Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / InformedSpecies

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Mughi did look like a cat in the original novels, but his design was a ShoutOut to the Coerl from ''Literature/TheVoyageOfTheSpaceBeagle'', so it was changed to avoid copyright issues.

to:

** Mughi did look like a cat in the original novels, but his design was a ShoutOut to the Coerl Coeurl from ''Literature/TheVoyageOfTheSpaceBeagle'', so it was changed to avoid copyright issues.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts" (which would be the Downplayed section of the PlayingWith tab) '''[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]]''', this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told'''[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously[[/note]]'''. If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts" (which would be the Downplayed section of the PlayingWith tab) '''[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]]''', this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told'''[[note]]If told (hence the name, Informed Species)'''[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously[[/note]]'''. If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"'''[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]]''', this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told'''[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously[[/note]]'''. If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"'''[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} counterparts" (which would be the Downplayed section of the PlayingWith tab) '''[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]]''', this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told'''[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously[[/note]]'''. If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

While this primarily applies to animal characters, it can also apply to anthropomorphic objects.


* In ''Toys/{{Bionicle}}'''s 2007 line, the Barraki have launchers used to fire squids that look more like lampreys than actual squids and are also stated to be vampiric like the latter.
** Many of the early Rahi fell into this. The Muaka and Kane-Ra are a few parts away from being a PaletteSwap, and are referred to as a tiger and a bull, respectively but only vaguely resemble either (being a giant mechanical creature with tank treads instead of back legs and no tails). The Kuma-Nui, made of parts from both, looks mostly like a much burlier Muaka with two treads and a tail made of rubber hose, and is said to be a ''rat.'' And then there's the Tarakava, which are stated to be lizards, but look more like a mix between a praying mantis and a Rock-Em Sock-Em Robot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No spoilers above the line (these aren't even spoilers)


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts".[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy]]. This trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[spoiler:If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.]] If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky
ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts".[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} counterparts"'''[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy]]. This FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]]''', this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[spoiler:If told'''[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.]] obviously[[/note]]'''. If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky
nitpicky ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts".[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy]]. This trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[spoiler:If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.]]If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts".[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy]]. This trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[spoiler:If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.]]If ]] If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor, nitpicky
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[spoiler:If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.]]If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} counterparts".[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy]], this FunnyAnimalAnatomy]]. This trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[spoiler:If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.]]If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details that are mostly obvious and that the general audience would notice, not minor minor, nitpicky
ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.[[/note]] If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} counterparts"[[spoiler:JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]], FunnyAnimalAnatomy]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[note]]If [[spoiler:If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.[[/note]] If ]]If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sports teams shouldn’t go under advertising


* The Tottenham Hotspur logo doesn't look much like a cockerel (rooster), looking more like a pigeon.

Removed: 297

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
when something has antennae, that makes people go "insect". when something has wings and antennae, that makes people go "flying insect." when something has wings, antennae, and stripes, that makes people go "bee." or possibly "wasp." really, the only oddity is that it's mostly red.


* The titular mascot of the Filipino fast food restaurant chain, Jollibee, is stated to be a bee, but literally the only things that make him one are his antenna, wings and stripes on his abdomen. Overall, he has a very human-like appearance barely looking anything like the insect he is based on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Many older examples of SeldomSeenSpecies look and act very little (or nothing) like their RealLife equivalents.

to:

Many older examples of SeldomSeenSpecies look and act very little (or nothing) (if anything) like their RealLife equivalents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.[[/note]] If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As a rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told.[[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.[[/note]] If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Related to CartoonCreature (whose actual species is entirely ambiguous) and CallASmeerpARabbit (which is about the ''name'' of their species, and not the species itself).

to:

Related to the CartoonCreature (whose actual species is entirely ambiguous) and CallASmeerpARabbit (which is about the ''name'' of their species, and not the species itself).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This is related to the CartoonCreature (whose actual species is entirely ambiguous), and CallASmeerpARabbit (which is about the ''name'' of their species, and not the species itself).

to:

