Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / DragonBallZResurrectionF

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I believe Whis's temporal do-overs are ''not'' TimeTravel, but rather he's literally ''reversing'' time, undoing the entire last five minutes across the entirety of the universe. There's no alternate timeline created when he does a do-over.

to:

** I believe Whis's temporal do-overs are ''not'' TimeTravel, but rather he's literally ''reversing'' reversing time, undoing (and therefore effectively ''erasing'') the entire last five minutes across the entirety of the universe.multiverse. There's no alternate timeline created when he does a do-over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] , meaning he only uses it when a change can be made after they know what they can do so, (Spoilers ahead) does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?

to:

* Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] , meaning he only uses it when a change can be made after they know what they can do so, (Spoilers ahead) does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?WMG?
** I believe Whis's temporal do-overs are ''not'' TimeTravel, but rather he's literally ''reversing'' time, undoing the entire last five minutes across the entirety of the universe. There's no alternate timeline created when he does a do-over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] meaning he only uses it when after they know what to do they make the change. (Spoilers ahead) Does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?

to:

* Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] , meaning he only uses it when a change can be made after they know what to do they make the change. can do so, (Spoilers ahead) Does does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] meaning he only uses it to make the change. (Spoilers ahead) Does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?

to:

* Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] meaning he only uses it when after they know what to do they make the change. (Spoilers ahead) Does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----

to:

--------
*Whis' "temporal do over" paradox question:[[spoiler: when Whis uses the temporal do over ability when Frieza "kamikazes" Earth, I understand the skill is dependent on who he saves gaining some TimeTravellersImmunity]] meaning he only uses it to make the change. (Spoilers ahead) Does everyone who participates in the do-over seamlessly take their former place in time, or is there a TimeBastard situation? Also more specific to Resurrection F, does Frieza carry on in the alternate timeline as the victorious conquerer, but STILL persist in HFIL in the altered timeline of Universe 7 since [[spoiler: Whis is basically an Angel or whatever]]? Or . . . . WMG?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

----

Added: 32

Changed: 40

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----



----



----



----



----



----



----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----




to:

----



** Beerus is a ''God'', it isn't a fancy megalomaniac title, he is legitimately a God of Destruction, the only beings that are stronger than them, are their angels, and Zeno, while, ''eventually'', Frieza might be able to become strong enough to take on Beerus, it's kind of up in the air, mostly due to The Gods and their Angels power levels being mostly unknown.

to:

** Beerus is a ''God'', it isn't a fancy megalomaniac title, he is legitimately a God of Destruction, the only beings that are stronger than them, are their angels, and Zeno, while, ''eventually'', Frieza might be able to become strong enough to take on Beerus, it's kind of up in the air, mostly due to The Gods and their Angels power levels being mostly unknown.unknown.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why is Frieza so afraid of Beerus? This seems like a dumb question, Frieza was told that there were two beings he should never challenge; Beerus and Majin Buu. He was told Goku defeated Buu, and despite that he was convinced he could surpass Buu. So why is he so certain he can't surpass Beerus? There is no indication he knew Beerus was stronger than Majin Buu so this feels like it was just there to pander to Beerus' fans.

to:

* Why is Frieza so afraid of Beerus? This seems like a dumb question, Frieza was told that there were two beings he should never challenge; Beerus and Majin Buu. He was told Goku defeated Buu, and despite that he was convinced he could surpass Buu. So why is he so certain he can't surpass Beerus? There is no indication he knew Beerus was stronger than Majin Buu so this feels like it was just there to pander to Beerus' fans.fans.
** Beerus is a ''God'', it isn't a fancy megalomaniac title, he is legitimately a God of Destruction, the only beings that are stronger than them, are their angels, and Zeno, while, ''eventually'', Frieza might be able to become strong enough to take on Beerus, it's kind of up in the air, mostly due to The Gods and their Angels power levels being mostly unknown.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Actually, in the entire series, the only person Gohan ever kills is Cell, and we all saw how much it took to get him to do that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It may be that Time Travel is a crime listed in the books just in case, but they've never actually found someone doing it. They probably don't even know how time travel works, so they don't know about the alternate time line thing. ''Super'' further states that Future Trunks's time travelling is the only case of time travel that has ever happened in Universe 7 anyway (not counting Whis's "rewinding" ability, which seems distinct from actual time-travel).

to:

** It may be that Time Travel is a crime listed in the books just in case, but they've never actually found someone doing it. They probably don't even know how time travel works, so they don't know about the alternate time line thing. ''Super'' further states that Future Trunks's time travelling is the only case of time travel that has ever happened in Universe 7 anyway (not counting Whis's "rewinding" ability, which seems distinct from actual time-travel).time-travel).

* Why is Frieza so afraid of Beerus? This seems like a dumb question, Frieza was told that there were two beings he should never challenge; Beerus and Majin Buu. He was told Goku defeated Buu, and despite that he was convinced he could surpass Buu. So why is he so certain he can't surpass Beerus? There is no indication he knew Beerus was stronger than Majin Buu so this feels like it was just there to pander to Beerus' fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level than him? It would be kinda hard to arrest the guy who can vaporize you in seconds.

to:

* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level than him? It would be kinda hard to arrest the guy who can vaporize you in seconds.seconds.
** It may be that Time Travel is a crime listed in the books just in case, but they've never actually found someone doing it. They probably don't even know how time travel works, so they don't know about the alternate time line thing. ''Super'' further states that Future Trunks's time travelling is the only case of time travel that has ever happened in Universe 7 anyway (not counting Whis's "rewinding" ability, which seems distinct from actual time-travel).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level than him? It would be kinda hard to arrest the guy if he can vaporize you in seconds.

to:

* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level than him? It would be kinda hard to arrest the guy if he who can vaporize you in seconds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level than him? Wouldn't that be like a city cop trying to take on a powerful terrorist leader?

to:

* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level than him? Wouldn't that It would be like a city cop trying kinda hard to take on a powerful terrorist leader?arrest the guy if he can vaporize you in seconds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level?

to:

* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level?level than him? Wouldn't that be like a city cop trying to take on a powerful terrorist leader?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He's in Hell. He is powerless there and he knows it. The point his face was exposed was just to allow him to see just what he'd be dealing with for an several years and then eternity.

to:

** He's in Hell. He is powerless there and he knows it. The point his face was exposed was just to allow him to see just what he'd be dealing with for an several years and then eternity.eternity.

