Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / CommonNonsenseJury

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->''Blackadder'': "I remember Massingbird's most famous case: the Case of the Bloody Knife. A man was found next to a murdered body. He had the knife in his hand, 13 witnesses had seen him stab the victim, and when the police arrived, he said "I'm glad I killed the bastard." [[AmoralAttorney Massingbird]] not only got him off; he got him knighted in the New Year's Honours List and the relatives of the victim had to pay to have the blood washed out of his jacket!".

to:

-->''Blackadder'': "I -->'''Blackadder:''' I remember Massingbird's most famous case: the Case of the Bloody Knife. A man was found next to a murdered body. He had the knife in his hand, 13 witnesses had seen him stab the victim, and when the police arrived, he said "I'm glad I killed the bastard." [[AmoralAttorney Massingbird]] not only got him off; he got him knighted in the New Year's Honours List and the relatives of the victim had to pay to have the blood washed out of his jacket!".jacket!.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Inverted in E.E. "Doc" Smith's ''First Lensman''. The Lensmen have such a thorough case built against their political opponents (who are in bed with [[spoiler:drug runners and human civilization's principal military enemy]]) that one of them tells the others "There is not a jury in the land, however corrupt, before which we could not win." And the enemy privately acknowledges this, putting all of its efforts into trying to keep the cases out of court prior to [[spoiler:the upcoming Presidential election]]..
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope


* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': In the episode "New Kid On The Block", Homer, ever the {{Jerkass}} BigEater, eats a whole restaurant's stock of food (''[[UpToEleven several times over]]'') [[BuffetBuffoonery because it offers an "all you can eat" buffet]] and then has the gall to sue it for false advertisement because it wasn't all that ''he'' could eat. It ends up being one of the few times that [[TheAllegedExpert Lionel]] [[AmoralAttorney Hutz]] (representing Homer) wins a case because all of the people in the jury were fat food lovers like Homer who felt sympathy for his "plight".

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': In the episode "New Kid On The Block", Homer, ever the {{Jerkass}} BigEater, eats a whole restaurant's stock of food (''[[UpToEleven several (''several times over]]'') over'') [[BuffetBuffoonery because it offers an "all you can eat" buffet]] and then has the gall to sue it for false advertisement because it wasn't all that ''he'' could eat. It ends up being one of the few times that [[TheAllegedExpert Lionel]] [[AmoralAttorney Hutz]] (representing Homer) wins a case because all of the people in the jury were fat food lovers like Homer who felt sympathy for his "plight".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now Flame Bait and Darth.


** [[ComicBook/ArkhamAsylumLivingHell The Great White Shark]] was [[WhatAnIdiot dumb enough]] to have his case transferred to Gotham City to skate on an InsanityDefense for embezzling millions from the life savings of his company's clients; dumb, because he winds up getting sent to [[BedlamHouse Arkham Asylum]]. The presiding judge lampshades the jury's idiocy for falling for his obvious lies, but takes comfort in knowing the white-collar "Shark" will be a mere guppy amongst the myriad of maniacs and psychopaths that Arkham houses. Of course, another explanation is that the jury thought anyone willingly going to Arkham must be insane.

to:

** [[ComicBook/ArkhamAsylumLivingHell The Great White Shark]] was [[WhatAnIdiot dumb enough]] enough to have his case transferred to Gotham City to skate on an InsanityDefense for embezzling millions from the life savings of his company's clients; dumb, because he winds up getting sent to [[BedlamHouse Arkham Asylum]]. The presiding judge lampshades the jury's idiocy for falling for his obvious lies, but takes comfort in knowing the white-collar "Shark" will be a mere guppy amongst the myriad of maniacs and psychopaths that Arkham houses. Of course, another explanation is that the jury thought anyone willingly going to Arkham must be insane.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Occasionally, a surprise acquittal can be due to a phenomenon known as "jury nullification", in which the jurors return a "not guilty" verdict even though the prosecution has in fact proven their case. This is usually because the jury feels that extenuating circumstances justify the crime, or occasionally because they feel the law is unfairly applied or simply ''wrong''. There are two sides to this: A) the US legal system says that it is not the jury's place to decide what the law ''should'' be, but to come to a conclusion as to whether the law ''as it is currently written'' has or has not been broken. B) Nevertheless, jury nullification is legal in the US. A criminal court can't insist on a guilty verdict, an acquittal can't be appealed, and jurors can't be punished for a verdict. [[note]]There are circumstances where a judge can set aside an acquittal, but it's extremely rare and limited to cases of juror misconduct; the result is a mistrial, not a guilty verdict, which means the defendant has to be tried again, or the case is dropped.[[/note]]


to:

