Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AmbiguousSituation

Go To

OR

Changed: 27

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''{{Homestuck}}''. The short version: A character who has the explicit ability to return from any death, except one that is either ''heroic'' or ''just'', dies and does not return. Hardly any readers think this is a heroic death, but there's ambiguous evidence suggesting that it's not a just death either, and that the real reason the character doesn't return is because of a cosmic accident cheating them out of their revival. [[hottip:Spoiler:The character in question is Vriska, the comic's BaseBreaker and reigning queen of AlternateCharacterInterpretation. She had committed many murders, was deliberately responsible for the creation of [[BigBad Bec Noir]], and was killed while leaving to fight Bec Noir--if Vriska had not been stopped, Bec Noir would have killed all her friends. However, Vriska's FreudianExcuse, her eleventh-hour remorse over prior misdeeds, and her desire to reform may or may not have redeemed her enough that her death no longer qualified as just. Further complicating the matter, the simultaneous ([[TimeyWimeyBall for a given value of "simultaneous"]]) destruction of a magic clock, whose pendulum was swinging between ''heroic'' and ''just'', may or may not have interfered with the universe making the right ruling on the nature of her death. Death sure is confusing!]] [[WordOfGod Word of Hussie]] [[http://www.formspring.me/mspadventures/q/205977743303664796 has outright stated]] that he intended for this to be ambiguous and divisive.

to:

* ''{{Homestuck}}''. The short version: A character who has the explicit ability to return from any death, except one that is either ''heroic'' or ''just'', dies and does not return. Hardly any readers think this is a heroic death, but there's ambiguous evidence suggesting that it's not a just death either, and that the real reason the character doesn't return is because of a cosmic accident cheating them out of their revival. [[hottip:Spoiler:The [[hottip:The longer, spoileriffic version:The character in question is Vriska, the comic's BaseBreaker and reigning queen of AlternateCharacterInterpretation. She had committed many murders, was deliberately responsible for the creation of [[BigBad Bec Noir]], and was killed while leaving to fight Bec Noir--if Vriska had not been stopped, Bec Noir would have killed all her friends. However, Vriska's FreudianExcuse, her eleventh-hour remorse over prior misdeeds, and her desire to reform may or may not have redeemed her enough that her death no longer qualified as just. Further complicating the matter, the simultaneous ([[TimeyWimeyBall for a given value of "simultaneous"]]) destruction of a magic clock, whose pendulum was swinging between ''heroic'' and ''just'', may or may not have interfered with the universe making the right ruling on the nature of her death. Death sure is confusing!]] [[WordOfGod Word of Hussie]] [[http://www.formspring.me/mspadventures/q/205977743303664796 has outright stated]] that he intended for this to be ambiguous and divisive.

Changed: 740

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''{{Homestuck}}''. The short version: A character who has the explicit ability to return from any death, except one that is either ''heroic'' or ''just'', dies and does not return. Hardly any readers think this is a heroic death, but there's ambiguous evidence suggesting that it's not a just death either, and that the real reason the character doesn't return is because of a cosmic accident cheating them out of their revival. [[hottip:Spoiler:The character in question is Vriska, the comic's BaseBreaker and reigning queen of AlternateCharacterInterpretation.]] [[WordOfGod Word of Hussie]] [[http://www.formspring.me/mspadventures/q/205977743303664796 has outright stated]] that he intended for this to be ambiguous and divisive.

to:

* ''{{Homestuck}}''. The short version: A character who has the explicit ability to return from any death, except one that is either ''heroic'' or ''just'', dies and does not return. Hardly any readers think this is a heroic death, but there's ambiguous evidence suggesting that it's not a just death either, and that the real reason the character doesn't return is because of a cosmic accident cheating them out of their revival. [[hottip:Spoiler:The character in question is Vriska, the comic's BaseBreaker and reigning queen of AlternateCharacterInterpretation.]] She had committed many murders, was deliberately responsible for the creation of [[BigBad Bec Noir]], and was killed while leaving to fight Bec Noir--if Vriska had not been stopped, Bec Noir would have killed all her friends. However, Vriska's FreudianExcuse, her eleventh-hour remorse over prior misdeeds, and her desire to reform may or may not have redeemed her enough that her death no longer qualified as just. Further complicating the matter, the simultaneous ([[TimeyWimeyBall for a given value of "simultaneous"]]) destruction of a magic clock, whose pendulum was swinging between ''heroic'' and ''just'', may or may not have interfered with the universe making the right ruling on the nature of her death. Death sure is confusing!]] [[WordOfGod Word of Hussie]] [[http://www.formspring.me/mspadventures/q/205977743303664796 has outright stated]] that he intended for this to be ambiguous and divisive.

