Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* After Laura is brought to Mordor, the Dark Lord forbids his minions from killing her. Fair enough, he might have a legitimate reason to keep her alive. However, he ends up poisoning her later on. Why did he give the order that she be kept alive if he was going to do that? And if he changed his mind for whatever reason... what exactly made him decide to kill her instead?
to:
* After Laura is brought to Mordor, the Dark Lord forbids his minions from killing her. Fair enough, he might have a legitimate reason to keep her alive. However, he ends up poisoning her later on. Why did he give the order that she be kept alive if he was going to do that? And if he changed his mind for whatever reason... what exactly made him decide to kill her instead?instead?
** It was probably non-lethal poison meant to prolong suffering.
** It was probably non-lethal poison meant to prolong suffering.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** I'm guessing just the rushed writing: the characters see the swords first, then presumably the people holding them, but the author forgot to mention the latter.
to:
** I'm guessing just the rushed writing: the characters see the swords first, then presumably the people holding them, but the author forgot to mention the latter.latter.
* After Laura is brought to Mordor, the Dark Lord forbids his minions from killing her. Fair enough, he might have a legitimate reason to keep her alive. However, he ends up poisoning her later on. Why did he give the order that she be kept alive if he was going to do that? And if he changed his mind for whatever reason... what exactly made him decide to kill her instead?
* After Laura is brought to Mordor, the Dark Lord forbids his minions from killing her. Fair enough, he might have a legitimate reason to keep her alive. However, he ends up poisoning her later on. Why did he give the order that she be kept alive if he was going to do that? And if he changed his mind for whatever reason... what exactly made him decide to kill her instead?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The context - "Legolas was happy for somerising" - leads this troper to believe it's meant to be "[for] some reason".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* What's with the talking swords?
to:
* What's with the talking swords?swords?
** I'm guessing just the rushed writing: the characters see the swords first, then presumably the people holding them, but the author forgot to mention the latter.
** I'm guessing just the rushed writing: the characters see the swords first, then presumably the people holding them, but the author forgot to mention the latter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* What exactly does "somerising" mean?
to:
* What exactly does "somerising" mean?mean?
* Gandalf says to Aragorn, "And then you and the others go help Legolas!". Who are "the others"?
* What's with the talking swords?
* Gandalf says to Aragorn, "And then you and the others go help Legolas!". Who are "the others"?
* What's with the talking swords?
