Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* Watson published "The Final Problem" in 1893, well over two years after the events described in this book. It's possible that the 'real' Professor Moriarty happened to die during this time, so Watson was able to use his name in the story. Its likely that Moriarty didn't have any relatives or heirs (or at any rate, none who could cause trouble). And Watson, at the end of the book, sympathizes with Holmes' perception of Moriarty as a villain (due to the latter's affair with Holmes' mother), so he probably didn't have too many scruples about using Moriarty's name for a fictitious "Napolean of Crime".
to:
* Watson published "The Final Problem" in 1893, well over two years after the events described in this book. It's possible that the 'real' Professor Moriarty happened to die during this time, so Watson was able to use his name in the story. Its likely that Moriarty didn't have any relatives or heirs (or at any rate, none who could cause trouble). And Watson, at the end of the book, sympathizes with Holmes' perception of Moriarty as a villain (due to the latter's affair with Holmes' mother), so he probably didn't have too many scruples about using Moriarty's name for a fictitious "Napolean "Napoleon of Crime".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Watson published "The Final Problem" in 1893, well over two years after the events described in this book. It's possible that the 'real' Professor Moriarty happened to die during this time, so Watson was able to use his name in the story. Its likely that Moriarty didn't have any relatives or heirs (or at any rate, none who could cause trouble). And Watson, at the end of the book, sympathizes with Holmes' perception of Moriarty as a villain (due to the latter's affair with Holmes' mother), so he probably didn't have too many scruples about using Moriarty's name for a fictitious "Napolean of Crime".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* It's just a FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''perfect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if all ends were neatly tied.
to:
* It's just a FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''perfect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if all ends were neatly tied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
----
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
to:
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
*** "Moriarty" is perhaps not the professor's real name in this version of the story. No doubt Names Have Been Changed To Protect The Innocent, and Moriarty is just the name Watson uses in this record of events (and when he writes up "The Final Problem") to conceal the good professor's identity from any accusations of slander.
to:
*** "Moriarty" is perhaps not the professor's real name in this version of the story. No doubt Names Have Been Changed To Protect The Innocent, names have been changed to protect the innocent, and Moriarty is just the name Watson uses in this record of events (and when he writes up "The Final Problem") to conceal the good professor's identity from any accusations of slander.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
*** "Moriarty" is perhaps not the professor's real name in this version of the story. No doubt Names Have Been Changed To Protect The Innocent, and Moriarty is just the name Watson uses in this record of events (and when he writes up "The Final Problem") to conceal the good professor's identity from any accusations of slander.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
to:
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* It's just a FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if all ends were neatly tied.
to:
* It's just a FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' ''perfect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if all ends were neatly tied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* It's just a FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if it has all ends neatly tied.
to:
* It's just a FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if it has all ends were neatly tied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* It's just a FixerFic. would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And not just anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and suchlike plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if it has all ends neatly tied.
to:
* It's just a FixerFic. would FixFic. Would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And done not just by anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and suchlike variety of plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if it has all ends neatly tied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
to:
* It's just a FixerFic. would it be reasonable to expect making ''prefect'' sense from a FixerSue + PossessionSue fic built around two messages brought by the prevailing political winds? And not just anyone, but an author from the show most famous for [[ExplosiveInstrumentation exploding consoles]] and suchlike plot-driven goof. Seriously, i'd be amazed if it has all ends neatly tied.
