Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* Hazel Wassername of ''{{30 Rock}}'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
to:
* Hazel Wassername of ''{{30 Rock}}'' ''[[30 Rock]]'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* Hazel Wassername of ''30 Rock'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
to:
* Hazel Wassername of ''30 Rock'' ''{{30 Rock}}'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* Hazel Wassername of ''30Rock'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
to:
* Hazel Wassername of ''30Rock'' ''30 Rock'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder: LiveActionTelevision]]
* Hazel Wassername of ''30Rock'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
[[/folder]]
* Hazel Wassername of ''30Rock'' has an IQ of 70 - which she seems to think is pretty high.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* In ''ForrestGump'', Forrest has an somewhat more probable IQ of about 75, which is considered the lowest for "normal" intelligence, or mildly retarded. While low, someone with an IQ of 75 could still go to school, get a job, get married, etc., just as Forrest did.
to:
* In ''ForrestGump'', Forrest has an a somewhat more probable IQ of about 75, which is considered the lowest for "normal" intelligence, or mildly retarded. While low, someone with an IQ of 75 could still go to school, get a job, get married, etc., just as Forrest did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
Unlike [[ImprobablyHighIQ the opposite end of the spectrum]], it's much more rare to see one of these scores reach ridiculous levels that don't match up with real world IQ testing. Of course, when it does get ridiculous like that (negative IQ scores anyone?), it's much more jarring. On the other hand, most ''really'' ridiculously low [=IQs=] - single digits, or negative numbers - are found in comedies, where the RuleOfFunny can be blamed, or in-character hyperbole.
to:
Unlike [[ImprobablyHighIQ the opposite end of the spectrum]], it's much more rare to see one of these scores reach ridiculous levels that don't match up with real world IQ testing. Of course, when it does get ridiculous like that (negative IQ scores anyone?), (to the point of giving negative scores), it's much more jarring. On the other hand, most ''really'' ridiculously low [=IQs=] - single digits, or negative numbers - are found in comedies, where the RuleOfFunny can be blamed, or in-character hyperbole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* The narrator of ''Stuck in Neutral'' has no conscious control of his muscles, and is typically assumed to be mindless, so his IQ was once measured at 3. (From his narration, he seems to be of above-average intelligence--he's just completely uneducated.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
An IQ of 85 is only one standard deviation below the mean. Nearly a sixth of the entire population has an IQ at least that low.
Deleted line(s) 19 (click to see context) :
* From ''[[{{Film/Alien}} Alien 3]]'': Aaron's IQ is 85. "Eighty-Five" has become his nickname, much to his displeasure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Justified, as they may be too stupid to realize that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter destruction commenced.
Changed line(s) 25,27 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average. [[FridgeBrilliance Of course, they could be completely unable to do any sort of IQ testing anyway because there's no way any of them could understand the process. It's possible that they don't know what is or how to calculate an average.]]
** They certainly do test IQ; the fact that Luke Wilson has the highest-tested IQ of anyone alive is even a plot point (not to mention the premise in and of itself). And the questions are so ridiculously easy that he might actually have an IQ of around 700 or so in the future.
** Alternatively, they still have automated IQ testing systems in place from before, but since they're all idiots they can't adjust the tests for the new average, so they're all being measured according to a scale from centuries ago.
** They certainly do test IQ; the fact that Luke Wilson has the highest-tested IQ of anyone alive is even a plot point (not to mention the premise in and of itself). And the questions are so ridiculously easy that he might actually have an IQ of around 700 or so in the future.
** Alternatively, they still have automated IQ testing systems in place from before, but since they're all idiots they can't adjust the tests for the new average, so they're all being measured according to a scale from centuries ago.
to:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, them and most of these people them probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average. [[FridgeBrilliance Of course, they could be completely unable to do any sort of IQ testing anyway because there's no way any of them could understand the process. It's possible that they don't know what is or how to calculate an average.]]
** They certainly do test IQ; the fact that Luke Wilson has the highest-tested IQ of anyone alive is even a plot point (not to mention the premise in and of itself). And the questions are so ridiculously easy that he might actually have an IQ of around 700 or so in the future.