This is related Related to the CartoonCreature (whose actual species is entirely ambiguous), ambiguous) and CallASmeerpARabbit (which is about the ''name'' of their species, and not the species itself).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Some examples are understandable and forgivable, especially if they are also an example of SeldomSeenSpecies, but for the most part Administrivia/TropesAreTools and so is making a character look less like their real world species counterpart due to TheLawOfConservationOfDetail, being able to tell a story easier (as MostWritersAreHuman) and sometimes simply because it looks [[RuleOfCool cool]] and/or [[RuleOfFun fun]]. See also ViewerSpeciesConfusion for a subtrope based on the audience reaction to a creature, and IAmNotWeasel for in-universe reactions.

to:

Some examples are understandable and forgivable, especially if they are also an example of SeldomSeenSpecies, but for the most part Administrivia/TropesAreTools and so is making a character look less like their real world species counterpart due to TheLawOfConservationOfDetail, being able to tell a story easier (as MostWritersAreHuman) and sometimes simply because it looks [[RuleOfCool cool]] and/or [[RuleOfFun fun]]. See also ViewerSpeciesConfusion for a subtrope based on the audience audience's reaction to a creature, and IAmNotWeasel for in-universe reactions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''Series/PowerRangersBeastMorphers'' did it again, changing [[Series/TokumeiSentaiGoBusters Beet Buster and Stag Buster]], who were JapaneseBeetleBrothers, to being based instead on a Mantis and Scarab respectively, despite them not looking like those at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''ComicStrip/MotherGooseAndGrimm'', while Grimm is clearly a dog, he doesn't really share much of resemblance with Bull Terriers, which he's stated to be. Combined with ArtEvolution, in the earlier strips he actually did look a lot like the particular breed.

to:

* In ''ComicStrip/MotherGooseAndGrimm'', while Grimm is clearly a dog, he doesn't really share much of resemblance with Bull Terriers, which he's stated to be.be, so he just looks like a generic yellow dog. Combined with ArtEvolution, in the earlier strips he actually did look a lot like the particular breed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** According to the script, the ceratopsian skull that the Indoraptor is impaled on is that of an ''Agujaceratops'', not a ''Triceratops'', as viewers commonly assume. The thing is, the skull's frill is clearly solid, a feature only ''Triceratops'' had. However, the producers have confirmed it's been decided that the skull was not any indentified ceratopsian. Interestingly, the junior novelization identifies it as a ''Triceratops horridus''.

to:

*** According to the script, the ceratopsian skull that the Indoraptor is impaled on is that of an ''Agujaceratops'', not a ''Triceratops'', as viewers commonly assume. The thing is, the skull's frill is clearly solid, a feature only ''Triceratops'' had. However, The producers, on the producers have confirmed it's been decided that other hand, claim the skull was not wasn't meant to be any indentified specific type of ceratopsian. Interestingly, the junior novelization identifies it as a ''Triceratops horridus''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Spinosaurus and Pteranodon are still clearly recognizable as such, despite their inaccuracies.


** ''Film/JurassicParkIII'':
*** The ''Spinosaurus''. It's got a skull and teeth more similar to ''Suchomimus'' as well as two crests instead of one. And now discoveries in 2014 and 2020 have made the film's depiction look ''even more inaccurate'' than its real-life counterpart. Granted, this can be excusable since suplementary material for ''Jurassic World'' and ''Fallen Kingdom'' implies [[spoiler:the Spinosaurus was a prototype for the Indominus rex project.]]
*** The ''Pteranodon'' have hooked bills full of sharp teeth, in spite of the animal meaning "Wing ''Without Teeth''". And especially egregious in that the ''Pteranodon'' from the previous film had the proper toothless bill albeit also hooked, though ''Film/JurassicWorld'' would bring back the toothless bills which are this time correctly pointed. All versions possess grasping feet and leathery wings however. Both the ''JPIII'' and ''JW'' versions lack pycnofibres, while it's ambiguous whether the ''TLW'' version has them or not (the concept art and macquettes portrays it with such).

