Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / Lucy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CreatorCameo: Luc Besson appears as a doctor in the Paris hospital, and is later among those shot by Mr Jang's gang.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MoralityChain: Lucy keeps Del Rio around, even though he himself acknowledges his own uselessness, because it helps keep her focused on helping people.

to:

* MoralityChain: Lucy keeps Del Rio around, even though he himself acknowledges his own uselessness, uselessness because it helps keep her focused on helping people.

Added: 343

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ActorAllusion:
** Director allusion - when Lucy is in Times Square, a poster for Luc Besson's ''Film/TheFamily'' can be seen.
** Another one. Luc Besson wrote the film ''Three Days To Kill'' - which featured an uncredited woman being tattooed. The same woman appears here as a tattoo artist, sporting a tattoo of the Mexican Lady of Guadalupe.



* ArtisticLicenseBiology: Liberties taken with brain usage, primarily. Drug induced superpowers as well, technically, but that's a gimme.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseBiology: Liberties taken with brain usage, primarily. Drug induced superpowers as well, technically, but that's a gimme.given.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SignatureLine: "What if we used 100% of the brain?" said by an exta during Norman's lecture is the most well-remembered quote from the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->''Life was given to us a billion years ago. [[TakeThatAudience What have we done with it?]]''

to:

-->''Life ->''Life was given to us a billion years ago. [[TakeThatAudience What have we done with it?]]''



Lucy (Johansson), was just a young woman who is forced into working as a drug mule for the Taiwanese mob. A bag of one particular drug is inserted into her abdomen, which suddenly ruptures when she is attacked, causing her own body to absorb the drug. This progressively causes her to access more and more of her brain's capabilities, granting several incredible abilities - and causing a remarkable metamorphosis...

to:

Lucy (Johansson), was just (Johansson) is a young woman who is forced into working as a drug mule for the Taiwanese mob. A bag of one particular drug is inserted into her abdomen, which suddenly ruptures when she is attacked, causing her own body to absorb the drug. This progressively causes her to access more and more of her brain's capabilities, granting several incredible abilities - and causing a remarkable metamorphosis...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NominalHero: If that. After being exposed to the drug, any restraint she might have goes right out the window, in favor of resolving the situation in the most expedient way possible, such as shooting a cab driver in the leg who didn't speak English to bully another cab driver to drive her to the hospital and once there waltzing into a surgery room, noticing the patient being operated on, figuring out through SherlockScan the patient wasn't going to survive anyway and casually blowing the poor patient away, telling this fact to the doctor and forcing him to suture her at gunpoint.

to:

* NominalHero: If that.Lucy. After being exposed to the drug, any restraint she might have goes right out the window, in favor of resolving the situation in the most expedient way possible, such as shooting a cab driver in the leg who didn't speak English to bully another cab driver to drive her to the hospital and once there waltzing into a surgery room, noticing the patient being operated on, figuring out through SherlockScan the patient wasn't going to survive anyway and casually blowing the poor patient away, telling this fact to the doctor and forcing him to suture her at gunpoint.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ProgressiveEraMontage: It happens while Lucy [[TimeTravel travels through the space-time continuum, from modern New York to the Big Bang]].

to:

* ProgressiveEraMontage: It happens while Lucy [[TimeTravel travels through the space-time continuum, from modern New York all the way to the Big Bang]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ProgressiveEraMontage: It happens while Lucy [[TimeTravel travels through the space-time continuum, from modern New York to the Big Bang]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OhCrap: The surgeon and the nurse make this expression when Lucy told them the drug bag that burst in her body was CPH4.

to:

* OhCrap: The surgeon and the nurse make this expression when Lucy told them the drug bag that burst in her body was CPH4.[=CPH4=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If you've seen the trailer, you've seen almost all the action sequences in the film.

to:

** If you've seen the trailer, you've seen almost all the action sequences in the film. Unfortunately, this is part of why the film received bad reviews and disinterest from some audiences, as the trailer portrayed the movie as a high octane action-packed sci-fi adventure when in fact, the movie has more to do with philosophy than anything else, so those who thought they were getting a summer blockbuster left the film disappointed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlueAndOrangeMorality: From Lucy's perspective she's not killing anyone, since no one ever actually dies its all relative to her.

to:

* BlueAndOrangeMorality: From Lucy's perspective she's not killing anyone, since anyone-since no one ever actually dies its dies, it's all relative to her.

Added: 131

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlueAndOrangeMorality: From Lucy's perspective she's not killing anyone, since no one ever actually dies its all relative to her.



* CelestialBody: The sum total of all of Lucy's knowledge regarding the entire universe [[spoiler:can be condensed to fit onto an elongated USB stick seemingly made of stars.[[note]]Which is a very oblique ShoutOut to the ''novel'' of ''2001''.[[/note]]]]

to:

* CelestialBody: The sum total of all of Lucy's knowledge regarding the entire universe [[spoiler:can [[spoiler: can be condensed to fit onto an elongated USB stick seemingly made of stars.[[note]]Which is a very oblique ShoutOut to the ''novel'' of ''2001''.[[/note]]]]

Added: 89

Changed: 9

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LivingEmotionalCrutch: Lucy tells Del Rio that he is her 'reminder' about her humanity.