Occasionally, a surprise acquittal can be due to a phenomenon known as "jury nullification", in which the jurors return a "not guilty" verdict even though the prosecution has in fact proven their case.case beyond a reasonable doubt. This is usually because the jury feels that extenuating circumstances justify the crime, or occasionally because they feel the law is unfairly applied or simply ''wrong''. There are two sides to this: A) the US legal system says that it is not the jury's place to decide what the law ''should'' be, but to come to a conclusion as to whether the law ''as it is currently written'' has or has not been broken. B) Nevertheless, jury nullification is legal in the US. A criminal court can't insist on a guilty verdict, an acquittal can't be appealed, and jurors can't be punished for a verdict. [[note]]There are circumstances where a judge can set aside an acquittal, but it's extremely rare and limited to cases of juror misconduct; the result is a mistrial, not a guilty verdict, which means the defendant has to be tried again, or the case is dropped.[[/note]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[ComicBook/ArkhamAsylumLivingHell The Great White Shark]] was [[WhatAnIdiot dumb enough]] to have his case transferred to Gotham City to skate on an InsanityDefense for embezzling millions from the life savings of his company's clients; dumb, because he winds up getting sent to [[BedlamHouse Arkham Asylum]]. The presiding judge lampshades the jury's idiocy for falling for his obvious lies, but takes comfort in knowing the white-collar "Shark" will be a mere guppy amongst the myriad of maniacs and psychopaths that Arkham houses.

to:

** [[ComicBook/ArkhamAsylumLivingHell The Great White Shark]] was [[WhatAnIdiot dumb enough]] to have his case transferred to Gotham City to skate on an InsanityDefense for embezzling millions from the life savings of his company's clients; dumb, because he winds up getting sent to [[BedlamHouse Arkham Asylum]]. The presiding judge lampshades the jury's idiocy for falling for his obvious lies, but takes comfort in knowing the white-collar "Shark" will be a mere guppy amongst the myriad of maniacs and psychopaths that Arkham houses.
houses. Of course, another explanation is that the jury thought anyone willingly going to Arkham must be insane.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Finch:''' You think your average juror is King Solomon? No! He's a roofer with a mortgage. He wants to go home and sit in his Barcalounger and let the cable TV wash over him. And this man doesn't give a single, solitary droplet of shit about truth, justice or your American way.\\

to:

-->'''Finch:''' -->'''Fitch:''' You think your average juror is King Solomon? No! He's a roofer with a mortgage. He wants to go home and sit in his Barcalounger and let the cable TV wash over him. And this man doesn't give a single, solitary droplet of shit about truth, justice or your American way.\\



'''Finch:''' [[HumansAreFlawed My point, exactly.]]

to:

'''Finch:''' '''Fitch:''' [[HumansAreFlawed My point, exactly.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Case 3 actually ends with the judge declaring a mistrial - the jury is split at the time


* ''VisualNovel/TheGreatAceAttorney'' has most trials revolve around the Jury System, and if you get a GameOver, the jury will falsely declare your client guilty. This can happen even if you are near the end of the trial and it's ''incredibly obvious'' who the real culprit is. In fact, they will do this [[OnceAnEpisode at least once per trial]] even when [[FissionMailed you do everything right]], at which point you need to do a Summation Examination and examine the jurors' reasoning, then point out flaws and convince the jurors to change their vote. [[spoiler:However, in Case 3 of the first game, this actually happens when the jurors falsely ''acquit'' the defendant, who really is guilty- and they do this even has the ''defense attorney'' begs them to give a little more time to solve the case.]]

to:

