Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 422 (click to see context) from:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where they interpreted the situation as the child willfully defying them and believed they ''had'' to follow through or else she'd become a SpoiledBrat (seemingly seeing the situation as akin to not giving in when a child is throwing a tantrum). [[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that her sister might not have been ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet where she could intentionally produce that particular sound.[[/note]] Fortunately, the parents came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
to:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where they had been told to expect their children to "rebel" against them and interpreted the situation this entire interaction as the child willfully defying them a show of defiance, and consequently believed they ''had'' to follow through stay the course or else she'd become a SpoiledBrat (seemingly seeing they'd be setting themselves and the child up for failure, and that this concept that had been drummed into them clouded their ability to recognize how messed up the situation as akin to not giving in when a child is throwing a tantrum). really was. [[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that she's not sure her sister might not have been was even ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet was in an in-between development phase where she could intentionally produce was starting to be able to make that particular sound.set of sounds, but didn't have quite enough of a grasp on it to do so on command just yet.[[/note]] Fortunately, the parents parents' better judgement ultimately won out, and they came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 422 (click to see context) from:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where they genuinely believed the kid was ''choosing'' to miss out on food rather than comply, and that "giving in" would be the first step in turning her into a SpoiledBrat (seemingly seeing the situation as akin to not giving in when a child is throwing a tantrum).[[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that her sister might not have been ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet where she could intentionally produce that particular sound.[[/note]] Fortunately, the parents came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
to:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where they genuinely interpreted the situation as the child willfully defying them and believed the kid was ''choosing'' they ''had'' to miss out on food rather than comply, and that "giving in" would be the first step in turning her into follow through or else she'd become a SpoiledBrat (seemingly seeing the situation as akin to not giving in when a child is throwing a tantrum).tantrum). [[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that her sister might not have been ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet where she could intentionally produce that particular sound.[[/note]] Fortunately, the parents came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 422 (click to see context) from:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where all the kid had to do to get food was comply, and by not doing so she was choosing to be denied food, and that "giving in" would basically be the equivalent of buying a kid a toy because they threw a tantrum.[[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that her sister might not have been ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet where she could intentionally produce that particular sound.[[/note]]Fortunately, the parents came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
to:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where all they genuinely believed the kid had was ''choosing'' to do to get miss out on food was rather than comply, and by not doing so she was choosing to be denied food, and that "giving in" would basically be the equivalent of buying first step in turning her into a kid SpoiledBrat (seemingly seeing the situation as akin to not giving in when a toy because they threw child is throwing a tantrum.tantrum).[[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that her sister might not have been ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet where she could intentionally produce that particular sound.[[/note]]Fortunately, [[/note]] Fortunately, the parents came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* [[https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2013/04/the-breaking-of-a-child-a-story-of-near-disaster.html This blog post]] features a particularly harrowing example in which a young toddler was denied food for more than ''two days'' because she wouldn't say "please". The submitter, the older sister of the child in question, posted the story to illustrate how some child-rearing methods can lead parents to do things that seem unthinkable while believing they're doing the right thing; in this case, the parents got stuck in a mindset where all the kid had to do to get food was comply, and by not doing so she was choosing to be denied food, and that "giving in" would basically be the equivalent of buying a kid a toy because they threw a tantrum.[[note]]Looking back on it, the submitter posited that her sister might not have been ''able'' to comply -- their parents assumed that because she had said the word in the past, she'd be able to say it on command, but it's possible she wasn't quite at the point yet where she could intentionally produce that particular sound.[[/note]]Fortunately, the parents came to their senses before any permanent harm could be done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** In "[[Recap/RugratsS6E23PartnersInCrimeThumbsUp Partners in Crime]]", when Angelica eats ten of Didi's dozen cupcakes, Charlotte punishes her by forbidding her from eating sweets for a week. Angelica does not take his punishment well and gets her baby cousin Dil to help her steal sweets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 109 (click to see context) from:
** ''[[https://archiveofourown.org/series/2332319 The Aizawa-Yamada Family series]]'': Shinso Hitoshi has several abusive foster parents do this. Ye recalls one telling him "only good children get to eat" and another saying that if he didn't finish what he was given-which was deliberately made from stuff he didn't like-he wouldn't eat the next day. It was also a side effect of his being muzzled as well.
to:
** ''[[https://archiveofourown.org/series/2332319 The Aizawa-Yamada Family series]]'': Shinso Hitoshi has several abusive foster parents do this. Ye this as does Present Mic when he was a kid. Mic recalls one telling him "only good children get to eat" and another Hitoshi recalls one saying that if he didn't finish what he was given-which was deliberately made from stuff he didn't like-he wouldn't eat the next day. It was also a side effect of his both being muzzled as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 233 (click to see context) from:
* Literature/VanasHeritage: After Nirvys failed attempt to flee from captivity, Vladr starves her to weaken and punish her. He goes so far; she almost starves to death.
to:
* Literature/VanasHeritage: ''Literature/VanasHeritage'': After Nirvys failed attempt to flee from captivity, Vladr starves her to weaken and punish her. He goes so far; she almost starves to death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)
Added DiffLines:
* Literature/VanasHeritage: After Nirvys failed attempt to flee from captivity, Vladr starves her to weaken and punish her. He goes so far; she almost starves to death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 136 (click to see context) from:
* ''Film/BootCamp'': After Ben and Sophie escape, Dr. Hail punishes all of the inmates by denying them breakfast for 3 months.
to:
* ''Film/BootCamp'': ''Film/BootCamp2008'': After Ben and Sophie escape, Dr. Hail punishes all of the inmates by denying them breakfast for 3 months.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 111 (click to see context) from:
* In ''[[https://archiveofourown.org/works/19110040 Lessons Learned]]'', Mitsuki Bakugou punished her son Katsuki this way if his grades didn't meet her standards.
to:
