Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed formatting
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
[---Visit the unabridged version [[AllGravityIsTheSame HERE]].---]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added the usual Laconic redirect.
Added DiffLines:
----
[---Visit the unabridged version [[AllGravityIsTheSame HERE]].---]
[---Visit the unabridged version [[AllGravityIsTheSame HERE]].---]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I don't know what that was about, but that definitely wasn't a laconic description of a trope.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* The entries in the Real Life and Film sections (Star Wars, specifically) need to remember that size is not necessarily indicative of mass. As example, the planet Mustafar, in ''the Revenge of the Sith,'' was a mining planet. Even had it been large, as assumed by the original editor (the Earth is not quite three times the size of Mustafar), any length of time with high tech mining methods could have reduced its mass sharply, as the heavy metals were mined and shipped offworld. Given that it was a small planet, ''situated between two gas giants,'' that may be even more true. As it is, it is more likely that Starkiller base had, like the Deathstar before it, artificial gravity.
to:
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* The entries in the Real Life and Film sections (Star Wars, specifically) need to remember that size is not necessarily indicative of mass. As example, the planet Mustafar, in ''the Revenge of the Sith,'' was a mining planet. Even had it been large, as claimed (and that will be fixed momentarily), any length of time with high tech mining methods could have reduced its mass sharply, as the heavy metals were mined and shipped offworld. Given that it was a small planet, ''situated between two gas giants,'' that may be even more true.
to:
* The entries in the Real Life and Film sections (Star Wars, specifically) need to remember that size is not necessarily indicative of mass. As example, the planet Mustafar, in ''the Revenge of the Sith,'' was a mining planet. Even had it been large, as claimed (and that will be fixed momentarily), assumed by the original editor (the Earth is not quite three times the size of Mustafar), any length of time with high tech mining methods could have reduced its mass sharply, as the heavy metals were mined and shipped offworld. Given that it was a small planet, ''situated between two gas giants,'' that may be even more true. As it is, it is more likely that Starkiller base had, like the Deathstar before it, artificial gravity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Incorrect physics/planetology.
Added DiffLines:
* The entries in the Real Life and Film sections (Star Wars, specifically) need to remember that size is not necessarily indicative of mass. As example, the planet Mustafar, in ''the Revenge of the Sith,'' was a mining planet. Even had it been large, as claimed (and that will be fixed momentarily), any length of time with high tech mining methods could have reduced its mass sharply, as the heavy metals were mined and shipped offworld. Given that it was a small planet, ''situated between two gas giants,'' that may be even more true.
