Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / HarryPotter

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* On Harry's kids names, they follow the same pattern. Their namesakes are parallels and foils to each other and the names are in order of who passed away first as well as their relationship with Harry.
** James Sirius. James was Sirius's best and first friend and Sirius greatly misses him. James is the first name not only because He's Harry's father while Sirius was Harry's godfather, with the exception of when Harry first found out about James's bullying, on the whole, Harry greatly admired him. Whereas for Sirius, Harry spent the majority of the third book fearing or hating him due to believing Sirius was the traitor.
** Albus Severus. Outside of Lily, Albus Dumbledore is the only one who saw how Snape's better nature and Snape worked for Dumbledore for many years. Similar to James, Albus Dumbledore has a past that temporarily made Harry angry and Harry's conversation with Hermione about it directly parallels Harry's conversation with Sirius and Remus after he saw Snape's Worst Memory. Sirius and
Snape are both similar as noted in the foils section. Harry often admired Dumbledore while Harry spent much of his Hogwarts years disliking Snape.
** Lily Luna. Lily is Harry's mother and Unlike the others, Lily is the only one who never became a broken pedestal for Harry. Similar to Snape, Luna was bullied and called a mean nickname. But unlike Snape, Luna never became mean.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Durmstrang puts a lot of emphasis on teaching the Dark Arts, which are used to harm, control, or kill others. It's implied that most witches and wizards from certain countries go to Durmstrang. The result? Entire wizarding communities have been raised on the Dark Arts and are probably a nightmare to live in, even if you embrace the Dark Arts.
** Similarly, when the Death Eaters replaced with DADA with the Dark Arts, they were setting up wizarding Britain to be the same. They also removed the defense part, so they were effectively building an entire generation of {{Glass Cannon}}s. Plus, some essential jobs that require DADA aren't likely to accept the Dark Arts as a replacement (healing, for example). Clearly, the Death Eaters were not considering long-term consequences of short-term success.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some have criticised Dumbledore sending Harry to the Dursleys when there may have been alternatives (as an example, at the point he made those arrangements he had no reason to be aware of the fact that Harry's godfather was an apparent traitor and Sirius could have certainly provided a reasonably secure upbringing). However, looking at Dumbledore's own past, his actions can be taken as him essentially seeing similarities between his own past and Harry's familial background that caused him to make various flawed assumptions. Not only could he have assumed that Harry would become arrogant if he grew up aware of his own prestige based on how Dumbledore himself became arrogant due to his reputation at school, but Dumbledore may have assumed that Petunia would get over her own issues with Lily after her death based on how the death of Ariana shocked Dumbledore out of his own issues with his family. By the time Harry started at Hogwarts, Dumbledore would have been aware that at least his assumptions about the Dursleys were flawed, but he by that point he genuinely had no better alternatives that could guarantee Harry's safety without turning him into a different kind of prisoner, as the familial blood wards were still reasonably reliable whereas securing another residence would have drawn too much attention.

to:

* Some have criticised Dumbledore sending Harry to the Dursleys when there may have been alternatives (as an example, at the point he made those arrangements he had no reason to be aware of the fact that Harry's godfather was an apparent traitor and Sirius could have certainly provided a reasonably secure upbringing). However, looking at Dumbledore's own past, his actions can be taken as him essentially seeing similarities between his own past and Harry's familial background that caused him to make various flawed assumptions. Not only could he have assumed that Harry would become arrogant if he grew up aware of his own prestige based on how Dumbledore himself became arrogant due to his reputation at school, but Dumbledore may have assumed that Petunia would get over her own issues with Lily after her death based on how the death of Ariana shocked Dumbledore out of his own issues with his family. By the time Harry started at Hogwarts, Dumbledore would have been aware that at least his assumptions about the Dursleys were flawed, but he by that point he also would have genuinely had no better alternatives that could guarantee Harry's safety without turning him into a different kind of prisoner, as the familial blood wards were still reasonably reliable whereas securing another residence would have drawn too much attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Some have criticised Dumbledore sending Harry to the Dursleys when there may have been alternatives (as an example, at the point he made those arrangements he had no reason to be aware of the fact that Harry's godfather was an apparent traitor and Sirius could have certainly provided a reasonably secure upbringing). However, looking at Dumbledore's own past, his actions can be taken as him essentially seeing similarities between his own past and Harry's familial background that caused him to make various flawed assumptions. Not only could he have assumed that Harry would become arrogant if he grew up aware of his own prestige based on how Dumbledore himself became arrogant due to his reputation at school, but Dumbledore may have assumed that Petunia would get over her own issues with Lily after her death based on how the death of Ariana shocked Dumbledore out of his own issues with his family. By the time Harry started at Hogwarts, Dumbledore would have been aware that at least his assumptions about the Dursleys were flawed, but he by that point he genuinely had no better alternatives that could guarantee Harry's safety without turning him into a different kind of prisoner, as the familial blood wards were still reasonably reliable whereas securing another residence would have drawn too much attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** These trust issues are reinforced in Book 3, when pretty much ''everyone'' knows the full story behind Sirius Black and his relationship to Harry's parents, and they're determined to keep Harry LockedOutOfTheLoop. Harry eventually finds out on his own when he overhears Fudge talking to Madame Rosmerta, [=McGonagall=] and Flitwick, and he's understandably angry that nobody told him the full truth (or at least, what they thought was the truth). In Book 5, the adults once again are hellbent on keeping Harry in the dark, which only fuels his anger and frustration even more because he ''knows'' they're keeping things from him, and even worse because it's not the first time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's also brilliant writing because the books are told from the point of view of Harry, who is eleven years old at the start. At that age, you have a naive view of the world, and don't realize how people aren't defined by what they are, so of course he would all Slytherins as evil. Part of Harry's character arc is understanding, as Sirius puts it, that "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". People are complicated. Thus it's important for Harry to see that Slytherin can produce a good person like Slughorn, or more complex people like Draco and Snape. It's also important for Harry and the reader to see that Gryffindor (which values bravery), can produce a [[DirtyCoward coward]] that Wormtail, that Hufflepuff (which values kindness), can produce a {{Jerkass}} like Zacharias Smith, and that Ravenclaw (which values intellect) can produce a {{Cloudcuckoolander}} like Luna.

