Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
It's important to note that there's a bit of a spectrum of pessimism with respect to Sturgeon's Law. The most optimistic end of the spectrum admits that 90% of everything is crap, but posits that the remaining 10% is [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome absolutely worth it]]. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."
to:
It's important to note that there's a bit of a spectrum of pessimism with respect to Sturgeon's Law. The most optimistic end of the spectrum admits states that 90% of everything is crap, but posits that the remaining 10% is [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome absolutely worth it]]. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
* '''Critic's Second Corollary:''' ''90% of people will criticise 90% of what they see, regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatised genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' We've classified the stigmatised genres in the GhettoIndex.
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatised genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' We've classified the stigmatised genres in the GhettoIndex.
to:
* '''Critic's Second Corollary:''' ''90% of people will criticise criticize 90% of what they see, regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but astigmatised stigmatized genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' We've classified the stigmatised stigmatized genres in the GhettoIndex.
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* '''Evonix's Corollary:''' ''Crap is fractal.'' In other words, 90% of the crap is crappier than the rest, and 90% of the non-crap is still head-and-shoulders worse than the rest. And you can keep doing that division all the way down.
to:
* '''Evonix's Corollary:''' ''Crap is fractal.'' In other words, 90% of the crap is crappier than the rest, and 90% of the non-crap that is still head-and-shoulders worse than the rest. And you can keep doing that division all the way down. It's also been said that the non-crap is 90% tainted.
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
* '''[[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's Corollary]]:''' ''Everything is shit until proven otherwise.'' Yahtzee has sometimes referred to this as the "[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]" and elaborated further in one review: "''Even if declaring a game to be shit after its first few hours of gameplay is [[CausticCritic perfectly professional]], one should never assume that [[DisappointingLastLevel a game that starts out good will stay that way]].''"
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].
to:
* '''[[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's Corollary]]:''' ''Everything is (or may as well be) shit until proven otherwise.'' Yahtzee has sometimes referred to this as the "[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]" and elaborated further in one review: "''Even if declaring a game to be shit after its first few hours of gameplay is [[CausticCritic perfectly professional]], one should never assume that [[DisappointingLastLevel a game that starts out good will stay that way]].''"
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYouyou're if you aren't crap, you are probably not so far away from someone who is crap]].
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].
to:
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].crap]].
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Sturgeon's Law is borne out by ''actual'', non-fictional science:
* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] essentially says that the skills necessary in assessing how good you are at something are the same skills necessary for actually ''being'' good at something. In other words, the worse you are at something, the less likely you are to ''know'' how bad you are. This is the phenomenon that leads to someone being GiftedlyBad and fuels Sturgeon's Law.
* The related "Worse-than-Average Effect" states that competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is. This kind of selects for Sturgeon's Law, in that good writers will be more hesitant to publish their work than bad ones, which in turn leads to over-representation of bad writers.
It's important to note that there's a bit of a spectrum of pessimism with respect to Sturgeon's Law. The most optimistic end of the spectrum admits that 90% of everything is crap, but posits that the remaining 10% is [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome absolutely worth it]]. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."
The most pessimistic end of the spectrum posits that Sturgeon's Law is a baseline; in other words, ''at least'' 90% of everything is crap, and the percentage could be as high as 95%, 98%, or 99.99%. The other side of the pessimism is the idea that the various filters (nostalgia, import, publication) aren't actually working, that 90% of all ''published'' work is crap, and the percentage of all works that are not crap is closer to [[MillionToOneChance one in a million]].
Fandom being what it is, there are a lot of expansions, clarifications, and specific instances of Sturgeon's Revelation out there:
* '''Corollary 1:''' ''The existence of immense quantities of trash in science fiction is admitted, and it is regrettable, but it is no more unnatural than the existence of trash anywhere.'' This is essentially how we get from "90% of SF is crap" to "90% of everything is crap".