Changed: 735

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*''{{Homestuck}}''. The short version: A character who has the explicit ability to return from any death, except one that is either ''heroic'' or ''just'', dies and does not return. Hardly any readers think this is a heroic death, but there's ambiguous evidence suggesting that it's not a just death either, and that the real reason the character doesn't return is because of a cosmic accident cheating them out of their revival. [[hottip:Spoiler:The character in question is Vriska, the comic's BaseBreaker and reigning queen of AlternateCharacterInterpretation.]] [[WordOfGod Word of Hussie]] [[http://www.formspring.me/mspadventures/q/205977743303664796 has outright stated]] that he intended for this to be ambiguous and divisive.

Changed: 203

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''{{From a Buick 8}}'' has multiple examples because the story is based around the idea that you'll never have all the answers. Is the Buick alive? Intelligent? Did it [[spoiler:kill Curtis]] and more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SourCode ends with Colter going back into the titular program and completly averts the destruction of the train using everything he had learned from his previous attempts. Then we see Goodwyn recieving a text message he had sent from within the program, and acting surpised when she hears that the bombing had been prevented, so did Colter actually change the past, or is he now in an alternate timeline within the program?

to:

* SourCode SourceCode ends with Colter going back into the titular program and completly averts the destruction of the train using everything he had learned from his previous attempts. Then we see Goodwyn recieving a text message he had sent from within the program, and acting surpised when she hears that the bombing had been prevented, so did Colter actually change the past, or is he now in an alternate timeline within the program?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*SourCode ends with Colter going back into the titular program and completly averts the destruction of the train using everything he had learned from his previous attempts. Then we see Goodwyn recieving a text message he had sent from within the program, and acting surpised when she hears that the bombing had been prevented, so did Colter actually change the past, or is he now in an alternate timeline within the program?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Insufficiently intentionally ambiguous.


* Kirk and Spock's relationship on StarTrek is left ambiguous. There is enough evidence on both sides to support them being in love or [[HeterosexualLifePartners like brothers]]. Sometimes the same "evidence" (for example the Vulcan word t'hy'la, which means friend/brother/lover) can b and is used by both sides, meaning that fans can debate until the end of time and not come to a consensus.

to:

* Kirk and Spock's relationship on StarTrek is left ambiguous. There is enough evidence on both sides Much of LifeOnMars, British version, was highly unclear as to support them being in love or [[HeterosexualLifePartners like brothers]]. Sometimes the same "evidence" (for example the Vulcan word t'hy'la, which means friend/brother/lover) can b and is used by both sides, meaning that fans can debate until the end of time and not come to a consensus.
what was reality.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:{{Theater}}]]
* Johnny Byron, the main character of ''[[Theatre/{{Jerusalem}} Jerusalem]]'', is a former daredevil and fantastic {{Munchausen}} who claims to have met the ninety-foot giant who built stonehenge. In the second act, Byron shows the local teens a drum that he claims was the giant's earring, saying that the giant told him to bang on it if ever he needed the help of the giants. In the final moments of the play, when Byron stands alone, bloodied and beaten, his land in the woods about to be invaded by a bulldozer and a dozen local constables, he beats the drum and calls upon the mythological figures of England. At this point, the text of the play says "Blackout", but the original production from the Royal Court Theatre that has since moved to Broadway ends with the rumble of enormous footsteps in the distance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''SilentHillShatteredMemories'' actually builds the entire crux of the plot around this, with the nature, outcome and even symbolism of the plot dependent on both the player's actions and interpretations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Compare MaybeMagicMaybeMundane for another kind of uncertainty. Contrast EpilepticTrees, which are conclusions that viewers draw when they don't limit themselves to information objectively present within the work.

