Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheReasonYouSuckSpeech: An argument between Sandra and Samuel boiled over into this from Sandra, raking Samuel over the coals [[spoiler:for blaming her and Daniel for his failures as a writer and inability to make time for himself.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
Sandra Voyter (Hüller) is a successful novelist who finds herself in the center of a media circus when her husband Samuel (Theis) is found dead after falling from the second floor of their chalet while doing renovations. Foul play cannot be entirely ruled out, and Sandra is indicted and brought to court, where she finds her entire life - her marriage, her sexuality, her writing, and her relationship with her visually impaired son Daniel (Graner) - put on trial. She may or may not be innocent, but as her lawyer Vincent (Artaud) tells her, that may not be the point.
to:
Sandra Voyter (Hüller) is a successful novelist who finds herself in the center of a media circus when her husband Samuel (Theis) is found dead after falling from the second floor of their chalet while doing renovations. Foul play cannot be entirely ruled out, and Sandra is indicted and brought to court, where she finds her entire life - her marriage, her sexuality, her writing, and her relationship with her visually impaired son Daniel (Graner) - put on trial. She may or may not be innocent, but as her lawyer Vincent (Artaud) (Arlaud) tells her, that may not be the point.
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
* MomentKiller: According to the prosecutor, this was why Samuel was blasting the same song over and over again while Sandra was hitting it off with her interviewer.
to:
* MomentKiller: According to the prosecutor, this was why Samuel was must have been blasting the same song over and over again while Sandra was hitting it off with her interviewer.interviewer to prevent the interaction from getting too flirty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DeadpanSnarker: The prosecutor can physically not stop himself from peppering his analyses and retorts with biting sarcasm, which makes him come off as the closest thing the movie has to an antagonist, and in turns makes the audience sympathise with Sandra to an extent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
Sandra Voyter (Hüller) is a successful novelist who finds herself in the center of a media circus when her husband Samuel (Theis) is found dead after falling from the second floor of their chalet while doing renovations. Foul play cannot be entirely ruled out, and Sandra is indicted and brought to court, where she finds her entire life - her marriage, her sexuality, her writing, and her relationship with her blind son Daniel (Graner) - put on trial. She may or may not be innocent, but as her lawyer Vincent (Artaud) tells her, that may not be the point.
to:
Sandra Voyter (Hüller) is a successful novelist who finds herself in the center of a media circus when her husband Samuel (Theis) is found dead after falling from the second floor of their chalet while doing renovations. Foul play cannot be entirely ruled out, and Sandra is indicted and brought to court, where she finds her entire life - her marriage, her sexuality, her writing, and her relationship with her blind visually impaired son Daniel (Graner) - put on trial. She may or may not be innocent, but as her lawyer Vincent (Artaud) tells her, that may not be the point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
''Anatomy of a Fall'' is a 2023 mystery-drama film, directed by Creator/JustineTriet and co-written by Triet and her partner Arthur Harari. It stars [[Creator/SandraHuller Sandra Hüller]], Swann Artaud, Milo Machado Graner, and Samuel Theis.
to:
''Anatomy of a Fall'' is a 2023 mystery-drama film, directed by Creator/JustineTriet and co-written by Triet and her partner Arthur Harari. It stars [[Creator/SandraHuller Sandra Hüller]], Swann Artaud, Arlaud, Milo Machado Graner, Machado-Graner, and Samuel Theis.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DoubleMeaningTitle: The titular "anatomy of a fall" refers to both the characters trying to figure out the exact circumstances regarding Samuel's fatal ''fall'' and also Sandra coming to grips with how her relationship with her husband ''fell'' apart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* AllLowercaseLetters: Used for the entirety of the opening credits as well as the "one year later" TimeSkip chyron.
to:
* AllLowercaseLetters: Used used for the entirety of the opening credits as well as the "one year later" TimeSkip {{time skip}} chyron.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* AmbiguousSituation: [[spoiler:On top of the many ambiguities of the ending, what exactly happened during the fight and who struck who is completely ambiguous. As opposed to the argument that preceded, which the audience sees play out, only the audio of the physical struggle is heard. Both sides' attorneys present different versions of what the jury is hearing.]]
to:
* AmbiguousSituation: [[spoiler:On On top of the many ambiguities of the ending, what AmbiguousEnding, there's also:
** [[spoiler:What was going on with the interviewer? The prosecutor says that Sandra was trying to seduce her, and that Samuel blasting his music was an attempt to ruin the moment. Sandra denies it, and we never find out more information about it.]]
** [[spoiler:What exactly happened during the fight and who struck who is completely ambiguous. As opposed to the argument that preceded, which is shown on screen to theaudience sees play out, audience, only the audio of the physical struggle is heard. Both sides' attorneys present different versions of what the jury is hearing.]]
** [[spoiler:What was going on with the interviewer? The prosecutor says that Sandra was trying to seduce her, and that Samuel blasting his music was an attempt to ruin the moment. Sandra denies it, and we never find out more information about it.]]
** [[spoiler:What exactly happened during the fight and who struck who is completely ambiguous. As opposed to the argument that preceded, which is shown on screen to the
Added DiffLines:
* MomentKiller: According to the prosecutor, this was why Samuel was blasting the same song over and over again while Sandra was hitting it off with her interviewer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AllLowercaseLetters: Used for the entirety of the opening credits as well as the "one year later" TimeSkip chyron.
