Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 66,67 (click to see context) from:
* The universe of ''MassEffect'' seems to be gender blind when it comes to humans, for the most part. Possibly quarians as well, considering the only quarian military groups we ever see are lead by Tali and the Admiralty board splits 60/40. Other alien races don't show their females [[strike:very often]] at all (the asari, being a OneGenderRace, don't count), but Garrus' war stories show that the Turians are integrated too. Restrooms are still segregated, though, as EDI will remind you if you stumble into the wrong room. Maybe a JustifiedTrope with genetic enhancements being standard for soldiers of humanity.
** Salarians do not follow this rule though, since their species breeds too few females to throw them into combat. From a human perspective, Krogan females are indistinguishable from the males (at least, under all the armor they wear), so it is a toss up on whether or not infertile females fight alongside the males.
** Salarians do not follow this rule though, since their species breeds too few females to throw them into combat. From a human perspective, Krogan females are indistinguishable from the males (at least, under all the armor they wear), so it is a toss up on whether or not infertile females fight alongside the males.
to:
* The universe of ''MassEffect'' seems to be gender blind when it comes to humans, for the most part. Possibly quarians as well, considering the only quarian military groups we ever see are lead by Tali and the Admiralty board splits 60/40. Other alien races don't show their females [[strike:very often]] at all (the asari, being a OneGenderRace, don't count), but Garrus' war stories show that the Turians turians are integrated too. Restrooms are still segregated, though, as EDI will remind you if you stumble into the wrong room. Maybe a JustifiedTrope with genetic enhancements being standard for soldiers of humanity.
** Salarians do not follow this rule though, since their species breeds too few females to throw them into combat. From a human perspective,Krogan krogan females are indistinguishable from the males (at least, under all the armor they wear), so it is a toss up on whether or not infertile females fight alongside the males.males.
** In Lair of the Broker one of the files states that infertile krogan females at least have garrison roles on their homeworld.
** Salarians do not follow this rule though, since their species breeds too few females to throw them into combat. From a human perspective,
** In Lair of the Broker one of the files states that infertile krogan females at least have garrison roles on their homeworld.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
For a related, video game-specific trope, see PurelyAestheticGender.
to:
For a related, video game-specific trope, see PurelyAestheticGender.
PurelyAestheticGender. Not to be confused with [[BiTheWay a person for whom]] [[AnythingThatMoves gender is no object]], IfYouKnowWhatIMean.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 74 (click to see context) from:
to:
** The night elves are one of the few notable exceptions. For the vast majority of WoW's cultures this trope is played completely straight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleting an unnecessary and sexist tangent.
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
*** What the game did have, all through 1st Edition, was an upper limit on female strength - it affected only those females who played fighters, rolled an 18 for strength, followed by 51% or higher on the "exceptional strength" bonus. Anyone of either sex who wasn't a fighter didn't roll the bonus percentage even if they had an 18 strength, nor (obviously) did anyone who didn't have an 18 strength in the first place; and the various belts and gloves that conferred fantastic strength worked just fine regardless of the gender of the wearer. Statistically, only a small fraction of female fighters were affected, and to a much lesser extent than, say, anyone who wanted to play an elven fighter (constitution penalty, ''Raise Dead'' doesn't work on you, you are limited to only 7th level at best). This compares very favourably to the real world, in which the entire female sex effectively receives at least a -1 to strength (there is overlap, obviously, but compare the ''nth'' percentile woman to the corresponding man and the difference is pronounced - and all the more so at the extreme upper end, which the rule above reflected), but did nothing to silence the screams of "sexist!" or proposals of counterbalancing measures which would benefit ''all'' women for the sake of the insult to a few. Eventually TSR caved and this rule went the way of all flesh.