to:

Compare MaybeMagicMaybeMundane for another kind of uncertainty. Contrast EpilepticTrees, which are conclusions that viewers draw when they don't limit themselves to information objectively present within the work. \n Also see CrypticConversation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:{{Anime}}]]
* ''NeonGenesisEvangelion'' has quite a bit of this, ''partly'' resulting from that FauxSymbolism mentioned in the trope description. The most notable example would be the final scene of ''End of Evangelion'', where the true meaning of Asuka's words remains up to viewer interpretation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''{{Changeling}}'': By the end, Walter is not returned to Christine... but in the epilogue, one of Northcott's escaped victims has been found. He says that both he and Walter escaped from their prison, but were separated in the dark. Maybe Walter was recaptured by Northcott, maybe he got away.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The sixth season of ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer'' has an episode called "Normal Again", which follows the CuckooNest trope: Buffy is injected with a poison that make her hallucinate... Or is it the other way around? According to a psychiatriest, who may or may not be a real person, she is in fact getting better: She has been sick all along, and now she's finally waking up from years of catatonic schizophrenia. So, the whole series is either ThisIsReality or a mad AllJustADream with a dash of TheSchizophreniaConspiracy. In the end, Buffy choses her live in sunnydale over her life in the mental institution, but the ending leaves it ambiguous whether or not the world she settled for is the real one.
* ''LawAndOrderSVU'' loves to leave stuff unresolved for the audience to ponder. Usually it's on the simple level whether the guy is guilty or not (such as in the episode "Doubt"), but sometimes they take it to a much deeper level. The detectives just keep spawning new theories, and none of them either gets verified. For example, the episode "Slaves" features a husband, his wife, and their nanny/girlfriend/SexSlave Elena. They keep the relationship hidden...

to:

* The sixth season of ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer'' has an episode called "Normal Again", which follows the CuckooNest trope: Buffy is injected with a poison that make her hallucinate... Or is it the other way around? According to a psychiatriest, psychiatrist, who may or may not be a real person, she is in fact getting better: She has been sick all along, and now she's finally waking up from years of catatonic schizophrenia. So, the whole series is either ThisIsReality or a mad AllJustADream with a dash of TheSchizophreniaConspiracy. In the end, Buffy choses chooses her live in sunnydale Sunnydale over her life in the mental institution, but the ending leaves it ambiguous whether or not the world she settled for is the real one.
* ''LawAndOrderSVU'' loves to leave stuff unresolved for the audience to ponder. Usually Usually, it's on the simple level whether the guy is guilty or not (such as in the episode "Doubt"), but sometimes they take it to a much deeper level. The detectives just keep spawning new theories, and none of them either gets verified. For example, the episode "Slaves" features a husband, his wife, and their nanny/girlfriend/SexSlave Elena. They keep the relationship hidden...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Kirk and Spock's relationship on StarTrek is left ambiguous. There is enough evidence on both sides to support them being in love or [[HeterosexualLifePartners like brothers]]. Sometimes the same "evidence" (for example the Vulcan word t'hy'la, which means friend/brother/lover) can b and is used by both sides, meaning that fans can debate until the end of time and not come to a consensus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Oh yeah! The example was worded in a way that doesn\'t make any sense to people who havn\'t seen the movie.


* ''{{Inception}}'' ends with an EsotericHappyEnding where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is EarnYourHappyEnding, with an implied HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If so, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.

to:

* ''{{Inception}}'' ends with an EsotericHappyEnding where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. not - which is his way of seeing the difference between reality and dreamworlds! Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is EarnYourHappyEnding, with an implied HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If so, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No, but not knowing whether the kids you see exists? Is.


* ''{{Inception}}'' ends with a [[EarnYourHappyEnding hard-earned happy ending]] where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is HappilyEverAfter. If not, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.

to:

* ''{{Inception}}'' ends with a [[EarnYourHappyEnding hard-earned happy ending]] an EsotericHappyEnding where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is EarnYourHappyEnding, with an implied HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If not, so, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Being happy to see your kids is hardly esoteric.


