Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,4 (click to see context) from:
* The killer was portrayed as having some cause and not wanting to kill innocent people if he could avoid it. So why kill Gina? She clearly wasn't talking to the police. She had just run away from them
to:
* The killer was portrayed as having some cause and not wanting to kill innocent people if he could avoid it. So why kill Gina? She clearly wasn't talking to the police. She had just run away from
** Witness.
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
to:
** [[spoiler:That's because Galvan provided the money.]]
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
to:
** It's just a cover.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Not sure if Bron|Broen did this similarly, but it's been a while now. My guess is that he's been doing it left and right. As for her, she's just frustrated that Marco had another affair. But hey, you're right that she's a hypocrite in itself.
Changed line(s) 17,20 (click to see context) from:
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
to:
** She is the one our protagonists know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* How did Fausto Galvan know that the stuff he was throwing in Graziella's goon's eyes was some caustic substance? It didn't have a label. Also why did he assume he was going to attack him? All he did was get up from his seat. There was very little indication he'd attack Fausto and besides, you'd have to be very stupid to attack Fausto anyway.
to:
* How did Fausto Galvan know that the stuff he was throwing in Graziella's goon's eyes was some caustic substance? It didn't have a label. Also why did he Fausto assume he the man was going getting up to attack him? All he did was get up from his seat. There was very little indication he'd attack Fausto and besides, you'd have to be very stupid I would even find it surprising that anyone would even try to attack Fausto anyway.
considering the torture he'd likely put you through
Changed line(s) 11,13 (click to see context) from:
* To what degree was Kenneth/David banking on Alma falling in love with him as part of his master plan. He's really kind of a schlub and she would seem out of his league. He kind of looked unsure of himself when he first kissed her. Besides, how did he anticipate Charlotte would seduce Marco?
* The big "Alma's a b---c" argument. Why does Alma insist on leaving Marco and holding him responsible for his sins when she committed a similar crime. At least he didn't drag their kids along to meet his extra-marital lover without the permission of the other one.
* The big "Alma's a b---c" argument. Why does Alma insist on leaving Marco and holding him responsible for his sins when she committed a similar crime. At least he didn't drag their kids along to meet his extra-marital lover without the permission of the other one.
to:
* To what degree was Kenneth/David banking on Alma falling in love with him as part of his master plan. plan? He's really kind of a schlub and she would seem out of his league. He kind of looked unsure of himself when he first kissed her. Besides, how did he anticipate Charlotte would seduce Marco?
* The big "Alma's a b---c" argument. Why does Alma insist on leaving Marco and holding him responsible for his sins when she committed a similarcrime. transgression? At least he didn't drag their kids along to meet his extra-marital lover without the permission of the other one.one.
* Why didn't Marco kill Linder for killing his henchman?
* The big "Alma's a b---c" argument. Why does Alma insist on leaving Marco and holding him responsible for his sins when she committed a similar
* Why didn't Marco kill Linder for killing his henchman?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*Why didn't Frye anticipate that he might be targeted when he already knew that the driver who committed the manslaughter was targeted. Didn't anyone think to move him to a safe house?
*The killer was portrayed as having some cause and not wanting to kill innocent people if he could avoid it. So why kill Gina? She clearly wasn't talking to the police. She had just run away from them
*How did Fausto Galvan know that the stuff he was throwing in Graziella's goon's eyes was some caustic substance? It didn't have a label. Also why did he assume he was going to attack him? All he did was get up from his seat. There was very little indication he'd attack Fausto and besides, you'd have to be very stupid to attack Fausto anyway.
*Why is Eva all of a sudden a priority and how is she Sonia or Marco'? There are plenty of other lost girls who didn't put themselves in a bad situation as Eva intentionally did. She pissed off the cartels by skipping town and then LEFT HER SAFE HAVEN and went back to Mexico? I'm not suggesting she deserved what's coming, but to give a similar scenario: If someone in the witness protection program leaves his new identity behind and faces the people he's hiding from, it's kind of not the witness protection program's problem anymore.
*In "Maria of the Desert" why didn't the cops even try to get the ransom money. Charlotte asked Marco about it and he was basically like "nah, we're straight." Those four people probably had millions upon millions and although no one likes to part with their money, it probably didn't hurt to ask. I imagine people in that situation would give the ransom.
*To what degree was Kenneth/David banking on Alma falling in love with him as part of his master plan. He's really kind of a schlub and she would seem out of his league. He kind of looked unsure of himself when he first kissed her. Besides, how did he anticipate Charlotte would seduce Marco?
*The big "Alma's a b---c" argument. Why does Alma insist on leaving Marco and holding him responsible for his sins when she committed a similar crime. At least he didn't drag their kids along to meet his extra-marital lover without the permission of the other one.
*The killer was portrayed as having some cause and not wanting to kill innocent people if he could avoid it. So why kill Gina? She clearly wasn't talking to the police. She had just run away from them
*How did Fausto Galvan know that the stuff he was throwing in Graziella's goon's eyes was some caustic substance? It didn't have a label. Also why did he assume he was going to attack him? All he did was get up from his seat. There was very little indication he'd attack Fausto and besides, you'd have to be very stupid to attack Fausto anyway.
*Why is Eva all of a sudden a priority and how is she Sonia or Marco'? There are plenty of other lost girls who didn't put themselves in a bad situation as Eva intentionally did. She pissed off the cartels by skipping town and then LEFT HER SAFE HAVEN and went back to Mexico? I'm not suggesting she deserved what's coming, but to give a similar scenario: If someone in the witness protection program leaves his new identity behind and faces the people he's hiding from, it's kind of not the witness protection program's problem anymore.
*In "Maria of the Desert" why didn't the cops even try to get the ransom money. Charlotte asked Marco about it and he was basically like "nah, we're straight." Those four people probably had millions upon millions and although no one likes to part with their money, it probably didn't hurt to ask. I imagine people in that situation would give the ransom.
*To what degree was Kenneth/David banking on Alma falling in love with him as part of his master plan. He's really kind of a schlub and she would seem out of his league. He kind of looked unsure of himself when he first kissed her. Besides, how did he anticipate Charlotte would seduce Marco?
*The big "Alma's a b---c" argument. Why does Alma insist on leaving Marco and holding him responsible for his sins when she committed a similar crime. At least he didn't drag their kids along to meet his extra-marital lover without the permission of the other one.
