Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / JusticeByOtherLegalMeans

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2007 Simpson argued that his current conviction and sentence for armed robbery and kidnapping is this for his acquittal for murder. Granted, the possibility was pointed out by the judge, who warned the jury that they could get removed from the bench if they used the murder trial as a prior prejudice. Though the general public thought he was all but convicted the moment he was arrested. It is also unlikely that many have sympathy for him about this. In an interesting contrast to his last trail, many believed he was both poorly defended and the authorities actually did have an agenda this time around.

to:

** In 2007 Simpson argued that his current conviction and sentence for armed robbery and kidnapping is this for his acquittal for murder. Granted, the possibility was pointed out by the judge, who warned the jury that they could get removed from the bench if they used the murder trial as a prior prejudice. Though the general public thought he was all but convicted the moment he was arrested. It arrested, it is also unlikely that many have sympathy for him about this. In an interesting contrast to his last trail, trial, many believed he was both poorly defended and the authorities actually did have an agenda this time around.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Similarly, serial killers, rapists and other criminals who commit particularly heinous crimes that make the news have been known to end up being jailed for other offenses without the authorities realizing that they've caught the person who's wanted for the more infamous crimes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* When an EngineeredPublicConfession doesn't work in ''Series/TheThinBlueLine'', Fowler gets the case thrown out by revealing that Goody was still wearing the prototype uniform that he was modeling when he found the planted evidence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PlayedForLaughs in ''Film/TheCampaign'': [[spoiler:Congressman]] Marty Huggins can't jail the Motch Brothers for their unethical campaign practices, because a lot of what they did was made illegal Citizen's United. [[spoiler: They instead go to jail for harboring Tim Wattley, who was really an international fugitive.]]

to:

* PlayedForLaughs in ''Film/TheCampaign'': [[spoiler:Congressman]] Marty Huggins can't jail the Motch Brothers for their unethical campaign practices, because a lot of what they did was made illegal legal by Citizen's United. [[spoiler: They instead go to jail for harboring Tim Wattley, who was really an international fugitive.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PlayedForLaughs in ''The/Campaign'': [[spoiler:Congressman]] Marty Huggins can't jail the Motch Brothers for their unethical campaign practices, because a lot of what they did was made illegal Citizen's United. [[spoiler: They instead go to jail for harboring Tim Wattley, who was really an international fugitive.]]

to:

* PlayedForLaughs in ''The/Campaign'': ''Film/TheCampaign'': [[spoiler:Congressman]] Marty Huggins can't jail the Motch Brothers for their unethical campaign practices, because a lot of what they did was made illegal Citizen's United. [[spoiler: They instead go to jail for harboring Tim Wattley, who was really an international fugitive.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* PlayedForLaughs in ''The/Campaign'': [[spoiler:Congressman]] Marty Huggins can't jail the Motch Brothers for their unethical campaign practices, because a lot of what they did was made illegal Citizen's United. [[spoiler: They instead go to jail for harboring Tim Wattley, who was really an international fugitive.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** After being declared not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in 1995 through a combination of incompetence on the part of the authorities and his lawyers making the very public argument he was the victim of racism. He was later sued by the Goldman family in a civil lawsuit, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this. The rights to a failed book deal concerning ''If I Did It'' passed to the Goldman family. It was a book were Simpson presented the scenario of how the murders would have taken place if he had committed the crimes and public outcry ensured it never got publication. In 2007 the Goldman family republished the book with the new name ''If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer'' with the "if" so small as to be unnoticeable.

to:

** After being declared not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in 1995 through a combination of incompetence on the part of the authorities and his lawyers making the very public argument he was the victim of racism. He was later sued by the Goldman family in a civil lawsuit, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this. The rights to a failed book deal concerning ''If I Did It'' passed to the Goldman family. It was a book were in which Simpson presented presents the scenario of how the murders would have taken place if he had committed the crimes and public outcry ensured it never got publication. In 2007 the Goldman family republished the book with the new name ''If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer'' with the "if" so small as to be unnoticeable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Contrast with FramingTheGuiltyParty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** After being declared not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in 1995 through a combination of incompetence on the part of the authorities and his lawyers making the very public argument he was the victim of racism. He was later sued by the Goldman family in a civil lawsuit, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this. The rights to a failed book deal concerning ''If I Did It'' passed to the Goldman family. It was a book were Simpson presented the scenario of how the murders would have taken place if he had committed the crimes and public outcry ensured it never got publication. In 2007 the Goldman family republished the book with the new name ''If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer'' with the if so small as to be unnoticeable.