* ''{{Inception}}'' ends with an EsotericHappyEnding where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If so, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.

to:

* ''{{Inception}}'' ends with an EsotericHappyEnding a [[EarnYourHappyEnding hard-earned happy ending]] where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If so, not, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 2008 movie ''Doubt'' invokes this. You're left never really knowing if the priest is actually guilty of the allegations.

to:

* The 2008 movie ''Doubt'' ''{{Doubt}}'' invokes this. You're left never really knowing if the priest is actually guilty of the allegations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''TheMatrix'', Neo have superpowers because he is in a computer simulation. In the sequel, he is revealed to have superpowers in the real world as well. Does this make him a SuperHero kind of TheMessiah? Or does it simply man that the "reality" is actually a computer-generated DreamWithinADream?

to:

* In ''TheMatrix'', Neo have has superpowers because he is in a computer simulation. In the sequel, he is revealed to have superpowers in the real world as well. Does this make him a SuperHero kind of TheMessiah? Or does it simply man that the "reality" is actually a computer-generated DreamWithinADream?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Citation? In this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vwqWFzepAU) clip, it appears that there are no external effects other than the sentinels shorting out, so what we see in the movie doesn't appear to disprove the idea that it's a sentinel-only power, but it feels...unsatisfying somehow. Where Occam's Razor tells us the simplest explanation is most likely to be true, is there a trope about the most interesting or most satisfying rule being true?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Turns out it's neither. His powers only affect sentinels, which are basically an extension of the Matrix that he already had power over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ShadowOfTheColossus, the only clear part of the plot is that Wander is trying to revive Mono by unsealing Dormin, and Lord Emon wants to stop this. This leaves us with a whole boatload of varying interpretations - for a small sample, is Wander a VillainProtagonist or a [[TheWoobie Woobie]]? Is Dormin displaying DarkIsEvil or DarkIsNotEvil? Is Emon a HeroAntagonist or a KnightTemplar? Indeed, director Fumito Ueda is on the record as wanting each player to form their own story, and boy has the fandom taken him up on that.

to:

* In ShadowOfTheColossus, the only clear part of the plot is that Wander is trying to revive Mono by unsealing Dormin, and Lord Emon wants to stop this. This leaves us with a whole boatload of varying interpretations - for a small sample, is Wander a VillainProtagonist or a [[TheWoobie Woobie]]? Is Dormin displaying DarkIsEvil or DarkIsNotEvil? Is Emon a HeroAntagonist or a KnightTemplar? Indeed, director Fumito Ueda is on the record as wanting each player to form their own story, and boy has the fandom taken him up on that.
that.
* Used to skirt around the issues of violence, death and sexuality in ''RuleOfRose'', where most characters are young children. Especially whether Mr. Hoffman sexually abused Clara and Diana. An infamous scenario features Hoffman summoning sad, reluctant Clara to his room, and you can witness through a keyhole how he...makes her scrub the floor, though in a very innuendo-laden position.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In ShadowOfTheColossus, the only clear part of the plot is that Wander is trying to revive Mono by unsealing Dormin, and Lord Emon wants to stop this. This leaves us with a whole boatload of varying interpretations - for a small sample, is Wander a VillainProtagonist or a [[TheWoobie Woobie]]? Is Dormin displaying DarkIsEvil or DarkIsNotEvil? Is Emon a HeroAntagonist or a KnightTemplar? Indeed, director Fumito Ueda is on the record as wanting each player to form their own story, and boy has the fandom taken him up on that.

to:

* In ShadowOfTheColossus, the only clear part of the plot is that Wander is trying to revive Mono by unsealing Dormin, and Lord Emon wants to stop this. This leaves us with a whole boatload of varying interpretations - for a small sample, is Wander a VillainProtagonist or a [[TheWoobie Woobie]]? Is Dormin displaying DarkIsEvil or DarkIsNotEvil? Is Emon a HeroAntagonist or a KnightTemplar? Indeed, director Fumito Ueda is on the record as wanting each player to form their own story, and boy has the fandom taken him up on that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:VideoGames]]
In ShadowOfTheColossus, the only clear part of the plot is that Wander is trying to revive Mono by unsealing Dormin, and Lord Emon wants to stop this. This leaves us with a whole boatload of varying interpretations - for a small sample, is Wander a VillainProtagonist or a [[TheWoobie Woobie]]? Is Dormin displaying DarkIsEvil or DarkIsNotEvil? Is Emon a HeroAntagonist or a KnightTemplar? Indeed, director Fumito Ueda is on the record as wanting each player to form their own story, and boy has the fandom taken him up on that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''AngelsWithDirtyFaces'' ends with a confident gangster wimpering and begging to live as he dies in the electric chair, even though he had arrogantly ignored the prospect of his death up until that moment. A friend of his had told him to stop the [[EvilIsCool proud and confident]] act so that the kids who knew him would stop viewing him as a role model. Did he take the advice and fake the whole thing to discourage the kids who looked up to the gangster lifestyle, or did he really just lose it?

Added: 170

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[AC:Webcomics]]

to:

[[AC:Webcomics]][[AC:WebComics]]


Added DiffLines:

[[AC:WebOriginal]]
* Invoked in [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v59b0iTRIs4 this episode of Zinnia Jones]], about how different Christians interpret TheBible differently.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A trope is being played. But ''what'' trope, that depends on a premise that we cannot know for sure: Either some vital piece of information is missing, or we are left with contradictiong information and no definite verification about what is correct and what is not. Take for example the page quote above, quoted from a song about an unidentified character. This song could be one of several different tropes, depending on who ''he'' is.

When ''played straight'', the characters probably (but not necessarily) know what they are talking about, but they're not giving the audience all the information needed to know the situation for sure. (Again with the song, teh singer's character surely know who he's talking about, but he sticks to calling him "he" plus various honorifics, never telling th eaudience what kind of character he's really talking about.)

to:

A trope is being played. But ''what'' trope, that depends on a premise that we cannot know for sure: Either some vital piece of information is missing, or we are left with contradictiong contradicting information and no definite verification about what is correct and what is not. Take for example the page quote above, quoted from a song about an unidentified character. This song could be one of several different tropes, depending on who ''he'' is.

When ''played straight'', the characters probably (but not necessarily) know what they are talking about, but they're not giving the audience all the information needed to know the situation for sure. (Again with the song, teh the singer's character surely know who he's talking about, but he sticks to calling him "he" plus various honorifics, never telling th eaudience the audience what kind of character he's really talking about.)




to:

* ''The Lady or the Tiger'', by Frank R. Stockton is an example of MortonsFork where the final decision and its result is never revealed. The tendency of people to bug the author to tell them which was the real ending [[TakeThat prompted its sequel]] ''The Discourager of Hesitancy'' which a group of characters who ask are told that they shall find out the answer one they can answer an equally ambiguously ended story.

Added: 539

Changed: 38

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The art of playing mutually exclusive tropes at the same time, by making the situation itself ambiguous so the viewers/readers can't know for sure what's going on. While this trope can come into play unintentionally, for example as a side effect of FauxSymbolism, it's normally intentionally played by the authors. This can be done to make the story moe interesting in general, as a way of GettingCrapPastTheRadar, or simply to appeal to several audiences at the same time - each of them likely to interpret the situation in whatever way they are most familiar with.

to:

The art of playing mutually exclusive tropes at the same time, by making the situation itself ambiguous so the viewers/readers can't know for sure what's going on. While this trope can come into play unintentionally, for example as a side effect of FauxSymbolism, it's normally intentionally played by the authors. This can be done to make the story moe more interesting in general, as a way of GettingCrapPastTheRadar, or simply to appeal to several audiences at the same time - each of them likely to interpret the situation in whatever way they are most familiar with.



* {{Inception}} ends with an EsotericHappyEnding where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If so, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.

to:

* {{Inception}} ''{{Inception}}'' ends with an EsotericHappyEnding where Cobb is so happy to see his children again that he forgets to check if his totem stops spinning or not. Will it stop spinning shortly after the scene? If so, the ending is HappilyEverAfter. Or will it not? If so, it's kinda a LotusEaterMachine.



