Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
*** Could easily be this is we assume that magical rites play by the same rules as in ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'', which would be quite a stunning coincidence but also very appropriate. Botch the ritual, and the entity being petitioned takes offense.
to:
*** Could easily be this is if we assume that magical rites play by the same rules as in ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'', which would be quite a stunning coincidence but also very appropriate. Botch the ritual, and the entity being petitioned takes offense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
*** could also a cuckolding situation. Maybe sex-denying mom said they had sex while drunk (guy thinks he forgot) but she was getting impregnated by the poolboy.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
****could also a cuckolding situation. Maybe sex-denying mom said they had sex while drunk (guy thinks he forgot) but she was getting impregnated by the poolboy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
*** Could easily be this is we assume that magical rites play by the same rules as in ''TheDresdenFiles'', which would be quite a stunning coincidence but also very appropriate. Botch the ritual, and the entity being petitioned takes offense.
to:
*** Could easily be this is we assume that magical rites play by the same rules as in ''TheDresdenFiles'', ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'', which would be quite a stunning coincidence but also very appropriate. Botch the ritual, and the entity being petitioned takes offense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
----
to:
*** Could easily be this is we assume that magical rites play by the same rules as in ''TheDresdenFiles'', which would be quite a stunning coincidence but also very appropriate. Botch the ritual, and the entity being petitioned takes offense.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Yog-Sothoth doesn't eat [[spoiler:Olivia]] because she isn't a virgin, but has no problems eating [[spoiler:''her father'']] who isn't a virgin either. Shouldn't [[spoiler:Hackshaw]] have burned the tentacles and been inedible to the monster, too?
to:
* Yog-Sothoth doesn't eat [[spoiler:Olivia]] because she isn't a virgin, but has no problems eating [[spoiler:''her father'']] who obviously isn't a virgin either. Shouldn't [[spoiler:Hackshaw]] have burned the tentacles and been inedible to the monster, too?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Could be that rather than being eaten, [[spoiler: Hackshaw]] was in fact being dragged off to some kind of FateWorseThanDeath because, as far as Yog-Sothoth is concerned, YouHaveFailedMe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Yog-Sothoth doesn't eat [[spoiler:Olivia]] because she isn't a virgin, but has no problems eating [[spoiler:''her father'']] who isn't a virgin either. Shouldn't [[spoiler:Hackshaw]] have burned the tentacles and been inedible to the monster, too?
----
----
