Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* The film itself is Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision, even if that ''meant'' [[{{Misblamed}} people would give him flack for "ruining Kubrick's vision"]].
to:
* The film itself is Spielberg's Creator/StevenSpielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick Creator/StanleyKubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision, even if that ''meant'' [[{{Misblamed}} people would give him flack for "ruining Kubrick's vision"]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* A subtle moment, but when the robots at the scrapyard realize that humans are coming, one robot is seen carrying another robot that can't walk to safety.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* Joe and David looking out for each other throughout the film, despite their respective programs posing the practical impossibility of them understanding what drives one another.
to:
* Joe and David looking out for each other throughout the film, despite their respective programs posing the practical impossibility of them understanding what drives one another.another.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* The people at the Flesh Fair [[MoralMyopia oddly enough]], David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believable cries of panic move the audience so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
to:
* The people at the Flesh Fair Fair, [[MoralMyopia oddly enough]], when David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believable cries of panic move the audience so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** The fact that Kubrick, the director of ''very cold'' movies would actually create a schmultzy and incredibly happy ending itself is uncharacteristic but still could be considered a heartwarming thing.
to:
** The fact that Kubrick, the director of ''very cold'' movies would actually create a schmultzy schmaltzy and incredibly happy ending itself is uncharacteristic but still could be considered a heartwarming thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The fact that Kubrick, the director of ''very cold'' movies would actually create a schmultzy and incredibly happy ending itself is uncharacteristic but still could be considered a heartwarming thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This troper thought that this moment needed to be on this page
Added DiffLines:
* When Monica activates David's imprinting protocol, he ceases to be just a "supertoy" and is now able to love like a real human being. The real heartwarming part? David calling Monica "mom" for the first time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* The film itself is Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.
to:
* The film itself is Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.vision, even if that ''meant'' [[{{Misblamed}} people would give him flack for "ruining Kubrick's vision"]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* The film itself is Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.
to:
* The film itself is Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.vision.
* Joe and David looking out for each other throughout the film, despite their respective programs posing the practical impossibility of them understanding what drives one another.
* Joe and David looking out for each other throughout the film, despite their respective programs posing the practical impossibility of them understanding what drives one another.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* The film itself if Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.
to:
* The film itself if is Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* The people at the Flesh Fair [[MoralMyopia oddly enough]], David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believable cries of panic move the audience so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
to:
* The people at the Flesh Fair [[MoralMyopia oddly enough]], David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believable cries of panic move the audience so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.riot.
* The film itself if Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.
* The film itself if Spielberg's tribute to his deceased friend. He kept the controversial ending in the movie because that was how Kubrick planned it, and he wanted to keep the movie true to Kubrick's vision.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* The people at the Flesh Fair [[MoralMyopia oddly enough]], David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable cries of panic move the audiance so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
to:
* The people at the Flesh Fair [[MoralMyopia oddly enough]], David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable believable cries of panic move the audiance audience so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* The people at the Flesh Fair oddly enough, David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable cries of panic move the audiance so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
to:
* The people at the Flesh Fair [[MoralMyopia oddly enough, enough]], David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable cries of panic move the audiance so much that they all step up to defend him from Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* The people at the Flesh Fair oddly enough, David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable cries of panic move the audiance so much that they all step up to defend him from the fairs' ''ringmaster'' and riot.
to:
* The people at the Flesh Fair oddly enough, David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable cries of panic move the audiance so much that they all step up to defend him from the fairs' ''ringmaster'' Lord Johnson Johnson and riot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* The people at the Flesh Fair oddly enough, David (not really knowing any better on top of being scared) cries out that he's actually a real boy. His very believeable cries of panic move the audiance so much that they all step up to defend him from the fairs' ''ringmaster'' and riot.
