Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Analysis / FallingDown

Go To

OR

Added: 521

Changed: 525

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.

to:

This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.
well-rewarded.



These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems [[MoneyDearBoy in the name of the bottom line]]. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially those seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers willing to do more work for less. Many employees who expected to retire with a pension could not collect one, further damaging their long-time prospects. Furthermore, only a handful of positions, or even only one, on their resume meant they would be seen as being underqualified for any job they applied for.

to:

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems [[MoneyDearBoy in the name of the bottom line]]. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. common.

The combination of cut-throat cutthroat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially those seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers willing to do more work for less. Many employees who expected to retire with a pension could not collect one, further damaging their long-time prospects. Furthermore, only a handful of positions, or even only one, on their resume meant they would be seen as being underqualified for any job they applied for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid.
Unfortunately, the ever-loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid underskilled organization men.

to:

* Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", grade," you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid.
Unfortunately, the ever-loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, expert due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid underskilled organization men.

Added: 4271

Changed: 5819

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


At first glance, it makes no sense that an experienced engineer like Will Foster should be unemployed for that long a period of time. After all, the design of missiles involves multiple disciplines and sub-fields, all of which can easily be deployed on civilian applications. A materials and metallurgy specialist who designs the missile's fuselage, warhead casing, nozzles etc can easily take that knowledge to the automotive industry, shipbuilding, components design, appliance design etc. An aeronautical engineer who designed the missile's airfoils can deploy that skill for a number of airplane makers, or even automotive or marine applications. A heat transfer specialist could work for a myriad of industries including HVAC, power generation, manufacturing processes etc. A rocket propulsion specialist could again, have gone over to the automotive, marine, clean energy, power generation, or pretty much any field where fuel combustion mechanisms are designed. An explosive warhead design specialist could go over to a myriad of demolition firms or explosives makers. A guidance, navigation and control specialist could take those skills to a myriad of embedded system applications. So, someone with D-Fens's skills should have been able to write his own ticket anywhere in the US. Why couldn't he?

The answer lies in the kind of corporate culture that had permeated America from the [=50s=] up until the tail end of the [=80s=]. This was the culture of ''The Organization Man''. The organization man was envisioned as the dedicated worker who displayed UndyingLoyalty towards his organization and in turn, the organization would take good care of him. People hired in to companies, and then if necessary, received training in the specific skills they needed to do their job. If the organization needed to change your job, they retrained and retooled you at their expense. If a move was required to faithfully serve the organization, you packed up and moved your family and kids. A certain degree of brown nosing was deemed normal, and even if you weren't a prolific hierarchical ladder climber, nobody thought ill of you if you remained at your current role for years, maybe even decades. In return for all this loyalty, the company gave you a decent pay and benefits, educational assistance, loan assistance, moving assistance, medical assistance, and most importantly a very generous pension. This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career, and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, help the company by innovating new products or strategies, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid underskilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially those seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers willing to do more work for less. Many employees who expected to retire with a pension could not collect one, further damaging their long-time prospects. Furthermore, only a handful of positions, or even only one, on their resume meant they would be seen as being underqualified for any job they applied for.

to:

At first glance, it makes no sense that an experienced engineer like Will Foster should be unemployed for that long a period of time. After all, the design of missiles involves multiple disciplines and sub-fields, all of which can easily be deployed on civilian applications. applications.
*
A materials and metallurgy specialist who designs the missile's fuselage, warhead casing, nozzles etc nozzles, etc. can easily take that knowledge to the automotive industry, shipbuilding, components design, appliance design etc. design, etc.
*
An aeronautical engineer who designed the missile's airfoils can deploy that skill for a number of airplane makers, or even automotive or marine applications. applications.
*
A heat transfer specialist could work for a myriad of industries including HVAC, power generation, manufacturing processes etc. processes, etc.
*
A rocket propulsion specialist could again, have gone over to the automotive, marine, clean energy, power generation, or pretty much any field where fuel combustion mechanisms are designed. designed.
*
An explosive warhead design specialist could go over to a myriad of demolition firms or explosives makers. makers.
*
A guidance, navigation navigation, and control specialist could take those skills to a myriad of embedded system applications. applications.
So, someone with D-Fens's D-Fens' skills should have been able to write his own ticket anywhere in the US. Why couldn't he?

The answer lies in the kind of corporate culture that had permeated America from the [=50s=] up until the tail end of the [=80s=]. This was the culture of ''The Organization Man''. Man''.

