Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / FreudianExcuse

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Unfortunately, just like a PetTheDog moment, the Freudian Excuse sometimes fails to give a villain any depth at all. If the villain is particularly evil, it can come across as an illogical and lame NonSequitur: "his [[AbusiveParents father]] beat him, and [[DisproportionateRetribution that's why he's an]] OmnicidalManiac." Even if the villain's crimes are proportionate, the writers have to strike a hard balance. Too much emphasis on the excuse, and it looks like they're attorneys justifying the villain. Too little, and it is a fallacious [[UsefulNotes/LogicalFallacies Appeal to Pity]] that looks like a ridiculously gratuitous scene of {{Wangst}}. However, this can in turn be highlighted in-story if the other characters point out that FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse. In the case of the CompleteMonster, it fails to justify anything, merely explaining their origins and nothing more. It could even be used to make the character ''worse'', since they know how awful it is to be treated horribly yet inflict pain on others anyway while rejecting the possibility of ever getting over their trauma and changing their ways.

to:

Unfortunately, just like a PetTheDog moment, the Freudian Excuse sometimes fails to give a villain any depth at all. If the villain is particularly evil, it can come across as an illogical and lame NonSequitur: "his [[AbusiveParents father]] beat him, and [[DisproportionateRetribution that's why he's an]] OmnicidalManiac." Even if the villain's crimes are proportionate, the writers have to strike a hard balance. Too much emphasis on the excuse, and it looks like they're attorneys justifying the villain. Too little, and it is a fallacious [[UsefulNotes/LogicalFallacies Appeal to Pity]] that looks like a ridiculously gratuitous scene of {{Wangst}}. However, this can in turn be highlighted in-story if the other characters point out that FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse. In the case of the CompleteMonster, it fails to justify anything, merely explaining their origins and nothing more. It could even be used to make the character ''worse'', since they know how awful it is to be treated horribly yet inflict pain on others anyway while rejecting the possibility of ever getting over their trauma and changing their ways.
ways, or simply highlight just how [[DisproportionateRetribution petty]] and [[InsaneTrollLogic unreasonable]] the character truly is, in which case it's questionable whether or not they are actually genuine, or if their "freudian excuse" is merely a [[JerkJustifications convenient justification.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Reformatting.


Most importantly, the Freudian Excuse does not involve the character growing or changing; it explains why they haven't changed, and in fact, often serves as a [[BeyondRedemption signal that they cannot and never will]]''. Bad writers often think that the excuse can substitute for CharacterDevelopment, but it does the exact opposite. Good writers know the excuse has limits, and watch them. If done well enough, it may lead the audience to CryForTheDevil or even straight-up turn a near-CompleteMonster into a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds. A Freudian Excuse is often invoked to explain how someone who UsedToBeASweetKid became such a monster instead - again, much writerly skill is generally needed to pull this off and make it poignant rather than pathetic.

to:

Most importantly, the Freudian Excuse does not involve the character growing or changing; it explains why they haven't changed, and in fact, often serves as a [[BeyondRedemption signal that they cannot and ''[[BeyondRedemption never will]]''. Bad writers often think that the excuse can substitute for CharacterDevelopment, but it does the exact opposite. Good writers know the excuse has limits, and watch them. If done well enough, it may lead the audience to CryForTheDevil or even straight-up turn a near-CompleteMonster into a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds. A Freudian Excuse is often invoked to explain how someone who UsedToBeASweetKid became such a monster instead - again, much writerly skill is generally needed to pull this off and make it poignant rather than pathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Most importantly, the Freudian Excuse does not involve the character growing or changing; it explains why they haven't changed, and in fact, often serves as a [[BeyondRedemption signal that they cannot and]] ''[[BeyondRedemption never will]]''. Bad writers often think that the excuse can substitute for CharacterDevelopment, but it does the exact opposite. Good writers know the excuse has limits, and watch them. If done well enough, it may lead the audience to CryForTheDevil or even straight-up turn a near-CompleteMonster into a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds. A Freudian Excuse is often invoked to explain how someone who UsedToBeASweetKid became such a monster instead - again, much writerly skill is generally needed to pull this off and make it poignant rather than pathetic.

to:

Most importantly, the Freudian Excuse does not involve the character growing or changing; it explains why they haven't changed, and in fact, often serves as a [[BeyondRedemption signal that they cannot and]] ''[[BeyondRedemption and never will]]''. Bad writers often think that the excuse can substitute for CharacterDevelopment, but it does the exact opposite. Good writers know the excuse has limits, and watch them. If done well enough, it may lead the audience to CryForTheDevil or even straight-up turn a near-CompleteMonster into a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds. A Freudian Excuse is often invoked to explain how someone who UsedToBeASweetKid became such a monster instead - again, much writerly skill is generally needed to pull this off and make it poignant rather than pathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Most importantly, the Freudian Excuse does not involve the character growing or changing; it explains why they haven't changed, and in fact, often serves as a signal that they cannot and ''never will''. Bad writers often think that the excuse can substitute for CharacterDevelopment, but it does the exact opposite. Good writers know the excuse has limits, and watch them. If done well enough, it may lead the audience to CryForTheDevil or even straight-up turn a near-CompleteMonster into a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds. A Freudian Excuse is often invoked to explain how someone who UsedToBeASweetKid became such a monster instead - again, much writerly skill is generally needed to pull this off and make it poignant rather than pathetic.

to:

Most importantly, the Freudian Excuse does not involve the character growing or changing; it explains why they haven't changed, and in fact, often serves as a [[BeyondRedemption signal that they cannot and ''never will''.and]] ''[[BeyondRedemption never will]]''. Bad writers often think that the excuse can substitute for CharacterDevelopment, but it does the exact opposite. Good writers know the excuse has limits, and watch them. If done well enough, it may lead the audience to CryForTheDevil or even straight-up turn a near-CompleteMonster into a WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds. A Freudian Excuse is often invoked to explain how someone who UsedToBeASweetKid became such a monster instead - again, much writerly skill is generally needed to pull this off and make it poignant rather than pathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Unfortunately, just like a PetTheDog moment, the Freudian Excuse sometimes fails to give a villain any depth at all. If the villain is particularly evil, it can come across as an illogical and lame NonSequitur: "his [[AbusiveDad father]] beat him, and [[DisproportionateRetribution that's why he's an]] OmnicidalManiac." Even if the villain's crimes are proportionate, the writers have to strike a hard balance. Too much emphasis on the excuse, and it looks like they're attorneys justifying the villain. Too little, and it is a fallacious [[UsefulNotes/LogicalFallacies Appeal to Pity]] that looks like a ridiculously gratuitous scene of {{Wangst}}. However, this can in turn be highlighted in-story if the other characters point out that FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse. In the case of the CompleteMonster, it fails to justify anything, merely explaining their origins and nothing more. It could even be used to make the character ''worse'', since they know how awful it is to be treated horribly yet inflict pain on others anyway while rejecting the possibility of ever getting over their trauma and changing their ways.

to:

Unfortunately, just like a PetTheDog moment, the Freudian Excuse sometimes fails to give a villain any depth at all. If the villain is particularly evil, it can come across as an illogical and lame NonSequitur: "his [[AbusiveDad [[AbusiveParents father]] beat him, and [[DisproportionateRetribution that's why he's an]] OmnicidalManiac." Even if the villain's crimes are proportionate, the writers have to strike a hard balance. Too much emphasis on the excuse, and it looks like they're attorneys justifying the villain. Too little, and it is a fallacious [[UsefulNotes/LogicalFallacies Appeal to Pity]] that looks like a ridiculously gratuitous scene of {{Wangst}}. However, this can in turn be highlighted in-story if the other characters point out that FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse. In the case of the CompleteMonster, it fails to justify anything, merely explaining their origins and nothing more. It could even be used to make the character ''worse'', since they know how awful it is to be treated horribly yet inflict pain on others anyway while rejecting the possibility of ever getting over their trauma and changing their ways.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jokermadlovecouch_8.png]]]]
[[caption-width-right:350:[[MultipleChoicePast Let's just say you should take this one with a grain of salt.]]]]

to:

[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures [[quoteright:349:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jokermadlovecouch_8.png]]]]
[[caption-width-right:350:[[MultipleChoicePast [[caption-width-right:349:[[MultipleChoicePast Let's just say you should take this one with a grain of salt.]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
quality upgrade


[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jokermadlovecouch.png]]]]

to:

[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jokermadlovecouch.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jokermadlovecouch_8.png]]]]



%%

to:

%%
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WarhammerAgeOfSigmar'': Most followers of Chaos didn't become so exactly willingly; after the Chaos gods defeated Sigmar's armies, Sigmar was forced to close off his realm of Azyr to save it, and anyone who didn't manage to get to a Realmgate in time was left to fend for themselves in the ensuing Age Of Chaos. For those people, swearing loyalty to one Chaos God or another was the only way to survive the post-apocalyptic hellscape the other seven Realms were turning into and more than a few were understandably angry at Sigmar for abandoning them. Now that Sigmar has started reclaiming the Realms from Chaos, he's openly acknowledged that a lot of Chaos worshippers are just desperate people trying to survive, and he's tried to [[TheRedeemer save as many of them as he can]].

to:

* ''WarhammerAgeOfSigmar'': ''TabletopGame/WarhammerAgeOfSigmar'': Most followers of Chaos didn't become so exactly willingly; after the Chaos gods defeated Sigmar's armies, Sigmar was forced to close off his realm of Azyr to save it, and anyone who didn't manage to get to a Realmgate in time was left to fend for themselves in the ensuing Age Of Chaos. For those people, swearing loyalty to one Chaos God god or another was the only way to survive the post-apocalyptic hellscape the other seven Realms were turning into and more than a few were understandably angry at Sigmar for abandoning them. Now that Sigmar has started reclaiming the Realms from Chaos, he's openly acknowledged that a lot of Chaos worshippers are just desperate people trying to survive, and he's tried to [[TheRedeemer save as many of them as he can]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WarhammerAgeOfSigmar'': Most followers of Chaos didn't become so exactly willingly; after the Chaos gods defeated Sigmar's armies, Sigmar was forced to close off his realm of Azyr to save it, and anyone who didn't manage to get to a Realmgate in time was left to fend for themselves in the ensuing Age Of Chaos. For those people, swearing loyalty to one Chaos God or another was the only way to survive the post-apocalyptic hellscape the other seven Realms were turning into and more than a few were understandably angry at Sigmar for abandoning them. Now that Sigmar has started reclaiming the Realms from Chaos, he's openly acknowledged that a lot of Chaos worshippers are just desperate people trying to survive, and he's tried to [[TheRedeemer save as many of them as he can]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's the Joker, dammit

Added DiffLines:

[[caption-width-right:350:[[MultipleChoicePast Let's just say you should take this one with a grain of salt.]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
According to image thread, 12 was chosen with 24 being a modified version. 5 seems to be put in by mistake.


[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/sketch_1683213184198_6.png]]]]

to:

[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/sketch_1683213184198_6.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jokermadlovecouch.png]]]]

Added: 2

Changed: 463

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



[[quoteright:250:[[Manga/{{Saki}} https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Saki_-_the_king_who_hated_tacos.png]]]]
[[caption-width-right:250:And so, he harnessed the power of corn to wage war...]]

to:

\n[[quoteright:250:[[Manga/{{Saki}} %% Image selected per Image Pickin' thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16831514350.79782700
%% Please don't change or remove without starting a new thread.
%%
[[quoteright:350:[[ComicBook/TheBatmanAdventures
https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Saki_-_the_king_who_hated_tacos.org/pmwiki/pub/images/sketch_1683213184198_6.png]]]]
[[caption-width-right:250:And so, he harnessed the power of corn to wage war...]]
%%

Added: 1221

Removed: 1221

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WebAnimation/{{Chadam}}'': Viceroy was abandoned by his parents and ostracized by the rest of the community for being born deformed and with no imagination, so he turned to studying, and thus got started on the path to being a MadScientist.
* The ''WebAnimation/FatherTucker'' short "Rest for the Wicked" has a scene where Father Tucker warmly reminisces on going camping with a priest named Father Taper when he was young. We then see a flashback of a clearly traumatized Tucker being told by Father Taper not to tell anyone what had happened, which implies that Father Tucker is a PedophilePriest because he himself was a victim of one.



* ''WebAnimation/SpookyMonth'': The leader of [[GangOfBullies the Hatzgang]], Roy, sends Skid and Pump to the spooky abandoned mansion and nonchalantly remarks "That's where my uncle takes me". Ross and Robert can only awkwardly shift away from him after thinking about it, and the next scene with the trio has Roy angrily ask "What do you mean it's ''wrong?!''", indicating Ross and Robert tried to tell him what his uncle was doing wasn't okay. Considering what dwells under that manor and what kinds of people visit it, the implications beyond that are all the more concerning.



* ''WebAnimation/{{Chadam}}'': Viceroy was abandoned by his parents and ostracized by the rest of the community for being born deformed and with no imagination, so he turned to studying, and thus got started on the path to being a MadScientist.
* The ''WebAnimation/FatherTucker'' short "Rest for the Wicked" has a scene where Father Tucker warmly reminisces on going camping with a priest named Father Taper when he was young. We then see a flashback of a clearly traumatized Tucker being told by Father Taper not to tell anyone what had happened, which implies that Father Tucker is a PedophilePriest because he himself was a victim of one.



* ''WebAnimation/SpookyMonth'': The leader of [[GangOfBullies the Hatzgang]], Roy, sends Skid and Pump to the spooky abandoned mansion and nonchalantly remarks "That's where my uncle takes me". Ross and Robert can only awkwardly shift away from him after thinking about it, and the next scene with the trio has Roy angrily ask "What do you mean it's ''wrong?!''", indicating Ross and Robert tried to tell him what his uncle was doing wasn't okay. Considering what dwells under that manor and what kinds of people visit it, the implications beyond that are all the more concerning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, not all examples of Freudian Excuses have to involve evil or villainous characters. It can also be used to explain the neurotic behaviors of even heroic or otherwise neutral characters.

to:

However, not all examples of Freudian Excuses have to involve evil or villainous characters. It can also be used to explain the neurotic behaviors of even heroic or otherwise neutral characters.
characters. And sometimes, the Freudian Excuse can work well in sympathizing with a character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WebVideo/CasualGeographic'': The presenter admits to having a deep and searing hatred of pelicans, which stems from a time when he was attacked and nearly blinded by a pelican as a child.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Unfortunately, just like a PetTheDog moment, the Freudian Excuse sometimes fails to give a villain any depth at all. If the villain is particularly evil, it can come across as an illogical and lame NonSequitur: "his father beat him, and [[DisproportionateRetribution that's why he's an]] OmnicidalManiac." Even if the villain's crimes are proportionate, the writers have to strike a hard balance. Too much emphasis on the excuse, and it looks like they're attorneys justifying the villain. Too little, and it is a fallacious [[UsefulNotes/LogicalFallacies Appeal to Pity]] that looks like a ridiculously gratuitous scene of {{Wangst}}. However, this can in turn be highlighted in-story if the other characters point out that FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse. In the case of the CompleteMonster, it fails to justify anything, merely explaining their origins and nothing more. It could even be used to make the character ''worse'', since they know how awful it is to be treated horribly yet inflict pain on others anyway while rejecting the possibility of ever getting over their trauma and changing their ways.

to:

Unfortunately, just like a PetTheDog moment, the Freudian Excuse sometimes fails to give a villain any depth at all. If the villain is particularly evil, it can come across as an illogical and lame NonSequitur: "his father [[AbusiveDad father]] beat him, and [[DisproportionateRetribution that's why he's an]] OmnicidalManiac." Even if the villain's crimes are proportionate, the writers have to strike a hard balance. Too much emphasis on the excuse, and it looks like they're attorneys justifying the villain. Too little, and it is a fallacious [[UsefulNotes/LogicalFallacies Appeal to Pity]] that looks like a ridiculously gratuitous scene of {{Wangst}}. However, this can in turn be highlighted in-story if the other characters point out that FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse. In the case of the CompleteMonster, it fails to justify anything, merely explaining their origins and nothing more. It could even be used to make the character ''worse'', since they know how awful it is to be treated horribly yet inflict pain on others anyway while rejecting the possibility of ever getting over their trauma and changing their ways.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Web Animation]]
*''WebAnimation/{{RWBY}}'':
** Implied with Cinder (whose source of inspiration is Literature/{{Cinderella}}), who seems to be power-hungry and determined to be feared due to being on the opposite end of the stick. Details don't come to light until Volume 8.
--->'''Cinder:''' You Atlas elites are all the same! You think hoarding power means you'll have it forever, but it just makes the rest of us ''hungrier!'' ''And I refuse to starve!''
** All we ever learn of Adam's past is that he was enslaved by the Schnee Dust Corporation like many other Faunus, and that the ordeal left him with a bad scar-brand over one of his eyes. The show intentionally doesn't go into further detail about it because a FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse.
[[/folder]]

Added: 77

Changed: 1320

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most of the Traitor Primarchs of ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer 40000}}'' possess one:

to:

* ''TabletopGame/InNomine'': The Archangel Dominic is infamous in Heaven as the leader of the angelic Inquisition, and for being one of the harshest, most judgmental and most intensely paranoid people in Heaven. Most of these issues are lingering effects of some rather unpleasant experiences during the original Fall and the War in Heaven. Once, long ago, Dominic was a mere word-bound angel and essentially little more than a glorified guidance counselor -- since no angel back then wished to defy God's will, all transgressions were done by accident and needed nothing more than a gentle reminder to be corrected. It was a fairly simple job, and Dominic was innocent and trusting. Lucifer's rebellion shattered his world, and he lost many of his oldest and closest friends to Hell -- chief among them his most trusted aide, the Cherub Asmodeus; this is one of the primary reasons why he refuses to let himself grow close to anybody, since he has come to view emotional bonds as innately dangerous. Additionally, Dominic was also left deeply shaken by the fact that he himself nearly succumbed to Lucifer's temptations; he concluded that, if even the Angel of Judgement could be nearly swayed into damnation, then nobody can truly be above temptation, and to this day remains unable to truly trust anybody.
* ''TabletopGame/Warhammer40000'':
Most of the Traitor Primarchs of ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer 40000}}'' possess one:

Top