to:
*** What the game did have, all through 1st Edition, was an upper limit on female strength - it affected only those females who played fighters, rolled an 18 for strength, followed by 51% or higher on the "exceptional strength" bonus. Anyone of either sex who wasn't a fighter didn't roll the bonus percentage even if they had an 18 strength, nor (obviously) did anyone who didn't have an 18 strength in the first place; and the various belts and gloves that conferred fantastic strength worked just fine regardless of the gender of the wearer. Statistically, only a small fraction of female fighters were affected, and to a much lesser extent than, say, anyone who wanted to play an elven fighter (constitution penalty, ''Raise Dead'' doesn't work on you, you are limited to only 7th level at best). This compares very favourably to the real world, in which the entire female sex effectively receives at least a -1 to strength (there is overlap, obviously, but compare the ''nth'' percentile woman to the corresponding man and the difference is pronounced - and all the more so at the extreme upper end, which the rule above reflected), but did nothing to silence the screams of "sexist!" or proposals of counterbalancing measures which would benefit ''all'' women for the sake of the insult to a few. Eventually TSR caved and this rule went the way of all flesh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 68 (click to see context) from:
* ''FinalFantasyVIII'': Male and female students and SeeDs at the Gardens train and fight together.
to:
* ''FinalFantasyVIII'': Male and female students and SeeDs [=SeeDs=] at the Gardens train and fight together.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That would be filed under Everyone Is Bi.
Changed line(s) 78,88 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Homestuck}}'' 's [[AllTrollsAreDifferent trolls]] have a completely [[EveryoneisBi gender-equal]] [[LoveDodecahedron romance system]].
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: i am not a homosexual.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: it is like, when a boy likes another boy.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: or i guess hates, in this case.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMANS HAVE A WORD FOR THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: yes.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HOW IS THAT EVEN A THING?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: shrug. it just is.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMAN ROMANCE SURE IS WEIRD.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: i am not a homosexual.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: it is like, when a boy likes another boy.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: or i guess hates, in this case.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMANS HAVE A WORD FOR THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: yes.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HOW IS THAT EVEN A THING?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: shrug. it just is.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMAN ROMANCE SURE IS WEIRD.]]
to:
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: i am not a homosexual.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: it is like, when a boy likes another boy.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: or i guess hates, in this case.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMANS HAVE A WORD FOR THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: yes.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HOW IS THAT EVEN A THING?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: shrug. it just is.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMAN ROMANCE SURE IS WEIRD.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 104 (click to see context) from:
** Canada's military is fully integrated and has been since 2001 when the last holdout (submarine service) had its prohibition against women serving aboard lifted.
to:
** Canada's military is fully integrated and has been since 2001 when the last holdout (submarine service) service, for the entirely practical reason they didn't have submarines equipped for female crew members until then) had its prohibition against women serving aboard lifted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
**** Dragon Magazine's letter column had one particular GM explaining his "balanced" houserule for his games, where female characters received a -2 strength penalty in return for the advantage of being capable of bearing children. The replies were... agitated, to say the least.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 72 (click to see context) from:
to:
* In ''WorldOfWarcraft'' players abide by this trope, but the societies they're theoretically members of aren't necessarily so accepting. Most notably night elf warriors are female and druids are male.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[AC:WesternAnimation]]
* ''{{Antz}}'' does this with, well, ants, both in worker and soldier roles. It's one step better than the InsectGenderBender, at least.
