Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** it’s left up to the person watching to decide their own HeadCanon, however with the dogs gone Mercedes and Charles most likely either left or they perished.
to:
** it’s left up to It’s ambiguous enough that the person watching to viewer can decide their own HeadCanon, however with the dogs gone Mercedes and Charles most likely either left or they perished.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In this version, Hal doesn't die like in the book and accuses John Thornton at a bar of allowing his dogs to run off, making him lose his fortune. In the original book, Hal drowned along with Charles, Mercedes and his dogs, but what happened with Charles and Mercedes here? There's [[WhatCouldHaveBeen an alternative version of the climax]] had Hal revealing that he lost his dogs and his sister, but in the finished film he doesn't mention neither Mercedes or Charles at the bar scene, so what happened with them?
to:
* In this version, Hal doesn't die like in the book and accuses John Thornton at a bar of allowing his dogs to run off, making him lose his fortune. In the original book, Hal drowned along with Charles, Mercedes and his dogs, but what happened with Charles and Mercedes here? There's [[WhatCouldHaveBeen an alternative version of the climax]] had Hal revealing that he lost his dogs and his sister, but in the finished film he doesn't mention neither Mercedes or Charles at the bar scene, so what happened with them?them?
** it’s left up to the person watching to decide their own HeadCanon, however with the dogs gone Mercedes and Charles most likely either left or they perished.
** it’s left up to the person watching to decide their own HeadCanon, however with the dogs gone Mercedes and Charles most likely either left or they perished.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In this version, Hal doesn't die like in the book and accuses John Thornton at a bar of allowing his dogs to run off, making him lose his fortune. In the original book, Hal drowned along with Charles, Mercedes and his dogs, but what happened with Charles and Mercedes here? I know that [[WhatCouldHaveBeen an alternative version of the climax]] had Hal revealing that he lost his dogs and his sister, but in the finished film he doesn't mention neither Mercedes or Charles at the bar scene, so what happened with them?
to:
* In this version, Hal doesn't die like in the book and accuses John Thornton at a bar of allowing his dogs to run off, making him lose his fortune. In the original book, Hal drowned along with Charles, Mercedes and his dogs, but what happened with Charles and Mercedes here? I know that There's [[WhatCouldHaveBeen an alternative version of the climax]] had Hal revealing that he lost his dogs and his sister, but in the finished film he doesn't mention neither Mercedes or Charles at the bar scene, so what happened with them?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* In this version, Hal doesn't die like in the book and accuses John Thornton at a bar of allowing his dogs to run off, making him lose his fortune. In the original book, Hal drowned along with Charles, Mercedes and his dogs, but what happened with Charles and Mercedes here? I know that [[WhatCouldHaveBeen an alternative version of the climax]] had Hal revealing that he lost his dogs and his sister, but in the finished film he doesn't mention neither Mercedes or Charles at the bar scene, so what happened with them?
