one of the evil conspiracy's plans for turning people into half-alien monsters. The method being tested here was feeding them beef from cattle injected with alien growth hormones, which failed to turn them into aliens, but did turn several teenage boys into super-predatory rapists. The conspiracy guys also had one of their men establish a weird cult run out of a nearby farmhouse whose members were all vegetarians, in order to act as a control group.
** Except a proper control group in that case would consist of people being fed beef from cattle not injected with alien growth hormones.
*** We already know what happens if you feed people beef from cattle not injected with alien growth hormones. Vegetarians included.
**** But do we know what happens if you feed people in that area beef from cattle not injected with alien growth hormones, along with other food grown in that area? If you have a control group in all the same conditions, you get a more precise result.

to:

* Despite usually being Subverted in ''Series/TheXFiles'', the epitome of unscientific, ''TheXFiles'' actually episode "Red Museum" gets this one right. In the episode ''Red Museum'', right, a small town was being used to test one of the evil conspiracy's plans for turning people into half-alien monsters. The method being tested here was feeding them beef from cattle injected with alien growth hormones, which failed to turn them into aliens, but did turn several teenage boys into super-predatory rapists. The conspiracy guys also had one of their men establish a weird cult run out of a nearby farmhouse whose members were all vegetarians, in order to act as a control group.
** Except a proper control group in that case would consist of people being fed beef from cattle not injected with alien growth hormones.
*** We
group. (We already know what happens if you feed people beef from cattle not ''not'' injected with alien growth hormones. Vegetarians included.
**** But do we know what happens if you feed people in that area beef from cattle not injected with alien growth hormones, along with other food grown in that area? If you have a control group in all the same conditions, you get a more precise result.
hormones.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Scientific experiments are a funny thing. When doing one, you need to have two groups -- the control group and the experimental group. Heck, sometimes their can be ''multiple'' control groups. This is done to make sure that the results of the experiments actually come from the things the scientists are doing, and don't happen on their own due to placebo effect or something in the test environment they weren't aware of.

to:

Scientific experiments are a funny thing. When doing one, you need to have two groups -- the control group and the experimental group. Heck, sometimes their there can be ''multiple'' control groups. This is done to make sure that the results of the experiments actually come from the things the scientists are doing, and don't happen on their own due to placebo effect or something in the test environment they weren't aware of.

Changed: 59

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Scientific experiments are a funny thing. When doing one, you need to have two groups -- the control group and the experimental group. Heck, sometimes their can be ''multiple'' control groups. This is done to make sure that the results of the experiments actually come from the things the scientists are doing, and don't happen on their own due to placebo effect.

to:

Scientific experiments are a funny thing. When doing one, you need to have two groups -- the control group and the experimental group. Heck, sometimes their can be ''multiple'' control groups. This is done to make sure that the results of the experiments actually come from the things the scientists are doing, and don't happen on their own due to placebo effect.
effect or something in the test environment they weren't aware of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A real life application of this trope is [[EmergencyTransformation experimental treatments conducted on terminally-ill patients]]: they know that they're dying, they've tried pretty much everything else, so they will willingly sign approval forms and let you start PlayingWithSyringes on the long shot that you ''might'' be able to save them. This is actually fairly rare, as even if the subject lives, the resultant information is of far less value without knowing exactly ''what'' you did that saved them... which is [[CaptainObvious what you learn from the control group.]] (Well, that, and to make sure the 'treatment' didn't actually kill them ''faster''.)

to:

A real life application of this trope is [[EmergencyTransformation experimental treatments conducted on terminally-ill patients]]: they know that they're dying, they've tried pretty much everything else, so they will willingly sign approval forms and let you start PlayingWithSyringes on the long shot that you ''might'' be able to save them. This is actually fairly rare, as even if the subject lives, the resultant information is of far less value without knowing exactly ''what'' you did that saved them... which is [[CaptainObvious what you learn from the control group.]] (Well, that, and to make sure the 'treatment' didn't actually kill them ''faster''.)) The reason it's done at all is that it's considered unethical to deny possibly-lifesaving treatment from a terminally ill patient in order to use them as part of a control group.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There have been more than a few cases of doctors deciding to forgo control groups in order to rush out a life-saving drug, only for it to be tragically realized later how ineffective and/or fatal it actually was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A real life application of this trope is [[EmergencyTransformation experimental treatments conducted on terminally-ill patients]]: they know that they're dying, they've tried pretty much everything else, so they will willingly sign approval forms and let you start PlayingWithSyringes on the long shot that you ''might'' be able to save them. This is actually fairly rare, as even if the subject lives, the resultant information is of far less value without knowing exactly ''what'' you did that saved them... which is [[CaptainObvious what you learn from the control group.]]

to:

A real life application of this trope is [[EmergencyTransformation experimental treatments conducted on terminally-ill patients]]: they know that they're dying, they've tried pretty much everything else, so they will willingly sign approval forms and let you start PlayingWithSyringes on the long shot that you ''might'' be able to save them. This is actually fairly rare, as even if the subject lives, the resultant information is of far less value without knowing exactly ''what'' you did that saved them... which is [[CaptainObvious what you learn from the control group.]]]] (Well, that, and to make sure the 'treatment' didn't actually kill them ''faster''.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Scientific experiments are a funny thing. When doing one, you need to have two groups -- the control group and the experimental group. This is done to make sure that the results of the experiments actually come from the things the scientists are doing, and don't happen on their own due to placebo effect.