* '''Corollary 2:''' ''The best science fiction is as good as the best fiction in any field.'' Obviously, this doesn't ''necessarily'' follow from the Revelation. Sci-fi has its strengths and weaknesses compared to other genres, but most of them are quite incidental. Also, the proportion of good sci-fi compared to good works in other genres is obscured by differences in the raw numbers; if there are a thousand people writing sci-fi and a hundred thousand people writing everything else, well, you do the maths.
* '''Crawford's Corollary:''' ''Should you ever find that less than 90% seems to be [crap], your standard is too low and should be adjusted.''
* '''Critic's First Corollary:''' ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crap and non-crap.''
* '''Critic's Second Corollary:''' ''90% of people will criticise 90% of what they see, regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatised genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' We've classified the stigmatised genres in the GhettoIndex.
* '''Website/TVTropes' First Corollary:''' ''The difficulty of getting a fanbase to agree on exactly which 10% is not crap [[UnpleasableFanbase increases exponentially]] with [[BrokenBase the size of the fanbase]]''. In other words, crap is in the eye of the beholder.
* '''Website/TVTropes' Second Corollary:''' ''Fanbases are perfectly happy to consume a portion of the genre they consider crap, but the difficulty of getting a fanbase to agree on exactly which portion of the "crap" part of the genre is worth consuming, and the size thereof, increases exponentially with the size of the fanbase.'' After all, we've got things like SoBadItsGood and GuiltyPleasure; it's "crap", but we still enjoy it. But we've also got DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible and EpicFail, and we generally ''don't'' enjoy it. The division between "crap you enjoy" and "total crap" is much more nebulous than the one between crap and non-crap; we don't even have a percentage for you.
* '''TheTheoremOfNarrowInterests:''' ''The more constrained the thing you're looking for, the fewer good examples exist.''
* '''Evonix's Corollary:''' ''Crap is fractal.'' In other words, 90% of the crap is crappier than the rest, and 90% of the non-crap is still head-and-shoulders worse than the rest. And you can keep doing that division all the way down.
* '''Video Game Corollary:''' ''If a {{Video Game|s}} has user-created content, not only will 90% of it be crap, 90% of the crap will be [[VideoGamePerversityPotential obscene in nature]]''. That 90% can be further divided into depictions of genitalia (male or female), [[ToiletHumour fart jokes]], and "[[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet LittleBig]][[GodwinsLaw Holocaust]]", although that division is more nebulous because it relies on a particular game's ability and willingness to filter out such content.
* '''[[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's Corollary]]:''' ''Everything is shit until proven otherwise.'' Yahtzee has sometimes referred to this as the "[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]" and elaborated further in one review: "''Even if declaring a game to be shit after its first few hours of gameplay is [[CausticCritic perfectly professional]], one should never assume that [[DisappointingLastLevel a game that starts out good will stay that way]].''"
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].
* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger Effect]] essentially says that the skills necessary in assessing how good you are at something are the same skills necessary for actually ''being'' good at something. In other words, the worse you are at something, the less likely you are to ''know'' how bad you are. This is the phenomenon that leads to someone being GiftedlyBad and fuels Sturgeon's Law.
* The related "Worse-than-Average Effect" states that competent people are more likely to evaluate their work as worse than it is. This kind of selects for Sturgeon's Law, in that good writers will be more hesitant to publish their work than bad ones, which in turn leads to over-representation of bad writers.
It's important to note that there's a bit of a spectrum of pessimism with respect to Sturgeon's Law. The most optimistic end of the spectrum admits that 90% of everything is crap, but posits that the remaining 10% is [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome absolutely worth it]]. As one writer put it, "flipping through Website/FanFictionDotNet is like flipping through hell with an occasional slice of the heavenly cheesecake thrown in."
