Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Analysis / GoofTroop

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Definitely a woobie''': Fits all the criteria perfectly including gaining the unconditional fandom alternate name "Poor PJ."

to:

'''Definitely a woobie''': Woobie''': Fits all the criteria perfectly including gaining the unconditional fandom alternate name "Poor PJ."


Pistol theoretically should have the same sort of chance for PJ to be TheWoobie, raised in the same environment and reguarly exploited by her father for chores. But nope. There are a variety of factors at play that make Pistol the ''least'' likely candidate out of all of the others. She's a CheerfulChild, rarely seen without a smile on her face. While her home-life isn't ideal, when it comes to a choice of PJ or Pistol, [[TheFavorite Pistol tends to come out on top,]] [[BrattyHalfPint she's considered something of a little brat]], and her position as the youngest child gives her [[TinyTyrannicalGirl some degree of power]] which she has taken advantage of. More so than anything, Pistol can't be the woobie because she's ''happy.'' In comparison to other characters, she has had a pretty satisfying life that even Max might envy. And this is why we only feel sorry for her in a couple of episodes at most.

to:

Pistol theoretically should have the same sort of chance for PJ to be TheWoobie, raised in the same environment and reguarly exploited by her father for chores. But nope. There are a variety of factors at play that make Pistol the ''least'' likely candidate out of all of the others. She's a CheerfulChild, rarely seen without a smile on her face. While her home-life isn't ideal, when it comes to a choice of PJ or Pistol, [[TheFavorite [[ParentalFavoritism Pistol tends to come out on top,]] [[BrattyHalfPint she's considered something of a little brat]], and her position as the youngest child gives her [[TinyTyrannicalGirl some degree of power]] which she has taken advantage of. More so than anything, Pistol can't be the woobie because she's ''happy.'' In comparison to other characters, she has had a pretty satisfying life that even Max might envy. And this is why we only feel sorry for her in a couple of episodes at most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


When it comes to suspicions of physical abuse, it's not a huge leap to make. Not only is Pete typecast as an antagonist across his history as a Disney character, but he is consistently a short-tempered, oafish, menacing brute rarely deserving of any respect or sympathy. Violence is not a speculation but something that comes naturally to him, and for him not to inflict physical abuse on others would require a level of self-control that we ''know'' he does not possess. Even without explicit displays of physical abuse he has been seen handling PJ roughly for his age, especially considering PJ is his own son.

to:

When it comes to suspicions of physical abuse, it's not a huge leap to make. Not only is Pete typecast as an antagonist across his history as a Disney character, but he is consistently with the personality of a short-tempered, oafish, menacing brute rarely deserving of any respect or sympathy. Violence is not a speculation but something that comes naturally to him, and for him not to ''not'' inflict physical abuse on others would require a level of self-control and restraint that we ''know'' he does not possess. Even without explicit displays of physical abuse he has been seen shown handling PJ roughly for his age, especially considering PJ is his own son.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Of course, as the page itself says: "There's a simple reason for this with the consistently abusive parents - the abuse is a big part of the series or movie, and if Social Services did step in and take the kids away, they'd probably never let them go back." We know this, but since this show plays AbusiveParents so seriously and realistically (not as a HilariouslyAbusiveChildhood), it just makes SocialServicesDoesNotExist's use more obvious, much like on the show with a similar (though less immediate) attitude, ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'', which notably had people asking about poor Helga and Stoop Kid not getting rescued on its {{Headscratchers}} page ''twice''.

to:

Of course, as the page itself says: "There's a simple reason for this with the consistently abusive parents - the abuse is a big part of the series or movie, and if Social Services did step in and take the kids away, they'd probably never let them go back." We know this, but since this show plays AbusiveParents so seriously and realistically (not as a HilariouslyAbusiveChildhood), it just makes SocialServicesDoesNotExist's use more obvious, much like on the show with a similar (though less immediate) attitude, ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'', which notably had people asking about poor Helga and Stoop Kid not getting rescued on its {{Headscratchers}} [[Headscratchers/HomePage Headscratchers]] page ''twice''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In ''AGoofyMovie'' he doesn't bring up Pistol at all. She's gone, and he doesn't care in the slightest. And that wouldn't be an issue but for that ''AGoofyMovie'' is canonically a sequel to ''GoofTroop.'' Who ''does'' he take on his road trip? It's PJ.

to:

In ''AGoofyMovie'' ''WesternAnimation/AGoofyMovie'' he doesn't bring up Pistol at all. She's gone, and he doesn't care in the slightest. And that wouldn't be an issue but for that ''AGoofyMovie'' ''A Goofy Movie'' is canonically a sequel to ''GoofTroop.'' ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop''. Who ''does'' he take on his road trip? It's PJ.



