Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / TheTalentedMrRipley

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationalHeroism: Tom Ripley commits two of the same murders as he does in the book, but he is presented as much more emotional and caring, with his [[TheSociopath sociopathy]] significantly toned down. As a particular example, Ripley in the books is introduced pretending to be an official with the electric company/other creditor organizations, and calls random people up to pressure them about (nonexistent) bills, partly so he can support himself on their money and [[ForTheEvulz partly for his own amusement]]. In contrast, Ripley in the film works as a waiter and engages in relatively innocent deceptions in which he lies about his background. He also benefits from the fact that Dickie, his first victim, gets a considerable dose of AdaptationalVillainy, going from an UpperClassTwit in the book to a caddish borderline sociopath in the film. Also, in this movie his murder of Dickie comes in a fit of rage, while in the book he plans it out in advance. On the other hand, [[spoiler:Tom also murders Peter Smith-Kingsley, who survived the novel]].

to:

* AdaptationalHeroism: Tom Ripley commits two of the same murders as he does in the book, but he is presented as much more emotional and caring, with his [[TheSociopath sociopathy]] significantly toned down. As a particular example, Ripley in the books is introduced pretending to be an official with the electric company/other creditor organizations, and calls random people up to pressure them about (nonexistent) bills, partly so he can support himself on their money and [[ForTheEvulz partly for his own amusement]]. In contrast, Ripley in the film works as a waiter and engages in relatively innocent deceptions in which he lies about his background. He also benefits from the fact that Dickie, his first victim, gets a considerable dose of AdaptationalVillainy, going from an UpperClassTwit in the book to a caddish borderline sociopath in the film. Also, in this movie his murder of Dickie comes in a fit of rage, while in the book he plans it out in advance. On the other hand, [[spoiler:Tom also murders Peter Smith-Kingsley, who survived the novel]].novel, when their relationship threatens his facade]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAce: The cruel irony of the film is that Tom really ''is'' a very talented guy. He's intelligent, charismatic and driven, and (as Phillip proves) perfectly capable of finding someone who loves him for himself. Unfortunately his low self-esteem, stemming from class insecurity and internalised homophobia, prevent him from realising this until it's too late.

to:

* BrokenAce: The cruel irony of the film is that Tom really ''is'' a very talented guy. He's intelligent, charismatic and driven, and (as Phillip proves) perfectly capable of finding someone who loves him for himself. He could have easily maintained a genuine friendship with Dickie that let him into the world he wanted to be a part of. Unfortunately his low self-esteem, stemming from class insecurity and internalised homophobia, prevent him from realising this until it's too late.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationInducedPlotHole: The scene where Marge confronts Tom about [[spoiler: him having Dickie's rings]] plays out differently than in the novel, and leaves a dangling thread that the book ties up. [[spoiler: In the novel, Marge is saved from being murdered by Tom when she concludes that Dickie must have actually committed suicide if he gave away his rings, and her suspicions of Tom are assuaged. In the film, she has no such revelation, tells Tom to his face that she knows he's lying, and is only saved by the timely arrival of Peter Smith-Kingsley. She goes on believing (correctly, one might add) that Tom killed Dickie for the rest of the movie, whereas the book's Ripley truly gets away scot-free with no one the wiser]].

to:

* AdaptationInducedPlotHole: AdaptationalExplanationExtrication: The scene where Marge confronts Tom about [[spoiler: him having Dickie's rings]] plays out differently than in the novel, and leaves a dangling thread that the book ties up. [[spoiler: In the novel, Marge is saved from being murdered by Tom when she concludes that Dickie must have actually committed suicide if he gave away his rings, and her suspicions of Tom are assuaged. In the film, she has no such revelation, tells Tom to his face that she knows he's lying, and is only saved by the timely arrival of Peter Smith-Kingsley. She goes on believing (correctly, one might add) that Tom killed Dickie for the rest of the movie, whereas the book's book Ripley truly gets away scot-free with no one the wiser]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Creator/CateBlanchett appears as Meredith, a society lady that Tom strikes up a casual friendship with before he goes to Europe. Compare this film to ''Film/PurpleNoon'', a 1960 French adaptation of the same book, with Creator/AlainDelon as Tom Ripley.

to:

Creator/CateBlanchett appears as Meredith, a society lady that Tom strikes up a casual friendship with before he goes to Europe. Compare this film to ''Film/PurpleNoon'', a 1960 French adaptation of the same book, with Creator/AlainDelon as Tom Ripley.
Ripley. Also compare it to ''{{Series/Ripley}}'', a 2024 adaptation starring {{Creator/Andrew Scott}} as Tom Ripley, Johnny Flynn as Dickie Greenleaf and {{Creator/Dakota Fanning}} as Marge Sherwood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationalSympathy: Ripley was something of an AntiVillain in the books, but he was still quite callous and sociopathic. Here he's portrayed as a rather tragic figure tormented by guilt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*{{Affably Evil}}: Tom is this, provided you don't cross him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* KilledOffScreen: Peter gets strangled to death by Tom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OnceMoreWithClarity: The opening credits roll over a scene of Tom alone in a room, sitting on a bed and looking distant and haunted. [[spoiler:The film ends on the same scene, in which we now know he's just murdered Peter, the only person who ever really cared about the real Tom Ripley, in order to preserve his web of deception.]]

Top