Changed: 390

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In its initial incarnation, the owlbear of ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', despite supposedly being a hybrid of bear and owl, was pretty hard to identify as such: it has bearlike arms and a thickset furry body, but the only owl-like trait it has is a beak, which certainly doesn't look like an owl beak (being almost as large as its head). Add in the armored head and the T-rex stance with a long thick tail dragging behind it, and one could be forgiven for thinking it's simply some kind of fantasy dinosaur rather than the MixAndMatchCritter it is. This owed to its original design being based less on owls or bears and more on a bootleg figure Gygax was using as a miniature. Later redesigns have tried to make it more like its inspirational critters, usually by shortening the tail considerably to give it a bearlike silhouette and giving it a rather obvious owl head.

to:

* In [[https://i.imgur.com/3EKyqzJ.png its initial incarnation, incarnation]], the owlbear of ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', despite supposedly being a hybrid of bear and owl, was pretty hard to identify as such: it has bearlike arms and a thickset furry body, but the only owl-like trait it has is a beak, which certainly doesn't look like an owl beak (being almost as large as its head). head), and feathers on its head, which are so sparsely drawn that they look like scales or armor instead. Add in the armored head gizzard neck, the hunchback, the oddly reduced fur on its limbs (to the point that its paws and feet seem to be hairless), and the T-rex stance with a long thick tail dragging behind it, and one could be forgiven for thinking it's simply some kind of fantasy dinosaur or possibly an obscure kaiju, rather than the MixAndMatchCritter that it is. This owed to its original design being based less on owls or bears and more on [[https://i.imgur.com/hZhuDbN.png a bootleg figure knockoff dinosaur toy]] Gary Gygax was using had used as a miniature.miniature in his home games. Later redesigns have tried to make it more like its inspirational critters, usually by shortening the tail considerably to give it a bearlike silhouette and giving it a rather obvious owl head.

Changed: 184

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In its initial incarnation, the owlbear of ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', despite supposedly being a hybrid of bear and owl, was pretty hard to identify as such: it has bearlike arms and a thickset furry body, but the only owl-like trait it has is a beak, which certainly doesn't look like an owl beak (being almost as large as its head). Add in the armored head, the thick lizard tail, and the T-rex stance, and one could be forgiven for thinking it's simply some kind of fantasy dinosaur rather than the MixAndMatchCritter it is. This owed to its original design being based less on owls or bears and more on a bootleg figure Gygax was using as a miniature. Later redesigns have tried to make it more like its inspirational critters.

to:

* In its initial incarnation, the owlbear of ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', despite supposedly being a hybrid of bear and owl, was pretty hard to identify as such: it has bearlike arms and a thickset furry body, but the only owl-like trait it has is a beak, which certainly doesn't look like an owl beak (being almost as large as its head). Add in the armored head, the thick lizard tail, head and the T-rex stance, stance with a long thick tail dragging behind it, and one could be forgiven for thinking it's simply some kind of fantasy dinosaur rather than the MixAndMatchCritter it is. This owed to its original design being based less on owls or bears and more on a bootleg figure Gygax was using as a miniature. Later redesigns have tried to make it more like its inspirational critters.critters, usually by shortening the tail considerably to give it a bearlike silhouette and giving it a rather obvious owl head.

Changed: 474

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* For a while, the owlbear of ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', despite supposedly being a hybrid of bear and owl, had a lot of traits that looked like neither: a gigantic beak, a long thick tail, and an armored head. It looks much more like an old-school dinosaur covered in fur, or possibly a giant ground sloth. This owed to its original design being based less on owls or bears and more with a bootleg figure Gygax was using as a miniature. Later redesigns have tried to make it more like its inspirational critters.

to:

* For a while, In its initial incarnation, the owlbear of ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'', despite supposedly being a hybrid of bear and owl, had was pretty hard to identify as such: it has bearlike arms and a lot of traits that looked like neither: thickset furry body, but the only owl-like trait it has is a gigantic beak, a long which certainly doesn't look like an owl beak (being almost as large as its head). Add in the armored head, the thick lizard tail, and an armored head. It looks much more like an old-school the T-rex stance, and one could be forgiven for thinking it's simply some kind of fantasy dinosaur covered in fur, or possibly a giant ground sloth. rather than the MixAndMatchCritter it is. This owed to its original design being based less on owls or bears and more with on a bootleg figure Gygax was using as a miniature. Later redesigns have tried to make it more like its inspirational critters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The G1 Decepticon Headmasters all have animals as their alternate modes. Weirdwolf, Skullcruncher, and Mindwipe all manage to look like the species their alt-modes are supposed to be (a wolf, a crocodile, and a bat, respectively). Others are not so lucky. Horri-Bull is, as his name suggests, supposed to be a bull. He has bull-like horns but his head has a broad snout full of sharp teeth, his feet have claws instead of hooves, and his tail is broad and forked (as it's his robot mode gun). Overall, he looks more like [[Film/Ghostbusters1984 Zuul]] than any sort of actual bull. His wavemates Squeezeplay and Fangry are so far beyond this that they're well into CallASmeerpARabbit territory: Squeezeplay's "crab" mode is more like an alien monster with crab claws, while Fangry's wolf mode has a wolf head on a bipedal body with bat wings.

to:

** The G1 Decepticon Headmasters all have animals as their alternate modes. Weirdwolf, Skullcruncher, and Mindwipe all manage to look like the species their alt-modes are supposed to be (a wolf, a crocodile, and a bat, respectively).respectively), and even Apeface, who is considerably more stylized, is relatively easy to peg as a gorilla. Others are not so lucky. Horri-Bull is, as his name suggests, supposed to be a bull. He has bull-like horns but his head has a broad snout full of sharp teeth, his feet have claws instead of hooves, and his tail is broad and forked (as it's his robot mode gun). Overall, he looks more like [[Film/Ghostbusters1984 Zuul]] than any sort of actual bull. His wavemates Squeezeplay and Fangry are so far beyond this that they're well into CallASmeerpARabbit territory: Squeezeplay's "crab" mode is more like an alien monster with crab claws, while Fangry's wolf mode has a wolf head on a bipedal body with bat wings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told. If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''

to:

'''NOTE: This trope is NOT "animal has qualities that differ from their real counterparts"[[note]]JustForFun/{{Egregious}} examples of this may go in ArtisticLicenseBiology or FunnyAnimalAnatomy[[/note]], this trope is "animal mainly does not look like their general species". As rule of thumb, ask yourself if you could recognize the animal's correct species without being told. [[note]]If you're familiar with what the real animal looks like, obviously.[[/note]] If not, then this is the correct trope. Also, keep MST3KMantra in mind and only point out details the general audience would notice, not minor ones only zoologists would care about.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The ''Mamenchisaurus'' look more like ''Diplodocus'' or ''Barosaurus'' in that they don't have a hump or a tail club. Most glaringly, they don't have the extra-long neck this dinosaur is famous for, meaning that they mostly just look like generic sauropods.

to:

*** The ''Mamenchisaurus'' look more like ''Diplodocus'' or ''Barosaurus'' in that they don't have a hump or a tail club. Most glaringly, they don't have the extra-long neck this dinosaur is famous for, meaning that they mostly just look like generic sauropods. This may be because the animal was going to be changed to ''Seismosaurus'' (nowadays a species of ''Diplodocus'') during mid-production, but the initial identification as '' Mamechisaurus'' has stuck.



*** According to the script, the ceratopsian skull that the Indoraptor is impaled on is that of an ''Agujaceratops'', not a ''Triceratops'', as viewers commonly assume. The thing is, the skull's frill is clearly solid, a feature only ''Triceratops'' had. Interestingly, the junior novelization identifies it as a ''Triceratops horridus''.

to:

*** According to the script, the ceratopsian skull that the Indoraptor is impaled on is that of an ''Agujaceratops'', not a ''Triceratops'', as viewers commonly assume. The thing is, the skull's frill is clearly solid, a feature only ''Triceratops'' had. However, the producers have confirmed it's been decided that the skull was not any indentified ceratopsian. Interestingly, the junior novelization identifies it as a ''Triceratops horridus''.

