Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / ReeferMadness

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed to Sexy Sweater Girl. Removing any entries that is just "Girl wears a sweater" with no indication/explicit mention that they are attractive, hot, or any further context.


* SweaterGirl: One scene shows Mary waiting for Bill at the tennis court in a tight sweater and shorts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SlidingScaleOfShinyVersusGritty: ''Very much'' on the shiny side, especially considering the producers' intent. The aforementioned nicest drug hangout in cinematic history and new car and all the young drug users are well- (and one would presume by 1936 standards fashionably-) dressed.
* SmokingIsCool: Averted. This was one of the first attempts (if not ''the'' first) at making smoking look ''uncool'', and viewers might have a hard time believing they didn't set the studio on fire... Using "joints" which look ''exactly'' like factory-produced cigarettes is a contributing factor. On the other hand, it's notable that the two leads, Bill and Mary, are depicted as ''incredibly'' square even for 1930s standards -- "Gooooosh, ''hot chocolate!'' -- and yet are implied to smoke (regular tobacco) even before they get introduced to pot.

to:

* SlidingScaleOfShinyVersusGritty: ''Very much'' on the shiny side, especially considering the producers' intent. The aforementioned nicest drug hangout in cinematic history and new car car, and all the young drug users are well- (and one would presume by 1936 standards fashionably-) dressed.
well-dressed.
* SmokingIsCool: Averted. This was one of the first attempts (if not ''the'' first) at making smoking look ''uncool'', and viewers might have a hard time believing they didn't set the studio on fire... Using "joints" which look ''exactly'' like factory-produced cigarettes is a contributing factor. On the other hand, it's notable that the two leads, Bill and Mary, are depicted as ''incredibly'' square even for 1930s standards -- "Gooooosh, ''hot chocolate!'' chocolate!''" -- and yet are implied to smoke (regular tobacco) even before they get introduced to pot.



* TotallyRadical: Aside from the constant uses of alternate names for the drug, the poster in the page image calls "marihuana" a sweet "pill", dated slang for even 1936 for a good time.

to:

* TotallyRadical: Aside from the constant uses of alternate names for the drug, the poster in the page image calls "marihuana" a sweet "pill", dated slang for slang, even 1936 for 1936, for a good time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Originally called ''Tell Your Children'', this anti-[[AntiquatedLinguistics marihuana]] film from [[TheGreatDepression 1936]], was directed by Louis Gasnier and originally financed by a [[MoralGuardians concerned church group]] and intended for parents, but was picked up by producer Dwain Esper who recut it as an ExploitationFilm. Today, it's in the public domain and considered SoBadItsGood, and has even inspired [[Film/ReeferMadnessTheMusical a 1998 musical satire which itself was adapted into a well-received TV special]].

to:

Originally called ''Tell Your Children'', this anti-[[AntiquatedLinguistics marihuana]] film from [[TheGreatDepression 1936]], 1936]] was directed by Louis Gasnier Gasnier, and originally financed by a [[MoralGuardians concerned church group]] and intended for parents, but was picked up by producer Dwain Esper Esper, who recut it as an ExploitationFilm. Today, it's in the public domain and considered SoBadItsGood, and has even inspired [[Film/ReeferMadnessTheMusical a 1998 musical satire satire, which itself was adapted into a well-received TV special]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As the film is in the public domain in the United States, freely witness the frightful toll of the new drug menace which is sweeping America [[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 on the Internet Archive]]. Don't do drugs, kids!

to:

As the film is in the public domain in the United States, freely witness the frightful toll of the new drug menace which is sweeping America [[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 on the Internet Archive]]. [[DrugsAreBad Don't do drugs, kids!kids!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Witness the frightful toll of the new drug menace which is sweeping America [[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 online.]] Don't do drugs, kids!

to:

Witness As the film is in the public domain in the United States, freely witness the frightful toll of the new drug menace which is sweeping America [[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 online.]] on the Internet Archive]]. Don't do drugs, kids!
kids!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* CourtroomAntic: A downplayed example; the prosecutor asks witness Dr. Carroll leading questions about Bill, which Carroll answers by affirming his suspicions of the boy's drug use. The judge warns Carroll that he's on the stand solely as a character witness and not to try to presume what has transpired. The prosecutor's very next inquiry is another leading question about Bill's drug use, and Carroll (being the SingleIssueWonk he is) readily answers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not what an Invoked Trope is. The character was not missing the moral point on purpose. It's just badly written.


* LostAesop: Invoked, for cripes sake! The lead jurist won't accept one juror's "reasonable doubt" argument, but then he envisions a hanging noose, reminding him that a man's life [[{{Pun}} hangs]] in the balance. He then proceeds to '''deliberately ignore his own epiphany''' and continues bullying the jury with his viewpoint.

to:

* LostAesop: Invoked, for cripes sake! The lead jurist won't accept one juror's "reasonable doubt" argument, but then he envisions a hanging noose, reminding him that a man's life [[{{Pun}} hangs]] in the balance. He then proceeds to '''deliberately ignore his own epiphany''' and continues bullying the jury with his viewpoint.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
In Universe Examples only means it can't refer to the work as a whole, unless the work were to recommend that course of action itself.