Ah, the wife. That's right, Pete does love Peg. We see it quite often, in fact. She's certainly not vulnerable either - she's attractive, has a good job, is aware that her husband's job is to decieve and manipulate people (he sells used cars, dammit). Pete was a big boy when she fell for him, so it's not his looks she's attracted to, and even if he could stand to shed a few pounds she never asks it of him. Sometimes he's disappointing, but she loves him. There's NoAccountingForTaste, right?

to:

Ah, the wife. That's right, Pete does love Peg. We see it quite often, in fact. She's certainly not vulnerable either - -- she's attractive, has a good job, is aware that her husband's job is to decieve deceive and manipulate people (he sells used cars, dammit). Pete was a big boy when she fell for him, so it's not his looks she's attracted to, and even if he could stand to shed a few pounds she never asks it of him. Sometimes he's disappointing, but she loves him. There's NoAccountingForTaste, right?



Seeing as Pete doesn't grasp the difference between fear and respect, it's likely that the love he feels for his wife becomes one with the way he's sometimes afraid of her. He will actively throw himself on his knees and grovel for her forgiveness sometimes. It's just further strength added to the arguement that Pete cannot recognise the difference the difference between fear and respect - only this time applied to him. This makes it likely that he had a fearful and highly controlling mother, which in some ways makes him almost a tragic villain.

to:

Seeing as Pete doesn't grasp the difference between fear and respect, it's likely that the love he feels for his wife becomes one with the way he's sometimes afraid of her. He will actively throw himself on his knees and grovel for her forgiveness sometimes. It's just further strength added to the arguement argument that Pete cannot recognise recognize the difference the difference between fear and respect - -- only this time applied to him. This makes it likely that he had a fearful and highly controlling mother, which in some ways makes him almost a tragic villain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Ah, the wife. That's right, Pete does love Peg. We see it quite often, in fact. She's certainly not vulnerable either - she's attractive, has a good job, is aware that her husband's job is to decieve and manipulate people (he sells used cars, dammit). Pete was a big boy when she fell for him, so it's not his looks she's attracted to, and even if he could stand to shed a few pounds she never asks it of him. Sometimes he's disappointing, but she loves him. [[NoTasteInMen Whatever does she see in him?]]

Well, it's not tough to see that Peg is completely the dominant one in their relationship. In fact it would scare off most men. But Pete loves and adores her. He worships her from head to toe, he's admitted he's lucky to have her, he would do just about anything for her... and he's kind of afraid of her too. Peg's no bully, but she keeps Pete right under her thumb, partly because she knows he needs to be kept there.

to:

Ah, the wife. That's right, Pete does love Peg. We see it quite often, in fact. She's certainly not vulnerable either - she's attractive, has a good job, is aware that her husband's job is to decieve and manipulate people (he sells used cars, dammit). Pete was a big boy when she fell for him, so it's not his looks she's attracted to, and even if he could stand to shed a few pounds she never asks it of him. Sometimes he's disappointing, but she loves him. [[NoTasteInMen Whatever does she see in him?]]

There's NoAccountingForTaste, right?

Well, it's not tough to see that Peg is completely the dominant one in their relationship.relationship. She's got a good job as an estate agent, which requires some degree of confidence and intelligence to pull off with any success. In fact it would scare off most men. But Pete loves and adores her. He worships her from head to toe, he's admitted he's lucky to have her, he would do just about anything for her... and he's kind of afraid of her too. Peg's no bully, but she keeps Pete right under her thumb, partly because she knows he needs to be kept there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Seeing as Pete doesn't grasp the difference between fear and respect, it's likely that the love he feels for his wife becomes one with the way he's sometimes afraid of her. He will actively throw himself on his knees and grovel for her forgiveness sometimes.

to:

Seeing as Pete doesn't grasp the difference between fear and respect, it's likely that the love he feels for his wife becomes one with the way he's sometimes afraid of her. He will actively throw himself on his knees and grovel for her forgiveness sometimes. \n It's just further strength added to the arguement that Pete cannot recognise the difference the difference between fear and respect - only this time applied to him. This makes it likely that he had a fearful and highly controlling mother, which in some ways makes him almost a tragic villain.