** Alternatively, they still have automated IQ testing systems in place from before, but since they're all idiots they can't adjust the tests for the new average, so they're all being measured according to a scale from centuries ago.
** They certainly do test IQ; the fact that Luke Wilson has the highest-tested IQ of anyone alive is even a plot point (not to mention the premise in and of itself). And the questions are so ridiculously easy that he might actually have an IQ of around 700 or so in the future.
** Alternatively, they still have automated IQ testing systems in place from before, but since they're all idiots they can't adjust the tests for the new average, so they're all being measured according to a scale from centuries ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Alternatively, they still have automated IQ testing systems in place from before, but since they're all idiots they can't adjust the tests for the new average, so they're all being measured according to a scale from centuries ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** They certainly do test IQ; the fact that Luke Wilson has the highest-tested IQ of anyone alive is even a plot point (not to mention the premise in and of itself). And the questions are so ridiculously easy that he might actually have an IQ of around 700 or so in the future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not an example of this.
Deleted line(s) 39,42 (click to see context) :
[[folder:Video Games]]
* ''{{Ultima Online}}'' has (or at least ''had'' - I haven't checked in a few years) a skilled called Evaluate Intelligence, which could be used to estimate the spellcasting capabilities of a target before engaging. Using this skill on almost any inanimate object would return the result "Smarter than a rock, but dumber than a piece of wood."
[[/folder]]
* ''{{Ultima Online}}'' has (or at least ''had'' - I haven't checked in a few years) a skilled called Evaluate Intelligence, which could be used to estimate the spellcasting capabilities of a target before engaging. Using this skill on almost any inanimate object would return the result "Smarter than a rock, but dumber than a piece of wood."
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Video Games]]
* ''{{Ultima Online}}'' has (or at least ''had'' - I haven't checked in a few years) a skilled called Evaluate Intelligence, which could be used to estimate the spellcasting capabilities of a target before engaging. Using this skill on almost any inanimate object would return the result "Smarter than a rock, but dumber than a piece of wood."
[[/folder]]
* ''{{Ultima Online}}'' has (or at least ''had'' - I haven't checked in a few years) a skilled called Evaluate Intelligence, which could be used to estimate the spellcasting capabilities of a target before engaging. Using this skill on almost any inanimate object would return the result "Smarter than a rock, but dumber than a piece of wood."
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing natter.
Changed line(s) 25,27 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average. (So it probably means: The average guy from the future would score 5, if brought to our time. Still improbably low.)
** [[FridgeBrilliance Although in this new society, they would be completely unable to do any sort of IQ testing anyway because there's no way any of them could understand the process. It's possible that they don't know what is or how to calculate an average.]]
** Well, they have a test, so the understand the ''need''. But when one of the questions is "If you have one bucket with two gallons of water, and another bucket with three gallons of water, how many buckets do you have?", there's a problem. Not because it's too easy, mind. Because that's a math question, not an IQ question.
** [[FridgeBrilliance Although in this new society, they would be completely unable to do any sort of IQ testing anyway because there's no way any of them could understand the process. It's possible that they don't know what is or how to calculate an average.]]
** Well, they have a test, so the understand the ''need''. But when one of the questions is "If you have one bucket with two gallons of water, and another bucket with three gallons of water, how many buckets do you have?", there's a problem. Not because it's too easy, mind. Because that's a math question, not an IQ question.
to:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average. (So it probably means: The average guy from the future would score 5, if brought to our time. Still improbably low.)
**[[FridgeBrilliance Although in this new society, Of course, they would could be completely unable to do any sort of IQ testing anyway because there's no way any of them could understand the process. It's possible that they don't know what is or how to calculate an average.]]
** Well, they have a test, so the understand the ''need''. But when one of the questions is "If you have one bucket with two gallons of water, and another bucket with three gallons of water, how many buckets do you have?", there's a problem. Not because it's too easy, mind. Because that's a math question, not an IQ question.]]
**
** Well, they have a test, so the understand the ''need''. But when one of the questions is "If you have one bucket with two gallons of water, and another bucket with three gallons of water, how many buckets do you have?", there's a problem. Not because it's too easy, mind. Because that's a math question, not an IQ question.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Please don\'t interpret the name literally. Read the trope definition first.
