Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* So as everyone knows, Enoch's defeat is the point where The Batter's actions are put in a different light if you didn't revisit a zone after purifying it yet, and I know gameplay-wise we are restricted to continue helping The Batter to advance the story, but narrative-wise, why wouldn't the player (as in the entity we represent) think to stop the Batter at this point? They control his every action and could've easily put an end to his genocidal crusade.
to:
* So as everyone knows, Enoch's defeat is the point where The Batter's actions are put in a different light if you didn't revisit a zone after purifying it yet, and I know gameplay-wise we are restricted to continue helping The Batter to advance the story, but narrative-wise, why wouldn't the player (as in the entity we represent) think to stop the Batter at this point? They control his every action and could've easily put an end to his genocidal crusade.crusade.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* So as everyone knows, Enoch's defeat is the point where The Batter's actions are put in a different light if you didn't revisit a zone after purifying it yet, and I know gameplay-wise we are restricted to continue helping The Batter to advance the story, but narrative-wise, why wouldn't the player (as in the entity we represent) think to stop the Batter at this point? They control his every action and could've easily put an end to his genocidal crusade.