to:

Scientific experiments are a funny thing. When doing one, you need to have two groups -- the control group and the experimental group. Heck, sometimes their can be ''multiple'' control groups. This is done to make sure that the results of the experiments actually come from the things the scientists are doing, and don't happen on their own due to placebo effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Humorously averted in [[http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0545.html this]] ''Order of the Stick'' comic. A test group of captured peasants is to be pushed off a tower into a rift leading to the SealedEvilInACan; a control group is just going to be pushed off the other side of the tower.

to:

* Humorously averted in [[http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0545.html this]] ''Order of the Stick'' ''WebComic/TheOrderOfTheStick'' comic. A test group of captured peasants is to be pushed off a tower into a rift leading to the SealedEvilInACan; a control group is just going to be pushed off the other side of the tower.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Speaking of having a control group yet still botching its implementation, in ''Series/{{House}},'' Thirteen is placed in the placebo group for a Huntington's Disease medication, which Foreman is able to find out by the nurse's small talk. Therefore, not only is the staff willing to spread this information around, said nurse even mentions that the real medication has a foul smell while the placebo doesn't, meaning they're trivially easy to tell apart which makes the whole exercise utterly pointless by countering the "placebo effect".

to:

* Speaking of having a control group yet still botching its implementation, in ''Series/{{House}},'' Thirteen is placed in the placebo group for a Huntington's Disease medication, which Foreman is able to find out by the nurse's small talk. Therefore, not only is the staff willing to spread this information around, said nurse even mentions that the real medication has a foul smell while the placebo doesn't, meaning they're trivially easy to tell apart which makes the whole exercise utterly pointless by countering the "placebo effect".placebo effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Speaking of having a control group yet still botching its implementation, in ''Series/{{House}},'' Thirteen is placed in the placebo group for a Huntington's Disease medication, which Foreman is able to find out by the nurse's small talk. Therefore, not only is the staff willing to spread this information around, said nurse even mentions that the real medication has a foul smell while the placebo doesn't, meaning they're trivially easy to tell apart which makes the whole exercise utterly pointless.

to:

* Speaking of having a control group yet still botching its implementation, in ''Series/{{House}},'' Thirteen is placed in the placebo group for a Huntington's Disease medication, which Foreman is able to find out by the nurse's small talk. Therefore, not only is the staff willing to spread this information around, said nurse even mentions that the real medication has a foul smell while the placebo doesn't, meaning they're trivially easy to tell apart which makes the whole exercise utterly pointless.pointless by countering the "placebo effect".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Doubled word.


** Also worth noting: in a proper double-blind medical study, ''no one'' knows which group is the placebo (or at least, not the people administering the medication) to prevent the researchers from accidentally giving the patients clues accidentally (for instance, through tone of voice or body language).

to:

** Also worth noting: in a proper double-blind medical study, ''no one'' knows which group is the placebo (or at least, not the people administering the medication) to prevent the researchers from accidentally giving the patients clues accidentally (for instance, through tone of voice or body language).

Changed: 5

Removed: 24

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''NightOfTheLepus'' actually got that right. Now if only the annoying kid would not have swapped two rabbits, the film would never have happened.
* ''Film/ResidentEvil''.

to:

* ''NightOfTheLepus'' ''Film/NightOfTheLepus'' actually got that right. Now if only the annoying kid would not have swapped two rabbits, the film would never have happened.
* ''Film/ResidentEvil''.
happened.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Take to extremes in the zombie flick ''Devil's Playground'', in which not one of the ''thirty thousand'' volunteer test subjects is apparently given a placebo in lieu of the invigorating (and accidentally-zombifying) experimental drug.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''[Caesars CEO Gary Loveman] likes to say there are three things that can get you fired from Caesars: Stealing, sexual harassment and running an experiment without a control group.''

to:

->''[Caesars CEO Gary Loveman] likes to say there are three things that can get you fired from Caesars: [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking Stealing, sexual harassment and running an experiment without a control group.'']]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because of the ethical considerations of giving potentially dying people placebos and condemning them to death, many medical drug tests have a "control" group which receives the best known conventional treatment while the test group receives the new drug, and it's compared to the known rather than to completely untreated people.

to:

** Because of the ethical considerations of giving potentially dying people placebos and condemning them to death, many medical drug tests have a "control" group which receives the best known conventional treatment (the "gold-standard regimen") while the test group receives the new drug, and it's compared to the known rather than to completely untreated people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VForVendetta'' -- The prisoners in the government facility were all exposed to experimental treatments. Not a single one of them seemed to be given placebo drugs. This is probably because, in the graphic novel, it was a parallel to NaziGermany and the main object was to sadistically kill minorities using a face-saving rationale, not to do actual science. After all, for ''real'' science, half-starved and worked-nigh-to-death subjects are less than ideal.

to:

* ''VForVendetta'' ''Film/VForVendetta'' -- The prisoners in the government facility were all exposed to experimental treatments. Not a single one of them seemed to be given placebo drugs. This is probably because, in the graphic novel, it was a parallel to NaziGermany and the main object was to sadistically kill minorities using a face-saving rationale, not to do actual science. After all, for ''real'' science, half-starved and worked-nigh-to-death subjects are less than ideal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A nice little aversion in ''StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'' where Sisko, Jake, Nog, and [[ItMakesSenseInContext Quark]] are surveying a planet, Nog notes they are going to check other water sources to make sure the elements in the water they are reading isn't unique to the local area.

Top