* ''{{Antz}}'' does this with, well, ants, both in worker and soldier roles. It's one step better than the InsectGenderBender, at least.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** What the game did have, all through 1st Edition, was an upper limit on female strength - it affected only those females who played fighters, rolled an 18 for strength, followed by 51% or higher on the "exceptional strength" bonus. Anyone of either sex who wasn't a fighter didn't roll the bonus percentage even if they had an 18 strength, nor (obviously) did anyone who didn't have an 18 strength in the first place; and the various belts and gloves that conferred fantastic strength worked just fine regardless of the gender of the wearer. Statistically, only a small fraction of female fighters were affected, and to a much lesser extent than, say, anyone who wanted to play an elven fighter (constitution penalty, ''Raise Dead'' doesn't work on you, you are limited to only 7th level at best). This compares very favourably to the real world, in which the entire female sex effectively receives at least a -1 to strength (there is overlap, obviously, but compare the ''nth'' percentile woman to the corresponding man and the difference is pronounced - and all the more so at the extreme upper end, which the rule above reflected), but did nothing to silence the screams of "sexist!" or proposals of counterbalancing measures which would benefit ''all'' women for the sake of the insult to a few. Eventually TSR caved and this rule went the way of all flesh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
**** Reasonable, given that Dr. Janice Lester was barking mad (let's face it, switching bodies with Kirk with the intention of living the rest of your life as him is not the act of a sane woman).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''TheForeverWar'' is similar to ''Starship Troopers'' but features a fully gender-integrated military... which before the end of the war is also fully homosexual as Earth society has moved on about a thousand years, literally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 73 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''{{Homestuck}}'' 's [[AllTrollsAreDifferent trolls]] have a completely [[EveryoneisBi gender-equal]] [[LoveDodecahedron romance system]].
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: i am not a homosexual.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: it is like, when a boy likes another boy.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: or i guess hates, in this case.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMANS HAVE A WORD FOR THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: yes.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HOW IS THAT EVEN A THING?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: shrug. it just is.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMAN ROMANCE SURE IS WEIRD.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: i am not a homosexual.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: it is like, when a boy likes another boy.]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: or i guess hates, in this case.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMANS HAVE A WORD FOR THAT?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: yes.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HOW IS THAT EVEN A THING?]]
-->[[color:#0715cd:EB: shrug. it just is.]]
-->[[color:#626262:CG: HUMAN ROMANCE SURE IS WEIRD.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Most of the cultures in the MalazanBookOfTheFallen are largely this, especially the dominant Malazan Empire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
to:
* The ''Quarters'' series by TanyaHuff plays this trope totally straight. Interestingly, though, it also draws attention to the trope by referring to many minor or background characters by their occupation -- "two guards," "a secretary" -- a few lines before the gendered pronoun is used. The reader then realizes that the guard or secretary to which s/he had unthinkingly assigned the "conventional" gender is, in fact, just the opposite.
**It is worth noting that in this series, sexual orientation is no object either; even ''royal weddings'' can be same-sex.
**It is worth noting that in this series, sexual orientation is no object either; even ''royal weddings'' can be same-sex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I know Inheritance Cycle is polarising ... it\'s just that their gender equality really stands out, so I think it should be mentioned.
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Inheritance Cycle has female elves just as good fighters as male elves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
This is sometimes the result of having an AuthorOnBoard. Other times, the writer forgot that a particular society probably wouldn't accept female soldiers and then some times it's because the author wants to feature a heroine who doesn't have to deal with StayInTheKitchen.
to:
This is sometimes the result of having an AuthorOnBoard. Other times, the writer forgot that a particular society probably wouldn't accept female soldiers and then some times it's because the author wants to feature a heroine who doesn't have to deal with StayInTheKitchen.
StayInTheKitchen.
For a related, video game-specific trope, see PurelyAestheticGender.
For a related, video game-specific trope, see PurelyAestheticGender.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No, not really. That doesn't explain her actions at all, and she's pretty explicit about the glass ceiling that doesn't allow women to be captains.
Deleted line(s) 39 (click to see context) :
**** Although given her exact wording, she ''could'' have meant the it was Kirk life as TheCaptain that left no room for him to have a permanent woman in his life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
to:
* TheCulture takes this trope UpToEleven. Not only have they left gender roles far behind, part of their standard set of genetic enchantments is the ability to go through a [[GenderBender fully functional sex change]] (over the course of several months) at will. The protagonist of TheCulture/ThePlayerOfGames is considered a bit odd because he's never even tried being female.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
* ''FinalFantasyVIII'': Male and female students and SeeDs at the [[militaryacademy Gardens]] train and fight together.
to:
* ''FinalFantasyVIII'': Male and female students and SeeDs at the [[militaryacademy Gardens]] Gardens train and fight together.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
***** As long as the Commonwealth Realms decide to retain a united Monarchy, this is true. It's generally considered a good idea for the Realms to maintain the same monarch, but with all the main countries now fully independent, they ''could'' theoretically decide to change the succession rules according to their own values, meaning that the lines of succession would eventually split. But as stated above, that's currently very unlikely.
