Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheScienceOfDiscworld

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ForWantOfANail: The numerous events that prevent Shakespeare or Darwin from producing their works in alternate Roundworld timelines.
** Hex also mentions how, in 1734, a German shoemaker named Joshua Goddelson left his house by the back door, setting in motion a chain of events that (somehow) leads to commercial fusion power in 2017.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheMonolith: Parodied with the Dean's chalkboard-assisted lesson to the apes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* YearInsideHourOutside: Early in the Project, millions of years pass in Roundworld for every Discworld day. Later, Hex takes control of time's passage within the artificial universe, and can subvert, avert, invert or play this trope straight at will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AsYouKnow: Zigzagged in the fiction portions, in which Ponder uses this phrase when he suspects Ridcully ''doesn't'' know something about physics; this gives him the chance to contrast Discworld physics (which the ''readers'' don't know) with Roundworld rules (which readers ''might'' know, but Ridcully doesn't).

to:

* AsYouKnow: Zigzagged in the fiction portions, in which Ponder uses this phrase out of politeness when he suspects Ridcully ''doesn't'' know something about physics; this gives him the chance to contrast Discworld physics (which the ''readers'' don't know) with Roundworld rules (which readers ''might'' know, but Ridcully doesn't).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AsYouKnow: Zigzagged in the fiction portions, in which Ponder uses this phrase when he suspects Ridcully ''doesn't'' know something about physics; this gives him the chance to contrast Discworld physics (which the ''readers'' don't know) with Roundworld rules (which readers ''might'' know, but Ridcully doesn't).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LiesToChildren: The TropeNamer.

to:

* LiesToChildren: The TropeNamer. In the fiction sections, Ponder describes his thaumic reactor to the other faculty using Lies-To-Wizards, and Hex's reports mainly consist of Lies-To-People.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EarlyBirdCameo: Roundworld itself, as Rincewind and Twoflower briefly travel there in ''TheColourOfMagic''.

to:

* EarlyBirdCameo: Roundworld itself, as Rincewind and Twoflower briefly travel there in ''TheColourOfMagic''.''Discworld/TheColourOfMagic''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''The Science of Discworld''', by TerryPratchett, Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen, is one half {{Discworld}} novel, in which the wizards accidentally create a universe without magic and are fascinated by the way it develops its own rules in the absence of NarrativeCausality, and one half popular science text, as Stewart and Cohen explain how the Roundworld Project (i.e., our universe) actually works.

to:

'''The ''The Science of Discworld''', Discworld'', by TerryPratchett, Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen, is one half {{Discworld}} novel, in which the wizards accidentally create a universe without magic and are fascinated by the way it develops its own rules in the absence of NarrativeCausality, and one half popular science text, as Stewart and Cohen explain how the Roundworld Project (i.e., our universe) actually works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Lies to Children example

Added DiffLines:

* LiesToChildren: The TropeNamer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Noodle Implement example

Added DiffLines:

* NoodleImplements: While preparing for Shakespeare to write ''AMidsummerNightsDream'', the Wizards run into various problems that Ridcully solves via a set of noodle implements. Most of the time the reader can easily figure out what he is going to do with them (The sole exception being related to a folk remedy that is explained in one of the science chapters).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ParodicTableOfTheElements: It's the standard table, except with extra space for narrativium and octium.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhatDidIDoLastNight: Rincewind experiences this in ''The Science of Discworld II'' after the wizards spend the night drinking with WilliamShakespeare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WriterOnBoard: Especially ''Science of Discworld III'' - the Rev. Richard Dawkins anyone?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeLogic: The wizards are unflinchingly convinced that inorganic matter in Roundworld couldn't possibly have become alive, insisting that rocks don't just start moving around on their own. This is an odd presumption on their part, considering that {{Discworld}} trolls ''are'' rocks that just spontaneously started to move around on their own, at least according to [[spoiler: the two versions of]] the dwarfish CreationMyth.
** Yes, but that happened in a universe filled with narrativium. "All Things Strive", Tak wrote, but not on Roundworld, they don't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Complaining. And this is not the point of the books, since it is argued in the second one that the act of story-telling and believing makes humans who we are today.