to:

** It's also brilliant writing because the books are told from the point of view of Harry, who is eleven years old at the start. At that age, you have a naive view of the world, and don't realize how people aren't defined by what they are, so of course he would view all Slytherins as evil.evil after everyone tells him how bad they are. Part of Harry's character arc is understanding, as Sirius puts it, that "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". People are complicated. Thus it's important for Harry to see that Slytherin can produce a good person like Slughorn, or more complex people like Draco and Snape. It's also important for Harry and the reader to see that Gryffindor (which values bravery), can produce a [[DirtyCoward coward]] that Wormtail, that Hufflepuff (which values kindness), can produce a {{Jerkass}} like Zacharias Smith, and that Ravenclaw (which values intellect) can produce a {{Cloudcuckoolander}} like Luna.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's also brilliant writing because the books are told from the point of view of Harry, who is eleven years old at the start. At that age, you have a naive view of the world, and don't realize how people aren't defined by what they are, so of course he would all Slytherins as evil. Part of Harry's character arc is understanding, as Sirius puts it, that "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". People are complicated. Thus it's important for Harry to see that Slytherin can produce a good person like Slughorn, or more complex people like Draco and Snape. It's also important for Harry and the reader to see that Gryffindor (which values bravery), can produce a [DirtyCoward coward] that Wormtail, that Hufflepuff (which values kindness), can produce a {{Jerkass}} like Zacharias Smith, and that Ravenclaw (which values intellect) can produce a {{Cloudcuckoolander}} like Luna.

to:

** It's also brilliant writing because the books are told from the point of view of Harry, who is eleven years old at the start. At that age, you have a naive view of the world, and don't realize how people aren't defined by what they are, so of course he would all Slytherins as evil. Part of Harry's character arc is understanding, as Sirius puts it, that "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". People are complicated. Thus it's important for Harry to see that Slytherin can produce a good person like Slughorn, or more complex people like Draco and Snape. It's also important for Harry and the reader to see that Gryffindor (which values bravery), can produce a [DirtyCoward coward] [[DirtyCoward coward]] that Wormtail, that Hufflepuff (which values kindness), can produce a {{Jerkass}} like Zacharias Smith, and that Ravenclaw (which values intellect) can produce a {{Cloudcuckoolander}} like Luna.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's also brilliant writing because the books are told from the point of view of Harry, who is eleven years old at the start. At that age, you have a naive view of the world, and don't realize how people aren't defined by what they are, so of course he would all Slytherins as evil. Part of Harry's character arc is understanding, as Sirius puts it, that "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". People are complicated. Thus it's important for Harry to see that Slytherin can produce a good person like Slughorn, or more complex people like Draco and Snape. It's also important for Harry and the reader to see that Gryffindor (which values bravery), can produce a [DirtyCoward coward] that Wormtail, that Hufflepuff (which values kindness), can produce a {{Jerkass}} like Zacharias Smith, and that Ravenclaw (which values intellect) can produce a {{Cloudcuckoolander}} like Luna.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Umn... He wasn't even eleven at the time, seems far too young to have had his... [[{{Squick}} Uhh]], sexual awakening. Also, how did he know about the cave beforehand instead of like... discovering it, randomly? He and the other orphans were only there for a short vacation, after all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup


* Has anyone else noticed that some of the most important people in Harry's life are redheads? His mother, his best friend and his family (which includes [[HeroesWantRedheads Harry's future wife]]), and even Dumbledore had auburn hair in his youth.

to:

* Has anyone else noticed that some of the most important people in Harry's life are redheads? His mother, his best friend and his family (which includes [[HeroesWantRedheads Harry's future wife]]), wife), and even Dumbledore had auburn hair in his youth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandthePhilosophersStone Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone]]
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheChamberofSecrets Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets]]
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterAndThePrisonerofAzkaban Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban]]
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheGobletofFire Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]]
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheOrderofthePhoenix Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix]]
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheHalfBloodPrince Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince]]
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheDeathlyHallows Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]

to:

* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandthePhilosophersStone ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterandthePhilosophersStone Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone]]
Stone]]''
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheChamberofSecrets ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheChamberofSecrets Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets]]
Secrets]]''
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterAndThePrisonerofAzkaban ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterAndThePrisonerofAzkaban Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban]]
Azkaban]]''
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheGobletofFire ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheGobletofFire Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]]
Fire]]''
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheOrderofthePhoenix ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheOrderofthePhoenix Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix]]
Phoenix]]''
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheHalfBloodPrince ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheHalfBloodPrince Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince]]
Prince]]''
* [[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheDeathlyHallows ''[[Fridge/HarryPotterandtheDeathlyHallows Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]Hallows]]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Fairly minor, but in one game there's a mention of one [[https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Hedley_Fleetwood Hedley Fleetwood]] having a mammoth for a patronus, which as members of the elephant family have tusks. [[StealthPun Now who else]] [[Music/FleetwoodMac share that surname and have an album called]] ''Music/{{Tusk}}''?

to:

* Fairly minor, but in one game there's a mention of one [[https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Hedley_Fleetwood Hedley Fleetwood]] having a mammoth for a patronus, which as members of the elephant family have tusks. [[StealthPun Now who else]] [[Music/FleetwoodMac share that surname and have an album called]] ''Music/{{Tusk}}''?''Music/{{Tusk|1979}}''?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Ravenclaw's emblem is not an eagle, it's a raven. A raven is arguably the most intelligent of birds with reasoning skills rivalling apes. It still fits the idea of intelligence being important, even going so far as recognising intellect in a type of animals not normally associated with it (birds).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**To further that point, it seems like the curse goes out of its way to permanently incapacitate (often years after they left) whoever takes the position, which makes sure they can't come just back later. All DADA teachers we see through the series suffer this fate, with the more competent ones ([[spoiler:Quirrel, Lupin, Moody and Snape]] outright dying, while Lockhart and Umbridge, the 2 bad teachers we see, are still alive, but unable by circumstance to teach [[spoiler:(the former having lost all his memories and still hasn't recovered while the later, per Word of God, is now imprisoned in Askaban after Voldemort's fall)]]

Added: 352

Changed: 451

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* From a [[CombatPragmatist purely pragmatic perspective]] most forms of serious life-or-death wizard duelling don't make a huge amount of sense when one remembers that Avada Kedavra, [[OneHitKill a curse that instantly kills the opponent with no defense or countermeasure barring a last-second dodge]] (or ancient protective magic from a loved one's sacrifice), exists. In a life-or-death situation any moment you're not using the Killing Curse on your opponent is a moment when your opponent could use the Killing Curse on you. So why isn't wizarding combat considerably more lethal with all participants firing off Killing Curses like pistols in an old-timey Wild West fight? Well, it's established (if not outright stated) that one's ability to perform magic is affected by a combination of factors most prominently a) a wizard's innate magical potential, b) how developed (well-exercised, if you would) that potential is and c) the emotional and mental state of the wizard at the time of casting (especially relevant for things like Patronuses). In ''Goblet'' Professor Moody (actually Bary Crouch Jr.) outright states that his entire class could hit him with Killing Curses simultaneously and he'd likely receive no more than a nosebleed, while in ''Phoenix'' Harry tries to use the Cruciatus Curse on Bellatrix he only knocks her off her feet because, according to her (who has no small amount of experience with the Cruciatus Curse), he didn't have the raw ''want'' to cause her pain. From this we can conclude that casting a curse as powerful as the Killing Curse requires a great and well-honed reserve of magical ability ''and'' a high degree of KillingIntent on the part of the caster. With this in mind, it makes sense why Voldemort is considered so terrifying by the rest of the Wizarding World; He has a vast reserve of magical ability from his ancient bloodline [[HybridPower with enough fresh genetics to really bring out his potential]] and an utterly sociopathic and loveless psychology that makes the will to murder come incredibly easily to him - no wonder he's the magical equivalent of a nuke in a game of rock-paper-scissors. This also explains why so few other wizards use the Killing curse; they simply don't have the raw will to kill, [[ThouShaltNotKill least of all Harry Potter.]]