* Jaco says time-traveling is a felony. There are a few problems with this. 1. How would he know when someone is committing the crime? Does he have a device that can tell him who belongs in his timeline, and who doesn't? He would have to stumble upon their time machine by accident. 2. If someone is indeed altering the past, it would be too late for him to react. His memory would be erased, and a new timeline would be created. 3. What if the culprit has a higher power level?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Gotta agree there, it's also not like Old Kai could do anything to stop Goku and co from just using the Namekian Dragon Balls. Death has become too much of a joke to be played for drama in the DB verse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I think what the original troper's trying to convey is something similar to how guns and bullets are treated in the Dragon Ball universe; no matter how off-guard or not you are, if the character is strong enough then getting shot has no effect and they just bounce off (or in earlier DB cases, give them bruises/put "non-lethal" holes through them). While yes, those instances are more or less PlayedForLaughs, a common ray gun would be nothing more than a scaled version of this to a SSGSS. That being said the similarities between them fall flat when you consider that the characters usually try to dodge or deflect energy attacks consistently throughout the franchise, especially if they are sharp or pointy. Some notable examples that come to mind are when Frieza shot and killed Vegeta with his "Death Beam" and Mercenary Tao using his Dodon Ray in an attempt to kill Goku in DB, which both bear a similarity to the one seen here.

to:

** I think what the original troper's trying to convey is something similar to how guns and bullets are treated in the Dragon Ball universe; no matter how off-guard or not you are, if the character is strong enough then getting shot has no effect and they just bounce off (or in earlier DB cases, give them bruises/put "non-lethal" holes through them). While yes, those instances are more or less PlayedForLaughs, a common ray gun would be nothing more than a scaled version of this to a SSGSS. That being said the similarities between them fall flat when you consider that the characters usually try to dodge or deflect energy attacks consistently throughout the franchise, especially if they are sharp or pointy. Some notable examples that come to mind are when Frieza shot and killed Vegeta with his "Death Beam" and Mercenary Tao using his Dodon Ray in an attempt to kill Goku in DB, both of which both bear a similarity to the one seen here.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I think what the original troper's trying to convey is something similar to how guns and bullets are treated in the Dragon Ball universe; no matter how off-guard or not you are, if the character is strong enough then getting shot has no effect and they just bounce off (or in earlier DB cases, give them bruises/put "non-lethal" holes through them). While yes, those instances are more or less PlayedForLaughs, a common ray gun would be nothing more than an scaled version of this to a SSGSS. That being said the similarities between them fall flat when you consider that the characters usually dodge or deflect energy attacks consistently throughout the franchise, implying they do more damage than any lump of metal could achieve.
* Why all of a sudden both Goku and Vegeta completely reject team work like it was part of their philosophy all along?! I can understand they are rivals and all, but they're seriously saying they'll not going to join forces neither against another enemy who threats the planet and all of their friends?! They completely forgotten they teamed up in Buu Saga exactly for that reason? And besides, they are seriously not going to learn anything after all they went through the fight against Frieza? So, what was the purpouse by making Whis lampshading their flaws in first place?

to:

** I think what the original troper's trying to convey is something similar to how guns and bullets are treated in the Dragon Ball universe; no matter how off-guard or not you are, if the character is strong enough then getting shot has no effect and they just bounce off (or in earlier DB cases, give them bruises/put "non-lethal" holes through them). While yes, those instances are more or less PlayedForLaughs, a common ray gun would be nothing more than an a scaled version of this to a SSGSS. That being said the similarities between them fall flat when you consider that the characters usually try to dodge or deflect energy attacks consistently throughout the franchise, implying especially if they do more damage than any lump of metal could achieve.
are sharp or pointy. Some notable examples that come to mind are when Frieza shot and killed Vegeta with his "Death Beam" and Mercenary Tao using his Dodon Ray in an attempt to kill Goku in DB, which both bear a similarity to the one seen here.
* Why all of a sudden both Goku and Vegeta completely reject team work teamwork like it was part of their philosophy all along?! I can understand they are rivals and all, but they're seriously saying they'll not going to join forces neither against another enemy who threats the planet and all of their friends?! They completely forgotten they teamed up in Buu Saga exactly for that reason? And besides, they are seriously not going to learn anything after all they went through the fight against Frieza? So, what was the purpouse by making Whis lampshading their flaws in first place?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Because someone likely added that line as a VoodooShark to explain why Yamcha was gone when the real reason was Toriyama didn't care or want him there. Yamcha beats Tien significantly in all other polls such as the Buu Saga poll where Tien didn't even rank, its easy to say he's more popular.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If Toriyama 'forgot' about Yamcha that line about Tien leaving Yamcha behind wouldn't be there. Plus, Yamcha only beats Tien by one slot in the popularity poll.

Top