Changed: 17

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dinobot's toy has a lot to be excused about it, being a ''Velociraptor'' toy in the post-''Film/JurassicPark'' mid-90s ([[RaptorAttack featherless, hands are wrong, way too big]]). What can't be easily excused is that he's incredibly chunky, with tiny arms, legs barely long enough to lift his belly off the ground, and gigantic hips, when ''Velociraptors'' were even then depicted as slim and slight with lanky limbs. He was redesigned somewhat in the cartoon, but even then, he's still a lot thicker than a real ''Velociraptor.'' If not for the sickle claw (which is small enough to be mistaken for a big toe), you'd probably think ''T-rex'' or ''Allosaurus'' first. His ''Universe'' toy managed to fix this a fair bit by slimming out his proportions, though his design is still outdated.

to:

** Dinobot's toy has a lot to be excused about it, being a ''Velociraptor'' toy in the post-''Film/JurassicPark'' mid-90s ([[RaptorAttack featherless, hands are wrong, way too big]]). What can't be easily excused is that he's incredibly chunky, with tiny arms, legs barely long enough to lift his belly off the ground, and gigantic hips, when ''Velociraptors'' were even then depicted as slim and slight with lanky limbs. He was redesigned somewhat in the cartoon, but even then, he's still a lot thicker than a real ''Velociraptor.'' If not for the sickle claw (which is small enough to be mistaken for a big toe), you'd probably think ''T-rex'' or ''Allosaurus'' first. His ''Universe'' toy and ''Kingdom'' toys managed to fix this a fair bit by slimming out his proportions, though his design is still outdated.

Changed: 53

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dinobot's toy has a lot to be excused about it, being a ''Velociraptor'' toy in the post-''Film/JurassicPark'' mid-90s ([[RaptorAttack featherless, hands are wrong, way too big]]). What can't be easily excused is that he's incredibly chunky, with tiny arms, legs barely long enough to lift his belly off the ground, and gigantic hips, when ''Velociraptors'' were even then depicted as slim and slight with lanky limbs. He was redesigned somewhat in the cartoon, but even then, he's still a lot thicker than a real ''Velociraptor.'' If not for the sickle claw, you'd probably think ''T-rex'' or ''Allosaurus'' first. His ''Universe'' toy managed to fix this a fair bit by slimming out his proportions, though his design is still outdated.

to:

** Dinobot's toy has a lot to be excused about it, being a ''Velociraptor'' toy in the post-''Film/JurassicPark'' mid-90s ([[RaptorAttack featherless, hands are wrong, way too big]]). What can't be easily excused is that he's incredibly chunky, with tiny arms, legs barely long enough to lift his belly off the ground, and gigantic hips, when ''Velociraptors'' were even then depicted as slim and slight with lanky limbs. He was redesigned somewhat in the cartoon, but even then, he's still a lot thicker than a real ''Velociraptor.'' If not for the sickle claw, claw (which is small enough to be mistaken for a big toe), you'd probably think ''T-rex'' or ''Allosaurus'' first. His ''Universe'' toy managed to fix this a fair bit by slimming out his proportions, though his design is still outdated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bingo is supposed to be a gorilla, but he has a dog's nose, shorter arms, and orange fur. In ''WesternAnimation/{{Jellystone}}'', he was redesigned as a TopHeavyGuy, making him resemble a gorilla more.

to:

** Bingo is supposed to be a gorilla, but he has looks more like a generic ape with a dog's nose, shorter arms, nose and orange fur. In ''WesternAnimation/{{Jellystone}}'', he was redesigned as a TopHeavyGuy, making him resemble a gorilla more.

Added: 293

Changed: 207

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Bingo of ''Series/TheBananaSplits'' is supposed to be a gorilla, but he has a dog's nose, shorter arms, and orange fur. In ''WesternAnimation/{{Jellystone}}'', he was redesigned as a TopHeavyGuy, making him look more like a gorilla.

to:

* ''Series/TheBananaSplits'':
**
Bingo of ''Series/TheBananaSplits'' is supposed to be a gorilla, but he has a dog's nose, shorter arms, and orange fur. In ''WesternAnimation/{{Jellystone}}'', he was redesigned as a TopHeavyGuy, making him resemble a gorilla more.
** Drooper is supposed to be a lion, but his longer snout makes him
look more like a gorilla.dog.

Top