* ''VisualNovel/TheGreatAceAttorney'' has most trials revolve around the Jury System, and if you get a GameOver, the jury will falsely declare your client guilty. This can happen even if you are near the end of the trial and it's ''incredibly obvious'' who the real culprit is. In fact, they will do this [[OnceAnEpisode at least once per trial]] even when [[FissionMailed you do everything right]], at which point you need to do a Summation Examination and examine the jurors' reasoning, then point out flaws and convince the jurors to change their vote. [[spoiler:However, in Case 3 of the first game, this actually happens when the jurors falsely ''acquit'' the defendant, who really is guilty- and they do this even has the ''defense attorney'' begs them to give a little more time to solve the case.]]\n
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VisualNovel/TheGreatAceAttorney'' has most trials revolve around the Jury System, and if you get a GameOver, the jury will falsely declare your client guilty. This can happen even if you are near the end of the trial and it's ''incredibly obvious'' who the real culprit is. In fact, they will do this [[OnceAnEpisode at least once per trial]] even when [[FissionMailed you do everything right]], at which point you need to do a Summation Examination and examine the jurors' reasoning, then point out flaws and convince the jurors to change their vote. [[spoiler:However, in Case 3 of the first game, this actually happens when the jurors falsely ''acquit'' the defendant, who really is guilty.]]

to:

* ''VisualNovel/TheGreatAceAttorney'' has most trials revolve around the Jury System, and if you get a GameOver, the jury will falsely declare your client guilty. This can happen even if you are near the end of the trial and it's ''incredibly obvious'' who the real culprit is. In fact, they will do this [[OnceAnEpisode at least once per trial]] even when [[FissionMailed you do everything right]], at which point you need to do a Summation Examination and examine the jurors' reasoning, then point out flaws and convince the jurors to change their vote. [[spoiler:However, in Case 3 of the first game, this actually happens when the jurors falsely ''acquit'' the defendant, who really is guilty.guilty- and they do this even has the ''defense attorney'' begs them to give a little more time to solve the case.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:VideoGames]]
* ''VisualNovel/TheGreatAceAttorney'' has most trials revolve around the Jury System, and if you get a GameOver, the jury will falsely declare your client guilty. This can happen even if you are near the end of the trial and it's ''incredibly obvious'' who the real culprit is. In fact, they will do this [[OnceAnEpisode at least once per trial]] even when [[FissionMailed you do everything right]], at which point you need to do a Summation Examination and examine the jurors' reasoning, then point out flaws and convince the jurors to change their vote. [[spoiler:However, in Case 3 of the first game, this actually happens when the jurors falsely ''acquit'' the defendant, who really is guilty.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been renamed, and it needs to be dewicked/moved


* ''Film/LiarLiar'' has Fletcher's secretary relate a friend's story of the "burglar sues the homeowner after B&E goes bad and wins" predicament to point out how he and other [[AmoralAttorney Amoral Attorneys]] [[NotSoDifferent are all alike]]. Fletcher insists he's not: [[spoiler: if he were the burglar's attorney, he would've gotten him twice for twice that amount of money]]. All this implies they must have a ''very'' compliant jury (also judge).

to:

* ''Film/LiarLiar'' has Fletcher's secretary relate a friend's story of the "burglar sues the homeowner after B&E goes bad and wins" predicament to point out how he and other [[AmoralAttorney Amoral Attorneys]] [[NotSoDifferent are all alike]].alike. Fletcher insists he's not: [[spoiler: if he were the burglar's attorney, he would've gotten him twice for twice that amount of money]]. All this implies they must have a ''very'' compliant jury (also judge).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is fourth-wall myopia. The audience knows he's guilty, but the jury didn't hear all the evidence because it was suppressed. From the jury's point of view, Darius was able to show that his mother hated him for existing and that the SVU detectives were all dirty cops (all of which was true). Since none of the witnesses were credible, the jury had reasonable doubt.


** One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode "Screwed", where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detectives' pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt. She's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14-month-old baby alive (the jury wasn't actually told about the baby), and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/RumpoleOfTheBailey'' presents us with "Rumpole a la Carte," in which the chef at a [[FrenchCuisineIsHaughty posh French restaurant]] in London is on trial for a health violation -- namely having a live mouse presented upon a customer's plate. Like most things in the health code, this is a strict-liability offense: it doesn't matter ''why'' you did it, it only matters that the code was violated. However, Rumpole does his best to laugh the case out of court, and produces evidence that the mouse was planted as a complex plot by the cashier.[[note]]The chef's venomous French wife was divorcing him, and since they had been married under French law, she would get half of the profits from the restaurant via [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_property community of property]]. The cashier hated the wife and was desperately in love with the chef, so she cooked up the scheme to ruin the restaurant so the ex would get nothing.[[/note]] The jury acquits.

