Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TwoThousandTenTheYearWeMakeContact

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Wouldn't the existence of two suns mess with various animal/plant life cycles that are dependent on a day/night cycle?
** It would, and it was explicitly mentioned by Arthur C. Clarke in his novel.
** Woopsie.
*** When Earth is between the Sun and Jupiter, it is still about 900-1000 times further from Jupiter than Europa is. Assuming Jupiter looks from Europa like the Sun from Earth, its magnitude from Earth would be -12m. That's about 10000 times brighter than Sirius - and about as bright as a half moon. Meaning that the night sky would look like in a moonlit night, except with a very brilliant dot. Farthest from Earth, Jupiter would still be almost half as bright at -11m, and still a very bright dot on the day sky.
*** So, in other words, the night sky as we know it would still exist, just with at least one light source being equivalent to a half-moon being present at all times? Notwithstanding the effects on sea turtles, migratory animals, etc., that doesn't sound quite drastic enough to warrant lovers' being ticked off as Clarke proposed.
*** Even in that case Lucifer would not be visible all the year and would have the same visibility Jupiter had before (and has in RealLife), one part of the year visible all the night, the opposite moment of the year invisible being too close to the Sun, and between visible as evening star or morning star[[note]]To be more exact during more or less part of the night, same as what happens with the Moon[[/note]]. However, besides messing with plants and animals, it would almost be a ''hell'' for (Earth-based) astronomers too, who would have even less dark nights to observe the sky (as if the Moon when it's past quarter and the bad weather were not enough, just ask an astronomer).
*** Fortunately, most Earthbound telescopes are radio, etc. and the serious optical telescopes are in space.
* The movie is deliberately vague about what "the problem in Central America" actually is. Is the USSR trying to supply nuclear missiles to Honduras, like they tried to do with Cuba, or is it something else? Cuba is an island, so it makes sense that the US can establish a naval blockade around it, but Honduras has land borders, so why couldn't the USSR transport whatever it is over land?

Added: 318

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* What was the original plan for HAL? In the original novel the Discovery lacked the fuel for a return trip. If everything had gone according to plan at the end of their mission the 5 astronauts would have all gone into hibernation and leave HAL in charge of the ship until a second vessel was sent to retrieve them. But in 2010 we learn that HAL is pretty much hardwired into the Discovery, with the crew of Lenov having to leave HAL behind to perish in the explosion of Jupiter. So was the plan to maroon HAL out in space the plan all along?

to:

* What was the original plan for HAL? In the original novel the Discovery lacked the fuel for a return trip. If everything had gone according to plan at the end of their mission the 5 astronauts would have all gone into hibernation and leave HAL in charge of the ship until a second vessel was sent to retrieve them. But in 2010 we learn that HAL is pretty much hardwired into the Discovery, with the crew of Lenov Leonov having to leave HAL behind to perish in the explosion of Jupiter. So was the plan to maroon HAL out in space the plan all along?



* In the book HAL never regains the power of speech, though he does have some limited abilities to recognize voice commands from Dr. Chandra. The trouble is that speech synthesis is a much simpler task than speech recognition. It also would have been a priority to reinstate since it would allow HAL to communicate with the crew without them being at a keyboard in emergency situations. Furthermore Clarke was saavy enough in Computer Science (it was one of his pet subjects, next to physics and mathematics) that he should've know this.
* Creating a speech synthesis system is far easier than creating a speech recognition system. However, Chandra wasn't building anything from the ground up, he was repairing an existing system. Perhaps the speech synthesis system was just far more damaged. Also possible he deliberately dragged his feet on fixing synthesis because he wanted to limit access to HAL.

to:

* In the book HAL never regains the power of speech, though he does have some limited abilities to recognize voice commands from Dr. Chandra. The trouble is that speech synthesis is a much simpler task than speech recognition. It also would have been a priority to reinstate since it would allow HAL to communicate with the crew without them being at a keyboard in emergency situations. Furthermore Clarke was saavy savvy enough in Computer Science (it was one of his pet subjects, next to physics and mathematics) that he should've know this.
* ** Creating a speech synthesis system is far easier than creating a speech recognition system. However, Chandra wasn't building anything from the ground up, he was repairing an existing system. Perhaps the speech synthesis system was just far more damaged. Also possible he deliberately dragged his feet on fixing synthesis because he wanted to limit access to HAL.