The most pessimistic end of the spectrum posits that Sturgeon's Law is a baseline; in other words, ''at least'' 90% of everything is crap, and the percentage could be as high as 95%, 98%, or 99.99%. The other side of the pessimism is the idea that the various filters (nostalgia, import, publication) aren't actually working, that 90% of all ''published'' work is crap, and the percentage of all works that are not crap is closer to [[MillionToOneChance one in a million]].
Fandom being what it is, there are a lot of expansions, clarifications, and specific instances of Sturgeon's Revelation out there:
* '''Corollary 1:''' ''The existence of immense quantities of trash in science fiction is admitted, and it is regrettable, but it is no more unnatural than the existence of trash anywhere.'' This is essentially how we get from "90% of SF is crap" to "90% of everything is crap".
* '''Corollary 2:''' ''The best science fiction is as good as the best fiction in any field.'' Obviously, this doesn't ''necessarily'' follow from the Revelation. Sci-fi has its strengths and weaknesses compared to other genres, but most of them are quite incidental. Also, the proportion of good sci-fi compared to good works in other genres is obscured by differences in the raw numbers; if there are a thousand people writing sci-fi and a hundred thousand people writing everything else, well, you do the maths.
* '''Crawford's Corollary:''' ''Should you ever find that less than 90% seems to be [crap], your standard is too low and should be adjusted.''
* '''Critic's First Corollary:''' ''90% of people lack the taste necessary to distinguish between crap and non-crap.''
* '''Critic's Second Corollary:''' ''90% of people will criticise 90% of what they see, regardless of their ability to distinguish crap from non-crap.''
* '''Ghetto Corollary:''' ''A "respectable" genre of fictional media will always be judged by the 10% of good works, but a stigmatised genre will always be judged by the 90% of bad works.'' We've classified the stigmatised genres in the GhettoIndex.
* '''Website/TVTropes' First Corollary:''' ''The difficulty of getting a fanbase to agree on exactly which 10% is not crap [[UnpleasableFanbase increases exponentially]] with [[BrokenBase the size of the fanbase]]''. In other words, crap is in the eye of the beholder.
* '''Website/TVTropes' Second Corollary:''' ''Fanbases are perfectly happy to consume a portion of the genre they consider crap, but the difficulty of getting a fanbase to agree on exactly which portion of the "crap" part of the genre is worth consuming, and the size thereof, increases exponentially with the size of the fanbase.'' After all, we've got things like SoBadItsGood and GuiltyPleasure; it's "crap", but we still enjoy it. But we've also got DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible and EpicFail, and we generally ''don't'' enjoy it. The division between "crap you enjoy" and "total crap" is much more nebulous than the one between crap and non-crap; we don't even have a percentage for you.
* '''TheTheoremOfNarrowInterests:''' ''The more constrained the thing you're looking for, the fewer good examples exist.''
* '''Evonix's Corollary:''' ''Crap is fractal.'' In other words, 90% of the crap is crappier than the rest, and 90% of the non-crap is still head-and-shoulders worse than the rest. And you can keep doing that division all the way down.
* '''Video Game Corollary:''' ''If a {{Video Game|s}} has user-created content, not only will 90% of it be crap, 90% of the crap will be [[VideoGamePerversityPotential obscene in nature]]''. That 90% can be further divided into depictions of genitalia (male or female), [[ToiletHumour fart jokes]], and "[[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet LittleBig]][[GodwinsLaw Holocaust]]", although that division is more nebulous because it relies on a particular game's ability and willingness to filter out such content.
* '''[[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's Corollary]]:''' ''Everything is shit until proven otherwise.'' Yahtzee has sometimes referred to this as the "[[TakeThat Guantánamo Bay approach]]" and elaborated further in one review: "''Even if declaring a game to be shit after its first few hours of gameplay is [[CausticCritic perfectly professional]], one should never assume that [[DisappointingLastLevel a game that starts out good will stay that way]].''"
* '''[[Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico Ruri's Law]]:''' ''The vast majority of people are idiots.'' Or, put another way, 90% of people are crap. In other words, [[ThisLoserIsYou you're probably crap]].
