Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 57 (click to see context) from:
* An unintentional example: when Neo meets the Architect, the former asks: "Why am I here?," to which the Architect explains that Neo is a recurring anomaly in the programming of the Matrix, whose code results in him meeting the Architect every several generations. In other words: the Architect explains ''what'' Neo is and ''how'' they came to meet; but not ''why'' they are meeting. However, because the Architect's SesquipedalianLoquaciousness makes his explanations difficult to follow, their exchange comes off as hilarious:
to:
* An unintentional example: when Neo meets the Architect, the former asks: "Why am I here?," to which the Architect explains that Neo is a recurring anomaly in the programming of the Matrix, whose code results in him meeting the Architect every several generations. In other words: the Architect explains ''what'' Neo is and ''how'' they came to meet; but not ''why'' they are meeting. However, because the Architect's SesquipedalianLoquaciousness makes his explanations difficult to follow, their exchange Neo's response comes off as hilarious:hilarious bewilderment:
Changed line(s) 60 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Neo''': [[DeadpanSnarker "You haven't answered my question."]]
to:
--> '''Neo''': [[DeadpanSnarker [[FlatWhat "You haven't answered my question."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* This exchange between Persephone and the Merovingian.
-->'''Persephone:''' Where are you going?\\
'''Merovingian:''' Please, ma cherie, I have told you. We are all victims of causality. I drank too much wine, I must take a piss.
-->'''Persephone:''' Where are you going?\\
'''Merovingian:''' Please, ma cherie, I have told you. We are all victims of causality. I drank too much wine, I must take a piss.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
* An unintentional example: when Neo meets the Architect, the former asks: "Why am I hear?," to which the Architect explains that Neo is a recurring anomaly in the programming of the Matrix, whose code results in him meeting the Architect every several generations. In other words: the Architect explains ''what'' Neo is and ''how'' they came to meet; but not ''why'' they are meeting. However, because the Architect's SesquipedalianLoquaciousness makes his explanations difficult to follow, their exchange comes off as hilarious:
to:
* An unintentional example: when Neo meets the Architect, the former asks: "Why am I hear?," here?," to which the Architect explains that Neo is a recurring anomaly in the programming of the Matrix, whose code results in him meeting the Architect every several generations. In other words: the Architect explains ''what'' Neo is and ''how'' they came to meet; but not ''why'' they are meeting. However, because the Architect's SesquipedalianLoquaciousness makes his explanations difficult to follow, their exchange comes off as hilarious:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
* An unintentional example: when Neo meets the Architect, the former asks: "Why am I hear?," to which the Architect explains that Neo is a recurring anomaly in the programming of the Matrix, whose code results in him meeting the Architect every several generations. In other words: the Architect explains ''what'' Neo is and ''how'' they came to meet; but not ''why'' they are meeting. However, because the Architect's SesquipedalianLoquacious makes his explanations difficult to follow, their exchange comes off as hilarious:
to:
* An unintentional example: when Neo meets the Architect, the former asks: "Why am I hear?," to which the Architect explains that Neo is a recurring anomaly in the programming of the Matrix, whose code results in him meeting the Architect every several generations. In other words: the Architect explains ''what'' Neo is and ''how'' they came to meet; but not ''why'' they are meeting. However, because the Architect's SesquipedalianLoquacious SesquipedalianLoquaciousness makes his explanations difficult to follow, their exchange comes off as hilarious:
