Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / DarknessAtNoon

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sidney Kingsley adapted the novel into a Broadway play in 1951 starring Claude Rains, who won a Tony Award for playing Rubashov.

to:

Sidney Kingsley adapted the novel into a Broadway play in 1951 starring Claude Rains, Creator/ClaudeRains, who won a Tony Award for playing Rubashov.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In prison, Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an old friend from Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Party member who has far less memory of life before the Revolution. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.

to:

In prison, Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an a cynical old friend from Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Party member who has far less memory of life before the Revolution.member. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In prison, Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an old friend from Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Party member who has barely any memory of life before the Revolution. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.

to:

In prison, Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an old friend from Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Party member who has barely any far less memory of life before the Revolution. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In prison, Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an old friend from the Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Communist who has barely any memory of life before the Revolution. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.

to:

In prison, Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an old friend from the Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Communist Party member who has barely any memory of life before the Revolution. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The protagonist is Nicholas Salmanovitch Rubashov, a veteran of the Revolution. He was one of the delegates to the first congress of the Party, captured in a photograph that used to hang on many walls. Of the bearded heads numbered in that photograph, only "No. 1" and his belated predecessor still remain in the Party's favor; the rest are being liquidated one by one.

Rubashov had been in jail many times before, and even dreamed of being woken up and arrested in the middle of the night, but he did not dream that it would be the People's Commissariat of the Interior who would be arresting him. In prison, he is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.

to:

The protagonist is Nicholas Salmanovitch Rubashov, a veteran of the Revolution. He was one of the delegates to the first congress of the Party, captured in a photograph that used to hang on many walls. Of the bearded heads numbered in that photograph, only "No. 1" and his belated predecessor still remain in the Party's favor; the rest are being liquidated one by one.

one. Rubashov had been in jail many times before, and even dreamed of being woken up and arrested in the middle of the night, but he did not dream that it would be the People's Commissariat of the Interior who would be arresting him. him.

In prison, he Rubashov is interrogated by two men: Ivanov, an old friend from the Revolutionary days, and Gletkin, a fanatical young Communist who has barely any memory of life before the Revolution. Rubashov is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been renamed, and it needs to be dewicked/moved


* NotSoDifferent: Ivanov tells Rubashov that their positions could easily have been reversed, and Rubashov admits to himself that, because they shared the same philosophy, if he had been interrogating Ivanov he would have brought the same arguments against him. This is one likely reason why Ivanov is also arrested and shot before Rubashov.

to:

* NotSoDifferent: NotSoDifferentRemark: Ivanov tells Rubashov that their positions could easily have been reversed, and Rubashov admits to himself that, because they shared the same philosophy, if he had been interrogating Ivanov he would have brought the same arguments against him. This is one likely reason why Ivanov is also arrested and shot before Rubashov.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* KarmaHoudini: [[TortureTechnician Gletkin]] and [[GreaterScopeVillain Number One]] never recieve any punishment.


Added DiffLines:

* VillainProtagonist: While "villain" may be a stretch, Rubashov is certainly no hero; over the course of the book it's revealed that he sold out various party members to enemy governments because the party wished him to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Sidney Kingsley adapted the novel into a Broadway play in 1951 starring Claude Rains, who won a Tony Award for playing Rubashov.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TortureAlwaysWorks: Gletkin is a firm believer in this, stating "Human beings able to resist any amount of physical pressure do not exist." Ivanov brings up that during the Civil War, Gletkin was captured by the enemy, and they tied a lighted candlewick on to his shaven skull, but he didn't confess. Gletkin counters that this was only because they didn't have enough time to torture him, as he was rescued a few hours later.

to:

* TortureAlwaysWorks: Gletkin is a firm believer in this, stating "Human beings able to resist any amount of physical pressure do not exist." Ivanov brings up that during the Civil War, Gletkin was captured by the enemy, and they tied a lighted candlewick on to his shaven skull, but he didn't confess. Gletkin counters that this was only because they didn't have enough time to torture him, as he was rescued a few hours later. Averted in the case of Rubashov, who confesses under non-violent interrogation without being tortured.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Rubashov had been in jail many times before, and even dreamed of being woken up and arrested in the middle of the night, but he did not dream that it would be the People's Commisariat of the Interior who would be arresting him. In prison, he is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.

to:

Rubashov had been in jail many times before, and even dreamed of being woken up and arrested in the middle of the night, but he did not dream that it would be the People's Commisariat Commissariat of the Interior who would be arresting him. In prison, he is offered the choice of an administrative trial or public trial. This means either die in silence, or confess in a show trial to criminal activities which he did not commit. As he ponders which course of action is more honorable, he reflects on his past life, which he had dedicated to the service of the Party and thinks about the immoral things he has done in the name of a better future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:317:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/darkness_at_noon.jpg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LongList: Rubashov gives Ivanov a list of things that are actually worse since the revolution. The list does nothing to shake Ivanov's dogmatic opinion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UsefulNotes/NaziGermany: Never explicitly called that, but the country is referred to several times throughout the novel. The year 1933 is frequently mentioned in conjunction with it; 1933 was the year Hitler became chancellor.

to:

* UsefulNotes/NaziGermany: Never explicitly called that, but the country is referred to several times throughout the novel. The year 1933 is frequently mentioned in conjunction with it; 1933 was the year Hitler became chancellor.Chancellor. Rubashov goes to Germany in a flashback to excommunicate a party member who isn't using the party's literature but instead substituting his own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UsefulNotes/NaziGermany: Never explicitly called that, but the country is referred to several times throughout the novel. The year 1933 is frequently mentioned in conjunction with it; 1933 was the year Hitler became chancellor.

Added: 242

Changed: 265

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
crosswicking


* WithUsOrAgainstUs: Rubashov recalls having enforced the principle that not to be absolutely with the Party was to be against the Revolution, and realizes he is doomed by that same principle now that the Party has decided to destroy him.

to:

* WithholdingTheirName: No. 402 refuses to give his name when Rubashov asks. [[spoiler: No, we don't know their name, either.]]
* WithUsOrAgainstUs: Rubashov recalls having enforced the principle that not to be absolutely with the Party was to be against the Revolution, and realizes he is doomed by that same principle now that the Party has decided to destroy him.him.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Darkness at Noon'' is a 1940 novel by Arthur Koestler. The story is set in the Soviet Union during JosephStalin's Great Purge in the 1930s. None of this is identified explicitly; the country is only referred as "the Country of the Revolution", the Communist Party as "The Party" and Stalin as "Number One". Koestler, who used to be a Communist, expressed his disillusionment with the movement through the novel. ''Darkness at Noon'' is considered to be one of the most influential anti-Soviet books ever written.

to:

''Darkness at Noon'' is a 1940 novel by Arthur Koestler. The story is set in the Soviet Union during JosephStalin's UsefulNotes/JosephStalin's Great Purge in the 1930s. None of this is identified explicitly; the country is only referred as "the Country of the Revolution", the Communist Party as "The Party" and Stalin as "Number One". Koestler, who used to be a Communist, expressed his disillusionment with the movement through the novel. ''Darkness at Noon'' is considered to be one of the most influential anti-Soviet books ever written.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DoomedMoralVictor: Averted strongly. [[spoiler:Rubashov is not and has never been a hero; he has actually done things just as bad or worse than what is being done to him to others when the party demanded it. He has no code of morality to which he can truly appeal beyond the will of the party, and the party now demands that he die for crimes he didn't commit, so this is what he does. This sets him apart from the officer in the neighboring cell, who belongs to a pre-revolutionary code.]]

to:

* DoomedMoralVictor: Averted {{Averted}} strongly. [[spoiler:Rubashov is not and has never been a hero; he has actually done things just as bad or worse than what is being done to him to others when the party demanded it. He has no code of morality to which he can truly appeal beyond the will of the party, and the party now demands that he die for crimes he didn't commit, so this is what he does. This sets him apart from the officer in the neighboring cell, who belongs to a pre-revolutionary code.]]



* FromACertainPointOfView: From a certain point of view, the charges brought up against Rubashov were true; for instance he did talk about plans of removing Number One by violence, or handing over a strategic territory to an enemy country. But nothing would have ever came of it, because the old generation was too tired, too worn out to actually do anything: "the whole activity of the so-called opposition had been senile chatter". But Rubashov can't explain this to Gletkin. However, when he's accused with something that isn't true from any point of view - committing sabotage in the aluminum trust he led - he manages to convince Gletkin to drop the charge.

to:

* FromACertainPointOfView: From a certain point of view, the charges brought up against Rubashov were true; for instance he did talk about plans of removing Number One by violence, or handing over a strategic territory to an enemy country. But nothing would have ever came of it, because the old generation was too tired, too worn out to actually do anything: "the whole activity of the so-called opposition had been senile chatter". But Rubashov can't explain this to Gletkin. However, when he's accused with of something that isn't true from any point of view - committing sabotage in the aluminum trust he led - he manages to convince Gletkin to drop the charge.



* TortureAlwaysWorks: Gletkin is a firm believer of this, stating "Human beings able to resist any amount of physical pressure do not exist." Ivanov brings up that during the Civil War, Gletkin was captured by the enemy, and they tied a lighted candlewick on to his shaven skull, but he didn't confess. Gletkin counters that this was only because they didn't have enough time to torture him, as he was rescued a few hours later.

to:

* TortureAlwaysWorks: Gletkin is a firm believer of in this, stating "Human beings able to resist any amount of physical pressure do not exist." Ivanov brings up that during the Civil War, Gletkin was captured by the enemy, and they tied a lighted candlewick on to his shaven skull, but he didn't confess. Gletkin counters that this was only because they didn't have enough time to torture him, as he was rescued a few hours later.

Added: 625

Removed: 625

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* AMillionIsAStatistic: Ivanov uses this as an excuse for the ReignOfTerror:
-->"Every year several million people are killed quite pointlessly by epidemics and other natural catastrophes. And we should shrink from sacrificing a few hundred thousand for the most promising experiment in history? Not to mention the legions of those who die of undernourishment and tuberculosis in coal and quicksilver mines, rice-fields and cotton plantations. No one takes any notice of them; nobody asks why or what for; but if here we shoot a few thousand objectively harmful people, the humanitarians all over the world foam at the mouth."


Added DiffLines:

* AMillionIsAStatistic: Ivanov uses this as an excuse for the ReignOfTerror:
-->"Every year several million people are killed quite pointlessly by epidemics and other natural catastrophes. And we should shrink from sacrificing a few hundred thousand for the most promising experiment in history? Not to mention the legions of those who die of undernourishment and tuberculosis in coal and quicksilver mines, rice-fields and cotton plantations. No one takes any notice of them; nobody asks why or what for; but if here we shoot a few thousand objectively harmful people, the humanitarians all over the world foam at the mouth."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FromACertainPointOfView: From a certain point of view, the charges brought up against Rubashov were true; for instance he did talk about plans of removing Number One by violence, or handing over a strategic territory to an enemy country. But nothing would have ever came of it, because the old generation was too tired, too worn out to actually do anything: "the whole activity of the so-called opposition had been senile chatter". But Rubashov can't explain this to Gletkin. When he's accused with something that isn't true from any point of view - committing sabotage in the aluminum trust he led - he manages to convince Gletkin to drop the charge.

to:

* FromACertainPointOfView: From a certain point of view, the charges brought up against Rubashov were true; for instance he did talk about plans of removing Number One by violence, or handing over a strategic territory to an enemy country. But nothing would have ever came of it, because the old generation was too tired, too worn out to actually do anything: "the whole activity of the so-called opposition had been senile chatter". But Rubashov can't explain this to Gletkin. When However, when he's accused with something that isn't true from any point of view - committing sabotage in the aluminum trust he led - he manages to convince Gletkin to drop the charge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FromACertainPointOfView: From a certain point of view, the charges brought up against Rubashov were true; for instance he did talk about plans of removing Number One by violence, or handing over a strategic territory to an enemy country. But nothing would have ever came of it, because the old generation was too tired, too worn out to actually do anything: "the whole activity of the so-called opposition had been senile chatter". But Rubashov can't explain this to Gletkin. When he's accused with something that isn't true from any point of view - committing sabotage in the aluminum trust he led - he manages to convince Gletkin to drop the charge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AsTheGoodBookSays: Wassilij, the porter of the house Rubashov lived in, and a veteran of his regiment in the Civil War keeps a Bible hidden in a hole in his mattress until his daughter finds it and throws it away. He can still quote passages from it by heart. The newspaper account of Rubashov's trial reminds him of the mockery of Jesus by the Roman soldiers.

to:

* AsTheGoodBookSays: Wassilij, the porter of the house Rubashov lived in, and a veteran of his regiment in the Civil War keeps a Bible hidden in a hole in his mattress until his daughter finds it and throws it away. He can still quote passages from it by heart. The newspaper account of Rubashov's trial reminds him of the mockery of Jesus by the Roman soldiers.soldiers - and himself signing a resolution condemning traitors like Rubashov reminds him of Peter denying Jesus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''No. 402:''' Honor is to live and die for one's belief.

to:

-->'''No. 402:''' Honor is to live and die for one's belief.beliefs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DoomedMoralVictor: Averted strongly. [[spoiler:Rubashov is not and has never been a hero; he has actually done things just as bad or worse than what is being done to him to others when the party demanded it. He has no code of morality to which he can truly appeal beyond the will of the party, and the party now demands that he die for crimes he didn't commit, so this is what he does. This sets him apart from the officer in the neighboring cell, who belongs to a pre-revolutionary code.]]
-->'''No. 402:''' Honor is to live and die for one's belief.
-->'''Rubashov:''' Honor is to be useful without vanity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TotalitarianUtilitarian: The philosophy of the revolution in a nutshell. Ivanov at one point notes that countless people die of starvation or disease every year, so he sees no reason why the party should shed any tears over the need to exterminate a few million 'objectively harmful' people if it helps create a better world for those who survive.

to:

* TotalitarianUtilitarian: The philosophy of the revolution in a nutshell. Ivanov at one point notes that countless people die pointlessly and meaninglessly of starvation or disease every year, so he sees no reason why the party should shed any tears over the need to exterminate a few million 'objectively harmful' people if it helps create a better world for those who survive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MotiveDecay: The Revolution as a whole.


Added DiffLines:

* TotalitarianUtilitarian: The philosophy of the revolution in a nutshell. Ivanov at one point notes that countless people die of starvation or disease every year, so he sees no reason why the party should shed any tears over the need to exterminate a few million 'objectively harmful' people if it helps create a better world for those who survive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ThePurge: Rubashov is just the latest victim in a series of purges within the Party.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* StartXToStopX: According to Ivanov, the Party must become a slaughterer, in order to abolish slaughtering, has to sacrifice lambs so that no more lambs may be slaughtered and to whip people with knouts so that they may learn not to let themselves be whipped.

to:

* StartXToStopX: According to Ivanov, the Party must become "become a slaughterer, in order to abolish slaughtering, slaughtering", has to sacrifice "sacrifice lambs so that no more lambs may be slaughtered slaughtered" and to whip "whip people with knouts so that they may learn not to let themselves be whipped.whipped".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* StartXToStopX: According to Ivanov, the Party must become a slaughterer, in order to abolish slaughtering, has to sacrifice lambs so that no more lambs may be slaughtered and to whip people with knouts so that they may learn not to let themselves be whipped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TortureAlwaysWorks: Gletkin is a firm believer of this, stating "Human beings able to resist any amount of physical pressure do not exist." Ivanov mentions that during the Civil War, Gletkin was captured by the enemy, and they tied a lighted candlewick on to his shaven skull, but he didn't confess. Gletkin counters that this was only because they didn't have enough time to torture him, as he was rescued a few hours later.

to:

* TortureAlwaysWorks: Gletkin is a firm believer of this, stating "Human beings able to resist any amount of physical pressure do not exist." Ivanov mentions brings up that during the Civil War, Gletkin was captured by the enemy, and they tied a lighted candlewick on to his shaven skull, but he didn't confess. Gletkin counters that this was only because they didn't have enough time to torture him, as he was rescued a few hours later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EveryScarHasAStory: Gletkin has a scar on his skull from the time he was tortured (see TortureAlwaysWorks).

Top