Added DiffLines:

** It's also possible that HAL's speech synthesizer, rather than being a separate module, is more integral into his "consciousness" system, and therefore couldn't be repaired separately from his other speech-related functions, or required a more holistic approach to reprogramming/repair than fixing an isolated fault.

Added: 1037

Changed: 1047

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Considering what the monoliths managed to do with Bowman, I doubt moving a planetoid somewhere else within the same star system would take much work. Yeah, the MESSENGER mission was a pain in the ass for ''us'', but we've only been sending stuff into space for a few decades. The monoliths are the end result of a culture so advanced they don't even need physical bodies, and there's little they can't do. Hell, they could probably just duplicate and encase Europa completely, allowing no heat to escape, then travel as a whole [[WallOfText into the Earth-Sun L3 point (since it's farthest from Earth, so it would barely perturb our orbit), where they would only need to occasionally stabilize the orbit and protect Europa from any Earth-based spacecraft. Moving Europa away from Io and Ganymede would cause the tidal shifts to stop, which would cause the subsurface volcanic activity to cease, but that hardly matters; the entire reason why the monoliths bothered turning Jupiter into a star in the first place was to allow intelligent life to develop on the surface of Europa, where it could use fire, the basis for all technology. In the books, the monoliths show little restraint in killing off cultures with no chance of developing technology. Also, in 2061 and 3001, it's established that Star!Jupiter would burn out after only a few thousand years, and that the lifeforms on Europa would need to be uplifted to the point of spacefaring before then in order to thrive. I don't know, it just seems like it would be less trouble on the whole whole if they just moved Europa closer to a star that's good for another few billion years.]] I guess we should just chalk it up to RuleOfCool/[[RuleOfDrama Drama]], since it would be pretty sweet if we were suddenly in a binary star system.

to:

*** Considering what the monoliths managed to do with Bowman, I doubt moving a planetoid somewhere else within the same star system would take much work. Yeah, the MESSENGER mission was a pain in the ass for ''us'', but we've only been sending stuff into space for a few decades. The monoliths are the end result of a culture so advanced they don't even need physical bodies, and there's little they can't do. Hell, they could probably just duplicate and encase Europa completely, allowing no heat to escape, then travel as a whole [[WallOfText into the Earth-Sun L3 point (since it's farthest from Earth, so it would barely perturb our orbit), where they would only need to occasionally stabilize the orbit and protect Europa from any Earth-based spacecraft. spacecraft.\\
\\
Moving Europa away from Io and Ganymede would cause the tidal shifts to stop, which would cause the subsurface volcanic activity to cease, but that hardly matters; the entire reason why the monoliths bothered turning Jupiter into a star in the first place was to allow intelligent life to develop on the surface of Europa, where it could use fire, the basis for all technology. technology.\\
\\
In the books, the monoliths show little restraint in killing off cultures with no chance of developing technology. Also, in 2061 and 3001, it's established that Star!Jupiter would burn out after only a few thousand years, and that the lifeforms on Europa would need to be uplifted to the point of spacefaring before then in order to thrive. I don't know, it just seems like it would be less trouble on the whole whole if they just moved Europa closer to a star that's good for another few billion years.]] \\
\\
I guess we should just chalk it up to RuleOfCool/[[RuleOfDrama Drama]], since it would be pretty sweet if we were suddenly in a binary star system.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [=HAL9000=] is supposedly the most advanced computer and AI available to man yet apparently no one checked how it would act when given conflicting directives? This is the kind of thing they teach you about in undergraduate (if not high-school) level computer science. Didn't the supposed genius Chandra think of this? Does HAL Laboratories even employ a QA team that isn't made up of a bunch of stoned monkeys? Any half-way decent test plan would have caught this. HAL should have been programmed to immediately reject any order which causes this kind of conflict.\\

to:

* ** The [=HAL9000=] is supposedly the most advanced computer and AI available to man yet apparently no one checked how it would act when given conflicting directives? This is the kind of thing they teach you about in undergraduate (if not high-school) level computer science. Didn't the supposed genius Chandra think of this? Does HAL Laboratories even employ a QA team that isn't made up of a bunch of stoned monkeys? Any half-way decent test plan would have caught this. HAL should have been programmed to immediately reject any order which causes this kind of conflict.\\
Tabs MOD

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Kill Em All was renamed Everybody Dies Ending due to misuse. Dewicking