to:

** After being declared not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in 1995 through a combination of incompetence on the part of the authorities and his lawyers making the very public argument he was the victim of racism. He was later sued by the Goldman family in a civil lawsuit, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this. The rights to a failed book deal concerning ''If I Did It'' passed to the Goldman family. It was a book were Simpson presented the scenario of how the murders would have taken place if he had committed the crimes and public outcry ensured it never got publication. In 2007 the Goldman family republished the book with the new name ''If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer'' with the if "if" so small as to be unnoticeable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* A problem in the Southern US during the heydey of the Ku Klux Klan was that oftentimes a KKK member would be arrested for assaulting or murdering a black man, but would be acquitted despite overwhelming evidence. The reason being that the juries, made up of Southern US citizens, usually contained other KKK members, or people sympathetic to the KKK. So the police then began arresting the KKK members for "infringing on the victim's human rights", which is a ''Federal'' crime, and the perpetrator would therefore be tried in a Federal court, whose jurors were not nearly so sympathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Edgeworth does this unwittingly in ''AceAttorney Investigations''. He gets Ernest Amano arrested for helping Lance cover up a murder, to the great delight of Agent Lang. Lang had been previously unable to prove he was tied to a smuggling ring and now had a reason to take him in.
** Phoenix and Edgeworth work together to pull this off in the last trial of ''Justice For All.'' The defendant was guilty of hiring someone to kill a rival, but they had only circumstantial evidence on him, and he could have walked. So Phoenix mentioned to the hired assassin (who was communicating via radio) that the defendant had kept blackmail material on him for insurance. [[{{CrowningMomentofAwesome}} The defendant ends up in fear for his life and goes to jail rather than get killed in his sleep.]]

to:

* Edgeworth does this unwittingly in ''AceAttorney Investigations''.''VisualNovel/AceAttorneyInvestigations''. He gets Ernest Amano arrested for helping Lance cover up a murder, to the great delight of Agent Lang. Lang had been previously unable to prove he was tied to a smuggling ring and now had a reason to take him in.
** Phoenix and Edgeworth work together to pull this off in the last trial of ''Justice For All.'' The defendant was is guilty of hiring someone to kill a rival, but they had have only circumstantial evidence on him, and he could have walked. walk. So Phoenix mentioned mentions to the hired assassin (who was (who's communicating via radio) that the defendant had kept blackmail material on him for insurance. [[{{CrowningMomentofAwesome}} [[CrowningMomentofAwesome The defendant ends up in fear for his life and goes to jail rather than get killed in his sleep.]]

Added: 492

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Another good example is when the police are in pursuit of a pair of thugs who killed an off-duty cop and kidnapped a limo driver. They catch one of the pair, but with no idea if the limo driver is dead or alive [=McCoy=] is forced to give him a very advantageous plea deal (including any "related crimes") in exchange for the whereabouts of the driver. Of course, the driver was already dead and the police later find the guy's partner also dead. [=McCoy=] can't get out of the deal, so he charges the living perp with murdering his partner on the slippery theory that the partner's murder was a completely unrelated crime. This leads to the quote at the top of the page, the plea means the original perp essentially walks for killing a cop, but ends up drawing a lengthy prison sentence anyway, for killing his accomplice.

to:

*** Another good example is when the police are in pursuit of a pair of thugs who killed an off-duty cop and kidnapped a limo driver. They catch one of the pair, but with no idea if the limo driver is dead or alive [=McCoy=] is forced to give him a very advantageous plea deal (including any "related crimes") in exchange for the whereabouts of the driver. Of course, the driver was already dead and the police later find the guy's partner also dead. [=McCoy=] can't get out of the deal, so he charges the living perp with murdering his partner on the slippery theory that the partner's murder was a completely unrelated crime. This leads to the quote at the top of the page, the plea means the original perp essentially walks for killing a cop, but ends up drawing a lengthy prison sentence anyway, for killing his accomplice.accomplice.
*** One from a different vector comes about when an OJ Simpson {{Expy}}, who had gotten off on the murder of his wife due to a bribed juror, is eventually nailed for the murder of the publisher of a book about the previous trial. [=McCoy=] was eventually able to get evidence that the defendant had lied about previous evidence, but also that he admitted killing his wife. The jury convicted him of the current murder, but looking at the jury kind of implied this trope for the previous case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In ''Literature/AfterTheGoldenAge'', the supervillain Destructor is ultimately arrested not for any of his attempts to destroy Commerce City, but on charges of fraud, tax evasion, and money laundering.