Added: 2241

Changed: 2681

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! SocialServicesDoesNotExist

Despite the existence of "Date with Destiny", it seems that most of the time Social Services ''Really'' Does Not Exist, considering that Pete has done all of the following things and not gotten in trouble: admitted to doing many abusive things in the middle of a hospital, and if we take his word for it, actually sent a kid to obedience school once ("Axed by Addition"), said he would treat his neighbor's kid like his "own son, only better" in the middle of a courtroom, with the son right there to scowl at him for the comment ("Bringin' on the Rain"), verbally abused his son in front of public officials ("Tub Be or Not Tub Be"), let his eleven-year-old run his used car dealership for a day ("To Heir Is Human"), and gotten caught in the act of child labor violations ("Mrs. Spoonerville"). Whether you believe Pete needs parenting counseling or that there's no hope and PJ should be taken away immediately, ''something'' should be done.

Of course, as the page itself says: "There's a simple reason for this with the consistently abusive parents - the abuse is a big part of the series or movie, and if Social Services did step in and take the kids away, they'd probably never let them go back." We know this, but since this show plays AbusiveParents so seriously and realistically (not as a HilariouslyAbusiveChildhood), it just makes SocialServicesDoesNotExist's use more obvious, much like on the show with a similar (though less immediate) attitude, ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'', which notably had people asking about poor Helga and Stoop Kid not getting rescued on its {{Headscratchers}} page ''twice''.

Now, there's another possibility and that's that Social Services ''does'' exist. This too is disturbing, but TruthInTelevision that the fear and mistrust an abused child feels, leads them to simply not trust anybody enough to tell them. When he likes, Pete can put on an excellent act of being a loving, devoted father. At 11 years old, and without friends, PJ might not know his situation is abnormal, or how to report his problems. We don't see any physical scars on PJ. He wears long sleeves and a neck-high sweater most of the time anyway. Thus far, it's all been going on behind closed doors.



!! SocialServicesDoesNotExist

Despite the existence of "Date with Destiny", it seems that most of the time Social Services ''Really'' Does Not Exist, considering that Pete has done all of the following things and not gotten in trouble: admitted to doing many abusive things in the middle of a hospital, and if we take his word for it, actually sent a kid to obedience school once ("Axed by Addition"), said he would treat his neighbor's kid like his "own son, only better" in the middle of a courtroom, with the son right there to scowl at him for the comment ("Bringin' on the Rain"), verbally abused his son in front of public officials ("Tub Be or Not Tub Be"), let his eleven-year-old run his used car dealership for a day ("To Heir Is Human"), and gotten caught in the act of child labor violations ("Mrs. Spoonerville"). Whether you believe Pete needs parenting counseling or that there's no hope and PJ should be taken away immediately, ''something'' should be done.

Of course, as the page itself says: "There's a simple reason for this with the consistently abusive parents - the abuse is a big part of the series or movie, and if Social Services did step in and take the kids away, they'd probably never let them go back." We know this, but since this show plays AbusiveParents so seriously and realistically (not as a HilariouslyAbusiveChildhood), it just makes SocialServicesDoesNotExist's use more obvious, much like on the show with a similar (though less immediate) attitude, ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'', which notably had people asking about poor Helga and Stoop Kid not getting rescued on its {{Headscratchers}} page ''twice''.

Now, there's another possibility and that's that Social Services ''does'' exist. This too is disturbing, but TruthInTelevision that the fear and mistrust an abused child feels, leads them to simply not trust anybody enough to tell them. When he likes, Pete can put on an excellent act of being a loving, devoted father. At 11 years old, and without friends, PJ might not know his situation is abnormal, or how to report his problems. We don't see any physical scars on PJ. He wears long sleeves and a neck-high sweater most of the time anyway. Thus far, it's all been going on behind closed doors.

to:

!! SocialServicesDoesNotExist

Despite
But he loves Peg, right?