* In TheMatrix, Neo have superpowers because he is in a computer simulation. In the sequel, he is revealed to have superpowers in the real world as well. Does this make him a SuperHero kind of TheMessiah? Or does it simply man that the "reality" is actually a computer-generated DreamWithinADream?
* * The 2008 movie ''doubt'' invokes this. You're left never really knowing if the priest is actually guilty of the allegations.

to:

* In TheMatrix, ''TheMatrix'', Neo have superpowers because he is in a computer simulation. In the sequel, he is revealed to have superpowers in the real world as well. Does this make him a SuperHero kind of TheMessiah? Or does it simply man that the "reality" is actually a computer-generated DreamWithinADream?
* * The 2008 movie ''doubt'' ''Doubt'' invokes this. You're left never really knowing if the priest is actually guilty of the allegations.



* Is the main relationship in the novel TheStoryOfO simply CasualKink and PropertyOfLove, or is it DestructiveRomance presented as AbusivelySexy? The novel exists in two versions. These versions have very different endings, casting the rest of the story in very different light. In the most popular version (which most adaptations are built on), the first option might be the most likely. In the alternative version, the second option is far more likely. [[spoiler: That version of the novel ends with the protagonist and her boyfriend agreeing that she should commit suicide... and she does.]]

to:

* Is the main relationship in the novel TheStoryOfO ''TheStoryOfO'' simply CasualKink and PropertyOfLove, or is it DestructiveRomance presented as AbusivelySexy? The novel exists in two versions. These versions have very different endings, casting the rest of the story in very different light. In the most popular version (which most adaptations are built on), the first option might be the most likely. In the alternative version, the second option is far more likely. [[spoiler: That version of the novel ends with the protagonist and her boyfriend agreeing that she should commit suicide... and she does.]]



* The sixth season of BuffyTheVampireSlayer has an episode called "Normal Again", which follows the CuckooNest trope: Buffy is injected with a poison that make her hallucinate... Or is it the other way around? According to a psychiatriest, who may or may not be a real person, she is in fact getting better: She has been sick all along, and now she's finally waking up from years of catatonic schizophrenia. So, the whole series is either ThisIsReality or a mad AllJustADream with a dash of TheSchizophreniaConspiracy. In the end, Buffy choses her live in sunnydale over her life in the mental institution, but the ending leaves it ambiguous whether or not the world she settled for is the real one.
* LawAndOrderSVU loves to leave stuff unresolved for the audience to ponder. Usually it's on the simple level whether the guy is guilty or not (such as in the episode "Doubt"), but sometimes they take it to a much deeper level. The detectives just keep spawning new theories, and none of them either gets verified. For example, the episode "Slaves" features a husband, his wife, and their nanny/girlfriend/SexSlave Elena. They keep the relationship hidden...

to:

* The sixth season of BuffyTheVampireSlayer ''BuffyTheVampireSlayer'' has an episode called "Normal Again", which follows the CuckooNest trope: Buffy is injected with a poison that make her hallucinate... Or is it the other way around? According to a psychiatriest, who may or may not be a real person, she is in fact getting better: She has been sick all along, and now she's finally waking up from years of catatonic schizophrenia. So, the whole series is either ThisIsReality or a mad AllJustADream with a dash of TheSchizophreniaConspiracy. In the end, Buffy choses her live in sunnydale over her life in the mental institution, but the ending leaves it ambiguous whether or not the world she settled for is the real one.
* LawAndOrderSVU ''LawAndOrderSVU'' loves to leave stuff unresolved for the audience to ponder. Usually it's on the simple level whether the guy is guilty or not (such as in the episode "Doubt"), but sometimes they take it to a much deeper level. The detectives just keep spawning new theories, and none of them either gets verified. For example, the episode "Slaves" features a husband, his wife, and their nanny/girlfriend/SexSlave Elena. They keep the relationship hidden...



