Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* If Dumbledore wanted to control Wizarding Britain from behind the scenes, why didn't he put Fudge under the imperius curse?
** Maybe he is one of the permitted opposition to make Dumbledore look better.
** Maybe he is one of the permitted opposition to make Dumbledore look better.
to:
* If Dumbledore wanted to control Wizarding Britain from behind the scenes, why didn't [[StatingTheSimpleSolution he put Fudge under the imperius curse?
Imperius Curse]]?
** Maybe he is one of the permitted opposition to make Dumbledore lookbetter.better? The fact that Fudge becomes his minion by the end complicates things, though.
** Maybe he is one of the permitted opposition to make Dumbledore look
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* If Dumbledore wanted to control Wizarding Britain from behind the scenes, why didn't he put Fudge under the imperius curse?
to:
* If Dumbledore wanted to control Wizarding Britain from behind the scenes, why didn't he put Fudge under the imperius curse?curse?
** Maybe he is one of the permitted opposition to make Dumbledore look better.
** Maybe he is one of the permitted opposition to make Dumbledore look better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* If Dumbledore wanted to control Wizarding Britain from behind the scenes, why didn't he put Fudge under the imperius curse?