Added: 2301

Changed: 205

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Sometimes, even ''Series/{{Monk}}'' has come across this:
** "Mr. Monk and the Wrong Man": an ex-con named Max Barton has been exonerated from a conviction for a particularly gruesome double murder, and Monk tries to help him rebuild his life. When the original witness to the crime chides him harshly for helping the very person she insists was the man she saw leaving the crime scene after she heard screaming, Monk suddenly realizes a detail about the crime scene that means Barton ''was'' guilty of the original murder all along, but due to double jeopardy, they can't retry him again. However, Monk finds that they can put Barton back in prison for killing the guy who was his partner in the original murder out of fear the guy would talk.
** "Mr. Monk Takes the Stand": a sculptor named Evan Gildea is suspected of murdering his wife Nancy and making it look like a break-in. However, when the trial comes up, Gildea's lawyer, the Saul Goodman-esque Harrison Powell, gets the case against his client thrown out by discrediting Monk and Captain Stottlemeyer despite all the evidence suggesting Gildea is guilty. However, Randy then approaches Monk asking him to help exonerate Rudy Smith, a friend of his from a police outreach program who has been accused of robbing an auto parts store and killing a clerk in the process (Rudy has confessed to robbing the clerk and taking her necklace and money from the cashier). In examining the scene, Monk notices evidence that exonerates Rudy of murder, and then he finds a discarded taillight bulb in the bushes next to the store, meaning that while they are unable to put Evan Gildea away for murdering his wife, they can put him away for killing the store clerk.[[note]]Monk had noticed when Gildea was driving away from the courthouse after his acquittal, his left taillight looked much newer than his right one, indicating it had recently been replaced. He also had learned from Randy that the M.O. of the clerk's death was identical to Nancy Gildea's death - blunt instrument to the back of the skull causing instant death.[[/note]] When interrogated, Gildea incriminates himself by calling Rudy "a chain-snatching, dope-smoking little thug," only to be told that [[INeverSaidItWasPoison while Rudy had indeed taken the clerk's necklace, this detail was never in the police report or released to the media]].



* Most serial killers are not convicted of all crimes they are believed to have committed, or even of all the crimes they claim to have done.

to:

* Most serial killers are not convicted of all crimes they are believed to have committed, or even of all the crimes they claim to have done.
done. For example, it's believed that Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer, among others, may have killed more people than just the ones they were convicted of.

Changed: 60

Removed: 30

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''ShamansTears'', Joshua Brand is unable to arrest the CorruptCorporateExecutive for various crimes because the victims (genetically engineered lifeforms) are not technically human. So he instead arrests him for violating the Endangered Species Act after he realizes one of the genetically engineered constructs was created using the DNA of a black-footed ferret.

to:

* In ''ShamansTears'', ''ComicBook/ShamansTears'', Joshua Brand is unable to arrest the CorruptCorporateExecutive for various crimes because the victims (genetically engineered lifeforms) are not technically human. So he instead arrests him for violating the Endangered Species Act after he realizes one of the genetically engineered constructs was created using the DNA of a black-footed ferret.



** ''CSI: Miami'' had Horatio unable to arrest a murderer because he had diplomatic immunity. However, one of the victims was a Canadian citizen, and Canada did not recognize the guy's diplomatic status. When the guy's yacht ends up in international waters, Horatio alerts the authorities.

to:

** ''CSI: Miami'' ''Series/CSIMiami'' had Horatio unable to arrest a murderer because he had diplomatic immunity. However, one of the victims was a Canadian citizen, and Canada did not recognize the guy's diplomatic status. When the guy's yacht ends up in international waters, Horatio alerts the authorities.