* MindOverMatter: From early on, Lucy uses her psychokinetic abilities like a seasoned [[Franchise/StarWars Jedi]]. However, she appears to be using them through control of neuronal impulses and electromagnetic activity rather than traditional methods.

to:

* MindOverMatter: From early on, Lucy uses her psychokinetic abilities like a seasoned [[Franchise/StarWars Jedi]]. However, she appears to be using them through the control of neuronal impulses and electromagnetic activity rather than traditional methods.



* OrganicTechnology: [[spoiler:When Lucy taps into 90% of her brain at the film's climax, she creates what Morgan Freeman's character describes as a "new generation computer" from her own body's mass... It looks like something straight out of ''{{VideoGame/Prototype}}''.]]
* PhysicalGod: Lucy is this near the end of the film. [[spoiler:Then subverted when she ultimately becomes an immaterial godlike entity intertwined with all of existence.]]

to:

* OrganicTechnology: [[spoiler:When [[spoiler: When Lucy taps into 90% of her brain at the film's climax, she creates what Morgan Freeman's character describes as a "new generation computer" from her own body's mass... It looks like something straight out of ''{{VideoGame/Prototype}}''.]]
* PhysicalGod: Lucy is this near the end of the film. [[spoiler:Then [[spoiler: Then subverted when she ultimately becomes an immaterial godlike entity intertwined with all of existence.]]



* RedShirtArmy: The Parisian police doesn't fare too well against the much heavier armed Korean mobsters. When the dust has settled, [[spoiler:Del Rio seems to be the SoleSurvivor out of at least a dozen cops]].

to:

* RedShirtArmy: The Parisian police doesn't don't fare too well against the much heavier armed Korean mobsters. When the dust has settled, [[spoiler:Del [[spoiler: Del Rio seems to be the SoleSurvivor out of at least a dozen cops]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OhCrap: The surgeon and the nurse make this expression when Lucy told them the drug bag that burst in her body was CPH4.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as having been the first human (male or female). But putting all that aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid creature that scientists, even in theory, could be definitively point to as having been the called ''the'' first human (male or female). But putting all that aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that a species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as having been the first human (male or female). But putting all that aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as having been the first human (male or female). But putting all that aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as having been the first human (male or female). But putting that all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as having been the first human (male or female). But putting all that all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as the first human (male or female). But putting that all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as having been the first human (male or female). But putting that all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply was never any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as the first human (male or female). But putting that all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply was never was any individual hominid that scientists, even in theory, could definitively point to as the first human (male or female). But putting that all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the nature of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply was never any individual hominid that scientists can definitively state was the first human (male or female). But even putting that aside, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the nature of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply was never any individual hominid that scientists can scientists, even in theory, could definitively state was point to as the first human (male or female). But even putting that aside, all aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it the “first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the nature of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply was never any individual hominid that scientists can definitively state was the first human (male or female). But even putting that aside, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it the “first “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the nature of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply was never any individual hominid that scientists can definitively state was the first human (male or female). But even putting that aside, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." That very phrase is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual and scientists cannot point to any individual as having definitively been the first human. But even putting that aside, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think calling it was the "first woman." That very “first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding of the nature of the discovery that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual gradual, and scientists cannot point to there simply was never any individual as having hominid that scientists can definitively been state was the first human.human (male or female). But even putting that aside, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." That very phrase is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual and there’s no single point when scientists can definitively say a particular individual was human while its parents were not. But even putting that aside for the moment, as well as the tricky question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." That very phrase is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual and there’s no single point when scientists can cannot point to any individual as having definitively say a particular individual was human while its parents were not. been the first human. But even putting that aside for the moment, as well as the tricky question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, aside, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." That very phrase is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual and there’s no single point when scientists can definitively say a particular individual was human while it’s parents were not. But even putting that aside for the moment, as well as the tricky question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." That very phrase is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual and there’s no single point when scientists can definitively say a particular individual was human while it’s its parents were not. But even putting that aside for the moment, as well as the tricky question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting That very phrase is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual and there’s no single point when scientists can definitively say a particular individual was human while it’s parents were not. But even putting that aside for the moment moment, as well as the tricky question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ‘’could’’ state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of that species, even if they ‘’could’’ ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossil that today's scientists happen to stumble across represents the earliest of that species, even if they could state with certainty that it's the oldest one in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossil that today's today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to stumble across represents find is literally the earliest first member of that species, even if they could ‘’could’’ state with certainty that it's the oldest one fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossil that today's scientists happen to stumble across represents the earliest of that species, even if it's the oldest one in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossil that today's scientists happen to stumble across represents the earliest of that species, even if they could state with certainty that it's the oldest one in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossils that today's scientists happen to stumble across represent the earliest of that species, even if it's the oldest one in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossils fossil that today's scientists happen to stumble across represent represents the earliest of that species, even if it's the oldest one in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved in fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossils that today's scientists happen to stumble across represent the earliest of that species, even if it's the oldest one in existence today.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePaleontology: Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of the "first woman." This is a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, there is no reason to think it was the "first woman." Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Australopithecines should be classified as humans, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved in as fossils), and there is no basis for assuming that any fossils that today's scientists happen to stumble across represent the earliest of that species, even if it's the oldest one in existence today.

Top