Ah,
the existence of "Date with Destiny", wife. That's right, Pete does love Peg. We see it seems quite often, in fact. She's certainly not vulnerable either - she's attractive, has a good job, is aware that most of the time Social Services ''Really'' Does Not Exist, considering that Pete has done all of the following things her husband's job is to decieve and not gotten in trouble: admitted to doing many abusive things in the middle of a hospital, and if we take his word for it, actually sent a kid to obedience school once ("Axed by Addition"), said he would treat his neighbor's kid like his "own son, only better" in the middle of a courtroom, with the son right there to scowl at him for the comment ("Bringin' on the Rain"), verbally abused his son in front of public officials ("Tub Be or Not Tub Be"), let his eleven-year-old run his used car dealership for a day ("To Heir Is Human"), and gotten caught in the act of child labor violations ("Mrs. Spoonerville"). Whether you believe Pete needs parenting counseling or that there's no hope and PJ should be taken away immediately, ''something'' should be done.

Of course, as the page itself says: "There's a simple reason for this with the consistently abusive parents - the abuse is a big part of the series or movie, and if Social Services did step in and take the kids away, they'd probably never let them go back." We know this, but since this show plays AbusiveParents so seriously and realistically (not as a HilariouslyAbusiveChildhood), it just makes SocialServicesDoesNotExist's use more obvious, much like on the show with a similar (though less immediate) attitude, ''WesternAnimation/HeyArnold'', which notably had
manipulate people asking about poor Helga and Stoop Kid not getting rescued on its {{Headscratchers}} page ''twice''.

Now, there's another possibility and that's that Social Services ''does'' exist. This too is disturbing, but TruthInTelevision that the fear and mistrust an abused child feels, leads them to simply not trust anybody enough to tell them. When he likes,
(he sells used cars, dammit). Pete can put on an excellent act of being was a loving, devoted father. At 11 years old, and without friends, PJ might not know his situation is abnormal, or how to report his problems. We don't see any physical scars on PJ. He wears long sleeves and a neck-high sweater most of the time anyway. Thus far, big boy when she fell for him, so it's all been going not his looks she's attracted to, and even if he could stand to shed a few pounds she never asks it of him. Sometimes he's disappointing, but she loves him. [[NoTasteInMen Whatever does she see in him?]]

Well, it's not tough to see that Peg is completely the dominant one in their relationship. In fact it would scare off most men. But Pete loves and adores her. He worships her from head to toe, he's admitted he's lucky to have her, he would do just about anything for her... and he's kind of afraid of her too. Peg's no bully, but she keeps Pete right under her thumb, partly because she knows he needs to be kept there.

Seeing as Pete doesn't grasp the difference between fear and respect, it's likely that the love he feels for his wife becomes one with the way he's sometimes afraid of her. He will actively throw himself
on behind closed doors.
his knees and grovel for her forgiveness sometimes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Claims of Pistol being The Favourite may be entirely wrong. If Pistol was the favourite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? But in "Pistolgeist" when Pistol asks Pete to read to her (and keep in mind that she went to Peg first), he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball-game. His words are shocking. "Ask PJ, he hates these things." He's explicitly telling his little girl that the ball-game is not only more important to him, but more important to ''anybody!'' How could he say that to his own daughter? Upon going to PJ, we learn that he's read to her many times before - this is not a one-off. And when Pistol throws a tantrum, who responds? It's ''Peg.'' And in "And Baby Makes Three" it's no better - PJ is going through his long list of chores given to him by Pete, and the next chore is... playing with Pistol. That's right, Pete considers playing with Pistol a chore. And Pistol informs us that this is no one-off either - that PJ was more fun when he was younger. When Pete has to make a nursery, he turns Pistol's bedroom into the new nursery without a second thought.

to:

Claims of Pistol being The Favourite may be entirely wrong.are less concrete than they seem. If Pistol was the favourite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? But in "Pistolgeist" when Pistol asks Pete to read to her (and keep in mind that she went to Peg first), he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball-game. His words are shocking. "Ask PJ, he hates these things." He's explicitly telling his little girl that the ball-game is not only more important to him, but more important to ''anybody!'' How could he say that to his own daughter? Upon going to PJ, we learn that he's read to her many times before - this is not a one-off. And when Pistol throws a tantrum, who responds? It's ''Peg.'' And in "And Baby Makes Three" it's no better - PJ is going through his long list of chores given to him by Pete, and the next chore is... playing with Pistol. That's right, Pete considers playing with Pistol a chore. And Pistol informs us that this is no one-off either - that PJ was more fun when he was younger. When Pete has to make a nursery, he turns Pistol's bedroom into the new nursery without a second thought.