Added DiffLines:
* From ''[[{{Film/Alien}} Alien 3]]'': Aaron's IQ is 85. "Eighty-Five" has become his nickname, much to his displeasure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Well, they have a test, so the understand the ''need''. But when one of the questions is "If you have one bucket with two gallons of water, and another bucket with three gallons of water, how many buckets do you have?", there's a problem. Not because it's too easy, mind. Because that's a math question, not an IQ question.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
85 is not exactly improbable
Deleted line(s) 26 (click to see context) :
* From ''[[{{Film/Alien}} Alien 3]]'': Aaron's IQ is 85. "Eighty-Five" has become his nickname, much to his displeasure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing first person.
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Garfield}}'' once gave us this list of beings, in order of intelligence (from 0 to 1000, I think): Amoeba - slug - dog - stone - ape - human - kitchen machine - cat.
to:
* ''{{Garfield}}'' once gave us this list of beings, in order of intelligence (from 0 to 1000, I think): [[ImprobablyHighIQ 1000]]): Amoeba - slug - dog - stone - ape - human - kitchen machine - cat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* Another character with ridiculously low IQ: [[TinyToonAdventures Elmyra Duff]], who has "no IQ" (presumed to mean an IQ of 0). This in comparison with a jar of mayonnaise, which has an IQ of 1.
to:
* Another character with ridiculously low IQ: [[TinyToonAdventures Elmyra Duff]], who has "no detectable IQ" (presumed to mean an IQ of 0). This in comparison with a jar of mayonnaise, which has is stated to have an IQ of 1.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** It has been theorized that if a troll would actually sit down in a chair and take an IQ test, it would score lower than ''the chair it was sitting in''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
** The logical conclusion of this score is that Homer is actually ''dumber than ForrestGump''. (The writers have claimed they started him as average, but [[{{Flanderization}} he loses about 5 IQ points a year from radiation]], and now he's basically "a dog that can talk".
to:
** The logical conclusion of this score is that Homer is actually ''dumber than ForrestGump''. (The writers have claimed they started him as average, but [[{{Flanderization}} he loses about 5 IQ points a year from radiation]], and now he's basically "a dog that who can talk".talk").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,20 (click to see context) from:
* In ForrestGump, Forrest has an somewhat more probable IQ of about 75, which is considered the lowest for "normal" intelligence, or mildly retarded. While low, someone with an IQ of 75 could still go to school, get a job, get married, etc., just as Forrest did.
* From ''Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory'':
* From ''Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory'':
to:
* In ForrestGump, ''ForrestGump'', Forrest has an somewhat more probable IQ of about 75, which is considered the lowest for "normal" intelligence, or mildly retarded. While low, someone with an IQ of 75 could still go to school, get a job, get married, etc., just as Forrest did.
* From''Willy ''{{Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory'':Factory}}'':
* From
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average.
to:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average. (So it probably means: The average guy from the future would score 5, if brought to our time. Still improbably low.)
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* In one of the spoof trailers for TropicThunder, the main character of Simple Jack is stated to have an IQ of five.
to:
* In one of the spoof trailers for TropicThunder, ''TropicThunder'', the main character of Simple Jack is stated to have an IQ of five.
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
* In the {{Discworld}} novel 'Thud', the rather drug addled troll named Brick is described at one point as having a possibly negative IQ for comedic effect. Sergeant Detritus is at least once jokingly commented to have a room temperature IQ, but in fact he is no fool and an excellent policeman, if not especially bright. Also subverted in that the comment can be taken literally, as [[AllTrollsAreDifferent Troll's brains]] in Discworld work faster in low temperatures, so his intelligence really is likely to be affected by the room temperature.
to:
* In the {{Discworld}} novel 'Thud', "Thud", the rather drug addled troll named Brick is described at one point as having a possibly negative IQ for comedic effect. Sergeant Detritus is at least once jokingly commented to have a room temperature IQ, but in fact he is no fool and an excellent policeman, if not especially bright. Also subverted in that the comment can be taken literally, as [[AllTrollsAreDifferent Troll's brains]] in Discworld work faster in low temperatures, so his intelligence really is likely to be affected by the room temperature.