** In one of the few original ''[=CSI=]'' episodes not involving murder, an exhibit of valuable Japanese historical items is robbed, with the perps making off with several items and millions of dollars in cash from the vault. The team finds out that all the items were fake. The perps, including the supposed owner of the items, a wealthy Japanese businessman, turn out to be employees of the guy hosting the exhibit (the pretender was also [[InterchangeableAsianCultures Chinese]]). Grissom confronts him with the evidence, but the guy points out that there's not enough to press charges. Grissom agrees but says he will send the evidence to the guy's insurance company to expose his scam.

to:

** In one of the few original ''[=CSI=]'' ''Series/{{CSI}}'' episodes not involving murder, an exhibit of valuable Japanese historical items is robbed, with the perps making off with several items and millions of dollars in cash from the vault. The team finds out that all the items were fake. The perps, including the supposed owner of the items, a wealthy Japanese businessman, turn out to be employees of the guy hosting the exhibit (the pretender was also [[InterchangeableAsianCultures Chinese]]). Grissom confronts him with the evidence, but the guy points out that there's not enough to press charges. Grissom agrees but says he will send the evidence to the guy's insurance company to expose his scam.



** In a classic Law and Order episode, the show's resident expert psychologist, Dr. Olivet, accused a gynecologist of raping her, but the court was forced to withdraw the charges when the defense attorney claimed that Dr. Olivet had visited the OB-GYN when one of her patients claimed he had raped her, and therefore claimed entrapment. ADA Stone then publicly announced that the city of New York would attempt to prosecute the OB-GYN again. When the doctor gloated that they couldn't touch him for Olivet's rape, Stone revealed that after his public announcement, some fifty-plus former patients stepped forward with rape charges of their own. As Stone then said when discussing a reduced sentence, Stone answered, "In a perfect world, I would leave you in a room with your former patients for an hour. I'll settle for you spending the rest of your life in jail."

to:

** In a classic Law ''Series/{{Law and Order Order}}'' episode, the show's resident expert psychologist, Dr. Olivet, accused a gynecologist of raping her, but the court was forced to withdraw the charges when the defense attorney claimed that Dr. Olivet had visited the OB-GYN when one of her patients claimed he had raped her, and therefore claimed entrapment. ADA Stone then publicly announced that the city of New York would attempt to prosecute the OB-GYN again. When the doctor gloated that they couldn't touch him for Olivet's rape, Stone revealed that after his public announcement, some fifty-plus former patients stepped forward with rape charges of their own. As Stone then said when discussing a reduced sentence, Stone answered, "In a perfect world, I would leave you in a room with your former patients for an hour. I'll settle for you spending the rest of your life in jail."



* In one episode of ThePractice, a man kills his wife. His son, trying to protect him, claims he attacked his dad and the gun went off accidentally. When the man is acquitted, the DA has the son arrested for felony murder. The dad then confesses to the killing but is protected by double jeopardy, so the judge puts them both away for 20 years for perjury.

to:

* In one episode of ThePractice, ''Series/ThePractice'', a man kills his wife. His son, trying to protect him, claims he attacked his dad and the gun went off accidentally. When the man is acquitted, the DA has the son arrested for felony murder. The dad then confesses to the killing but is protected by double jeopardy, so the judge puts them both away for 20 years for perjury.



<<|CrimeAndPunishmentTropes|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As mentioned above, AlCapone. To elaborate, his sentence of 11 years imprisonment for tax evasion was, at the time, the longest sentence ever given for the crime.

to:

* As mentioned above, AlCapone. To elaborate, his sentence of 11 years imprisonment for tax evasion evasion[[note]]Somewhat hilariously, the government couldn't make the case the Capone was a crime kingpin, but they ''could'' point to his lifestyle and spending habits and say he was earning money he hadn't paid taxes on. It was pointed out at the time that the government was consciously ignoring ''how'' Capone had earned the money (which they couldn't prove) and instead focusing on the fact that he ''had'' the money and owed taxes on it[[/note]] was, at the time, the longest sentence ever given for the crime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Brought up, with a traditional Wraith Squadron twist, in the [[XWingSeries X-Wing novel]] ''Mercy Kill''. A [[TheAlliance Galactic Alliance]] general is suspected of belonging to a conspiracy to put TheEmpire back in charge, and the Wraiths are trying to find evidence of his treason. In the process, they find ample evidence of his smuggling and profiteering by selling off Alliance military property (including an ElaborateUndergroundBase full of contraband), and they consider setting him up to be prosecuted on this charge. However, they decide it would be too easy for him to claim that a junior officer was behind the whole thing, particularly since he recently [[BoxedCrook "retained"]] the services of a master identity forger. The Wraiths continue to look for evidence before he can undergo a lengthy, but flawless transformation into his new identity. Then Piggy has an epiphany -- the general has ''already'' undergone the process (so that he can disappear at moment's notice if need be) but is using prosthetics to masquerade as his old self [[RevengeBeforeReason in order to hunt them down]]. So they gather up a bunch of witnesses and reveal his "true" identity, thereby framing the general for murdering and impersonating... ''himself''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TheCloser'', "Good Housekeeping"; a spoiled rich youth, Austin Philips, fled south of the border to avoid prosecution for killing the daughter of a Hispanic immigrant. Knowing she couldn't get him extradited, Brenda went to Mexico to get the full story from him, and he refuses to come back to the US no matter what she tried, even letting Brenda charge his parents, which would cut him off. Brenda asks him for the story so she can close the case, and offers to drop the charges against his parents. The killer, confident he's beyond the reach of American law enforcement, tearfully confesses that he did it by accident, at which point, Brenda reveals that the murdered girl ''hadn't'' been born in the U.S., as her mother had claimed. Bad move, confessing that you've killed a Mexican citizen when you just ''fled'' to Mexico! The Mexican cops lay hands on him, and Brenda is noticeably disturbed right afterwards, breaking out the booze she bought to bribe the Federales if needed; you ''don't'' want to be a white prettyboy in a Mexican prison. [[http://www.tv.com/the-closer/good-housekeeping/episode/410670/recap.html?tag=episode_recap;recap More detail here]].

to:

* ''TheCloser'', ''Series/TheCloser'', "Good Housekeeping"; a spoiled rich youth, Austin Philips, fled south of the border to avoid prosecution for killing the daughter of a Hispanic immigrant. Knowing she couldn't get him extradited, Brenda went to Mexico to get the full story from him, and he refuses to come back to the US no matter what she tried, even letting Brenda charge his parents, which would cut him off. Brenda asks him for the story so she can close the case, and offers to drop the charges against his parents. The killer, confident he's beyond the reach of American law enforcement, tearfully confesses that he did it by accident, at which point, Brenda reveals that the murdered girl ''hadn't'' been born in the U.S., as her mother had claimed. Bad move, confessing that you've killed a Mexican citizen when you just ''fled'' to Mexico! The Mexican cops lay hands on him, and Brenda is noticeably disturbed right afterwards, breaking out the booze she bought to bribe the Federales if needed; you ''don't'' want to be a white prettyboy in a Mexican prison. [[http://www.tv.com/the-closer/good-housekeeping/episode/410670/recap.html?tag=episode_recap;recap More detail here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Oh, right, unhidden spoilers.


* ''TheLincolnLawyer'' [[DiscussedTrope discussed the trope]] with a client charged with attempted rape. The eponymous lawyer was worried that, even if his client isn't convicted, his victim would be able to sue him. In the end, [[spoiler:the client got away when the prison snitch called by the prosecutor to testify wasn't a reliable witness, forcing a mistrial, but the police decided to investigate his claims that the client had previously raped and killed another girl and framed an innocent man. It turns out to be true and he was convicted for that. ''Just as planned''.]]

to:

* ''TheLincolnLawyer'' [[DiscussedTrope discussed the trope]] with a client charged with attempted rape. The eponymous lawyer was worried that, even if his client isn't convicted, his victim would be able to sue him. In the end, [[spoiler:the the client got away when the prison snitch called by the prosecutor to testify wasn't a reliable witness, forcing a mistrial, but the police decided to investigate his claims that the client had previously raped and killed another girl and framed an innocent man. It turns out to be true and he was convicted for that. ''Just as planned''.]]
planned''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TheLincolnLawyer'' [[DiscussedTrope discussed the trope]] with a client charged with attempted rape. The eponymous lawyer was worried that, even if his client isn't convicted, his victim would be able to sue him. In the end, the client got away when the prison snitch called by the prosecutor to testify wasn't a reliable witness but the police decided to investigate his claims that the client had previously raped and killed another girl and framed an innocent man. It turns out to be true and he was convicted for that.

to:

* ''TheLincolnLawyer'' [[DiscussedTrope discussed the trope]] with a client charged with attempted rape. The eponymous lawyer was worried that, even if his client isn't convicted, his victim would be able to sue him. In the end, the [[spoiler:the client got away when the prison snitch called by the prosecutor to testify wasn't a reliable witness witness, forcing a mistrial, but the police decided to investigate his claims that the client had previously raped and killed another girl and framed an innocent man. It turns out to be true and he was convicted for that.
that. ''Just as planned''.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In one of the few original ''[=CSI=]'' episodes not involving murder, an exhibit of valuable Japanese historical items is robbed, with the perps making off with several items and millions of dollars in cash from the vault. The team finds out that all the items were fake. The perps, including the supposed owner of the items, a wealthy Japanese businessman, turn out to be employees of the guy hosting the exhibit (the pretender was also [[AllAsiansAreAlike Chinese]]). Grissom confronts him with the evidence, but the guy points out that there's not enough to press charges. Grissom agrees but says he will send the evidence to the guy's insurance company to expose his scam.

to:

** In one of the few original ''[=CSI=]'' episodes not involving murder, an exhibit of valuable Japanese historical items is robbed, with the perps making off with several items and millions of dollars in cash from the vault. The team finds out that all the items were fake. The perps, including the supposed owner of the items, a wealthy Japanese businessman, turn out to be employees of the guy hosting the exhibit (the pretender was also [[AllAsiansAreAlike [[InterchangeableAsianCultures Chinese]]). Grissom confronts him with the evidence, but the guy points out that there's not enough to press charges. Grissom agrees but says he will send the evidence to the guy's insurance company to expose his scam.

Changed: 264

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Another good example is when the police are in pursuit of a pair of thugs who killed an off-duty cop and kidnapped a limo driver. They catch one of the pair, but with no idea if the limo driver is dead or alive [=McCoy=] is forced to give him a very advantageous plea deal (including any "related crimes") in exchange for the whereabouts of the driver. Of course, the driver was already dead. Later, the police find the guy's partner dead. [=McCoy=] can't get out of the deal, so he charges the living perp with murdering the other on the theory that it was a completely unrelated crime.

to:

*** Another good example is when the police are in pursuit of a pair of thugs who killed an off-duty cop and kidnapped a limo driver. They catch one of the pair, but with no idea if the limo driver is dead or alive [=McCoy=] is forced to give him a very advantageous plea deal (including any "related crimes") in exchange for the whereabouts of the driver. Of course, the driver was already dead. Later, dead and the police later find the guy's partner also dead. [=McCoy=] can't get out of the deal, so he charges the living perp with murdering the other his partner on the slippery theory that it the partner's murder was a completely unrelated crime.crime. This leads to the quote at the top of the page, the plea means the original perp essentially walks for killing a cop, but ends up drawing a lengthy prison sentence anyway, for killing his accomplice.

Changed: 1346

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* O.J. Simpson has argued that his current conviction and sentence for armed robbery and kidnapping is this for his acquittal for murder. It is quite likely. It is also likely that no one has any sympathy for him about this.
** Much earlier he also lost a civil suit for the deaths to the Goldman family, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this.
** And granted, the possibility was pointed out by the judge, who warned the jury that they could get removed from the bench if they used the murder trial as a prior prejudice.

to:

* O.J. Simpson
** After being declared not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown
Simpson has and Ronald Goldman in 1995 through a combination of incompetence on the part of the authorities and his lawyers making the very public argument he was the victim of racism. He was later sued by the Goldman family in a civil lawsuit, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this. The rights to a failed book deal concerning ''If I Did It'' passed to the Goldman family. It was a book were Simpson presented the scenario of how the murders would have taken place if he had committed the crimes and public outcry ensured it never got publication. In 2007 the Goldman family republished the book with the new name ''If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer'' with the if so small as to be unnoticeable.
** In 2007 Simpson
argued that his current conviction and sentence for armed robbery and kidnapping is this for his acquittal for murder. It is quite likely. It is also likely that no one has any sympathy for him about this.
** Much earlier he also lost a civil suit for the deaths to the Goldman family, who were awarded damages in excess of 30 million. However, he's paid only a tiny fraction of this.
** And granted,
Granted, the possibility was pointed out by the judge, who warned the jury that they could get removed from the bench if they used the murder trial as a prior prejudice.prejudice. Though the general public thought he was all but convicted the moment he was arrested. It is also unlikely that many have sympathy for him about this. In an interesting contrast to his last trail, many believed he was both poorly defended and the authorities actually did have an agenda this time around.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This is also a fairly common tactic on ''LawAndOrder'', as is threatening suspects' friends and acquaintances with accessory charges to get them to testify--or to get the criminal to confess.
** For example, an episode of ''LawAndOrderUK'' has a man get off for manslaughter and drug running after a witness changes his statement. After the trial, Steel has a EurekaMoment and asks his boss to "pull a Capone" on him and get him for tax evasion (which they do).