In ''AGoofyMovie'' he doesn't bring up Pistol at all. She's gone, and he doesn't care in the slightest. And that wouldn't be an issue but for that ''AGoofyMovie'' is canonically a sequel to ''GoofTroop.'' Who does he take on his road trip? It's PJ.

to:

In ''AGoofyMovie'' he doesn't bring up Pistol at all. She's gone, and he doesn't care in the slightest. And that wouldn't be an issue but for that ''AGoofyMovie'' is canonically a sequel to ''GoofTroop.'' Who does ''does'' he take on his road trip? It's PJ.

Added: 467

Changed: 578

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


: Pistol - The Favourite?

to:

: !! Pistol - The Favourite?



Effectively, if you were to ask Pete who his favourite was, it's likely that he'd name PJ. He may find PJ disappointing, but he'd much rather spend time with his son and 'educate' him, than waste any time on his daughter. True, Pistol isn't verbally abused, nor is Pete as heavy-handed with her, but that's more because Pete spends less time with her. What irony, that Pete's attention results in PJ being even more poorly treated than his emotionally neglected sister.

to:

In ''AGoofyMovie'' he doesn't bring up Pistol at all. She's gone, and he doesn't care in the slightest. And that wouldn't be an issue but for that ''AGoofyMovie'' is canonically a sequel to ''GoofTroop.'' Who does he take on his road trip? It's PJ.

Effectively, if you were to ask Pete who his favourite was, it's likely that he'd name PJ. He may find PJ disappointing, but he'd much rather spend time with his son and 'educate' improve him, than waste any time on his daughter. True, Pistol isn't verbally abused, nor is Pete as heavy-handed with her, but that's more because Pete spends less time with her. What irony, that Pete's attention results in PJ being even more poorly treated than his emotionally neglected sister.

Added: 2028

Removed: 1663

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Claims of Pistol being TheFavourite may be entirely wrong. If Pistol was the favourite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? But in "Pistolgeist" when Pistol asks Pete to read to her (and keep in mind that she went to Peg first), he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball-game. His words are shocking. "Ask PJ, he hates these things." He's explicitly telling his little girl that the ball-game is not only more important to him, but more important to ''anybody!'' How could he say that to his own daughter? Upon going to PJ, he tells us that he's read to her many times before - this is not a one-off. And when Pistol throws a tantrum, who responds? It's ''Peg.'' And in "And Baby Makes Three" it's no better - PJ is going through his long list of chores given to him by Pete, and the next chore is... playing with Pistol. That's right, Pete considers playing with Pistol a chore. And Pistol informs us that this is no one-off either - that PJ was more fun when he was younger. When Pete has to make a nursery, he turns Pistol's bedroom into the new nursery without a second thought.

If you were to ask Pete who his favourite was, it's likely that he'd name PJ. He may find PJ disappointing, but he'd much rather spend time with his son and 'educate' him, than waste any time on his daughter. True, Pistol isn't verbally abused, nor is Pete as heavy-handed with her, but that's more because Pete spends less time with her. What irony, that Pete's attention results in PJ being even more poorly treated than his emotionally neglected sister.


Added DiffLines:

: Pistol - The Favourite?

Claims of Pistol being The Favourite may be entirely wrong. If Pistol was the favourite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? But in "Pistolgeist" when Pistol asks Pete to read to her (and keep in mind that she went to Peg first), he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball-game. His words are shocking. "Ask PJ, he hates these things." He's explicitly telling his little girl that the ball-game is not only more important to him, but more important to ''anybody!'' How could he say that to his own daughter? Upon going to PJ, we learn that he's read to her many times before - this is not a one-off. And when Pistol throws a tantrum, who responds? It's ''Peg.'' And in "And Baby Makes Three" it's no better - PJ is going through his long list of chores given to him by Pete, and the next chore is... playing with Pistol. That's right, Pete considers playing with Pistol a chore. And Pistol informs us that this is no one-off either - that PJ was more fun when he was younger. When Pete has to make a nursery, he turns Pistol's bedroom into the new nursery without a second thought.

When does Pete pay attention to Pistol? When she's got information for him. When he can get her to do chores. When does he talk to her, play with her, teach her, spend any father-time with her at all? Never. To Pete, Pistol is a waste of time to distance himself from as often as possible. What an appalling way to treat a child.