to:

* ''Series/RumpoleOfTheBailey'' presents us with "Rumpole a la Carte," in which the chef at a [[FrenchCuisineIsHaughty posh French restaurant]] in London is on trial for a health violation -- namely having a live mouse presented upon a customer's plate. Like most things in the health code, this is a strict-liability offense: it doesn't matter ''why'' you did it, or ''how'' it happened, it only matters that the code was violated. However, Rumpole does his best to laugh the case out of court, and produces evidence that the mouse was planted as a complex plot by the cashier.[[note]]The chef's venomous French wife was divorcing him, and since they had been married under French law, she would get half of the profits from the restaurant via [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_property community of property]]. The cashier hated the wife and was desperately in love with the chef, so she cooked up the scheme to ruin the restaurant so the ex would get nothing.[[/note]] The jury acquits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The SVU episode "Redemption" opens with a jury finding a man not guilty of raping his granddaughter despite said granddaughter's testimony, Stabler's testimony, and the fact that the victim and the defendant had the same sexually transmitted infection. Even by his standards Stabler is not in a good mental state for the rest of the episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode "Screwed", where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive (the jury wasn't actually told about the baby), and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.

to:

** One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode "Screwed", where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's detectives' pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's aunt. She's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old 14-month-old baby alive (the jury wasn't actually told about the baby), and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Another episode features the judge berating the jury for their decision to award a ridiculous amount of money to the plaintiff in a dubious fraud lawsuit, before exercising his power to reduce the amount.

to:

** Another episode features the judge berating the jury for their decision to award a ridiculous amount of money to the plaintiff in a dubious fraud lawsuit, before exercising his power to reduce the amount. The attorney and clients accept that without much protest (they were pretty stunned when the verdict was announced), though the client does ruefully admit that when he first heard the jury's original verdict he immediately started imagining his brand new boat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': In the episode "New Kid On The Block", Homer, ever the {{Jerkass}} BigEater, [[BuffetBuffoonery eats a whole restaurant's stock of food because it offers an "all you can eat" buffet]] and then has the gall to sue it for false advertisement because it wasn't all that ''he'' could eat. It ends up being one of the few times that [[TheAllegedExpert Lionel]] [[AmoralAttorney Hutz]] (representing Homer) wins a case because all of the people in the jury were fat food lovers like Homer who felt sympathy for his "plight".

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': In the episode "New Kid On The Block", Homer, ever the {{Jerkass}} BigEater, [[BuffetBuffoonery eats a whole restaurant's stock of food (''[[UpToEleven several times over]]'') [[BuffetBuffoonery because it offers an "all you can eat" buffet]] and then has the gall to sue it for false advertisement because it wasn't all that ''he'' could eat. It ends up being one of the few times that [[TheAllegedExpert Lionel]] [[AmoralAttorney Hutz]] (representing Homer) wins a case because all of the people in the jury were fat food lovers like Homer who felt sympathy for his "plight".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'': In the episode "New Kid On The Block", Homer, ever the {{Jerkass}} BigEater, [[BuffetBuffoonery eats a whole restaurant's stock of food because it offers an "all you can eat" buffet]] and then has the gall to sue it for false advertisement because it wasn't all that ''he'' could eat. It ends up being one of the few times that [[TheAllegedExpert Lionel]] [[AmoralAttorney Hutz]] (representing Homer) wins a case because all of the people in the jury were fat food lovers like Homer who felt sympathy for his "plight".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In real life (principally in the USA), the "voir dire" process is meant to ensure that juries are made up of fair and impartial members who will treat the case seriously. In the UK and Commonwealth, it can include testing the competency of potential jurors. Still, a number of high-profile cases with unexpected outcomes have led to juries being described as "twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty".

to:

In real life (principally in the USA), the "voir dire" process is meant to ensure that juries are made up of fair and impartial members who will treat the case seriously. In the UK and Commonwealth, it can include testing the competency of potential jurors. Still, a number However, in most US jurisdictions, lawyers are allowed to weed out potential jurors for any reason at all (other than race), granting plenty of high-profile cases with unexpected outcomes have led to latitude for less ethical lawyers who prefer juries being described as "twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty".
that are easily swayed by emotional appeals and courtroom theatrics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Literature/ToKillAMockingbird'', Atticus Finch demonstrates the accuser Mayella's injuries were caused by a [[TheKillerWasLeftHanded left-handed individual]] while the defendant, Tom Robinson paralyzed his left arm in an accident. The jury of that time in the DeepSouth still convicted him, refusing to consider the idea that a black person could ever be WronglyAccused of a crime. (Or, [[AlternateCharacterInterpretation alternately]], a false conviction seemed like the lesser evil compared to [[CategoryTraitor the shunning and violence]] they might face if they decided to acquit.)

