Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Awesome / NitroRad

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
spelling/grammar fix(es)


* His response to Jimmy Whetzel's... [[FailedASpotCheck less than well researched]] review of ''Yokai Watch is'' something to behold. Not only does James manage to deconstruct every point that he disagrees with in a very intelligent and well-thought out manner, but ''he manages to do it all without making a single personal jab at Jimmy's expense.'' On a website where several gaming channels tend to AccentuatetheNegative in not so graceful ways, James' professional and well-constructed rebuttal to a series that he's very fond of is amazing to see.

to:

* His response to Jimmy Whetzel's... [[FailedASpotCheck less than well researched]] review of ''Yokai Watch is'' something to behold. Not only does James manage to deconstruct every point that he disagrees with in a very intelligent and well-thought out manner, but ''he manages to do it all without making a single personal jab at Jimmy's expense.'' On a website where several gaming channels tend to AccentuatetheNegative AccentuateTheNegative in not so graceful ways, James' professional and well-constructed rebuttal to a series that he's very fond of is amazing to see.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added example(s)



--> '''James:''' Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, "Yeah!" I hate it! Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish! What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!

to:

\n--> '''James:''' Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, "Yeah!" I hate it! Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish! What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!up!
* His response to Jimmy Whetzel's... [[FailedASpotCheck less than well researched]] review of ''Yokai Watch is'' something to behold. Not only does James manage to deconstruct every point that he disagrees with in a very intelligent and well-thought out manner, but ''he manages to do it all without making a single personal jab at Jimmy's expense.'' On a website where several gaming channels tend to AccentuatetheNegative in not so graceful ways, James' professional and well-constructed rebuttal to a series that he's very fond of is amazing to see.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> '''James:''' Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, "Yeah"! I hate it! Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish! What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!

to:

--> '''James:''' Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, "Yeah"! "Yeah!" I hate it! Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish! What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!

Changed: 640

Removed: 588

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, James realizes the protagonist is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, he handily [[WhatTheHellHero tears into Frogger]] with a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

--> “Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, 'Yeah'! I hate it!"

--> "Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish!"

--> "What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!”

to:

* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, James realizes the protagonist is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, he handily [[WhatTheHellHero tears into Frogger]] with a [[TranquilFury calm, but brutal]] [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

--> “Yeah, '''James:''' Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, 'Yeah'! "Yeah"! I hate it!"

--> "Think
it! Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish!"

--> "What
selfish! What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!”up!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, James realizes the protagonist is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, he handily tears into Frogger with a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

to:

* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, James realizes the protagonist is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, he handily [[WhatTheHellHero tears into Frogger Frogger]] with a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, James realizes the protagonist is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, hehandily tears into Frogger with a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

to:

* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, James realizes the protagonist is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, hehandily he handily tears into Frogger with a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, he handily tears into the protagonist in a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

to:

* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, he handily tears into James realizes the protagonist in is no better than the FinalBoss who was shoehorned into the game's climax. Following this epiphany, hehandily tears into Frogger with a [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> “Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, 'Yeah!' I hate it!"

to:

--> “Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, 'Yeah!' 'Yeah'! I hate it!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish!"

to:

--> "Think about this, too: like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished ''wished'' for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "Think about this, too: Like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish!"

to:

--> "Think about this, too: Like, like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. ''That'' is pretty selfish!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> “Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, “Yeah!” I hate it!"

to:

--> “Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, “Yeah!” 'Yeah!' I hate it!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, he handily tears into the protagonist in a [[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

to:

* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, he handily tears into the protagonist in a [[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "Think about this, too: Like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. That is pretty selfish!"

to:

--> "Think about this, too: Like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. That ''That'' is pretty selfish!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* His review of [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiZJ-9w5jrQ Banned Memories]], a ''Franchise/SilentHill'' inspired horror game. The way he describes the game and showcases how ''terrifying'' it can be besides having [=PS1=] graphics is phenomenal. Any fan of horror in general will love this review, because it talks about exactly how effective horror without jumpscares is.

to:

* His review of [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiZJ-9w5jrQ Banned Memories]], a ''Franchise/SilentHill'' inspired horror game. The way he describes the game and showcases how ''terrifying'' it can be besides having [=PS1=] graphics is phenomenal. Any fan of horror in general will love this review, because it talks about exactly how effective horror without jumpscares is.is.
* In his ''Frogger: The Great Quest'' review, he handily tears into the protagonist in a [[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech calm, but brutal speech]]:

--> “Yeah, I know, I know. This happened because Frogger wished for it, but, man, I dunno. I just really did not want this entitled, disgusting little frog to get that kiss. He just decides out of the blue that he gets to be a prince. He doesn’t earn it, there’s no character development through this plot, no! He just decides he gets what he wants, and the writers go, “Yeah!” I hate it!"

--> "Think about this, too: Like, Mario saves people out of his own desire to do good, right? But Frogger? ''No''. He wished for this situation. He had to deliberately ''put somebody in danger'' to save them. And even then, he’s only saving them to get what he wants, not because he actually cares about people in need of rescue. That is pretty selfish!"

--> "What an unlikeable character, man. It was bad enough that he’s annoying and uncomfortably strange throughout the entire game, but once I really put some thought into his motivations, I realized that it’s kinda messed up!”
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* His review of [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiZJ-9w5jrQ Banned Memories]], a ''VideoGame/SilentHill'' inspired horror game. The way he describes the game and showcases how ''terrifying'' it can be besides having [=PS1=] graphics is phenomenal. Any fan of horror in general will love this review, because it talks about exactly how effective horror without jumpscares is.

to:

* His review of [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiZJ-9w5jrQ Banned Memories]], a ''VideoGame/SilentHill'' ''Franchise/SilentHill'' inspired horror game. The way he describes the game and showcases how ''terrifying'' it can be besides having [=PS1=] graphics is phenomenal. Any fan of horror in general will love this review, because it talks about exactly how effective horror without jumpscares is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* James actually beating Bubsy 3D. With skillful make-up, acting, and editing, he demonstrated his frustrations with the game beyond the jokes most cover.

to:

* James actually beating [[Videogame/{{Bubsy}} Bubsy 3D.3D]]. With skillful make-up, acting, and editing, he demonstrated his frustrations with the game beyond the jokes most cover.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving from YMMV page

Added DiffLines:

* James actually beating Bubsy 3D. With skillful make-up, acting, and editing, he demonstrated his frustrations with the game beyond the jokes most cover.
* His review of [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiZJ-9w5jrQ Banned Memories]], a ''VideoGame/SilentHill'' inspired horror game. The way he describes the game and showcases how ''terrifying'' it can be besides having [=PS1=] graphics is phenomenal. Any fan of horror in general will love this review, because it talks about exactly how effective horror without jumpscares is.

Top