The organization man was envisioned as the dedicated worker who displayed UndyingLoyalty towards his organization and in turn, the organization would take good care of him. People hired in to companies, and then if necessary, received training in the specific skills they needed to do their job. job.
*
If the organization needed to change your job, they retrained and retooled you at their expense. expense.
*
If a move was required to faithfully serve the organization, you packed up and moved your family and kids. kids.
A certain degree of brown nosing was deemed normal, and even if you weren't a prolific hierarchical ladder climber, nobody thought ill of you if you remained at your current role for years, maybe even decades. In return for all this loyalty, the company gave you a decent pay and benefits, educational assistance, loan assistance, moving assistance, medical assistance, and most importantly a very generous pension. pension.

This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career, career and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. stagnation.
*
If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. role.
*
If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, help the company by innovating new products or strategies, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, thus have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, organization [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. organizations]].
*
Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, field or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. paid.
Unfortunately, the ever loyal ever-loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid underskilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems [[MoneyDearBoy in the name of the bottom line.line]]. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially those seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers willing to do more work for less. Many employees who expected to retire with a pension could not collect one, further damaging their long-time prospects. Furthermore, only a handful of positions, or even only one, on their resume meant they would be seen as being underqualified for any job they applied for.

Changed: 209

Removed: 225

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, help the company by innovating new products or strategies, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers who were willing to do more work for less. Many of these employees who expected to retire with a pension were unable to collect one, further damaging their long time prospects.

Also, working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms and adapt to their rhythm and culture. Getting fired with only one company in your credentials looks terrible on your resume.

to:

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, help the company by innovating new products or strategies, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled underskilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones those seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers who were willing to do more work for less. Many of these employees who expected to retire with a pension were unable to could not collect one, further damaging their long time prospects.

Also, working for the same company for
long-time prospects. Furthermore, only a long time handful of positions, or even only one, on their resume meant they would limit your ability to work be seen as being underqualified for other firms and adapt to their rhythm and culture. Getting fired with only one company in your credentials looks terrible on your resume.
any job they applied for.



Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This is precisely what happened to Foster: he was downsized, left bereft of promised benefits, and unable to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy due to a perceived lack of experience.

to:

This is precisely what happened to Foster: if his muttering about being "overqualified and underskilled" is any indication, he was downsized, left bereft of promised benefits, and unable to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy due to a perceived lack of experience.

Added: 261

Changed: 1807

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers who were willing to do more work for less.

This is precisely what happened to Foster.

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also, working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms and adapt to their rhythm and work culture. Getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume, preventing Foster from being able to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy.

Foster finding himself without a job, being unable to send his ex-wife child support, and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation as he looks through the wanted ads.

to:

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities and replaced with younger workers who were willing to do more work for less. Many of these employees who expected to retire with a pension were unable to collect one, further damaging their long time prospects.

Also, working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms and adapt to their rhythm and culture. Getting fired with only one company in your credentials looks terrible on your resume.

This is precisely what happened to Foster.

Foster: he was downsized, left bereft of promised benefits, and unable to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy due to a perceived lack of experience.

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also, working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms and adapt to their rhythm and work culture. Getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume, preventing Foster from being able to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy.

culture.

Foster finding himself without a job, being unable to send his ex-wife child support, and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation he holds toward the world and his frustration as he looks through the wanted "Help Wanted" ads.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities.

to:

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, help the company by innovating new products or strategies, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones seen as too old and highly paid, were fired as liabilities.liabilities and replaced with younger workers who were willing to do more work for less.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones who were seen as too old and too highly paid, were fired as liabilities.

to:

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were also becoming more and more common. The combination of cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many employees, especially ones who were seen as too old and too highly paid, were fired as liabilities.



Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms, and getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume, and would prevent Foster from being able to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also Also, working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms, firms and getting adapt to their rhythm and work culture. Getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume, and would prevent preventing Foster from being able to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms, and getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume.

Foster finding himself without a job and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation as he looks through the wanted ads.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms, and getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume.

resume, and would prevent Foster from being able to take his knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy.

Foster finding himself without a job job, being unable to send his ex-wife child support, and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation as he looks through the wanted ads.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also getting fired is something that looks terrible on your resume.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also working for the same company for a long time would limit your ability to work for other firms, and getting fired with having only one company in your credentials is something that looks terrible on your resume.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Foster finding himself without a job and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation and he looks through the wanted ads.

to:

Foster finding himself without a job and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation and as he looks through the wanted ads.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also being fired is simply something that looks terrible on your resume.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector of the economy. Adding in the sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the declining defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also being getting fired is simply something that looks terrible on your resume.

Added: 160

Changed: 357

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from rewarding employees to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were common and as a result of these mergers, many more employees, especially ones who were seen as too old and too highly paid, were fired as liabilities.

to:

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from rewarding employees cradle-to-the-grave security to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms also began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were common also becoming more and as a result more common. The combination of these mergers, cut-throat hiring policies, outsourcing, and corporate mergers meant many more employees, especially ones who were seen as too old and too highly paid, were fired as liabilities.



Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector in the economy. Adding in the weak economy of the early 1990s, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector in of the economy. Adding in the weak economy sharp recession of the early 1990s, which was especially pronounced in Southern California due to the prominence of the defense industry, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture. Also being fired is simply something that looks terrible on your resume.

Foster finding himself without a job and living with his mom isn't too much of a shock, nor the severe rage and desperation and he looks through the wanted ads.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from company loyalty to more cutthroat business tactics.

to:

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from company loyalty rewarding employees to an obsession with removing inefficient employees and cumbersome management systems in the name of the bottom line. Corporations like General Electric implemented "vitality curves" where 10% of the employees would be fired based on performance. Many industrial firms began outsourcing their production to countries with lax labor laws. Corporate mergers and acquisitions were common and as a result of these mergers, many more cutthroat business tactics.employees, especially ones who were seen as too old and too highly paid, were fired as liabilities.



Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector in the economy. Adding in the weak economy of the early 1990s, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job.

to:

Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector in the economy. Adding in the weak economy of the early 1990s, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job. And being middle-aged would mean he would have trouble competing against younger people more in tune with the post-1980s corporate culture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from company loyalty to the bottom line. Downsizing became a more common trend in major corporations.

to:

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from company loyalty to the bottom line. Downsizing became a more common trend in major corporations.cutthroat business tactics.

Added: 245

Changed: 42

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men. This is precisely what happened to Foster.

to:

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men.

These professional handicaps became even more limiting as corporate culture in the 1980s shifted away from company loyalty to the bottom line. Downsizing became a more common trend in major corporations.

This is precisely what happened to Foster.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


Also, the end of the Cold War was marked by a downturn in the defense industries. Due to Foster's failure to broaden his skillset, he wouldn't have been able to take knowledge of missile production to another sector in the economy. Adding in the weak economy of the early 1990s, Bill would be at a severe disadvantage in terms of finding a job, let alone one that paid as well as his defense job.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


At first glance, it makes no sense that an experienced engineer like Will Foster should be unemployed for that long a period of time. After all, the design of missiles involve multiple disciplines and sub-fields, all of which can easily be deployed on civilian applications. A materials and metallurgy specialist who designs the missile's fuselage, warhead casing, nozzles etc can easily take that knowledge to the automotive industry, shipbuilding, components design, appliance design etc. An aeronautical engineer who designed the missile's airfoils can deploy that skill for a number of airplane makers, or even automotive or marine applications. A heat transfer specialist could work for a myriad of industries including HVAC, power generation, manufacturing processes etc. A rocket propulsion specialist could again, have gone over to the automotive, marine, clean energy, power generation, or pretty much any field where fuel combustion mechanisms are designed. An explosive warhead design specialist could go over to a myriad of demolition firms or explosives makers. A guidance, navigation and control specialist could take those skills to a myriad of embedded system applications. So, someone with D-Fens's skills should have been able to write his own ticket anywhere in the US. Why couldn't he?

to:

At first glance, it makes no sense that an experienced engineer like Will Foster should be unemployed for that long a period of time. After all, the design of missiles involve involves multiple disciplines and sub-fields, all of which can easily be deployed on civilian applications. A materials and metallurgy specialist who designs the missile's fuselage, warhead casing, nozzles etc can easily take that knowledge to the automotive industry, shipbuilding, components design, appliance design etc. An aeronautical engineer who designed the missile's airfoils can deploy that skill for a number of airplane makers, or even automotive or marine applications. A heat transfer specialist could work for a myriad of industries including HVAC, power generation, manufacturing processes etc. A rocket propulsion specialist could again, have gone over to the automotive, marine, clean energy, power generation, or pretty much any field where fuel combustion mechanisms are designed. An explosive warhead design specialist could go over to a myriad of demolition firms or explosives makers. A guidance, navigation and control specialist could take those skills to a myriad of embedded system applications. So, someone with D-Fens's skills should have been able to write his own ticket anywhere in the US. Why couldn't he?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The answer lies in the kind of corporate culture that had permeated America from the [=50s=] up until the tail end of the [=80s=]. This was the culture of ''The Organization Man''. The organization man was envisioned as the dedicated worker who displayed UndyingLoyalty towards his organization and in turn, the organization would take good care of him. People hired in to companies, and then if neccesary, received training in the specific skills they needed to do their job. If the organization needed to change your job, they retrained and retooled you at their expense. If a move was required to faithfully serve the organization, you packed up and moved your family and kids. A certain degree of brown nosing was deemed normal, and even if you weren't a prolific hierarchical ladder climber, nobody thought I'll of you if you remained at your current role for years, maybe even decades. In return for all this loyalty, the company gave you a decent pay and benefits, educational assistance, loan assistance, moving assistance, medical assistance, and most importantly a very generous pension. This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career, and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.