Added DiffLines:
*** This is very similar to the role of the "Prince Consort" of the Commonwealth realms (Albert for Victoria, and Philip for Queen Elizabeth), which operates on the same principle: He married into royalty and has all the same perks, but he still must walk "one step behind" his Queen. The idea is basically the spear counterpart to the "Queen Consort" (a Queen who married into the family rather than a "Queen Regnant", which is a ruling Queen).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 60 (click to see context) :
* ''DragonAge'' goes to great lengths to [[JustifiedTrope justify]] its use of this trope. It's helpful that the Messiah figure of the majority religion is a woman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''TheLeftHandOfDarkness'' by Ursula Le Guin takes the basic idea so far it almost becomes disqualified as an example, as the human-descended people on the planet Gethen are all of both sexes (or neither); they take turns becoming "male" or "female" for reproduction. The human-as-we-know-it protagonist is really confused by this even after years of living there as an ambassador of sorts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** Salarians do not follow this rule though, since their species breeds too few females to throw them into combat. From a human perspective, Krogan females are indistinguishable from the males (at least, under all the armor they wear), so it is a toss up on whether or not infertile females fight alongside the males.
Deleted line(s) 57 (click to see context) :
** Salarians do not follow this rule though, since their species breeds too few females to throw them into combat. From a human perspective, Krogan females are indistinguishable from the males (at least, under all the armor they wear), so it is a toss up on whether or not infertile females fight alongside the males.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding another example
* ''FinalFantasyVIII'': Male and female students and SeeDs at the [[militaryacademy Gardens]] train and fight together.
Changed line(s) 61,62 (click to see context) from:
* GearsOfWar: The first two games and the novelizations subvert this. Only men do the fighting. All fertile women are used for reproductive purposes, while non-fertile women serve in support roles. The third game, however, plays this straight. The women fight alongside the men. This is because humanity is down to its last throes and needs every available body to fight.
to:
* GearsOfWar: ''GearsOfWar'': The first two games and the novelizations subvert this. Only men do the fighting. All fertile women are used for reproductive purposes, while non-fertile women serve in support roles. The third game, however, plays this straight. The women fight alongside the men. This is because humanity is down to its last throes and needs every available body to fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding another example
Changed line(s) 61 (click to see context) from:
to:
* GearsOfWar: The first two games and the novelizations subvert this. Only men do the fighting. All fertile women are used for reproductive purposes, while non-fertile women serve in support roles. The third game, however, plays this straight. The women fight alongside the men. This is because humanity is down to its last throes and needs every available body to fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 79 (click to see context) from:
to:
** While not all branches are fully integrated, the United States Coast Guard allows women to serve in all roles, and has females at all ranks, including several rear admirals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 60 (click to see context) from:
to:
* The ''{{Fallout}}'' universe has a fairly equal amount of female and male bandits, raiders, quest-givers and such. Justified in post-apocalyptic settings, really, since it would be stupid for society to waste any able pair of hands.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49,50 (click to see context) from:
* This varies from culture to culture in {{Traveller}}. The ruling class of the Third Imperium is like this however.
to:
* This varies from culture to culture in {{Traveller}}. The ruling class of the Third Imperium is like this however.
however.
* As backward as the FeudalFuture of ''{{BattleTech}}'' may seem at times, gender equality is pretty much the universe-wide default. Even in the (explicitly matriarchal) Magistracy of Canopus.
* As backward as the FeudalFuture of ''{{BattleTech}}'' may seem at times, gender equality is pretty much the universe-wide default. Even in the (explicitly matriarchal) Magistracy of Canopus.