to:

* From a [[CombatPragmatist purely pragmatic perspective]] most forms of serious life-or-death wizard duelling don't make a huge amount of sense when one remembers that Avada Kedavra, [[OneHitKill a curse that instantly kills the opponent with no defense or countermeasure barring a last-second dodge]] (or ancient protective magic from a loved one's sacrifice), exists. In a life-or-death situation any moment you're not using the Killing Curse on your opponent is a moment when your opponent could use the Killing Curse on you. So why isn't wizarding combat considerably more lethal with all participants firing off Killing Curses like pistols in an old-timey Wild West fight? Well, it's established (if not outright stated) that one's ability to perform magic is affected by a combination of factors most prominently a) a wizard's innate magical potential, b) how developed (well-exercised, if you would) that potential is and c) the emotional and mental state of the wizard at the time of casting (especially relevant for things like Patronuses). In ''Goblet'' Professor Moody (actually Bary Barty Crouch Jr.) outright states that his entire class could hit him with Killing Curses simultaneously and he'd likely receive no more than a nosebleed, while in ''Phoenix'' Harry tries to use the Cruciatus Curse on Bellatrix he only knocks her off her feet because, according to her (who has no small amount of experience with the Cruciatus Curse), he didn't have the raw ''want'' to cause her pain. From this we can conclude that casting a curse as powerful as the Killing Curse requires a great and well-honed reserve of magical ability ''and'' a high degree of KillingIntent on the part of the caster. With this in mind, it makes sense why Voldemort is considered so terrifying by the rest of the Wizarding World; He has a vast reserve of magical ability from his ancient bloodline [[HybridPower with enough fresh genetics to really bring out his potential]] and an utterly sociopathic and loveless psychology that makes the will to murder come incredibly easily to him - no wonder he's the magical equivalent of a nuke in a game of rock-paper-scissors. This also explains why so few other wizards use the Killing curse; they simply don't have the raw will to kill, [[ThouShaltNotKill least of all Harry Potter.]]



** More like anyone can be a hero under the right circumstances. Harry might have been a mediocre wizard in the end, but he still ended up becoming the only one who could defeat Voldemort [[SelfFulfillingProphecy entirely due to Voldemort's own actions]].

to:

** More like anyone can be a hero under the right circumstances. Harry might have been a mediocre wizard in the end, but he still ended up becoming the only one who could defeat Voldemort [[SelfFulfillingProphecy entirely due to Voldemort's own Voldemort's]] [[NiceJobFixingItVillain own]] [[HoistByHisOwnPetard actions]].



* Polyjuice Potion. By drinking it, you will become a perfect copy of the original person, even taking over the eye-sight. It can have some horrible consequences, like somebody else posing as you to commit a crime. But, this also means that your privacy is gone. You want to know what a person looks like naked? Drink their potion! Stalkers would love it…

to:

** They’re the only ones besides [[spoiler:all Horcuxes of Tom Riddle and Voldemort himself]] who know that it was him. Everyone else thinks it’s Morfin, Voldy’s uncle.
* Polyjuice Potion. By drinking it, you will become a perfect copy of the original person, even taking over on the eye-sight.eyesight. It can have some horrible consequences, like somebody else posing as you to commit a crime. But, this also means that your privacy is gone. You want to know what a person looks like naked? Drink their potion! Stalkers would love it…
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** And the one who greeted death like an old friend was the one who had the invisibility cloak, which Harry also has for years.

to:

** And the one who greeted death like an old friend was the one who had the invisibility cloak, which Harry also has for years. And considering Harry is the direct descendant of that brother in particular, you can say ItRunsInTheFamily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** What if it was the other way around? What if McGonagall had no desire to force the Slytherin teens to fight their own parents or close relatives but suspected or ''knew'' Voldemort would have no such hesitation the other way around?

to:

** What if it was the other way around? What if McGonagall [=McGonagall=] had no desire to force the Slytherin teens to fight their own parents or close relatives but suspected or ''knew'' Voldemort would have no such hesitation the other way around?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** More like anyone can be a hero under the right circumstances. Harry might have been a mediocre wizard in the end, but he still ended up becoming the only one who could defeat Voldemort [[SelfFullingProphecy entirely due to Voldemort's own actions]].

to:

** More like anyone can be a hero under the right circumstances. Harry might have been a mediocre wizard in the end, but he still ended up becoming the only one who could defeat Voldemort [[SelfFullingProphecy [[SelfFulfillingProphecy entirely due to Voldemort's own actions]].

Top