to:

* This is also a fairly common tactic on ''LawAndOrder'', ''Series/LawAndOrder'', as is threatening suspects' friends and acquaintances with accessory charges to get them to testify--or to get the criminal to confess.
** For example, an episode of ''LawAndOrderUK'' ''Series/LawAndOrderUK'' has a man get off for manslaughter and drug running after a witness changes his statement. After the trial, Steel has a EurekaMoment and asks his boss to "pull a Capone" on him and get him for tax evasion (which they do).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Another good example is when the police are in pursuit of a pair of thugs who killed an off-duty cop and kidnapped a limo driver. They catch one of the pair, but with no idea if the limo driver is dead or alive [=McCoy=] is forced to give him a very advantageous plea deal (including any "related crimes") in exchange for the whereabouts of the driver. Of course, the driver was already dead. Later, the police find the guy's partner dead. [=McCoy=] can't get out of the deal, so he charges the living perp with murdering the other on the theory that it was a completely unrelated crime.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Most serial killers are not convicted of all crimes they are believed to have committed, or even of all the crimes they claim to have done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''{{Batman}} with Robin the Boy Wonder'': In one episode, the Joker and his thugs, disguised as a filming crew, were looking for a treasure. It was later revealed the only treasure was a fake. The Joker thought he'd get off because he couldn't be convicted for looking for a false treasure he never found. He was then told he could be nailed for making a film without proper authorization.

to:

* ''{{Batman}} ''Franchise/{{Batman}} with Robin the Boy Wonder'': In one episode, the Joker and his thugs, disguised as a filming crew, were looking for a treasure. It was later revealed the only treasure was a fake. The Joker thought he'd get off because he couldn't be convicted for looking for a false treasure he never found. He was then told he could be nailed for making a film without proper authorization.

Changed: 41

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** One of the better ones involves a pair of conspirators who shot a man just for the thrill. Their defense tactic is to have both of them point fingers at the other, only one person actually shot the victim and the evidence proving conspiracy was thrown out. The jury can't convict them both, and since they're unsure who did it, they would likely acquit both. However, [=McCoy=] tricks one of the lawyers into getting the trials severed. The result, both defendants will now face separate trials for the ''same'' crime, where attempting to blame their co-conspirator is a defense the jury can choose to believe or not. And given the heinousness of the crime, they probably won't. We don't see it play out though, one of the defendants confesses out of guilt before his case can go to the jury, and his testimony hangs his partner. D.A. Schiff even remarks on how [=McCoy=] got the justice system to legally recognize a physical impossibility ( Both men fired the same bullet from the same gun ).

to:

*** One of the better ones involves a pair of conspirators who shot a man just for the thrill. Their defense tactic is to have both of them point fingers at the other, only one person actually shot the victim (only one bullet was fired) and the evidence proving conspiracy was thrown out. The jury can't convict them both, and since they're unsure who did it, they would likely acquit both. However, [=McCoy=] tricks one of the lawyers into getting the trials severed. The result, both defendants will now face separate trials for the ''same'' crime, where attempting to blame their co-conspirator is a defense the jury can choose to believe or not. And given the heinousness of the crime, they probably won't. We don't see it play out though, one of the defendants confesses out of guilt before his case can go to the jury, and his testimony hangs his partner. D.A. Schiff even remarks on how [=McCoy=] got the justice system to legally recognize accept a physical impossibility ( Both men fired the same bullet from the same gun ).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->-- ''Franchise/LawAndOrder''

to:

-->-- ''Franchise/LawAndOrder''
''Series/LawAndOrder''



* On ''BlueHeelers'', Tom goes after a suspected gangster (played by Gary Sweet) in this fashion, even bringing up Al Capone at one point.

to:

* On ''BlueHeelers'', ''Series/BlueHeelers'', Tom goes after a suspected gangster (played by Gary Sweet) in this fashion, even bringing up Al Capone at one point.

Top