Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Would HAVE, not would of.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* Why didn't Conans dad just, move back or to the side? If the chains were loose enough that he could pull it down on himself, there would of been the option to move.
to:
* Why didn't Conans dad just, move back or to the side? If the chains were loose enough that he could pull it down on himself, there would of have been the option to move.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* Why didn't Conans dad just, move back or to the side? If the chains were loose enough that he could pull it down on himself, there would of been the option to move.
to:
* Why didn't Conans dad just, move back or to the side? If the chains were loose enough that he could pull it down on himself, there would of been the option to move.move.
** Because the chains weren't that loose, every movement was tossing droplets of molten steel on him. The chains were tight enough that he moved at all, he'd get spattered. Moving enough in any direction would have dropped enough on him before he got clear to either cripple him for life or kill him.
** Because the chains weren't that loose, every movement was tossing droplets of molten steel on him. The chains were tight enough that he moved at all, he'd get spattered. Moving enough in any direction would have dropped enough on him before he got clear to either cripple him for life or kill him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Just because it could be broken down doesn't mean it wasn't indestructible; it was made from the bones of kings, it's quite possible it could be reduced down to the separate bits belonging to each king but not any further.
to:
** Just because it could be broken down doesn't mean it wasn't indestructible; it was made from the bones of kings, it's quite possible it could be reduced down to the separate bits belonging to each king but not any further.further.
* Why didn't Conans dad just, move back or to the side? If the chains were loose enough that he could pull it down on himself, there would of been the option to move.
* Why didn't Conans dad just, move back or to the side? If the chains were loose enough that he could pull it down on himself, there would of been the option to move.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Maybe they were afraid if they broke it down even further, it would release the dark powers contained within the mask.
to:
** Maybe they were afraid if they broke it down even further, it would release the dark powers contained within the mask.mask.
**Just because it could be broken down doesn't mean it wasn't indestructible; it was made from the bones of kings, it's quite possible it could be reduced down to the separate bits belonging to each king but not any further.
**Just because it could be broken down doesn't mean it wasn't indestructible; it was made from the bones of kings, it's quite possible it could be reduced down to the separate bits belonging to each king but not any further.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Since the Mask of Acheron is so dangerous, why didn't anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy it, such as by grinding it to powder rather than scattering the pieces and hiding them? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible and it was too dangerous to have whole, so why not destroy it?
to:
* Since the Mask of Acheron is so dangerous, why didn't anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy it, such as by grinding it to powder rather than scattering the pieces and hiding them? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible and it was too dangerous to have whole, so why not destroy it?it?
** Maybe they were afraid if they broke it down even further, it would release the dark powers contained within the mask.
** Maybe they were afraid if they broke it down even further, it would release the dark powers contained within the mask.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Since the Mask of Acheron is so dangerous, why didn't anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy it, such as by grinding it to powder? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible and it was too dangerous to have whole, so why not destroy it?
to:
* Since the Mask of Acheron is so dangerous, why didn't anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy it, such as by grinding it to powder? powder rather than scattering the pieces and hiding them? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible and it was too dangerous to have whole, so why not destroy it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* If the mask is so dangerous, why did anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy The Mask of Acheron, such as by grinding it to powder? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, why not destroy it?
to:
* If Since the mask Mask of Acheron is so dangerous, why did didn't anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy The Mask of Acheron, it, such as by grinding it to powder? powder? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, indestructible and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, whole, so why not destroy it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* If the mask is so dangerous, why did anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy the mask, such as grind it to powder? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, why not destroy it?
to:
* If the mask is so dangerous, why did anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy the mask, The Mask of Acheron, such as grind by grinding it to powder? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, why not destroy it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* If the mask is so dangerous, why did anyone from the barbarian tribes try to destroy the mask? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, why not destroy it?
to:
* If the mask is so dangerous, why did anyone from the barbarian tribes try to completely destroy the mask? mask, such as grind it to powder? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, why not destroy it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* If the mask is so dangerous, why did anyone from the barbarian tribes try to destroy the mask? The fact that it could be broken into pieces meant it wasn't indestructible, and it was too dangerous to have whole. So, why not destroy it?
