Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation here: Dream kills hope. He gives out Hope by giving people dreams and aspirations, but he can also kill hope by taking them away like he did with serial killers. Presumably, using your opponent as a trump card in "The oldest game" is automatic loss and you admitting that you lost the game. If Lucifer said "I am Morpheus, Lord of Dreams, hope giver and destroyer" Dream's answer would be a smile and "Good game, thanks for playing." as he takes his winnings.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation here: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Dream kills hope. He gives out Hope by giving people dreams and aspirations, but he can also kill hope by taking them away like he did with serial killers. Presumably, using your opponent as a trump card in "The oldest game" is automatic loss and you admitting that you lost the game. If Lucifer said "I am Morpheus, Lord of Dreams, hope giver and destroyer" Dream's answer would be a smile and "Good "No, I am. Good game, thanks for playing." as he takes his winnings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
alternative character interpretation
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation here: Dream kills hope. He gives out Hope by giving people dreams and aspirations, but he can also kill hope by taking them away like he did with serial killers. Presumably, using your opponent as a trump card in "The oldest game" is automatic loss and you admitting that you lost the game. If Lucifer said "I am Morpheus, Lord of Dreams, hope giver and destroyer" Dream's answer would be a smile and "Good game, thanks for playing." as he takes his winnings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Touch nickpicky there. Ethel is saying the amulet kept her alive to be 116 years old, she's just phrasing it in a way that is slightly wrong in a literal sense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Also even if they did notice it, so what? Unless you know what it is it just looks like John has a bit of rather tacky jewellery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 91 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[folder: "This amulet has kept me alive for 116 years." No, it hasn't. It couldn't have.]]
* Ethel tells John the amulet has kept her alive for 116 years, but she couldn't have had it for 116 years. A couple of scenes before she walks out with Dream's tools, Paul recommends ''Vile Bodies'', a book that was published in 1930, to Alex. Assuming that the scenes took place in sequential order with no time skips between them, that ''Vile Bodies'' is still a new book, and that she traded the helm to Choronzon immediately after making her escape, the absolute maximum amount of time that Ethel could have had the amulet in the present is 92 years.
[[/folder]]
* Ethel tells John the amulet has kept her alive for 116 years, but she couldn't have had it for 116 years. A couple of scenes before she walks out with Dream's tools, Paul recommends ''Vile Bodies'', a book that was published in 1930, to Alex. Assuming that the scenes took place in sequential order with no time skips between them, that ''Vile Bodies'' is still a new book, and that she traded the helm to Choronzon immediately after making her escape, the absolute maximum amount of time that Ethel could have had the amulet in the present is 92 years.
[[/folder]]