* WatchItStoned: The movie might be just a teensy bit counterproductive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed up some stuff


* TheAggressiveDrugDealer: Jack won't hesitate to sell pot to whomever he can set his sights on. Blanch also qualifies, even if she's not an actual dealer; at one point, she uses ReversePsychology to goad Bill into trying a joint.

to:

* TheAggressiveDrugDealer: Jack won't hesitate to sell pot to whomever he can set his sights on. Blanch Blanche also qualifies, even if she's not an actual dealer; at one point, she uses ReversePsychology to goad Bill into trying a joint.



* AxCrazy: When going over the government files on "marahuana," they talk about a teenager who became addicted to the drug and killed his family with an ax for some reason. It might have been an allusion to an actual person who was believed to have murdered his family while stoned (he was schizophrenic).

to:

* AxCrazy: When going over the government files on "marahuana," "marihuana," they talk about a teenager who became addicted to the drug and killed his family with an ax for some reason. It might have been an allusion to an actual person who was believed to have murdered his family while stoned (he was schizophrenic).



* BreakingTheFourthWall / TheFourthWallWillNotProtectYou: At the end, the principal says that this could happen to anyone's children, like yours, or yours, or ''[[SeanConneryIsAboutToShootYou yours]]'' (repeating the OpeningCrawl; as such, it also counts as an example of {{Bookends}}).

to:

* BreakingTheFourthWall / TheFourthWallWillNotProtectYou: BreakingTheFourthWall[=/=]TheFourthWallWillNotProtectYou: At the end, the principal says that this could happen to anyone's children, like yours, or yours, or ''[[SeanConneryIsAboutToShootYou yours]]'' (repeating the OpeningCrawl; as such, it also counts as an example of {{Bookends}}).



* EpicFail: This movie's message is that [[DrugsAreBad Drugs Are Bad]]. It is ''impossible'' to take it seriously because of how over-the-top it is.

to:

* EpicFail: This movie's message is that [[DrugsAreBad Drugs Are Bad]].DrugsAreBad. It is ''impossible'' to take it seriously because of how over-the-top it is.



* FunctionalGenreSavvy / SingleIssueWonk: While he does prove to be correct, Dr. Carroll never even considers the possibility that Bill's aberrant behavior might be the result of any problem other than marijuana use.

to:

* FunctionalGenreSavvy / SingleIssueWonk: FunctionalGenreSavvy[=/=]SingleIssueWonk: While he does prove to be correct, Dr. Carroll never even considers the possibility that Bill's aberrant behavior might be the result of any problem other than marijuana marihuana use.



* StonerFlick: Ironically. Many people first hear about it first from someone who's watched it stoned.

to:

* StonerFlick: Ironically. Many people first hear about it first from someone who's watched it stoned.

Changed: 235

Removed: 434

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not seeing what punishment she got isn't the same as her not getting one, since we know the cops caught her.


* KarmaHoudini:
** Jimmy runs a man over with his car while stoned and gets away clean. Odd for a 1930s movie (since UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode had a rule about bad people not being able to get away with committing crimes) and especially odd for this movie.
** Although we see Mae being grilled by the cops, we never hear what punishment is eventually dished out to her (possibly because of her [[EvenEvilHasStandards attitude toward underage clients]]).

to:

* KarmaHoudini:
**
KarmaHoudini: Jimmy runs a man over with his car while stoned and gets away clean. Odd for a 1930s movie (since UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode had a rule about bad people not being able to get away with committing crimes) and especially odd for this movie.
** Although we see Mae being grilled by the cops, we never hear what punishment is eventually dished out to her (possibly because of her [[EvenEvilHasStandards attitude toward underage clients]]).
movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CelebrityResemblance: In the ''Podcast/RiffTrax'' commentary, the soda shop piano player is compared to [[Series/{{Seinfeld}} Kramer]] and the Creator/MarxBrothers while Dr. Caroll is compared to [[{{Series/Alf}} Willie Tanner]] and TheJudge is compared to Dick Cheney.

to:

* CelebrityResemblance: In the ''Podcast/RiffTrax'' commentary, the soda shop piano player is compared to [[Series/{{Seinfeld}} Kramer]] and the Creator/MarxBrothers while Dr. Caroll is compared to [[{{Series/Alf}} Willie Tanner]] and TheJudge The Judge is compared to Dick Cheney.

Added: 197

Removed: 192

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheJudge: Of the gruff older white man sort, who, coincidentally, is played by the same actor who appeared as a judge in Film/TheThreeStooges' ''Disorder in the Court'' later that same year.


Added DiffLines:

* SternOldJudge: Of the gruff older white man sort, who, coincidentally, is played by the same actor who appeared as a judge in Film/TheThreeStooges' ''Disorder in the Court'' later that same year.

Top