* BeliefMakesYouStupid: According to ''III'', if Darwin hadn't written ''The Origin of Species'', humanity would never leave the earth before it froze. [[WriterOnBoard Right...]]
** The idea presumably is that if people begin to accept "God did it" as the general answer to any difficult scientific question, they won't be able to innovate as much as they otherwise could. Darwin's case would be an important precedent in all this - not because he doesn't write his book, as someone else would do it in his stead, but because he writes it to support the idea of Intelligent Design.

Added: 350

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InSpiteOfANail: Apparently, if Darwin had become a believer in what we'd now call "intelligent design", RichardDawkins would have been the author of ''The Origin Of Species'', sadly too late to make a difference. Which suggests that there's a historical imperative that Dawkins ''must'' be a Darwinist, ''even if Darwin isn't''.

to:

* InSpiteOfANail: Apparently, if Darwin had become a believer in what we'd now call "intelligent design", RichardDawkins would have been the author of ''The Origin Of Species'', sadly too late to make a difference. Which suggests that there's a historical imperative that Dawkins ''must'' be a Darwinist, ''even if Darwin isn't''.
** The data is there to be found, Darwin or no Darwin, but in this scenario Richard Dawkins is the only person bloody-minded enough to go against an established authority and mine out the inconsistencies of the widely accepted model. It's unlikely that Darwin's theory had anything in itself to do with Dawkins becoming an atheist in the first place.

Added: 402

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BeliefMakesYouStupid: According to ''III'', if Darwin hadn't written ''The Origin of Species'', humanity would never leave the earth before it froze. [[WriterOnBoard Right...]]

to:

* BeliefMakesYouStupid: According to ''III'', if Darwin hadn't written ''The Origin of Species'', humanity would never leave the earth before it froze. [[WriterOnBoard Right...]]]]
** The idea presumably is that if people begin to accept "God did it" as the general answer to any difficult scientific question, they won't be able to innovate as much as they otherwise could. Darwin's case would be an important precedent in all this - not because he doesn't write his book, as someone else would do it in his stead, but because he writes it to support the idea of Intelligent Design.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BeliefMakesYouStupid: According to ''III'', if Darwin hadn't written ''The Origin of Species'', humanity would never leave the earth before it froze. [[WriterOnBoard Right...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Yes, but that happened in a universe filled with narrativium. "All Things Strive", Tak wrote, but not on Roundworld, they don't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InSpiteOfANail: Apparently, if Darwin had become a believer in what we'd now call "intelligent design", RichardDawkins would have been the discoverer of modern evolutionary theory. Suggesting that Dawkins ''must'' be a Darwinist, ''even if Darwin isn't''.

to:

* InSpiteOfANail: Apparently, if Darwin had become a believer in what we'd now call "intelligent design", RichardDawkins would have been the discoverer author of modern evolutionary theory. Suggesting ''The Origin Of Species'', sadly too late to make a difference. Which suggests that there's a historical imperative that Dawkins ''must'' be a Darwinist, ''even if Darwin isn't''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InSpiteOfANail: Apparently, if Darwin had become a believer in what we'd now call "intelligent design", RichardDawkins would have been the discoverer of modern evolutionary theory. Suggesting that Dawkins ''must'' be a Darwinist, ''even if Darwin isn't''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InterruptedSuicide: Rincewind repeatedly puts a fish back into the water, not realizing it's adapting to life on land rather than trying to kill itself.

Added: 263

Changed: 218

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It was followed by two sequels: ''The Science of Discworld II: The Globe'', in which the wizards must stop TheFairFolk preying on the superstitious folk of Elizabethan Roundworld, while Stewart and Cohen talk about the nature of storytelling and belief, and ''The Science of Discworld III: Darwin's Watch'', in which the wizards stop the God of Evolution from seriously confusing Charles Darwin, while Stewart and Cohen discuss his theory in more detail than they had to spare in the first book.

to:

It was followed by two sequels: ''The Science of Discworld II: The Globe'', in which the wizards must stop TheFairFolk preying on the superstitious folk of Elizabethan Roundworld, while Stewart and Cohen talk about the nature of storytelling and belief, and ''The Science of Discworld III: Darwin's Watch'', in which the wizards stop the God of Evolution from seriously confusing Charles Darwin, CharlesDarwin, while Stewart and Cohen discuss his theory in more detail than they had to spare in the first book.



* BeethovenWasAnAlienSpy: {{Shakespeare}} and Darwin, amongst others, are greatly influenced by the wizards.

to:

* AlternateHistory: several in the later books, all of them ending with [[spoiler: humanity failing to invent the SpaceElevator before it's Giant Snowball Time]].
* BeethovenWasAnAlienSpy: {{Shakespeare}} and Darwin, [[CharlesDarwin Darwin]], amongst others, are greatly influenced by the wizards.



* {{Magitek}}: Hex of course, and the Thaumic Engine is the magical equivalent of a nuclear reactor (going back to Pratchett's roots, as he made many similar comparisons in ''Discworld/TheColourOfMagic''.

to:

* {{Magitek}}: Hex of course, and the Thaumic Engine is the magical equivalent of a nuclear reactor (going back to Pratchett's roots, as he made many similar comparisons in ''Discworld/TheColourOfMagic''.''Discworld/TheColourOfMagic'').


Added DiffLines:

*SpaceElevator: One appears in Book One. In the later books, the wizards' goal is the continued existence of a timeline that contains it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FridgeLogic: The wizards are unflinchingly convinced that inorganic matter in Roundworld couldn't possibly have become alive, insisting that rocks don't just start moving around on their own. This is an odd presumption on their part, considering that {{Discworld}} trolls ''are'' rocks that just spontaneously started to move around on their own, at least according to [[spoiler: the two versions of]] the dwarfish CreationMyth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EarlyBirdCameo: Roundworld itself, as Rincewind and Twoflower briefly travel there in ''TheColourOfMagic''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As it is, the first book contains a paragraph speculating about how, if sentient crabs had instead evolved in humans' place, three of them might be writing ''The Science of Dishworld'', about a bowl-shaped world that's carried on the backs of gigantic marine invertebrates.

to:

** As it is, the first book contains a paragraph speculating about how, if sentient crabs had instead evolved on the Earth in humans' place, three of them might be writing ''The Science of Dishworld'', about a bowl-shaped world that's carried on the backs of gigantic marine invertebrates.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** As it is, the first book contains a paragraph speculating about how, if sentient crabs had instead evolved in humans' place, three of them might be writing ''The Science of Dishworld'', about a bowl-shaped world that's carried on the backs of gigantic marine invertebrates.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fridge Logic goes in It Just Bugs Me. Also, while I haven't read the book, those aren't Necro Non Sequiturs in the example.


* FridgeLogic: If it's such a surprise to the wizards that planets are round in our universe, why was it already called "The Roundworld Project"?
*** Because the bubble that the mini-universe is contained inside was also a sphere?
** Also, in the first book, humans successfully flee into space. Then in the second book, the elves muck with the timeline and the humans don't get off. The wizards undo the timeline mucking but discover the humans STILL don't escape, because they need just the right amount of elvish influence...even though they originally escaped with none at all. What?
*** The elves were there in the first timeline, but the wizards don't know it until they go inside Roundworld in the second book.



* NecroNonSequitur: Intentionally; the many deaths of Darwin.
-->'''Ponder Stibbons''': Look at this stuff! "Darwin bitten by poisonous spider ... Darwin savaged by kangaroo ... stung by jellyfish ... eaten by shark ... ''Beagle'' found floating, table laid for a meal, this time in a different ocean, still no one on board ... Darwin struck by lightning ... killed by volcanic activity ... ''Beagle'' sunk by freak wave" ... ''does anyone expect us to believe this for one minute?''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The elves were there in the first timeline, but the wizards don't know it until they go inside Roundworld in the second book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Because the bubble that the mini-universe is contained inside was also a sphere?

Top