to:

The answer lies in the kind of corporate culture that had permeated America from the [=50s=] up until the tail end of the [=80s=]. This was the culture of ''The Organization Man''. The organization man was envisioned as the dedicated worker who displayed UndyingLoyalty towards his organization and in turn, the organization would take good care of him. People hired in to companies, and then if neccesary, necessary, received training in the specific skills they needed to do their job. If the organization needed to change your job, they retrained and retooled you at their expense. If a move was required to faithfully serve the organization, you packed up and moved your family and kids. A certain degree of brown nosing was deemed normal, and even if you weren't a prolific hierarchical ladder climber, nobody thought I'll ill of you if you remained at your current role for years, maybe even decades. In return for all this loyalty, the company gave you a decent pay and benefits, educational assistance, loan assistance, moving assistance, medical assistance, and most importantly a very generous pension. This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career, and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men. This is precisely what happened to Foster.

to:

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men. This is precisely what happened to Foster.Foster.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

! Foster's lack of economic viability explained

At first glance, it makes no sense that an experienced engineer like Will Foster should be unemployed for that long a period of time. After all, the design of missiles involve multiple disciplines and sub-fields, all of which can easily be deployed on civilian applications. A materials and metallurgy specialist who designs the missile's fuselage, warhead casing, nozzles etc can easily take that knowledge to the automotive industry, shipbuilding, components design, appliance design etc. An aeronautical engineer who designed the missile's airfoils can deploy that skill for a number of airplane makers, or even automotive or marine applications. A heat transfer specialist could work for a myriad of industries including HVAC, power generation, manufacturing processes etc. A rocket propulsion specialist could again, have gone over to the automotive, marine, clean energy, power generation, or pretty much any field where fuel combustion mechanisms are designed. An explosive warhead design specialist could go over to a myriad of demolition firms or explosives makers. A guidance, navigation and control specialist could take those skills to a myriad of embedded system applications. So, someone with D-Fens's skills should have been able to write his own ticket anywhere in the US. Why couldn't he?

The answer lies in the kind of corporate culture that had permeated America from the [=50s=] up until the tail end of the [=80s=]. This was the culture of ''The Organization Man''. The organization man was envisioned as the dedicated worker who displayed UndyingLoyalty towards his organization and in turn, the organization would take good care of him. People hired in to companies, and then if neccesary, received training in the specific skills they needed to do their job. If the organization needed to change your job, they retrained and retooled you at their expense. If a move was required to faithfully serve the organization, you packed up and moved your family and kids. A certain degree of brown nosing was deemed normal, and even if you weren't a prolific hierarchical ladder climber, nobody thought I'll of you if you remained at your current role for years, maybe even decades. In return for all this loyalty, the company gave you a decent pay and benefits, educational assistance, loan assistance, moving assistance, medical assistance, and most importantly a very generous pension. This kind of culture would have been prevalent in many companies during Foster's career, and would have been that much ''more'' emphasized in a defense contractor. Being reliant on the government for revenue meant that a defense contractor had to become like any government agency, with its own bureaucracy. Such a place would have ''reinforced'' the notion of being a good loyal worker bee, whose loyalty shall be well rewarded.

However, this kind of organizational loyalty has a flip side - it also reinforces professional stagnation. If the organization expects you to do the same job for 30 years, then retire and collect a handsome pension, you won't be inclined to try and learn any skills outside of what is needed for your current role. If the organization gave you all the training you needed to slide into the new job they chose you for, you won't feel the incentive to develop skills and knowledge on your own. You won't be incentivized to analyze the job market out there, discover other more challenging or exciting career possibilities, or even a new idea that you could use for a startup. You will thus, have very specific skills suited for a very specific job in one organization, [[CripplingOverspecialization that doesn't translate well to similar jobs in other organizations]]. Then there is also the fact that experienced employees cost money - a lot of money. So, if your skills remained stagnant for years, and your salary kept increasing based only on "time in grade", you will eventually reach a point where you are being overpaid for the work you are doing. Unless you possess expert knowledge in some field, or are a very effective manager, you won't be able to justify the high salary you are being paid. Unfortunately, the ever loyal organization man cannot eventually become a manager or an expert, due to the stagnation that this culture incentivizes. Therefore, especially for a defense contractor, the only recourse is to trim the fat and get rid of the overpaid under skilled organization men. This is precisely what happened to Foster.

Top