*** This is important. HAL didn't go immediately into KillEmAll mode. It started with minor malfunctions that gradually spiraled more and more out of control until the final psychotic breakdown. The butterfly effect in AI, if you will. Also, Arthur C. Clarke was obviously not a computer scientist! His in-universe explanation of how the super-virus humanity used against the Monolith works in 3001 is also something that someone with experience in computer science can probably pick apart with ease.\\

to:

*** This is important. HAL didn't go immediately into KillEmAll mode. It started with minor malfunctions that gradually spiraled more and more out of control until the final psychotic breakdown. The butterfly effect in AI, if you will. Also, Arthur C. Clarke was obviously not a computer scientist! His in-universe explanation of how the super-virus humanity used against the Monolith works in 3001 is also something that someone with experience in computer science can probably pick apart with ease.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


---> '''HAL:''' Well, certainly no one could have been unaware of the very strange stories floating around before we left. Rumors of something being dug up on the moon. I never gave these stories much credence. But particularly in view of some of the other things that have happened I find them difficult to put out of my mind. For instance, the way all our preparations were kept under such tight security. And the melodramatic touch of putting doctors Hunter, Kimball and Kaminski aboard already in hibernation after four months of separate training on their own.

to:

---> ----> '''HAL:''' Well, certainly no one could have been unaware of the very strange stories floating around before we left. Rumors of something being dug up on the moon. I never gave these stories much credence. But particularly in view of some of the other things that have happened I find them difficult to put out of my mind. For instance, the way all our preparations were kept under such tight security. And the melodramatic touch of putting doctors Hunter, Kimball and Kaminski aboard already in hibernation after four months of separate training on their own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He ''did'' regain speech in the book, almost immediately ("Good morning, Dr. Chandra. My name is HAL. I am ready for my first lesson."). But he had a couple of verbal tics and other idiosyncrasies, so it became common practice to check his spoken words against his readouts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Think of this as a case of FailsafeFailure. Worried that AiIsACrapshoot, HAL was designed to be incapable of lying or secrecy. Which is a common sense safety measure for a hyper-intelligent A.I. But, as Chandra observes, HAL was told to lie by Humans who find it easy to lie. Those Humans were likely more accustomed to non-sentient computers that ''were'' capable of securing data and keeping secrets. Being bureaucrats and intelligence personnel, it probably never even occurred to them to ask what HAL's limitations were. They simply assumed that he would function like a normal computer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Creating a speech synthesis system is far easier than creating a speech recognition system. However, Chandra wasn't building anything from the ground up, he was repairing an existing system. Perhaps the speech synthesis system was just far more damaged. Also possible he deliberately dragged his feet on fixing synthesis because he wanted to limit access to HAL.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Dimitri's supposed to be Floyd's former opposite number in the Soviet Union. Hard to write off the chairman of a country's space program as a mere "foreign agent".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the book HAL never regains the power of speech, though he does have some limited abilities to recognize voice commands from Dr. Chandra. The trouble is that speech synthesis is a much simpler task than speech recognition. It also would have been a priority to reinstate since it would allow HAL to communicate with the crew without them being at a keyboard in emergency situations. Furthermore Clarke was saavy enough in Computer Science (it was one of his pet subjects, next to physics and mathematics) that he should've know this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I thought the “good thing” was for the people of Earth, because the USSR and USA were on the brink of nuclear war, and what just happened gave everyone a whopping reality check: there ARE aliens, now EVERYBODY knows it, and the superpower conflict suddenly seemed small.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It is certainly in a sense a failure of QA, but Hal is a very complex system. Considering it seems that once the transmission to Jupiter was detected, they wanted to get out there as fast as possible, and corners were likely cut. Even if something came up in testing, they probably had a limited launch window and it might have been a many year delay if they missed the window. Also, maybe something DID come up in testing, and they believed they patched it. And after all, Hal was actually a redundancy. Hal could carry out the mission without humans, but the humans could carry out the mission without Hal. So a potential Hal malfunction wouldn’t be a show stopper. Hal just went far crazier than they expected. (Though, to be fair, it doesn’t appear this contingency was planned for at all, considering Frank and Dave weren’t explicitly trained on disconnecting Hal. The way they talk about it being tricky to switch to ground control sounds like a complete hack.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So, Dimitri hits up on Floyd to suggest a Soviet-American mission... um... at, well, this looks like the Very Large Array, or similar, but no matter what, how in the world could any sort of foreign agent waltz into such a place?

to:

* So, Dimitri hits up on Floyd to suggest a Soviet-American mission... um... at, well, this looks like the Very Large Array, or similar, but no matter what, how in the world could any sort of foreign agent waltz into such a place? place? It may not be the most secure place in the world, but sheesh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* So, Dimitri hits up on Floyd to suggest a Soviet-American mission... um... at, well, this looks like the Very Large Array, or similar, but no matter what, how in the world could any sort of foreign agent waltz into such a place?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Why is it implied that Lucifer means a permanent end to dark nights? Whenever Earth and Lucifer were on opposite sides of the Sun, or even when it was below the horizon, Earth's nights would be as dark as ever.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because humans have had survival drives wired into their brains by millions of years of natural selection culling the human-ancestors who didn't have enough of one. But the drive to perpetuate its own existence isn't something that an artificial intelligence just acquires out of nowhere; at the very least, it'd need to be ''told'' to behave that way (= Third Law of Robotics). The closest thing to a "survival drive" that HAL had were his orders to see that the mission was completed. If getting switched off and rebooted at a safer time will best serve that purpose, he ''has'' to accept deactivation, same as he'd have to agree to crash the ship into Europa and be destroyed if ''that'' were what his instructions demanded.

to:

** Because humans have had survival drives wired into their brains by millions of years of natural selection culling the human-ancestors who didn't have enough of one. But the drive to perpetuate its own existence isn't something that an artificial intelligence just acquires out of nowhere; at the very least, it'd need to be ''told'' to behave that way (= Third Law of Robotics). The closest thing to a "survival drive" that HAL had were his orders to see that the mission was completed. If getting switched off and rebooted at a safer time will best serve that purpose, he ''has'' to accept deactivation, same as he'd have he has to agree to crash accept a dangerous task that destroys him in the ship into Europa and be destroyed if ''that'' were what his instructions demanded.end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because humans have had survival drives wired into their brains by millions of years of natural selection culling the human-ancestors who didn't have enough of one. But the drive to perpetuate its own existence isn't something that an artificial intelligence just acquires out of nowhere; at the very least, it'd need to be ''told'' to behave that way (= Third Law of Robotics). The closest thing to a "survival drive" that HAL had were his orders to see that the mission was completed. If getting switched off and rebooted at a safer time will best serve that purpose, he ''has'' to accept deactivation, same as he'd have to agree to crash the ship into Europa and be destroyed if ''that'' were what his instructions demanded.

Added: 354

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Not necessarily an increase in mass. More along the lines of reprocessing Jupiter's atmosphere to increase its density by synthesizing higher elements. As the density of the planet increased, it would also shrink in size as the balance between gravity and internal pressure changed; it just had to get dense enough and hot enough for fusion to start.






*** This is important. HAL didn't go immediately into KillEmAll mode. It started with minor malfunctions that gradually spiralled more and more out of control until the final psychotic breakdown. The butterfly effect in AI, if you will. Also, Arthur C. Clarke was obviously not a computer scientist! His in-universe explanation of how the super-virus humanity used against the Monolith works in 3001 is also something that someone with experience in computer science can probably pick apart with ease.\\

to:

*** This is important. HAL didn't go immediately into KillEmAll mode. It started with minor malfunctions that gradually spiralled spiraled more and more out of control until the final psychotic breakdown. The butterfly effect in AI, if you will. Also, Arthur C. Clarke was obviously not a computer scientist! His in-universe explanation of how the super-virus humanity used against the Monolith works in 3001 is also something that someone with experience in computer science can probably pick apart with ease.\\

Changed: 124

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** On this point, consider the effects that the moon has on Earth's gravity already, for example, causing the ocean tides.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Not to mention that we don't even know how much the Monolith Builders have going on. It might be the height of pretension to assume that humanity and the Europans are occupying most of their time. We might be a rather unimportant side project designed to keep some intern busy, and thus the project manager is finding the easiest/least resource intensive solutions to their problems because that's what the budget allows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Still, I agree it's weird that he didn't even try. Of course, [[WordOfGod according to]] [[ArthurCClarke the author,]] each novel is supposed to be in its own continuity that just happens to mostly match up with the other books, so if we apply the same logic to the movies, it explains why Bowman didn't try the override command; maybe there ''was'' no override command in the first movie. (It also explains why the flatscreen displays aboard ''Discovery'' have mysteriously turned into CRT monitors nine years later.)

to:

*** Still, I agree it's weird that he didn't even try. Of course, [[WordOfGod according to]] [[ArthurCClarke [[Creator/ArthurCClarke the author,]] each novel is supposed to be in its own continuity that just happens to mostly match up with the other books, so if we apply the same logic to the movies, it explains why Bowman didn't try the override command; maybe there ''was'' no override command in the first movie. (It also explains why the flatscreen displays aboard ''Discovery'' have mysteriously turned into CRT monitors nine years later.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Is it me or do the final scenes show Jupiter-Lucifer looking brighter from Earth than the Sun looks from Europa? Shouldn't there be a reciprocity in how both suns look to their respective farthest planets?

to:

* Is it me or do the final scenes show Jupiter-Lucifer looking brighter from Earth than the Sun looks from Europa? Shouldn't there be a reciprocity in how both suns look to their respective farthest planets?planets (especially considering that the Sun would still be the larger of the two stars)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Is it me or do the final scenes show the Sun looking dimmer from Europa than Jupiter-Lucifer looks from Earth? Shouldn't there be a reciprocity in how both suns look to their respective orbiting planets?

to:

* Is it me or do the final scenes show the Sun looking dimmer from Europa than Jupiter-Lucifer looking brighter from Earth than the Sun looks from Earth? Europa? Shouldn't there be a reciprocity in how both suns look to their respective orbiting farthest planets?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Is it me or do the final scenes show the Sun looking dimmer from Europa than Jupiter-Lucifer looks from Earth? Shouldn't there be a reciprocity in how both suns look to their respective orbiting planets?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** IIRC, the Monolith started replicating itself out of nothing to increase Jupiter's mass in order to reach an ignition point and turn the planet into a star. This means Jupiter-Lucifer's mass was increased, which would increase it's gravity as well, which spells bad news for earthlings.

to:

*** IIRC, the Monolith started replicating itself out of nothing to increase Jupiter's mass in order to reach an ignition point and turn the planet into a star. This means Jupiter-Lucifer's mass was increased, which would increase it's its gravity as well, which spells bad news for earthlings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** IIRC, the Monolith started replicating itself out of nothing to increase Jupiter's mass in order to reach an ignition point and turn the planet into a star. This means Jupiter-Lucifer's mass was increased, which would increase it's gravity as well, which spells bad news for earthlings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The propulsion system of the ''Discovery'' (as mentioned in the books, but left rather vague in the films save for some production materials) was a so-called "plasma drive", which used a gas-core nuclear reactor that superheated a propellant, kind of like a turbo-charged ion engine; no oxygen necessary. Liquid hydrogen would be more efficient, but also more likely to leach out into space and evaporate over time. In the book, the ship used hydrogen on the initial burn from Earth in booster tanks that were discarded, then used ammonia as fuel for the rest of the mission. In the book of 2001, the target for ''Discovery'' was changed from Jupiter to Saturn (where the monolith broadcast instead), and THAT meant no solo return trip, as the mission couldn't be redesigned for a return from Saturn. In the films, the ship had enough propellant for a minimum-fuel transfer back to Earth over the course of a couple of years (while the initial flight to Jupiter is described as having taken most of a year). And in all cases, it was assumed HAL was well-adjusted enough that he could keep the ship running and watch the hibernating astronauts without a problem for years. Mining hydrogen from the upper atmosphere would be really difficult, as the ship is not at all designed to handle a planetary atmosphere.

to:

** The propulsion system of the ''Discovery'' (as mentioned in the books, but left rather vague in the films save for some production materials) was a so-called "plasma drive", which used a gas-core nuclear reactor that superheated a propellant, kind of like a turbo-charged ion engine; no oxygen necessary. Liquid hydrogen would be more efficient, but also more likely to leach out into space and evaporate over time. In the book, the ship used hydrogen on the initial burn from Earth in booster tanks that were discarded, then used ammonia as fuel for the rest of the mission. In the book of 2001, the target for ''Discovery'' was changed from Jupiter to Saturn (where the monolith broadcast instead), and THAT meant no solo return trip, as the mission couldn't be redesigned for a return from Saturn. In the films, the ship had enough propellant for a minimum-fuel transfer back to Earth over the course of a couple of years (while the initial flight to Jupiter is described as having taken most of a year). And in all cases, it was assumed HAL was well-adjusted enough that he could keep the ship running and watch the hibernating astronauts without a problem for years. Mining hydrogen from the upper atmosphere would be really difficult, as the ship is not at all designed to handle a planetary atmosphere.atmosphere, nor -seemingly- to mine and refine the gas.

Top