* {{Blutengel}}'s song Solitary Angel (see page quote) is about a saviour who is "not from heaven sent" - which means it could be a secular force or a spirutal force other then the god of christianity. This character could be a powerful human, since "angel" is a common metaphor for generic benevolence. The character could also be a powerful vampire, since most of the songs from the same band are about vampires and they routinely use "angel" as a euphemism for "vampire" or "lover". And of course, it could also be referring to an angel in the literal religious sense - either one that simply works on it's own accord, or a fallen one. So, what trope or tropes is this?

to:

* {{Blutengel}}'s ''{{Blutengel}}'''s song Solitary Angel (see page quote) is about a saviour who is "not from heaven sent" - which means it could be a secular force or a spirutal spiritual force other then than the god God of christianity.Christianity. This character could be a powerful human, since "angel" is a common metaphor for generic benevolence. The character could also be a powerful vampire, since most of the songs from the same band are about vampires and they routinely use "angel" as a euphemism for "vampire" or "lover". And of course, it could also be referring to an angel in the literal religious sense - either one that simply works on it's own accord, or a fallen one. So, what trope or tropes is this?



* Invoked in Miley Cyrus' song [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7_vtsrk-J8 Who Owns My Heart]]: the protagonist is having a strong emotional reaction. But she doesn't know if it's caused by ThePowerOfLove or by CrowningMusicOfAwesome.

to:

* Invoked in Miley Cyrus' song [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7_vtsrk-J8 Who Owns My Heart]]: the protagonist is having a strong emotional reaction. But she doesn't know if it's caused by ThePowerOfLove or by CrowningMusicOfAwesome.CrowningMusicOfAwesome.

[[AC:Webcomics]]
* ''GunnerkriggCourt'': In an early chapter, Reynardine apparently [[BodySurf attempts to possess Antimony]], which would have killed her. Much later, Coyote insists that trying to kill Annie would have been out of character for Rey, leading many readers to reinterpret the earlier scene as an elaborate attempt on Rey's part to fake his own death and go into hiding, rather than a genuine possession attempt. Tom Siddell has confirmed that he deliberately set up the scene so the fanbase would be divided on the issue.

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The sixth season of BuffyTheVampireSlayer has an episode called "Normal Again", in which Buffy is injected with a poison that make her hallucinate... Or is it the other way around? According to a psychiatriest, who may or may not be a real person, she is in fact getting better: She has been sick all along, and now she's finally waking up from years of catatonic schizophrenia. So, the whole series is either ThisIsReality or a mad AllJustADream with a dash of TheSchizophreniaConspiracy. In the end, Buffy choses her live in sunnydale over her life in the mental institution, but the ending leaves it ambiguous whether or not the world she settled for is the real one.

to:

* The sixth season of BuffyTheVampireSlayer has an episode called "Normal Again", in which follows the CuckooNest trope: Buffy is injected with a poison that make her hallucinate... Or is it the other way around? According to a psychiatriest, who may or may not be a real person, she is in fact getting better: She has been sick all along, and now she's finally waking up from years of catatonic schizophrenia. So, the whole series is either ThisIsReality or a mad AllJustADream with a dash of TheSchizophreniaConspiracy. In the end, Buffy choses her live in sunnydale over her life in the mental institution, but the ending leaves it ambiguous whether or not the world she settled for is the real one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The art of playing mutually exclusive tropes at the same time, by making the situation itself ambiguous so the viewers/readers can't know for sure what's going on. While this trope can come into play unintentionally, for example as a side effect of FauxSymbolism, i's normally intentionally played by the authors. This can be done to make the story moe interesting in general, as a way of GettingCrapPastTheRadar, or simply to appeal to several audiences at the same time - each of them likely to interpret the situation in whatever way they are most familiar with.

to:

The art of playing mutually exclusive tropes at the same time, by making the situation itself ambiguous so the viewers/readers can't know for sure what's going on. While this trope can come into play unintentionally, for example as a side effect of FauxSymbolism, i's it's normally intentionally played by the authors. This can be done to make the story moe interesting in general, as a way of GettingCrapPastTheRadar, or simply to appeal to several audiences at the same time - each of them likely to interpret the situation in whatever way they are most familiar with.

Top