Effectively, if you were to ask Pete who his favourite was, it's likely that he'd name PJ. He may find PJ disappointing, but he'd much rather spend time with his son and 'educate' him, than waste any time on his daughter. True, Pistol isn't verbally abused, nor is Pete as heavy-handed with her, but that's more because Pete spends less time with her. What irony, that Pete's attention results in PJ being even more poorly treated than his emotionally neglected sister.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Claims of Pistol being TheFavourite may be entirely wrong. If Pistol was the favorite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? Pete might not be as heavy-handed with Pistol, but that's more a result of him not spending much time with her at all. In "Pistolgeist" when Pistol asks Pete to read to her, he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball-game. His words are "Ask PJ, he hates these things." How could Pete say that? He's explicitly telling his little girl that the ball-game is not only more important to him, but more important to anybody! How could he say that to his own daughter?

Other motivations across the series appear to be that Pete wants PJ to succeed to make himself look good, or believes PJ's failure implies that he is somehow inferior. Note that PJ calls his father 'sir' on a regular basis when they speak. Max has never done this with Goofy.

to:

Claims of Pistol being TheFavourite may be entirely wrong. If Pistol was the favorite, favourite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? Pete might not be as heavy-handed with Pistol, but that's more a result of him not spending much time with her at all. In But in "Pistolgeist" when Pistol asks Pete to read to her, her (and keep in mind that she went to Peg first), he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball-game. His words are shocking. "Ask PJ, he hates these things." How could Pete say that? He's explicitly telling his little girl that the ball-game is not only more important to him, but more important to anybody! ''anybody!'' How could he say that to his own daughter?

Other motivations across the series appear
daughter? Upon going to be PJ, he tells us that he's read to her many times before - this is not a one-off. And when Pistol throws a tantrum, who responds? It's ''Peg.'' And in "And Baby Makes Three" it's no better - PJ is going through his long list of chores given to him by Pete, and the next chore is... playing with Pistol. That's right, Pete wants considers playing with Pistol a chore. And Pistol informs us that this is no one-off either - that PJ to succeed was more fun when he was younger. When Pete has to make himself look good, or believes PJ's failure implies a nursery, he turns Pistol's bedroom into the new nursery without a second thought.

If you were to ask Pete who his favourite was, it's likely
that he he'd name PJ. He may find PJ disappointing, but he'd much rather spend time with his son and 'educate' him, than waste any time on his daughter. True, Pistol isn't verbally abused, nor is somehow inferior. Note Pete as heavy-handed with her, but that's more because Pete spends less time with her. What irony, that Pete's attention results in PJ calls being even more poorly treated than his father 'sir' on a regular basis when they speak. Max has never done this with Goofy.
emotionally neglected sister.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As for Pistol, her being his 'favorite' is not as clear as it might seem. While as a girl and the younger child she is certainly handled more delicately, Pete has also tricked ''her'' into doing endless chores for a few cents alongside PJ, and generally seems disinclined to listen to her or spend time with her at his inconvenience - in "Pistolgeist" he refuses her request to read to him in favour of watching the ball game, in "Baby Makes Three" he isn't even listening when she asks him for a baby brother, and prepares to turn her room into a nursery for the new baby, while planning to move her in with PJ. Other times he sees playing with her as a chore to be delegated to PJ. The irony is that he ends up spending more 'father' time with PJ, but is more abusive to him in the process.

to:

As for Claims of Pistol being TheFavourite may be entirely wrong. If Pistol was the favorite, wouldn't Pete spend more time with her? Wouldn't he play with her more often, read to her on demand, take her on these character-building trips? Pete might not be as heavy-handed with Pistol, her being his 'favorite' is not as clear as it might seem. While as a girl and the younger child she is certainly handled but that's more delicately, Pete has also tricked ''her'' into doing endless chores for a few cents alongside PJ, and generally seems disinclined to listen to her or spend result of him not spending much time with her at his inconvenience - in all. In "Pistolgeist" he refuses her request when Pistol asks Pete to read to him in favour of her, he dismisses her off-hand, since he is watching the ball game, in "Baby Makes Three" ball-game. His words are "Ask PJ, he isn't even listening when she asks him for a baby brother, and prepares to turn her room into a nursery for the new baby, while planning to move her in with PJ. Other times he sees playing with her as a chore to be delegated to PJ. The irony is hates these things." How could Pete say that? He's explicitly telling his little girl that he ends up spending the ball-game is not only more 'father' time with PJ, important to him, but is more abusive important to him in the process.
anybody! How could he say that to his own daughter?

Top