to:

* In ''Literature/ToKillAMockingbird'', Atticus Finch demonstrates the accuser Mayella's injuries were caused by a [[TheKillerWasLeftHanded left-handed individual]] while the defendant, Tom Robinson paralyzed his left arm in an accident. The jury of that time in the DeepSouth still convicted him, refusing to consider but the idea fact that they spent hours deliberating instead of immediately returning with a guilty verdict is taken as unofficial confirmation that at least some of them recognized the truth (even if they quickly acquiesced to the unjust and racist expectations of their community that a black person man accused of such a crime could ever not be WronglyAccused of a crime. (Or, [[AlternateCharacterInterpretation alternately]], a false conviction seemed like the lesser evil compared allowed to [[CategoryTraitor the shunning and violence]] they might face if they decided to acquit.)go free).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jury.png]]

Added: 1709

Changed: 1718

Removed: 363

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
In the case of the Iranian woman, the other employees threatened to quit en masse if she wasn't fired, so Jimmy's argument was actually, "what happened was wrong, but you shouldn't blame my cousin". The pilot episode of Harry's Law doesn't fit this trope because the jury convicted, the judge gave him a slap on the wrist.


* A frequent occurrence on the ''Series/LawAndOrder'' franchise. One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode Screwed, where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive, and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.

to:

* A frequent occurrence on the ''Series/LawAndOrder'' franchise. franchise:
**
One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode Screwed, "Screwed", where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive, alive (the jury wasn't actually told about the baby), and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.off.
** The SVU episode "Obscene" had a MoralGuardian crusader shoot an offensive shock jock. They had evidence that it was a premeditated publicity stunt and her defense was that the shock jock was a bad influence on her son. It worked.



** Jimmy once defended his cousin for firing a woman due to her Iranian heritage. His case literally amounted to "she's a good person, but we should judge her for the actions of her countrymen". It works. The judge throws out the verdict, orders Jimmy's cousin to pay a hefty compensation, and delivers a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech to Jimmy, his cousin, and the jury.



* The second episode of ''Series/HarrysLaw'' featured a woman on trial for committing armed robbery, with eyewitness testimony and video evidence. The defense Harry presented basically amounted to "Yeah, she did it, and she wasn't insane or senile, but she's an old woman". It worked. With only slightly more justification, the first episode had a young man get off on drug possession charges (and a corresponding "third strike" prison sentence) through the argument that as he was on his way to college, the "greater good" of society would be better served by not convicting.

to:

* The second episode of ''Series/HarrysLaw'' featured a woman on trial for committing armed robbery, with eyewitness testimony and video evidence. The defense Harry presented basically amounted to "Yeah, she did it, and she wasn't insane or senile, but she's an old woman". It worked. With only slightly more justification, the first episode had a young man get off on drug possession charges (and a corresponding "third strike" prison sentence) through the argument that as he was on his way to college, the "greater good" of society would be better served by not convicting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A frequent occurrence on the ''Series/LawAndOrder'' franchise. One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode Screwed, where Darius Parker, Fin's nephew/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive, and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.

to:

* A frequent occurrence on the ''Series/LawAndOrder'' franchise. One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode Screwed, where Darius Parker, Fin's nephew/stepson, brother-in-law/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive, and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A frequent occurrence on the ''Series/LawAndOrder'' franchise. One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode Screwed, where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepfather, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive, and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.

to:

* A frequent occurrence on the ''Series/LawAndOrder'' franchise. One of the most infuriating was in the SVU episode Screwed, where Darius Parker, Fin's brother-in-law/stepfather, nephew/stepson, a sociopath with a vengeance gets off scot-free on raping and murdering a woman and her baby because of his mommy issues. He gets a corrupt ex-cop for a defense who's feeding him dirt on the SVU detective's pasts provided to him by a police lieutenant with a grudge against their captain. His confession is thrown out because he keeps it a secret from the detectives that he has an outstanding warrant, so when they finally do get a confession, he's made it so it's inadmissible. He causes Elliot's daughter to be arrested for an old DUI, Fin's reputation to be tarnished, Captain Cragen to be in danger of losing his badge, and Olivia to be thrown in front of IAB. All because his mother, Teresa, was raped by her father and couldn't bear to raise him, so she posed as his aunt; she's convinced to testify and finally admit who raped her and in turn Darius batters and abuses her on the stand, accusing her of lying because she didn't file a report (nobody believed her). He rapes and murders a woman, buries her 14 month-old baby alive, and takes the whole unit down because of chickenshit personal issues that could have been solved by any half-decent therapist. And he's acquitted. The assistant district attorney Casey Novak damn near looks like she's holding back tears when the delusional jury lets him off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicking, since it's an inaccessible roleplay filed under Unpublished Works now.


[[AC:Web Original]]
* In the ''Roleplay/GlobalGuardiansPBEMUniverse'', it proved almost impossible to convict Ambrosia of any crime, even when she was caught red handed with both video and DNA evidence, because her lawyer managed to disqualify any woman who had a chance of landing on the jury. Her pheromone-driven power to cause all men to view her as attractive and friendly did the rest...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Did not see the example was already posted


* A judge actually called out a jury for this on an episode of Series/ThePractice. The protagonist attorneys won a staggering verdict for their client, but the thoroughly disgusted judge (who had made clear throughout the trial that he thought the case was a joke) unilaterally slashed the verdict to a still-respectable amount and chewed the jurors out for their verdict. The attorneys and their client were actually pretty OK with that, as the judge gave them a pretty solid chunk of change and they kind of knew the jury got out over their skis a bit.

to:

* A judge actually called out a jury for this on an episode of Series/ThePractice. The protagonist attorneys won a staggering verdict for their client, but the thoroughly disgusted judge (who had made clear throughout the trial that he thought the case was a joke) unilaterally slashed the verdict to a still-respectable amount and chewed the jurors out for their verdict. The attorneys and their client were actually pretty OK with that, as the judge gave them a pretty solid chunk of change and they kind of knew the jury got out over their skis a bit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* A judge actually called out a jury for this on an episode of Series/ThePractice. The protagonist attorneys won a staggering verdict for their client, but the thoroughly disgusted judge (who had made clear throughout the trial that he thought the case was a joke) unilaterally slashed the verdict to a still-respectable amount and chewed the jurors out for their verdict. The attorneys and their client were actually pretty OK with that, as the judge gave them a pretty solid chunk of change and they kind of knew the jury got out over their skis a bit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Literature/ToKillAMockingbird'', Atticus Finch demonstrates the accuser Mayella's injuries were caused by a [[TheKillerWasLeftHanded left-handed individual]] while the defendant, Tom Robinson paralyzed his left arm in an accident. The jury of that time in the DeepSouth still convicted him, refusing to consider the idea that a black person could ever be WronglyAccused of a crime. (Or, [[AlternateCharacterInterpretation alternately]], a false conviction seemed like the lesser evil compared to the shunning and violence they might face if they decided to acquit.)

to:

* In ''Literature/ToKillAMockingbird'', Atticus Finch demonstrates the accuser Mayella's injuries were caused by a [[TheKillerWasLeftHanded left-handed individual]] while the defendant, Tom Robinson paralyzed his left arm in an accident. The jury of that time in the DeepSouth still convicted him, refusing to consider the idea that a black person could ever be WronglyAccused of a crime. (Or, [[AlternateCharacterInterpretation alternately]], a false conviction seemed like the lesser evil compared to [[CategoryTraitor the shunning and violence violence]] they might face if they decided to acquit.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In real life (principally in the USA), the "voir dire" process is meant to ensure that juries are made up of fair and impartial members who will treat the case seriously. In the UK and Commonwealth, it can include testing the competency of potential jurors. Still, a number of high-profile cases with unexpected outcomes have led to juries being described as "twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty."

to:

In real life (principally in the USA), the "voir dire" process is meant to ensure that juries are made up of fair and impartial members who will treat the case seriously. In the UK and Commonwealth, it can include testing the competency of potential jurors. Still, a number of high-profile cases with unexpected outcomes have led to juries being described as "twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty."
duty".

Top