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Newspaper Comics]]
* ''{{Garfield}}'' once gave us this list of beings, in order of intelligence (from 0 to 1000, I think): Amoeba - slug - dog - stone - ape - human - kitchen machine - cat.
[[/folder]]
* ''{{Garfield}}'' once gave us this list of beings, in order of intelligence (from 0 to 1000, I think): Amoeba - slug - dog - stone - ape - human - kitchen machine - cat.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[FridgeBrilliance Although in this new society, they would be completely unable to do any sort of IQ testing anyway because there's no way any of them could understand the process. It's possible that they don't know what is or how to calculate an average.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
-->Jerry "The King" Lawler: I heard he took an IQ test and the results came back negative.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average.
to:
* ''{{Idiocracy}}'' demonstrates this. The two intelligent people who never bred had a believable IQ of about 130, while the football player and the trailer park people, had scores in seventies and eighties, which are believably low-average. However, five hundred years later, the average score was five. Granted these people were so stupid that their society was collapsing around them, and most of these people probably would qualify as retarded, but a person with a score of five would be unable to walk or talk. Furthermore, given how IQ is defined, it's impossible for the ''average'' IQ to be anything other than 100, since the norms are adjusted to ensure that average.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
* Peter Griffin of ''FamilyGuy'' has an IQ of 40. (The episode "Petarded" puts him on a graph below both normal people and the line for retarded, [[AcceptableTargets but above creationists]].) The episode in which this is revealed blatantly said Peter was retarded, and he can't live without assistance, temporarily losing custody of his kids after Lois was injured. However, he still does a little more than he should be able to. While his job performance is very poor, he apparently is good enough to keep it. Also, he's legally allowed to drive, and apparently can give [[strike:informed consent]] complete guesswork on major surgery.
to:
* Peter Griffin of ''FamilyGuy'' has an IQ of 40. (The episode "Petarded" puts him on a graph below both normal people and the line for retarded, [[AcceptableTargets but above creationists]].) The episode in which this is revealed blatantly said Peter was retarded, and he can't live without assistance, temporarily losing custody of his kids after Lois was injured. However, he still does a little more than he should be able to. While his job performance is very poor, he apparently is good enough to keep it. Also, he's legally allowed to drive, drive and apparently can give [[strike:informed consent]] consent to major surgery, even though his "informed consent" to the latter is complete guesswork on major surgery.guesswork.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
Unlike [[ImprobablyHighIQ the opposite end of the spectrum]], it's much more rare to see one of these scores reach ridiculous levels that don't match up with real world IQ testing. Of course, when it does get ridiculous like that (negative IQ scores anyone?), it's much more jarring. On the other hand, most ''really'' ridiculously low IQs - single digits, or negative numbers - are found in comedies, where the RuleOfFunny can be blamed.
to:
Unlike [[ImprobablyHighIQ the opposite end of the spectrum]], it's much more rare to see one of these scores reach ridiculous levels that don't match up with real world IQ testing. Of course, when it does get ridiculous like that (negative IQ scores anyone?), it's much more jarring. On the other hand, most ''really'' ridiculously low IQs [=IQs=] - single digits, or negative numbers - are found in comedies, where the RuleOfFunny can be blamed.
blamed, or in-character hyperbole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
Unlike [[ImprobablyHighIQ the opposite end of the spectrum]], it's much more rare to see one of these scores reach ridiculous levels that don't match up with real world IQ testing. Of course, when it does get ridiculous like that (negative IQ scores anyone?), it's much more jarring.
to:
Unlike [[ImprobablyHighIQ the opposite end of the spectrum]], it's much more rare to see one of these scores reach ridiculous levels that don't match up with real world IQ testing. Of course, when it does get ridiculous like that (negative IQ scores anyone?), it's much more jarring.
jarring. On the other hand, most ''really'' ridiculously low IQs - single digits, or negative numbers - are found in comedies, where the RuleOfFunny can be blamed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
-->Jerry "The King" Lawler: I heard he took an IQ test and the results came back negative.
-->-- WWF Attitude
-->-- WWF Attitude
Added DiffLines: