Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Love Momozono from ''FreshPrettyCure'', period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
to:
* BraveNewWorld is a [[TotalitarianUtilitarian merciless]] [[DeconstructedTrope deconstruction]]: the government makes sure people are basically [[HappinessInSlavery enslaved to happiness]].
--> "Happiness is a hard master—particularly other people's happiness."
--> "Happiness is a hard master—particularly other people's happiness."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The series was mentioned twice.
Changed line(s) 43,45 (click to see context) from:
* WickedLovely: The Summer Court's basic mentality. Keenan's Summer Girls in particular serve as a strong 'choose happiness' thing.
** "Sometimes, it's not about being happy, but courting happiness."
** "Sometimes, it's not about being happy, but courting happiness."
to:
** "Sometimes, it's not about being happy, but courting happiness."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 64 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Finn from ''AdventureTime'' wants to solve everyone's problems. In another show, the way this was set up would lead to him realizing he can't, and making most people happy, or [[SweetAndSourGrapes giving up but finding that making himself happy makes everyone else happier]]. But this is ''[[CrazyAwesome Adventure Time]]'', after all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
to:
* WickedLovely: The Summer Court's basic mentality. Keenan's Summer Girls in particular serve as a strong 'choose happiness' thing.
**"Sometimes, it's not about being happy, but courting happiness."
**"Sometimes, it's not about being happy, but courting happiness."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 68 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''Random acts of kindness''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* [[KushielsLegacy Kushiel's Mercy]] has Ptolmey Solon, the world's probably smartest man, who holds that happiness is the highest form of wisdom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
Compare ''and'' contrast TotalitarianUtilitarian and HappinessIsMandatory, as well as GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
to:
Compare GoodFeelsGood. Compare ''and'' contrast TotalitarianUtilitarian and HappinessIsMandatory, as well as GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Those tropes are about how to HANDLE risky stuff (including BDSM) and promiscuity so that happiness is maximized and suffering is minimized. Not about BDSM (or other potentially dangerous stuff) or promiscuity per se.
If the character is also promiscuous or such, he is it in an EthicalSlut kind of way. One way of maximizing happiness while keeping the risks of suffering minimal is to make sure that your play (sexually and otherwise) is SafeSaneAndConsensual.
Changed line(s) 47,48 (click to see context) from:
* In the DungeonsAndDragons setting Scarred Lands, the titan Gulaben held the powers of granting happiness. Unfortunately, as a fickle titan, she might kill you even as she induces pleasure beyond imagination. Because of the temptation her powers brought, the gods were forced to gather up and destroy any memory of her to prevent her from being released.
to:
* In the DungeonsAndDragons setting Scarred Lands, the titan Gulaben held the powers of granting happiness. Unfortunately, as The mortal peoples believed her to be ForHappiness, and her popularity made her a threat to the God's reign over the world. Claiming that her power was merely a sinister kind of GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul, the Gods captured her and destroyed all memories of her so that noone would try to set her free. The official truth is that she was a fickle and cruel titan, she might kill you even as she induces pleasure beyond imagination. Because of the temptation her powers brought, the The gods were forced simply did [[IDidWhatIHadToDo did what they had to gather up and destroy any memory of her do]]. And since no longer remember the real truth about Gulaben, we'll just have to prevent her from being released.
take their word for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 47,48 (click to see context) from:
* In the DungeonsAndDragons setting Scarred Lands, the titan Gulaben was believed to be this. The belief lasted until the gods, unable to convince the population otherwise, [[MindRape mindraped]] the [[MoralEventHorizon entire creation]] to make all mortals forget she even existed. Of course, Gulaben was actually [[WrittenByTheWinners evil]], but utlimately it's left for the gamemaster to decide.
to:
* In the DungeonsAndDragons setting Scarred Lands, the titan Gulaben was believed to be this. The belief lasted until held the gods, unable to convince the population otherwise, [[MindRape mindraped]] the [[MoralEventHorizon entire creation]] to make all mortals forget powers of granting happiness. Unfortunately, as a fickle titan, she might kill you even existed. Of course, Gulaben was actually [[WrittenByTheWinners evil]], but utlimately it's left for as she induces pleasure beyond imagination. Because of the gamemaster temptation her powers brought, the gods were forced to decide.
gather up and destroy any memory of her to prevent her from being released.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Respectively: BDSM and sexual promiscuity are so tangentially related to "making people happy" that I'd say there are at least fifty other tropes equally worth linking to. They really aren't on the same playing field. Second, "Happiness Is Mandatory" is more of a twisted version of this mindset than its opposite.
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
See also SafeSaneAndConsensual and EthicalSlut. Contrast HappinessIsMandatory. Compare ''and'' contrast TotalitarianUtilitarian as well as GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,20 (click to see context) from:
* Elmer from {{Baccano!}} has this as his raison d'etre: he just wants everyone (particularly his more melancholy immortal bretheren) to smile.
to:
* Elmer from {{Baccano!}} {{Baccano}} has this as his raison d'etre: he just wants everyone (particularly his more melancholy immortal bretheren) to smile.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Elmer from {{Baccano!}} has this as his raison d'etre: he just wants everyone (particularly his more melancholy immortal bretheren) to smile.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
->"I'm on the pursuit of happiness and I know
->Everything that shine ain't always gonna be gold..."
->-- Kid Cudi featuring MGMT, "Pursuit of Happiness"
->Everything that shine ain't always gonna be gold..."
->-- Kid Cudi featuring MGMT, "Pursuit of Happiness"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
to:
** That and get people drunk. Apple Cider, what he was best remembered for giving to people, ferments very quickly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
Contrast HappinessIsMandatory. Compare and contrast GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
to:
See also SafeSaneAndConsensual and EthicalSlut. Contrast HappinessIsMandatory. Compare and ''and'' contrast TotalitarianUtilitarian as well as GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Paranoia example is the trope Happiness Is Mandatory
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
While Bob might be any average guy, his desire to make happiness possible - and especially the fight against needless suffering that comes with it - might drive him to become a hero. Being a ChaoticGood kind of character, he might clash with a LawfulGood hero who disregards ForHappiness in favor of having ForGreatJustice as his only driving principle. A hero who embrace BOTH ForHappiness and ForGreatJustice, keeping a balance between them when they clash, is NeutralGood.
to:
While Bob might be any average guy, his desire to make happiness possible - and especially the fight against needless suffering that comes with it - might drive him to become a hero. Being In some iterpretations of Order vs Chaos, Bob is a ChaoticGood kind of character, he character who might clash with a LawfulGood hero who disregards ForHappiness in favor of having ForGreatJustice as his only driving principle. A hero who in such a setting embrace BOTH ForHappiness and ForGreatJustice, keeping a balance between them when they clash, is NeutralGood.
NeutralGood.
Contrast HappinessIsMandatory. Compare and contrast GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
Contrast HappinessIsMandatory. Compare and contrast GettingSmiliesPaintedOnYourSoul.
Changed line(s) 40,41 (click to see context) from:
* [[{{Paranoia}} The Computer will make you happy.]] Unhappiness is treason. Treason is punishable by immediate execution. Are you happy, citizen?
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
to:
* [[{{Paranoia}} The Computer will make you happy.]] Unhappiness is treason. Treason is punishable by immediate execution. Are you happy, citizen?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misplaced example by mistake
Deleted line(s) 43,45 (click to see context) :
[[AC:WebComics]]
* In ''TheOrderOfTheStick'', Elan and his mother both always try their best to live up to this trope.
Added DiffLines:
[[AC:WebComics]]
* In ''TheOrderOfTheStick'', Elan and his mother both always try their best to live up to this trope.
* In ''TheOrderOfTheStick'', Elan and his mother both always try their best to live up to this trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
to:
* This is pretty much [[{{Darkstalkers}} Felicia's]] outlook on life -- pursue happiness, and try to make as many other people happy as possible along the way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 55 (click to see context) from:
* The people who give out "Free Hugs" on the street.
to:
* The people who give out "Free Hugs" on the street.street.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Lets for example say that [[ForTheEvulz Alice is having a great time hurting Steve]]. Bob disapproves: It's a good thing that she's doing something she enjoys, but it's not cool that she's doing it at his expense. Bob has no desire to punish her for her misdeeds, but might do so if that's the most efficient way to make her stop and to help Steve get his self-esteem back.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Lets for example say that [[ForTheEvulz Alice is having a great time hurting Steve]]. Bob disapproves: It's a good thing that she's doing something she enjoy, but it's not cool that she's doing it at his expense. Bob has no desire to punish her for her misdeeds, but might do so if that's the most efficient way to make her stop and to help Steve get his self-esteem back.
to:
Lets for example say that [[ForTheEvulz Alice is having a great time hurting Steve]]. Bob disapproves: It's a good thing that she's doing something she enjoy, enjoys, but it's not cool that she's doing it at his expense. Bob has no desire to punish her for her misdeeds, but might do so if that's the most efficient way to make her stop and to help Steve get his self-esteem back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Lets for example say that [[ForTheEvulz Alice is having a great time hurting Steve]]. Bob disapproves: It's a good thing that she's doing something she enjoy, but it's not cool that she's doing it at his expense. Bob have no desire to punish her for her misdeeds, but might do so if that's the most efficient way to make her stop and to help Steve get his self-esteem back.
to:
Lets for example say that [[ForTheEvulz Alice is having a great time hurting Steve]]. Bob disapproves: It's a good thing that she's doing something she enjoy, but it's not cool that she's doing it at his expense. Bob have has no desire to punish her for her misdeeds, but might do so if that's the most efficient way to make her stop and to help Steve get his self-esteem back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Lots of fluff moved to Useful Notes
Changed line(s) 1,20 (click to see context) from:
<<|Repair Shop Notification:usxqk2oh9v644q48qmqgmrc5|>>
While most heroes limit themselves to [[StatusQuoIsGod thwarting whatever schemes the villains are up to]], some actively try to spread joy and happiness to as many as possible.
Lets say that Alice is trying to get a law overthrown, simply because she think that the law (or some effect of the law) is making people unhappy. Or lets say that Bob is trying to cheer Alice up, and one of the reasons he do this is that he want people to be happy. If he spends extra energy on her because she is a person that he admires, it doesn't disqualify him from this trope. However, if he care about the happiness of ''only'' a little circle of specially selected people, then it's [[ForExample something]] [[IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy else]].
In different ways, this is the [[MirrorSelf polar opposite]] of ForGreatJustice and ForTheEvulz. One could say that ForHappiness expresses a ChaoticGood mindset, while ForGreatJustice is LawfulGood and ForTheEvulz is ChaoticEvil.
When comparing ForHappiness and ForGreatJustice, both strive for the greater good. However, the former trope is [[TheUtilitarian morality based on consequences]], while the later is [[TheDeontologist morality based on principles]].
When comparing ForHappiness and ForTheEvulz, both are about the character trying to spread happiness. However, the character going for ForHappiness is trying to bring as much happiness to as many as possible, and if it has to be on other people's expense at all then the damage should be as minimal as possible. While on the other hand a character going ForTheEvulz is trying to achieve happiness for himself and some likeminded people at other people's expense.
In other words, it's "''maximize the happiness for everyone and minimize the suffering for everyone''" versus "''maximize the happiness for me, and never mind the suffering as long as it only happens to other people''". In yet other words, it's EthicalHedonism versus [[TheHedonist Narcissistic Hedonism]].
Trying one's best For Happiness is a required trait of any character who is an ethical hedonist without being a StrawHypocrite or HollywoodAtheist. However, a character doesn't have to be philosophically inclined to be For Happiness. The desire to make the world a better place through spreading or enabling happiness can come from anything from simple Empathy to the religious worship of a deity that fits the concept.
An ethical hedonist character that strives For Happiness doesn't try to force people to be "[[LotusEaterMachine happy]]" or otherwise violate them for the greater good. That's the realm of the TotalitarianUtilitarian.
However, the ethical hedonist is likely to be ChaoticGood rather than LawfulGood, and when she goes up against the BigBad it's more likely to be to protect the people from getting hurt rather than punishing him for his crimes. Likewise, she is likely to let her fallen comrades [[LetThemDieHappy Die Happy]] rather than [[WillNotTellALie letting her honesty go too far]]. Of course, even the purest ethical hedonist generally consider lies and deceit to be a bad thing. But that's not because it's bad on principle but rather because it have a tendency to have [[SnowballLie unforseen bad consequences]].
While most heroes limit themselves to [[StatusQuoIsGod thwarting whatever schemes the villains are up to]], some actively try to spread joy and happiness to as many as possible.
Lets say that Alice is trying to get a law overthrown, simply because she think that the law (or some effect of the law) is making people unhappy. Or lets say that Bob is trying to cheer Alice up, and one of the reasons he do this is that he want people to be happy. If he spends extra energy on her because she is a person that he admires, it doesn't disqualify him from this trope. However, if he care about the happiness of ''only'' a little circle of specially selected people, then it's [[ForExample something]] [[IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy else]].
In different ways, this is the [[MirrorSelf polar opposite]] of ForGreatJustice and ForTheEvulz. One could say that ForHappiness expresses a ChaoticGood mindset, while ForGreatJustice is LawfulGood and ForTheEvulz is ChaoticEvil.
When comparing ForHappiness and ForGreatJustice, both strive for the greater good. However, the former trope is [[TheUtilitarian morality based on consequences]], while the later is [[TheDeontologist morality based on principles]].
When comparing ForHappiness and ForTheEvulz, both are about the character trying to spread happiness. However, the character going for ForHappiness is trying to bring as much happiness to as many as possible, and if it has to be on other people's expense at all then the damage should be as minimal as possible. While on the other hand a character going ForTheEvulz is trying to achieve happiness for himself and some likeminded people at other people's expense.
In other words, it's "''maximize the happiness for everyone and minimize the suffering for everyone''" versus "''maximize the happiness for me, and never mind the suffering as long as it only happens to other people''". In yet other words, it's EthicalHedonism versus [[TheHedonist Narcissistic Hedonism]].
Trying one's best For Happiness is a required trait of any character who is an ethical hedonist without being a StrawHypocrite or HollywoodAtheist. However, a character doesn't have to be philosophically inclined to be For Happiness. The desire to make the world a better place through spreading or enabling happiness can come from anything from simple Empathy to the religious worship of a deity that fits the concept.
An ethical hedonist character that strives For Happiness doesn't try to force people to be "[[LotusEaterMachine happy]]" or otherwise violate them for the greater good. That's the realm of the TotalitarianUtilitarian.
However, the ethical hedonist is likely to be ChaoticGood rather than LawfulGood, and when she goes up against the BigBad it's more likely to be to protect the people from getting hurt rather than punishing him for his crimes. Likewise, she is likely to let her fallen comrades [[LetThemDieHappy Die Happy]] rather than [[WillNotTellALie letting her honesty go too far]]. Of course, even the purest ethical hedonist generally consider lies and deceit to be a bad thing. But that's not because it's bad on principle but rather because it have a tendency to have [[SnowballLie unforseen bad consequences]].
to:
While most heroes limit themselves to [[StatusQuoIsGod thwarting whatever schemes the villains are up to]], some actively try to spread joy and happiness to as many as possible.
Lets say that Alice is trying to get a law overthrown, simply because she think that the law (or some effect of the law) is making people unhappy. Or lets say that
In different ways, this
Lets for example say that [[ForTheEvulz Alice is having a great time hurting Steve]]. Bob disapproves: It's a good thing that she's doing something she enjoy, but it's not cool that she's doing it at his expense. Bob have no desire to punish her for her misdeeds, but might do so if that's the
While Bob might be any average guy, his desire to make happiness possible - and especially the fight against needless suffering that comes with it - might drive him to become a hero. Being a ChaoticGood kind of character, he might clash with a LawfulGood hero who disregards ForHappiness in favor of having ForGreatJustice
When comparing
When comparing ForHappiness and ForTheEvulz, both are about the character trying to spread happiness. However, the character going for ForHappiness is trying to bring as much happiness to as many as possible, and if it has to be on other people's expense at all then the damage should be as minimal as possible. While on the other hand
In other words, it's "''maximize the happiness for everyone and minimize the suffering for everyone''" versus "''maximize the happiness for me, and never mind the suffering as long as it only happens to other people''". In yet other words, it's EthicalHedonism versus [[TheHedonist Narcissistic Hedonism]].
Trying one's best For Happiness is a required trait of any character who is an ethical hedonist without being a StrawHypocrite or HollywoodAtheist. However, a character doesn't have to be philosophically inclined to be For Happiness. The desire to make the world a better place through spreading or enabling happiness can come from anything from simple Empathy to the religious worship of a deity that fits the concept.
An ethical hedonist character that strives For Happiness doesn't try to force people to be "[[LotusEaterMachine happy]]" or otherwise violate
However, the ethical hedonist is likely to be ChaoticGood rather than LawfulGood, and
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 68 (click to see context) from:
* The King of Bhutan measures the prosperity and success of his nation (and, hence, his rule) in terms of Gross Domestic Happiness.
to:
* The King of Bhutan measures the prosperity and success of his nation (and, hence, his rule) in terms of Gross Domestic Happiness.Happiness.
* The people who give out "Free Hugs" on the street.
* The people who give out "Free Hugs" on the street.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45,46 (click to see context) from:
*In {{Animorphs}}, the Pemalites fit this trope to a T. Created by [[SufficientlyAdvancedAlien The Ellimist]] to spread life, love and freedom, they did exactly that... until [[EldritchAbomination Crayak's]] pet creation, the Howlers, straight-up [[CurbStompBattle slaughtered their asses.]]
to:
*In {{Animorphs}}, the Pemalites fit this trope to a T. Created by [[SufficientlyAdvancedAlien The Ellimist]] to spread life, love and freedom, they did exactly that... until [[EldritchAbomination Crayak's]] pet creation, the Howlers, straight-up [[CurbStompBattle slaughtered their asses.]] It's worth noting that the Howlers [[spoiler:are also like this, Crayak just gave them a warped sense of what people find fun.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 50,51 (click to see context) from:
* In KamenRiderW one half of W Shotaro Hidari makes it his mission to make sure no one in Fuuto cries. And if a villain does makes people cry Shotaro can go to extremes to stop them.
to:
* In KamenRiderW one half of W ''KamenRiderDouble'', Shotaro Hidari makes it his mission to make sure no one in Fuuto Futo cries. And if a villain does makes people The fastest way to [[BerserkButton set him off]] is to make sombody cry Shotaro can go to extremes to stop them.
in his presence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just fixing some typos.
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Lets say that Alice is trying to get a law overthrown, simply because she think that the law (or some effect of the law) is making people unhappy. Or lets say that Bob is trying to cheer Alice up, and one of the reasons he do this is that he want people to be haappy. If he spends extra energy on her because she is a person that he admires, it doesn't disqualify him from this trope. However, if he care about the happiness of ''only'' a little circle of specially selected people, then it's [[ForExample something]] [[IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy else]].
to:
Lets say that Alice is trying to get a law overthrown, simply because she think that the law (or some effect of the law) is making people unhappy. Or lets say that Bob is trying to cheer Alice up, and one of the reasons he do this is that he want people to be haappy.happy. If he spends extra energy on her because she is a person that he admires, it doesn't disqualify him from this trope. However, if he care about the happiness of ''only'' a little circle of specially selected people, then it's [[ForExample something]] [[IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy else]].
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
When comparing ForHappiness and ForTheEvulz, both are about the character tryingg to spread happiness. However, the character going for ForHappiness is trying to bring as much happiness to as many as possible, and if it has to be on other people's expense at all then the damage should be as minimal as possible. While on the other hand a character going ForTheEvulz is trying to achieve happiness for himself and some likeminded people at other people's expense.
to:
When comparing ForHappiness and ForTheEvulz, both are about the character tryingg trying to spread happiness. However, the character going for ForHappiness is trying to bring as much happiness to as many as possible, and if it has to be on other people's expense at all then the damage should be as minimal as possible. While on the other hand a character going ForTheEvulz is trying to achieve happiness for himself and some likeminded people at other people's expense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
<<|Repair Shop Notification:usxqk2oh9v644q48qmqgmrc5|>>